Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:25:16.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Environmental enrichment and impoverishment: neurophysiological effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2009

Francine L. Dolins
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Dearborn
Get access

Summary

The idea that the degree of complexity in an animal's environment may cause neurophysiological changes is not a new one. Nor, indeed, is the idea that performance of certain learning and memory tasks by an individual might, in some way, ‘exercise’ particular regions of the brain and that this ‘exercise’ might lead to changes in size or capacity of those brain regions. Most of us at some time have probably wished that our intellectual power could be enhanced by mind exercises in a way not too dissimilar from going jogging or working out in a gym. Equally, we might worry that failure to exercise our intellect might lead to it growing flabby and atrophying. Evidence does exist that the complexity of our environment has a strong effect on the development and maintenance of cortical connections. For most animals, the laboratory environment is usually far simpler and less stimulating than their natural environment would be. This sensory impoverishment may have a significantly detrimental effect on an animal's brain organization, particularly during its development. The aim of this chapter is to survey what is known of the effects of environmental complexity on neurophysiological development and to determine the key elements of the environment important for normal development.

The first experiments testing the neurophysiological effects of environmental conditions were done over 300 years ago. By the middle of this century, increased knowledge of brain development had resulted in a firm belief that brain size did not change in response to experience: the size and structure of the adult brain was purely and simply a product of development and developmental processes were genetically fixed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Attitudes to Animals
Views in Animal Welfare
, pp. 54 - 76
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×