Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T14:31:05.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2021

J. N. Adams
J. N. Adams
Affiliation:
All Souls College, Oxford
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Asyndeton and its Interpretation in Latin Literature
History, Patterns, Textual Criticism
 , pp. 700 - 714
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ADAMS, J. N. (1970), A Philological Commentary on Tacitus, Annals 14, 1–54 (Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Oxford July 1970).Google Scholar
ADAMS, J. N. (1995a), ‘The language of the Vindolanda writing tablets: an interim report’, JRS 85, 86–134.Google Scholar
ADAMS, J. N. (1995b), Pelagonius and Latin Veterinary Terminology in the Roman Empire (Leiden).Google Scholar
ADAMS, J. N. (2003), Bilingualism and the Latin Language (Cambridge).Google Scholar
ADAMS, J. N. (2005), ‘The Bellum Africum’, in Reinhardt, , Lapidge, and Adams, (2005), 73–96.Google Scholar
ADAMS, J. N. (2013), Social Variation and the Latin Language (Cambridge).Google Scholar
ADAMS, J. N. (2016), An Anthology of Informal Latin 200 BC – AD 900: Fifty Texts with Translations and Linguistic Commentary (Cambridge).Google Scholar
ADAMS, J. N., CHAHOUD, A. and PEZZINI, G. eds (forthcoming), Early Latin: Constructs, Diversity, Reception (Cambridge).Google Scholar
ADAMS, J. N. and MAYER, R. G. eds (1999), Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry (Oxford).Google Scholar
ADAMS, J. N. and NIKITINA, V. (forthcoming), ‘Early Latin prayers and aspects of coordination’, in Adams, , Chahoud, and Pezzini, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
ALLAN, W. (2008), Euripides: Helen (Cambridge).Google Scholar
ANDERSON, W. B. (1928), Livy Book IX, 3rd edn (Cambridge).Google Scholar
ANDRÉ, J. (1949), Étude sur les termes de couleur dans la langue latine (Paris).Google Scholar
ARNOTT, W. G. (1996), Alexis, the Fragments: A Commentary (Cambridge).Google Scholar
ARNOTT, W. G. (1996–2000), Menander, 3 vols (Cambridge, Mass. and London).Google Scholar
ASH, R. (2007), Tacitus Histories Book II (Cambridge).Google Scholar
ASH, R. (2018), Tacitus Annals Book XV (Cambridge).Google Scholar
AUDOLLENT, A. (1904), Defixionum tabellae (Paris).Google Scholar
AUSTIN, R. G. (1955), P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber quartus (Oxford).Google Scholar
AUSTIN, R. G. (1964), P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber secundus (Oxford).Google Scholar
AUSTIN, R. G. (1971), P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber primus (Oxford).Google Scholar
AUSTIN, R. G. (1977), P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber sextus (Oxford).Google Scholar
AXELSON, B. (1987), Kleine Schriften zur lateinischen Philologie, ed. Önnerfors, A. and Schaar, C. (Lund).Google Scholar
BADER, F. (1962), La formation des composés nominaux du latin (Paris).Google Scholar
BAILEY, C. (1947), Titi Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex, 3 vols (Oxford).Google Scholar
BALDI, P. and CUZZOLIN, P. eds (2009), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax 1: Syntax of the Sentence (Berlin and New York).Google Scholar
BALDI, P. and CUZZOLIN, P. eds (2010), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax 2: Constituent Syntax: Adverbial Phrase, Adverbs, Mood, Tense (Berlin and New York).Google Scholar
BANNON, C. J. (2013), ‘Pipes and property in the sale of real estate (D 19.1.38.2)’, in du Plessis, P. J. ed., Law and Society in the Roman World (Edinburgh), 207–23.Google Scholar
BARRETT, W. S. (1964), Euripides: Hippolytos (Oxford).Google Scholar
BARSBY, J. (1999), Terence: Eunuchus (Cambridge).Google Scholar
BARSBY, J. (2001), Terence, 2 vols (Cambridge, Mass. and London).Google Scholar
BATE, J. and RASMUSSEN, E. (2007), The RSC Shakespeare: William Shakespeare, Complete Works (Basingstoke).Google Scholar
BATTEZZATO, L. (2018), Euripides: Hecuba (Cambridge).Google Scholar
BATTEZZATO, L. and RODDA, M. A. (2018), ‘Particelle e asindeto nel Greco classico’, Glotta 94, 3–37.Google Scholar
BAUER, B. L. M. (2017), Nominal Apposition in Indo-European: Its Forms and Functions, and its Evolution in Latin-Romance (Berlin and Boston).Google Scholar
BAUER, L. (2009), ‘Typology of compounds’, in Lieber, and Stekauer, (2009), 343–56.Google Scholar
BAUER, W., ARNDT, W. F. and GINGRICH, F. W. (1952), A Greek–English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 4th edn (Chicago).Google Scholar
BAYET, J. (1954), Tite-Live, Histoire romaine, tome v, livre v, with translation by Baillet, G. (Paris).Google Scholar
BENNETT, C. E. (1910–14), Syntax of Early Latin, 2 vols (Boston).Google Scholar
BERRY, D. (1996), Cicero: Pro P. Sulla oratio (Cambridge).Google Scholar
BIDDAU, F. (2008), Q. Terentii Scauri De orthographia (Hildesheim).Google Scholar
BLÄNSDORF, J. (2010), ‘The defixiones from the sanctuary of Isis and Mater Magna in Mainz’, in Gordon, and Simón, (2010), 141–89.Google Scholar
BLOOMFIELD, L. (1935), Language, 2nd edn (London).Google Scholar
BOCCOTTI, G. (1975), ‘L’asindeto e il τρίκωλον nella retorica classica’, Bollettino dell’Istituto di filologia greca, Universtità di Padova 2, 34–59.Google Scholar
BOWIE, A. (2019), Homer: Iliad Book III (Cambridge).Google Scholar
BRASWELL, B. K. (1988), A Commentary on the Fourth Pythian Ode of Pindar (Berlin and New York).Google Scholar
BREED, B. W., KEITEL, E. and WALLACE, R. eds (2018), Lucilius and Satire in Second-Century BC Rome (Cambridge).Google Scholar
BRIGGS, W. W. (1983), Concordantia in Catonis Librum de agri cultura (Hildesheim, Zurich and New York).Google Scholar
BRINK, C. O. (1971), Horace on Poetry (Cambridge).Google Scholar
BRISCOE, J. (1973), A Commentary on Livy Books XXXI–XXXIII (Oxford).Google Scholar
BRISCOE, J. (1981), A Commentary on Livy Books XXXIV–XXXVII (Oxford).Google Scholar
BRISCOE, J. (1986), Titi Liui Ab urbe condita libri XLI–XLV (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
BRISCOE, J. (2008), A Commentary on Livy Books 38–40 (Oxford).Google Scholar
BRISCOE, J. (2012), A Commentary on Livy Books 41–45 (Oxford).Google Scholar
BRISCOE, J. (2016), Titi Liui Ab urbe condita (Oxford).Google Scholar
BRISCOE, J. and HORNBLOWER, S. eds (2020), Livy Ab urbe condita Book XXII (Cambridge).Google Scholar
BRIX, J. and NIEMEYER, M. (1907), Ausgewählte Komödien des T. Maccius Plautus I: Trinummus, 5th edn (Leipzig and Berlin).Google Scholar
BROTHERS, A. J. (2000), Terence: The Eunuch (Warminster).Google Scholar
BROWN, R. D. (1987), Lucretius on Love and Sex: A Commentary on De rerum natura IV, 1030–1287 with Prolegomena, Text, and Translation (Leiden, New York, Copenhagen and Cologne).Google Scholar
BUCK, C. D. (1904), A Grammar of Oscan and Umbrian (Boston).Google Scholar
BUCK, C. D. (1933), Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin (Chicago).Google Scholar
BUCKLAND, W. W. (1921) A Text-Book of Roman Law from Augustus to Justinian (Cambridge).Google Scholar
BUTLER, H. E. and CARY, M. (1924), M. Tulli Ciceronis De provinciis consularibus oratio ad senatum (Oxford).Google Scholar
CALBOLI, G. (1993), Rhetorica ad C. Herennium (Bologna).Google Scholar
CALBOLI, G. (1997a), ‘Asindeto e polisindeto’, Enciclopedia Oraziana (Rome), 2.799–803.Google Scholar
CALBOLI, G. (1997b), ‘Ossimoro’, Enciclopedia Oraziana (Rome), 2.933–5.Google Scholar
CARDINALETTI, A. and GIUSTI, G. (2001), ‘“Semi-lexical” motion verbs in Romance and Germanic’, in Corver, N. and Van Riemsdijk, H. eds, Semi-Lexical Categories: On the Function of Content Words and the Content of Function Words (Berlin), 371–414.Google Scholar
CHAHOUD, A. (1998), C. Lucilii reliquiarum concordantiae (Hildesheim, Zurich and New York).Google Scholar
CHAHOUD, A. (2018), ‘Verbal mosaics: speech patterns and generic stylization in Lucilius’, in Breed, , Keitel, and Wallace, (2018), 132–161.Google Scholar
CHANTRAINE, P. (1953), ‘Un tour archaïque chez Pindare (Ol. VI, 78; Pyth. IV, 217)’, RPh 27, 16–20.Google Scholar
CHAPOT, F. and LAUROT, B. (2001), Corpus de prières grecques et romaines (Turnhout).Google Scholar
CHRISTENSEN, H. (1908), ‘Que – que bei den römischen Hexametrikern (bis etwa 500 n. Chr.)’, ALL 15, 165–221.Google Scholar
CHRISTENSON, D. M. (2000), Plautus: Amphitruo (Cambridge).Google Scholar
COLEMAN, R. G. G. (1999), ‘Poetic diction, poetic discourse and the poetic register’, in Adams, and Mayer, (1999), 21–93.Google Scholar
COLLARD, C. (1975), Euripides: Supplices 2 (Groningen).Google Scholar
COLLINGE, N. E. (1985), The Laws of Indo-European (Amsterdam and Philadelphia).Google Scholar
COLSON, F. H. (1942), Cicero: Pro Milone (London).Google Scholar
CORNELL, T. J. (1995), The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars c. 1000–264 BC (London and New York).Google Scholar
COULON, V. and VAN DAELE, H. (1977), Aristophane III: Les oiseaux, Lysistrata (Paris).Google Scholar
COURTNEY, E. (1991), The Poems of Petronius (Atlanta, Ga).Google Scholar
COURTNEY, E. (1993), The Fragmentary Latin Poets (Oxford).Google Scholar
COURTNEY, E. (1999), Archaic Latin Prose (Atlanta, Ga).Google Scholar
CRAWFORD, M. H. ed. (1996), Roman Statutes, 2 vols (Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 64) (London).Google Scholar
CRUSCHINA, S. (2018), ‘The “go for” construction in Sicilian’, in D’Alessandro, R. and Pescarini, D. eds, Advances in Italian Dialectology: Sketches of Italo-Romance Grammars (Leiden), 292–320.Google Scholar
CRUSE, D. A. (1986), Lexical Semantics (Cambridge).Google Scholar
CURBERA, J. B., SIERRA DELAGE, M. and VELÁZQUEZ, I. (1999), ‘A bilingual curse tablet from Barchín del Hoyo (Cuenca, Spain)’, ZPE 125, 279–83.Google Scholar
DALBY, A. (1998), Cato on Farming: De agricultura (Exeter).Google Scholar
DAMON, C. ed. (2015a), C. Iuli Caesaris Commentariorum Libri III De bello ciuili (Oxford).Google Scholar
DAMON, C. (2015b), Studies on the Text of Caesar’s Bellum civile (Oxford).Google Scholar
DANIEL, R. W. and MALTOMINI, F. eds (1990–2), Supplementum magicum, 2 vols (Opladen).Google Scholar
DAUBE, D. (1956), Forms of Roman Legislation (Oxford).Google Scholar
DE MELO, W. (2019), Varro: De lingua Latina, 2 vols (Oxford).Google Scholar
DE MEO, C. (1983), Lingue tecniche del latino (Bologna).Google Scholar
DE VAAN, M. (2008), Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages (Leiden and Boston).Google Scholar
DE ZULUETA, F. (1945), The Roman Law of Sale (Oxford).Google Scholar
DE ZULUETA, F. (1946), The Institutes of Gaius 1 (Oxford).Google Scholar
DELAMARRE, X. (2003), Dictionnaire de le langue gauloise, 2nd edn (Paris).Google Scholar
DELBRÜCK, B. (1900), Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen 3 (Strassburg) (= K. Brugmann and B. Delbrück, Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen 5).Google Scholar
DENNISTON, J. D. (1934), The Greek Particles (Oxford).Google Scholar
DENNISTON, J. D. (1952), Greek Prose Style (Oxford).Google Scholar
DEUFERT, M. (2017), Prolegomena zur Editio Teubneriana des Lukrez (Berlin and Boston).Google Scholar
DEUFERT, M. (2018), Kritischer Kommentar zu Lukrezens De rerum natura (Berlin and Boston).Google Scholar
DEUFERT, M. (2019), Titus Lucretius Carus De rerum natura libri VI (Berlin and Boston).Google Scholar
DEVINE, A. M. and STEPHENS, L. D. (2006), Latin Word Order: Structured Meaning and Information (New York).Google Scholar
DI NAPOLI, M. (2011), Velii Longi De orthographia (Hildesheim).Google Scholar
DICKEY, E. (2012), The Colloquia of the Hermeneumata Pseudodositheana 1: Colloquia Monacensia-Einsidlensia, Leidense-Stephani, and Stephani (Cambridge).Google Scholar
DICKEY, E. (2015), The Colloquia of the Hermeneumata Pseudodositheana 2: Colloquium Harleianum, Colloquium Montepessulanum, Colloquium Celtis, and Fragments(Cambridge).Google Scholar
DIEHL, E. (1911), Poetarum Romanorum veterum reliquiae (Bonn).Google Scholar
DIGGLE, J. (1994), Euripidea: Collected Essays (Oxford).Google Scholar
DIGGLE, J. (2004), Theophrastus: Characters (Cambridge).Google Scholar
DIK, S. C. (1968), Coordination: its Implications for the Theory of General Linguistics (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
DOUGAN, T. W. (1905), M. Tulli Ciceronis Tusculanarum disputationum libri quinque 1: Books I and II (Cambridge).Google Scholar
DOUGAN, T. W. and HENRY, R. M. (1934), M. Tulli Ciceronis Tusculanarum disputationum libri quinque 2: Books III–V (Cambridge).Google Scholar
DOVER, K. J. (1968), Aristophanes: Clouds (Oxford).Google Scholar
DOVER, K. J. (1993), Aristophanes: Frogs (Oxford).Google Scholar
DUNKEL, G. (1982), ‘The original syntax of *-kwe’, Die Sprache 28, 129–43.Google Scholar
DURANTE, M. (1976), Sulla preistoria della tradizione poetica greca 2: Risultanze della comparazione indoeuropea (Rome).Google Scholar
DYCK, A. R. (2004), A Commentary on Cicero, De legibus (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
DYCK, A. R. (2008), Cicero: Catilinarians (Cambridge).Google Scholar
DYCK, A. R. (2010), Cicero: Pro Sexto Roscio (Cambridge).Google Scholar
EISENHUT, W. (1983), Catulli Veronensis liber (Leipzig).Google Scholar
ELLIS, R. (1889), A Commentary on Catullus, 2nd edn (Oxford).Google Scholar
ENK, P. J. (1932), Plauti Mercator, cum prolegomenis, notis criticis, commentario exegetico, 2 vols (Leiden).Google Scholar
ERNOUT, A. (1935), Plaute Bacchides: commentaire exégétique et critique (Paris).Google Scholar
ERNOUT, A. (1946), Philologica (Paris) (the first of what were to be three volumes).Google Scholar
FEDELI, P. (1980), Sesto Properzio: il primo libro delle Elegie (Florence).Google Scholar
FEHLING, D. (1969), Die Wiederholungsfiguren und ihr Gebrauch bei den Griechen vor Gorgias (Berlin).Google Scholar
FERRERO, M. G. (1976), ‘L’asindeto in Menandro’, Dioniso 47, 82–106.Google Scholar
FINGLASS, P. J. (2007), Sophocles: Electra (Cambridge).Google Scholar
FINGLASS, P. J. (2011), Sophocles: Ajax (Cambridge).Google Scholar
FORDYCE, C. J. (1961), Catullus: A Commentary (Oxford).Google Scholar
FRAENKEL, E. (1950), Aeschylus: Agamemnon, 3 vols (Oxford).Google Scholar
FRAENKEL, E. (1960), Elementi Plautini in Plauto (Florence).Google Scholar
FRAENKEL, E. (2007), Plautine Elements in Plautus (Plautinisches im Plautus), translated by Drevikovsky, T. and Muecke, F. (Oxford).Google Scholar
GERBER, A., GREEF, A. and JOHN, C. (1891–1903), Lexicon Taciteum, 2 vols (Leipzig).Google Scholar
GOLDBERG, S. M. and MANUWALD, G. (2018), Fragmentary Republican Latin: Ennius, 2 vols (Cambridge, Mass. and London).Google Scholar
GOMME, A. W. and SANDBACH, F. H. (1973), Menander, a Commentary (Oxford).Google Scholar
GONDA, J. (1959), Stylistic Repetition in the Veda (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
GOODY, J. (1977), The Domestication of the Savage Mind (Cambridge).Google Scholar
GOODYEAR, F. R. D. (1972), The Annals of Tacitus 1: Annals 1.1–54 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
GOODYEAR, F. R. D. (1981), The Annals of Tacitus 2: Annals 1.55–81 and Annals 2 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
GORDON, R. L. and SIMÓN, F. M. eds (2010), Magical Practice in the Latin West: Papers from the International Conference held at the University of Zaragoza 30 Sept.–1 Oct. 2005 (Leiden and Boston).Google Scholar
GRATWICK, A. S. (1993), Plautus: Menaechmi (Cambridge).Google Scholar
GRAY, C. (2015), Jerome, Vita Malchi: Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary (Oxford).Google Scholar
GREEN, J. (2010), Green’s Dictionary of Slang, 3 vols (London).Google Scholar
GRIFFIN, J. (1995), Homer: Iliad Book Nine (Oxford).Google Scholar
GRIFFITH, M. (1983), Aeschylus: Prometheus Bound (Cambridge).Google Scholar
GRIFFITHS, E. (2018), If not Critical, ed. Johnston, F. (Oxford).Google Scholar
GRILLO, L. (2015), Cicero’s De provinciis consularibus oratio (New York).Google Scholar
HALLA-AHO, H. (2009), The Non-Literary Latin Letters: A Study of their Syntax and Pragmatics (Helsinki).Google Scholar
HALM, C. (1863), Rhetores Latini minores (Leipzig).Google Scholar
HARRISON, S. J. (1991), Vergil: Aeneid 10 (Oxford).Google Scholar
HASPELMATH, M. ed. (2004a), Coordinating Constructions (Amsterdam and Philadelphia).Google Scholar
HASPELMATH, M. (2004b), ‘Coordinating constructions: an overview’, in Haspelmath, (2004a), 3–39.Google Scholar
HEUBNER, H. (1963), P. Cornelius Tacitus, Die Historien 1: Erstes Buch (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
HEYCOCK, C. and PETERSEN, H. P. (2012), ‘Pseudo-coordinations in Faroese’, in Braunmüller, K. and Gabriel, C. eds, Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies (Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 13) (Amsterdam), 259–80.Google Scholar
HICKSON, F. V. (1993), Roman Prayer Language: Livy and the Aneid [sic] of Vergil (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
HOFMANN, J. B. (1951), Lateinische Umgangssprache, 3rd edn (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
HOFMANN, J. B. and RICOTTILLI, L. (2003), La lingua d’uso latina, 3rd edn (translation with supplements of Hofmann 1951 by L. R.) (Bologna).Google Scholar
HOFMANN, J. B. and SZANTYR, A. (1965), Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik (Munich).Google Scholar
HORNBLOWER, S. (2008), A Commentary on Thucydides 3: Books 5.25–8.109 (Oxford).Google Scholar
HORNBLOWER, S. (2015), Lykophron: Alexandra (Oxford).Google Scholar
HORSFALL, N. (2000), Virgil, Aeneid 7: A Commentary (Leiden, Boston and Cologne).Google Scholar
HORSFALL, N. (2006), Virgil, Aeneid 3: A Commentary (Leiden and Boston).Google Scholar
HORSFALL, N. (2008), Virgil, Aeneid 2: A Commentary (Leiden and Boston).Google Scholar
HORSFALL, N. (2013), Virgil, Aeneid 6: A Commentary, 2 vols (Berlin and Boston).Google Scholar
HUDDLESTON, R. (2002), ‘Syntactic overview’, in Huddleston, and Pullum, (2002), 43–69.Google Scholar
HUDDLESTON, R., PAYNE, J. and PETERSON, P. (2002), ‘Coordination and supplementation’, in Huddleston, and Pullum, (2002), 1273–1362.Google Scholar
HUDDLESTON, R. and PULLUM, G. K. eds (2002), The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (Cambridge).Google Scholar
HUITINK, L. and ROOD, T. (2019), Xenophon: Anabasis Book III (Cambridge).Google Scholar
INSLER, S. (1998), ‘mitrā́váruṇā or mitrā́ váruṇā?’ in Jasanoff, J., Melchert, H. C., Olivier, L. eds, Mír Curad: Studies in Honor of Calvert Watkins (Innsbruck), 285–90.Google Scholar
JAMISON, S. W. and BRERETON, J. P. (2014), The Rigveda: The Earliest Religious Poetry of India, 3 vols (Oxford and New York).Google Scholar
JESPERSEN, O. (1924), The Philosophy of Grammar (London).Google Scholar
JOCELYN, H. D. (1967), The Tragedies of Ennius (Cambridge).Google Scholar
JOHANSEN, H. F. and WHITTLE, E. W. (1980), Aeschylus: The Suppliants, 3 vols (Hofbogtrykkeri).Google Scholar
KALB, W. (1888), Das Juristenlatein: Versuch einer Charakteristik auf Grundlage der Digesten, 2nd edn (Nuremberg).Google Scholar
KALB, W. (1912), Wegweiser in die römische Rechtssprache, mit Übersetzungsbeispielen aus dem Gebiete des römischen Rechts (Leipzig).Google Scholar
KASTER, R. A. (1977), ‘A note on Catullus, c. 71.4’, Philologus 121, 308–12.Google Scholar
KASTER, R. A. (2006), Marcus Tullius Cicero: Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius (Oxford).Google Scholar
KASTER, R. A. (2011), Macrobius, Saturnalia: Books 3–5 (Cambridge, Mass. and London).Google Scholar
KASTOVSKY, D. (2009), ‘Diachronic Perspectives’, in Lieber, and Stekauer, (2009), 323–40.Google Scholar
KAUER, R. and LINDSAY, W. M. (1926), P. Terenti Afri comoediae (Oxford).Google Scholar
KAY, N. M. (2020), Venantius Fortunatus: Vita Sancti Martini: Prologue and Books I–II (Cambridge).Google Scholar
KIPARSKY, P. (2010), ‘Dvandvas, blocking, and the associative: the bumpy ride from phrase to word’, Language 88, 302–31.Google Scholar
KLEINKNECHT, H. (1937), Die Gebetsparodie in der Antike (Stuttgart and Berlin).Google Scholar
KOESTERMANN, E. (1963), Cornelius Tacitus, Annalen I: Buch 1–3 (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
KOESTERMANN, E. (1965), Cornelii Taciti Libri qui supersunt I: Ab excessu divi Augusti (Leipzig).Google Scholar
KOESTERMANN, E. (1967), Cornelius Tacitus, Annalen III: Buch 11–13 (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
KOESTERMANN, E. (1968), Cornelius Tacitus, Annalen IV: Buch 14–16 (Heidel-berg).Google Scholar
KÖHM, J. (1905), Altlateinische Forschungen (Leipzig).Google Scholar
KRENKEL, W. (1970), Lucilius: Satiren, 2 vols (Leiden).Google Scholar
KROLL, W. (1924), Studien zum Verständnis der römischen Literatur (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
KROLL, W. (1929), C. Valerius Catullus, 2nd edn, 1st edn 1922, reprinted with addenda 1968.Google Scholar
KROPP, A. (2008a), Defixiones: Ein aktuelles Corpus lateinischer Fluchtafeln (Speyer).Google Scholar
KROPP, A. (2008b), Magische Sprachverwendung in vulgärlateinischen Fluchtafeln (defixiones) (Tübingen).Google Scholar
KRUSCHWITZ, P. (2002), Carmina saturnia epigraphica: Einleitung, Text und Kommentar zu den saturnischen Versinschriften (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
KÜHNER, R. and GERTH, B. (1898–1904), Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache, 2 vols (Hanover and Leipzig).Google Scholar
KÜHNER, R. and STEGMANN, C. (1955), Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache: Satzlehre, 3rd edn revised by Thierfelder, A., 2 vols (Leverkusen).Google Scholar
LANDGRAF, G. (1892), ‘Egens = exgens’, ALL 7, 275–7.Google Scholar
LANDGRAF, G. (1914), Kommentar zu Ciceros Rede Pro Sex. Roscio Amerino, 2nd edn (Leipzig and Berlin).Google Scholar
LANGSLOW, D. (2009), Jacob Wackernagel, Lectures on Syntax, with Special Reference to Greek, Latin, and Germanic (Oxford).Google Scholar
LAUSBERG, H. (1960), Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik: Eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft (Munich).Google Scholar
LAUSBERG, H. (1998), Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study, translated by Bliss, M. T., Jansen, A. and Horton, D. E., edited by Horton, D. E. and Anderson, R. D. (Leiden, Boston and Cologne).Google Scholar
LEDGEWAY, A. (1997), ‘Asyndetic complementation in Neapolitan dialect’, The Italianist 17, 231–73.Google Scholar
LEDGEWAY, A. (2009), Grammatica diacronica del napoletano (Tübingen).Google Scholar
LEDGEWAY, A. (2016), ‘From coordination to subordination: the grammaticalization of progressive and andative aspect in the dialects of Salento’, in Cardoso, A., Martins, A. M., Pereira, S., Pinto, C. and Pratas, F. eds, Coordination and Subordination, Form and Meaning: Selected Papers from CSI Lisbon 2014 (Newcastle), 157–84.Google Scholar
LEE, G. (1991), The Poems of Catullus (Oxford and New York).Google Scholar
LENAGHAN, J. O. (1969), A Commentary on Cicero’s Oration De haruspicum responso (The Hague and Paris).Google Scholar
LEO, F. (1898), ‘Sub divo columine’, ALL 10, 273–8.Google Scholar
LEO, F. (1912), Plautinische Forschungen, 2nd edn (Berlin).Google Scholar
LEO, F. (1960), Ausgewählte kleine Schriften 1: Zur römischen Literatur des Zeitalters der Republik, ed. Fraenkel, E. (Rome).Google Scholar
LEUMANN, M. (1977), Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre, 6th edn (Munich).Google Scholar
LIEBER, R. and STEKAUER, P. eds (2009), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding (Oxford).Google Scholar
LINDERSKI, J. (1986), ‘The augural law’, ANRW 2.16.3, 2146–2312 (Berlin and New York).Google Scholar
LINDHOLM, E. (1931), Stilistische Studien: Zur Erweiterung der Satzglieder im Lateinischen (Lund).Google Scholar
LINDNER, T. (2002), Lateinische Komposita: Morphologische, historische und lexikalische Studien (Innsbruck).Google Scholar
LINDSAY, W. M. (1900), The Captivi of Plautus (London).Google Scholar
LINDSAY, W. M. (1907), Syntax of Plautus (Oxford).Google Scholar
LODGE, G. (1924–33), Lexicon Plautinum, 2 vols (Leipzig).Google Scholar
LÖFSTEDT, E. (1911), Philologischer Kommentar zur Peregrinatio Aetheriae (Uppsala).Google Scholar
LÖFSTEDT, E. (1956), Syntactica: Studien und Beiträge zur historischen Syntax des Lateins 1, 2nd edn, 2 (Lund).Google Scholar
LUISELLI, B. (1969), Il problema della più antica prosa latina (Cagliari).Google Scholar
LUNELLI, A. (1980), La lingua poetica latina: saggi di Wilhelm Kroll, Hendrikus H. Janssen, Manu Leumann (Bologna).Google Scholar
LYONS, J. (1968), Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics (Cambridge).Google Scholar
LYONS, J. (1977), Semantics 1 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
MACRAE, D. E. (2018), ‘The freedman’s story: an accusation of witchcraft in the social world of early imperial Roman Italy (CIL 11.4639 = ILS 3001)’, JRS 108, 53–73.Google Scholar
MADVIG, N. (1876), M. Tullii Ciceronis De finibus bonorum et malorum libri quinque (Copenhagen).Google Scholar
MAEHLER, H. (2000), ‘Beobachtungen zum Gebrauch des Satz-Asyndetons bei Bakchylides und Pindar’, in Poesia e religione in Grecia: Studi in onore di G. Aurelio Privitera (Naples), 421–30.Google Scholar
MAEHLER, H. (2004), Bacchylides: A Selection (Cambridge).Google Scholar
MAGNI, E. (2010), ‘Mood and modality’, in Baldi, and Cuzzolin, (2010), 193–275.Google Scholar
MAGUINNESS, W. S. (1965), ‘The language of Lucretius’, in Dudley, D. R. ed., Lucretius (London).Google Scholar
MALHERBE, A. J. (1984), ‘“In season and out of season”: 2 Timothy 4:2’, Journal of Biblical Literature 103, 235–43.Google Scholar
MALLOCH, S. J. V. (2013), The Annals of Tacitus: Book 11 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
MANUWALD, G. (2007), Cicero, Philippics 3–9 2: Commentary (Berlin and New York).Google Scholar
MANUWALD, G. (2018), Cicero: Agrarian Speeches, Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary (Oxford).Google Scholar
MARIOTTI, S. (1951), Lezioni su Ennio (Pesaro).Google Scholar
MARIOTTI, S. (1952), Livio Andronico e la traduzione artistica (Milan).Google Scholar
MAROUZEAU, J. (1962), Traité de stylistique latine, 4th edn (Paris).Google Scholar
MARTIN, R. H. (1976), Terence: Adelphoe (Cambridge).Google Scholar
MARX, F. (1904–5), C. Lucilii Carminum reliquiae, 2 vols (Leipzig).Google Scholar
MASTRONARDE, D. J. (2002), Euripides: Medea (Cambridge).Google Scholar
MATTHEWS, P. H. (2014), The Positions of Adjectives in English (Oxford).Google Scholar
MAURACH, G. (1988), Der Poenulus des Plautus (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
MAURACH, G. (1995), Lateinische Dichtersprache (Darmstadt).Google Scholar
MEYER-LÜBKE, W. (1900), Grammaire des langues romanes 3: Syntaxe (Traduction française, by Doutrepont, A. and Doutrepont, G.) (Paris).Google Scholar
MONTANARI, F. (1995), Vocabolario della lingua greca (Turin).Google Scholar
MOREL, W. (1927), Fragmenta poetarum Latinorum epicorum et lyricorum praeter Ennium et Lucilium, 2nd edn (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
MUNRO, H. A. J. (1886), T. Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex, 4th edn, 3 vols (London).Google Scholar
MYNORS, R. A. B. (1990), Virgil: Georgics (Oxford).Google Scholar
NICHOLAS, B. (1962), An Introduction to Roman Law (Oxford).Google Scholar
NIPPERDEY, K. and ANDRESEN, G. (1880), Cornelius Tacitus 2: Ab excessu divi Augusti XI–XVI, 4th edn (Berlin).Google Scholar
NISBET, R. G. (1939), M. Tulli Ciceronis De domo sua ad pontifices oratio (Oxford).Google Scholar
NISBET, R. G. M. (1961), M. Tulli Ciceronis In L. Calpurnium Pisonem oratio (Oxford).Google Scholar
NISBET, R. G. M. (1978), ‘Notes on the text of Catullus’, PCPhS 24, 92–115.Google Scholar
NISBET, R. G. M. and HUBBARD, M. (1978), A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book II (Oxford).Google Scholar
NISBET, R. G. M. and RUDD, N. (2004), A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book III (Oxford).Google Scholar
NORDEN, E. (1897), De Minucii Felicis aetate et genere dicendi (Greifswald).Google Scholar
NORDEN, E. (1939), Aus altrömischen Priesterbüchern (Lund and Leipzig).Google Scholar
NORDEN, E. (1957), P. Vergilius Maro: Aeneis Buch VI, 4th edn (Darmstadt).Google Scholar
NORDEN, E. (1958), Die antike Kunstprosa vom VI. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance, 5th edn (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
OAKLEY, S. P. (1997), A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X 1: Introduction and Book VI (Oxford).Google Scholar
OAKLEY, S. P. (1998), A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X 2: Books VII and VIII (Oxford).Google Scholar
OAKLEY, S. P. (2005a), A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X 3: Book IX (Oxford).Google Scholar
OAKLEY, S. P. (2005b), A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X 4: Book X (Oxford).Google Scholar
OGILVIE, R. M. (1965), A Commentary on Livy Books 1–5 (Oxford).Google Scholar
OLSON, S. D. (2002), Aristophanes Acharnians (Oxford).Google Scholar
ONIGA, R. (1988), I compositi nominali latini (Bologna).Google Scholar
OTTO, A. (1890), Die Sprichwörter und sprichwörtlichen Redensarten der Römer (Leipzig).Google Scholar
PANAYOTAKIS, C. (2010), Decimus Laberius: The Fragments (Cambridge).Google Scholar
PARKER, L. P. E. (2007), Euripides: Alcestis (Oxford).Google Scholar
PEASE, A. S. (1955), M. Tulli Ciceronis De natura deorum libri III: Liber primus (Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
PEASE, A. S. (1958), M. Tulli Ciceronis De natura deorum libri III: Libri secundus et tertius (Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
PEASE, A. S. (1963), M. Tulli Ciceronis De divinatione libri duo (Darmstadt) (reprint: originally published in two volumes with different pagination in University of Illinois Studies in Language and Literature [6], 1920 and [8], 1923).Google Scholar
PENNEY, J. H. W. (2005), ‘Connections in archaic Latin prose’, in Reinhardt, , Lapidge, and Adams, (2005), 37–51.Google Scholar
PETERSMANN, H. (1973), T. Maccius Plautus: Stichus (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
PINKSTER, H. (1969), ‘A B & C coordination in Latin’, Mnem. ser. 4, 22, 458–67.Google Scholar
PINKSTER, H. (1990), ‘La coordination’, L’information grammaticale 46, 8–13.Google Scholar
PINKSTER, H. (2015), The Oxford Latin Syntax 1 (Oxford).Google Scholar
PINKSTER, H. (forthcoming), The Oxford Latin Syntax 2.Google Scholar
POCCETTI, P. (2018), ‘Another image of literary Latin: language variation and the aims of Lucilius’ Satires’, in Breed, , Keitel, and Wallace, (2018), 81–131.Google Scholar
POTTER, D. S. and DAMON, C. (1999), ‘The Senatus consultum de Cn. Pisone patre’, AJP 120 1 (Special Issue: The Senatus consultum de Cn. Pisone patre), 13–41.Google Scholar
POULTNEY, J. W. (1959), The Bronze Tablets of Iguvium (Philological Monographs Published by the American Philological Association, 18).Google Scholar
POWELL, J. G. F. (1988), Cicero: Cato Maior de senectute (Cambridge).Google Scholar
POWELL, J. G. F. (2005), ‘Cicero’s adaptation of legal Latin in the De legibus’, in Reinhardt, , Lapidge, and Adams, (2005), 117–50.Google Scholar
PREMINGER, A. and BROGAN, T. V. F. eds (1993), The New Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics (Princeton, N.J.).Google Scholar
PREUSS, S. (1881), De bimembris dissoluti apud scriptores Romanos usu sollemni (Edenkoben).Google Scholar
PUTTFARKEN, W. (1914), Das Asyndeton bei den römischen Dichtern der archaischen und klassischen Zeit (Kiel).Google Scholar
QUIRK, R., GREENBAUM, S., LEECH, G. and SVARTVIK, J. (1972), A Grammar of Contemporary English (London).Google Scholar
QUIRK, R. and WRENN, C. L. (1957), An Old English Grammar, 2nd edn (London).Google Scholar
RADERMACHER, L. (1954), Aristophanes’ ‘Frösche’: Einleitung, Text und Kommentar, 2nd edn, revised by Kraus, W. (Vienna).Google Scholar
RAMSEY, J. T. (2007), Sallust’s Bellum Catilinae, 2nd edn (Oxford).Google Scholar
RAMSEY, J. T. (2015), Sallust 2: Fragments of the Histories; Letters to Caesar (Loeb Classical Library) (Cambridge, Mass. and London).Google Scholar
RANSTRAND, G. (1951), Querolusstudien (Stockholm).Google Scholar
REID, J. S. (1885), M. Tulli Ciceronis Academica (London).Google Scholar
REID, J. S. (1925), M. Tulli Ciceronis De finibus bonorum et malorum libri I, II (Cambridge).Google Scholar
REINHARDT, T. (2003), Cicero’s Topica (Oxford).Google Scholar
REINHARDT, T., LAPIDGE, M. and ADAMS, J. N. eds (2005), Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose (Oxford).Google Scholar
RENEHAN, R. (1976), Studies in Greek Texts: Critical Observations to Homer, Plato, Euripides, Aristophanes and other Authors (Göttingen).Google Scholar
RENEHAN, R. (1977), ‘Compound-simplex verbal iteration in Plautus’, CP 72, 243–8.Google Scholar
REYNOLDS, L. D. ed. (1998), M. Tulli Ciceronis De finibus bonorum et malorum libri quinque (Oxford).Google Scholar
RIBBECK, O. (1871), Scaenicae Romanorum poesis fragmenta 1: Tragicorum Romanorum fragmenta, 2nd edn (Leipzig).Google Scholar
RICCOBONO, S. (1968), Fontes iuris Romani antejustiniani Pars prima: Leges, 2nd edn (Florence).Google Scholar
RICHARDSON, N. (2010), Three Homeric Hymns, to Apollo, Hermes, and Aphrodite (Hymns 3, 4 and 5) (Cambridge).Google Scholar
RIX, H. (2002), Sabellische Texte: Die Texte des Oskischen, Umbrischen and Südpikenischen (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
ROBY, H. J. (1884), An Introduction to the Study of Justinian’s Digest (Cambridge).Google Scholar
ROSS, D. O. (1969), Style and Tradition in Catullus (Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
RUCKDESCHEL, F. (1910), Archaismen und Vulgarismen in der Sprache des Horaz (Munich).Google Scholar
RUSSELL, D. A. (2001), Quintilian: The Orator’s Education, 5 vols (Cambridge, Mass. and London).Google Scholar
RUTHERFORD, R. B. (2012), Greek Tragic Style: Form, Language and Interpretation (Oxford).Google Scholar
SCALISI, S. and BISETTO, A. (2009), ‘The classification of compounds’, in Lieber, and Stekauer, (2009), 34–53.Google Scholar
SCHEID, J. (1998), Commentarii Fratrum Arvalium qui supersunt: Les copies épigraphiques des protocoles annuels de la Confrérie Arvale (21 AV. – 304 AP. J.-C.) (Rome).Google Scholar
SCHIERL, P. (2006), Die Tragödien des Pacuvius: Ein Kommentar zu den Fragmenten mit Einleitung, Text und Übersetzung (Berlin and New York).Google Scholar
SCHMELING, G. (2011), A Commentary on the Satyrica of Petronius (Oxford).Google Scholar
SCHMIDT, E. G. (1975), ‘Philosophische und poetische Elemente bei Lukrez’, in Urushadze, and Gordeziani, (1975), 175–99.Google Scholar
SCHWYZER, E. (1950), Griechische Grammatik auf der Grundlage von Karl Brugmanns Griechischer Grammatik 2: Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik, completed and edited by Debrunner, A., 4th edn (Munich).Google Scholar
SHACKLETON BAILEY, D. R. (1965–70), Cicero’s Letters to Atticus, 7 vols (Cambridge).Google Scholar
SHACKLETON BAILEY, D. R. (1977), Cicero: Epistulae ad familiares, 2 vols (Cambridge).Google Scholar
SHACKLETON BAILEY, D. R. (1991), Cicero, back from Exile: Six Speeches upon his Return (Atlanta).Google Scholar
SHERK, R. K. (1969), Roman Documents from the Greek East: Senatus consulta and epistulae to the Age of Augustus (Baltimore, Md.).Google Scholar
SJÖGREN, H. (1900), De particulis copulatiuis apud Plautum et Terentium quaestiones selectae (Uppsala).Google Scholar
SKARD, E. (1933), Ennius und Sallustius (Oslo).Google Scholar
SKUTSCH, O. (1985), The Annals of Quintus Ennius (Oxford).Google Scholar
SMITH, M. F. (1992), Lucretius: De rerum natura, revised version of the edition of Rouse, W. H. D. (Cambridge, Mass. and London).Google Scholar
SOMMERSTEIN, A. H. (1987), Aristophanes: Birds (Warminster).Google Scholar
SOMMERSTEIN, A. H. (1989), Aeschylus: Eumenides (Cambridge).Google Scholar
SOMMERSTEIN, A. H. (2019), Aeschylus: Suppliants (Cambridge).Google Scholar
SPAL, A. (2016), Poesie – Erotik – Witz: Humorvoll-spöttische Versinschriften zu Liebe und Körperlichkeit in Pompeji und Umgebung (Berlin and Boston).Google Scholar
STANFORD, W. B. (1963), Aristophanes: The Frogs, 2nd edn (London).Google Scholar
STEVENS, P. T. (1971), Euripides: Andromache (Oxford).Google Scholar
STRZELECKI, W. (1964), Cn. Naevii Belli Punici carmen (Leipzig).Google Scholar
TARRANT, R. (2012), Virgil: Aeneid Book XII (Cambridge).Google Scholar
TAYLOR, B. (forthcoming), ‘Lucretius and early Latin’, in Adams, , Chahoud, and Pezzini, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
THOMAS, R. T. (2011), Horace: Odes Book IV and Carmen saeculare (Cambridge).Google Scholar
THOMSON, D. F. S. (1997), Catullus: edited with a Textual and Interpretative Commentary (Toronto, Buffalo and London).Google Scholar
TIDNER, E. (1922), De particulis copulatiuis apud Scriptores Historiae Augustae quaestiones selectae (Uppsala).Google Scholar
TIMPANARO, S. (1954), review of O. Skutsch, The Annals of Quintus Ennius (An inaugural lecture delivered at University College, London, 29th November, 1951) (London, 1953), JRS 44, 155–7.Google Scholar
TIMPANARO, S. (1967), ‘Note a interpreti Virgiliani antichi’, RFIC (95), 428–45.Google Scholar
TIMPANARO, S. (1978), Contributi di filologia e di storia della lingua latina (Rome).Google Scholar
TIMPANARO, S. (1994), ‘Alcuni tipi di sinonimi in asindeto in latino arcaico e in età classica repubblicana’, in id., Nuovi contributi di filologia e storia della lingua latina (Bologna), 1–74.Google Scholar
TOMLIN, R. S. O. (2016), ‘Inscriptions’, Britannia 47, 389–415.Google Scholar
TORREGO, M. Esperanza (2009), ‘Coordination’, in Baldi, and Cuzzolin, (2009), 443–87.Google Scholar
UNTERMANN, J. (2000), Wörterbuch des Oskisch-Umbrischen (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
URUSHADZE, A. V. and GORDEZIANI, R. V. eds (1975), Problems in Ancient Culture (Tbilisi).Google Scholar
USHER, R. G. (1978), Euripides: Cyclops, Introduction and Commentary (Rome).Google Scholar
VAHLEN, J. (1903), Ennianae poesis reliquiae, 2nd edn (Leipzig).Google Scholar
VAN DEN HOUT, M. P. J. ed. (1988) M. Cornelii Frontonis Epistulae (Leipzig).Google Scholar
VAN RENGEN, W. (1984), ‘Deux défixions contre les bleus à Apamée (VIe siècle apr. J.-C.’, in Balty, J. ed., Apamée de Syrie. Bilan des recherches archéologiques 1973–1979: Aspects d’architecture domestique d’Apamée (Actes du colloque tenu à Bruxelles les 29, 30 et 31 mai 1980) (Brussels), 213–33.Google Scholar
WACHTER, R. (1987), Altlateinische Inschriften: Sprachliche und epigraphische Untersuchungen zu den Dokumenten bis etwa 150 v. Chr. (Bern).Google Scholar
WACKERNAGEL, J. (1905), Altindische Grammatik 2.1: Einleitung zur Wortlehre, Nominalkomposition (Göttingen).Google Scholar
WACKERNAGEL, J. (1969), Kleine Schriften, 2nd edn, 2 vols. (Göttingen).Google Scholar
WALBANK, F. W. (1979), A Historical Commentary on Polybius 3: Commentary on Books XIX–XL (Oxford).Google Scholar
WALTHER, H. (1967), Carmina medii aevi posterioris Latina II/5: Lateinische Sprichwörter und Sentenzen des Mittelalters in alphabetischer Anordnung 5: Sim–Z (Göttingen).Google Scholar
WALTHER, H. (1969), Carmina medii aevi posterioris Latina II/6: Lateinische Sprichwörter und Sentenzen des Mittelalters in alphabetischer Anordnung 6: Register der Namen, Sachen und Wörter zu Teil 1–5 (Göttingen).Google Scholar
WARMINGTON, E. H. (1936), Remains of Old Latin 2: Livius Andronicus, Naevius, Pacuvius and Accius (London and Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
WARMINGTON, E. H. (1961), Remains of Old Latin 1: Ennius and Caecilius, 3rd edn (London and Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
WARMINGTON, E. H. (1967), Remains of Old Latin 3: Lucilius, The Twelve Tables, 2nd edn (London and Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
WATKINS, C. (1967), ‘An Indo-European construction in Greek and Latin’, HSCP 71, 115–19.Google Scholar
WATKINS, C. (1995), How to Kill a Dragon: Aspects of Indo-European Poetics (Oxford).Google Scholar
WATSON, A. (1967), The Law of Persons in the Later Roman Republic (Oxford).Google Scholar
WATSON, A. (1968), The Law of Property in the Later Roman Republic (Oxford).Google Scholar
WATSON, A. (1971), Roman Private Law around 200 BC (Edinburgh).Google Scholar
WEST, M. L. (1966), Hesiod: Theogony (Oxford).Google Scholar
WEST, M. L. (1978), Hesiod: Works and Days (Oxford).Google Scholar
WEST, M. L. (1988), ‘The rise of the Greek epic’, JHS 108, 151–72.Google Scholar
WEST, M. L. (2007), Indo-European Poetry and Myth (Oxford).Google Scholar
WILKINSON, L. P. (1963), Golden Latin Artistry (Cambridge).Google Scholar
WILLIAMS, G. (1968), Tradition and Originality in Roman Poetry (Oxford).Google Scholar
WILLIAMS, R. D. (1960), P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber quintus (Oxford).Google Scholar
WILLS, J. (1996), Repetition in Latin Poetry: Figures of Allusion (Oxford).Google Scholar
WINTERBOTTOM, M. (1970), Problems in Quintilian (Institute of Classical Studies, Bulletin Supplement No. 25) (London).Google Scholar
WINTERBOTTOM, M. (1984), The Minor Declamations ascribed to Quintilian (Berlin and New York).Google Scholar
WINTERBOTTOM, M. ed. (1994), M. Tulli Ciceronis De officiis (Oxford).Google Scholar
WÖLFFLIN, E. (1900), ‘Zum Asyndeton bei Sallust’, ALL 11, 27–35.Google Scholar
WÖLFFLIN, E. (1933), Ausgewählte Schriften, edited by Meyer, G. (Leipzig).Google Scholar
WÖLFFLIN, E. and MIODOŃSKI, (1889), C. Asini Polionis De bello Africo commentarius (Leipzig).Google Scholar
WOODCOCK, E. C. (1959), A New Latin Syntax (London).Google Scholar
WOODMAN, A. J. (1977), Velleius Paterculus: The Tiberian Narrative (2.94–131) (Cambridge).Google Scholar
WOODMAN, A. J. (1983), Velleius Paterculus: The Caesarian and Augustan Narrative (2.41–93) (Cambridge).Google Scholar
WOODMAN, A. J. (2004), Tacitus, the Annals (Indianapolis, IN and Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
WOODMAN, A. J. (2007), Sallust: Cataline’s War, The Jugurthine War, Histories (London).Google Scholar
WOODMAN, A. J. (2017), The Annals of Tacitus: Books 5 and 6 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
WOODMAN, A. J. (2018), The Annals of Tacitus Book 4 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
WOODMAN, A. J. with KRAUS, C. S. (2014), Tacitus Agricola (Cambridge).Google Scholar
WOODMAN, A. J. and MARTIN, R. H. (1996), The Annals of Tacitus Book 3 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
WOYTEK, E. (1982), T. Maccius Plautus, Persa: Einleitung, Text und Kommentar (Vienna).Google Scholar
YOUTIE, H. C. (1982), Scriptiunculae posteriores 2 (Bonn).Google Scholar
YOUTIE, H. C. and BONNER, C. (1937), ‘Two curse tablets from Beisan’, TAPA 68, 43–77 (= Youtie 1982: 609–77).Google Scholar
ZAGO, A. (2017), Pompeii Commentum in Artis Donati partem tertiam, 2 vols (Hildesheim).Google Scholar
ZIMMERMANN, R. (1996), The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition (Oxford and New York).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • J. N. Adams, All Souls College, Oxford
  • Book: Asyndeton and its Interpretation in Latin Literature
  • Online publication: 13 May 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108943284.034
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • J. N. Adams, All Souls College, Oxford
  • Book: Asyndeton and its Interpretation in Latin Literature
  • Online publication: 13 May 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108943284.034
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • J. N. Adams, All Souls College, Oxford
  • Book: Asyndeton and its Interpretation in Latin Literature
  • Online publication: 13 May 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108943284.034
Available formats
×