Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: December 2012

5 - Relativistic foundations of astrometry and celestial mechanics

from Part II - Foundations of astrometry and celestial mechanics

Summary

Introduction

Tremendous progress in technology during the last 30 years has led to enormous improvements of accuracy in astrometry and related disciplines. Considering the growth of accuracy of positional observations in the course of time, we see that during the 25 years between 1988 and 2013 we expect the same gain in accuracy (4.5 orders of magnitude) as that realized during the whole previous history of astrometry, from Hipparchus till 1988 (over 2000 years). It is clear that for current and anticipated accuracy requirements, astronomical phenomena have to be formulated within the framework of general relativity. Many high-precision astronomical techniques already require sophisticated relativistic modeling since the main relativistic effects are several orders of magnitude larger than the technical accuracy of observations. Consequently, many current and planned observational projects cannot achieve their goals without a properly relativistic analysis. In principle, some basic relativistic effects have been taken into account since at least the 1960s. However, for a long time relativity has been viewed as “one more small correction” to the standard Newtonian formulae, rather than the fundamental framework for the data analysis. For the observational accuracy expected from proposed space instruments like Gaia, we must include not only the main relativistic effects, but also a multitude of second-order corrections. In this case it is impossible to treat relativistic effects as small corrections to the standard Newtonian scheme of data reduction. Consequently, the whole modeling scheme should be formulated in a language compatible with general relativity. Many Newtonian concepts and ideas should be re-considered and replaced by mathematically rigorous relativistic alternatives, including time, celestial coordinates, parallax, proper motion, etc.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
Belokurov, V.A. and Evans, N.W. (2002). Astrometric microlensing with the GAIA satellite. MNRAS, 331, 649.
Bertotti, B., Iess, L., and Tortora, P. (2003). A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft. Nature, 425, 374.
Brumberg, V. A. (1991). Essential Relativistic Celestial Mechanics. Bristol: Adam Hilger.
Cooperstock, F. I., Faraoni, V., and Vollick, D. N. (1998). The influence of the cosmological expansion on local systems. ApJ, 503, 61.
Damour, T., Soffel, M., and Xu, Ch. (1991). General-relativistic celestial mechanics. I. Method and definition of reference systems. Phys. Rev.D, 43, 3273.
Damour, T., Piazza, F., and Veneziano, G. (2002). Violations of the equivalence principle in a dilaton-runaway scenario. Phys. Rev.D, 66, 046007.
,IAU (2001). IAU Information Bulletin, 88 (errata in IAU Information Bulletin, 89).
,IERS (2010). IERS Conventions 2010, eds. G., Petit and B., Luzum, IERS Technical Note, 36. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie.
Klioner, S. A. (2003a). A practical relativistic model for microarcsecond astrometry in space. AJ, 125, 1580.
Klioner, S. A. (2003b). Light propagation in the gravitational field of moving bodies by means of Lorentz transformation I. Mass monopoles moving with constant velocities. A&A, 404, 783.
Klioner, S. A. (2004). Physically adequate proper reference system of a test observer and relativistic description of the GAIA attitude. Phys. Rev.D, 69, 124001.
Klioner, S. A. (2007). Testing relativity with space astrometry missions. In Lasers, Clocks and Drag-Free: Exploration of Relativistic Gravity in Space, eds. H., Dittus, C., Lämmerzahl, and S. G., Turyshev. Berlin: Springer, p. 399.
Klioner, S.A., Gerlach, E., and Soffel, M. (2009). Relativistic aspects of rotational motion of celestial bodies. In Relativity in Fundamental Astronomy, eds. S., Klioner, K., Seidelmann, and M., Soffel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 112.
Klioner, S. A. and Peip, M. (2003). Numerical simulations of the light propagation in gravitational field of moving bodies. A&A, 410, 1063.
Klioner, S. A. and Soffel, M. H. (2000). Relativistic celestial mechanics with PPN parameters. Phys. Rev.D, 62, ID 024019.
Klioner, S. A. and Soffel, M. H. (2005). Refining the relativistic model for Gaia: cosmological effects in the BCRS. ESA Special Publication ESA SP-576, 305.
Kopeikin, S. M. and Gwinn, C. (2000). Sub-microarcsecond astrometry and new horizons in relativistic gravitational physics. In Towards Models and Constants for Sub-Microarcsecond Astrometry, eds. K. J., Johnston, D. D., McCarthy, B. J., Luzum, and G. H., Kaplan. Washington, DC: US Naval Observatory, p. 303.
Kopeikin, S. M. and Schäfer, G. (1999). Lorentz covariant theory of light propagation in gravitational fields of arbitrary-moving bodies. Phys. Rev.D, 60, 124002.
Kopeikin, S. and Vlasov, I. (2004). Parametrized post-Newtonian theory of reference frames, multipolar expansions and equations of motion in the N-body problem. Phys. Rep., 400, 209.
Mignard, F. and Klioner, S. A. (2008). Space astrometry and relativity. In Space Astrometry and Relativity, Proceedings of the Eleventh Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, eds. H., Kleinert, R. T., Jantzen, and R., Ruffini. Singapore: World Scientific, p. 245.
Rickman, H. (2001). Reports on Astronomy, Trans. IAU, XXIVB.
Schutz, B. (1985). A First Course in General Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Soffel, M. (1989). Relativity in Astrometry, Celestial Mechanics and Geodesy. Berlin: Spinger.
Soffel, M., Klioner, S. A., Petit, G., et al. (2003). The IAU 2000 resolutions for astrometry, celestial mechanics, and metrology in the relativistic framework: explanatory supplement. AJ, 126, 2687.
Will, C. M. (1993). Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Will, C. M. (2006). The confrontation between general relativity and experiment. Living Rev. Relativity, 9, 3, http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2006-3 (Update of lrr-2001-4).