Book contents
- Assessing the World Trade Organization: Fit for Purpose?
- Assessing the World Trade Organization
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction and Setting the Stage
- Part II New Insight from the Early Times
- Part III General Trends and Patterns in WTO Dispute Settlement
- 5 Dispute Settlement in the WTO
- 6 About the Melting of Icebergs
- 7 The WTO Dispute Settlement System
- 8 Does Trade Comply?
- Part IV Zooming in on Specific Debates
- Part V Interactions Within and Across Regimes
- Index
- References
7 - The WTO Dispute Settlement System
Consolidating Success and Confronting New Challenges
from Part III - General Trends and Patterns in WTO Dispute Settlement
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 May 2017
Book contents
- Assessing the World Trade Organization: Fit for Purpose?
- Assessing the World Trade Organization
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction and Setting the Stage
- Part II New Insight from the Early Times
- Part III General Trends and Patterns in WTO Dispute Settlement
- 5 Dispute Settlement in the WTO
- 6 About the Melting of Icebergs
- 7 The WTO Dispute Settlement System
- 8 Does Trade Comply?
- Part IV Zooming in on Specific Debates
- Part V Interactions Within and Across Regimes
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Assessing the World Trade OrganizationFit for Purpose?, pp. 147 - 174Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
The Economist. 2015. ‘Torture by Tariff – Retaliating Against Unfair Trade Practices Is a Calculation in Cruelty’.Google Scholar
Elsig, Manfred and Pollack, Mark A. 2014 ‘Agents, Trustees, and International Courts: The Politics of Judicial Appointment at the World Trade Organization’. European Journal of International Relations 20 (2): 391–415.Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard and Mavroidis, Petros. 2015. ‘WTO “à la carte” or “menu du jour”? Assessing the Case for More Plurilateral Agreements’. European Journal of International Law 26 (2): 319–343.Google Scholar
Malacrida, Reto. 2015. ‘WTO Panel Composition: Searching Far and Wide for Administrators of World Trade Justice’. In A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO, edited by Marceau, Gabrielle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost. 2015. ‘The Rule of Law Without the Rule of Lawyers? Why Investment Arbitrators Are from Mars, Trade Adjudicators Are from Venus’. The American Journal of International Law 109 (4): 761–805.Google Scholar
Sacerdoti, Giorgio. 2016. ‘The Future of the WTO Dispute Settlement System: Consolidating a Success Story’. In The Future of the Global Trade Order, edited by Braga, C. and Hoekman, B.. Florence: EUI.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, Elsig, Manfred and Puig, Sergio. 2016. ‘The Extensive (but Fragile) Authority of the WTO Appellate Body’. Law and Contemporary Problems 79 (1): 237–273.Google Scholar
Unterhalter, David. 2015. ‘The Authority of an Institution: The Appellate Body under Review’. In A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO, edited by Marceau, Gabrielle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by