Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T22:27:14.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

22 - Historical revisions: Abstract Expressionism and Picasso

from Section C - Abundance, 1961–1971

Get access

Summary

Most of Alloway's revisionism in the 1960s focused, understandably, on Abstract Expressionism because so much art of the 1960s was a reaction against it. As the orthodoxy it had provided had been successfully challenged, it was time to re-evaluate it. The re-evaluation would have largely to focus on the individuals who comprised it because, as he argued in 1965, initially, “their impact on the world was as a group or, at least, as a cluster of individuals identified with the United States. Now, however, the personal attitudes and unique characteristics of each artist are visible within the general experience of breakthrough and drastically modified tradition.” Furthermore, the early deaths of Gorky (1948), Pollock (1956), Kline (1962), Baziotes (1963), David Smith (1965), and Hofmann (1966 but not early) led to a spate of retrospectives.

Alloway, while still in England, wrote three times about Jackson Pollock in 1961. At this stage he was still preaching to the unconverted, but as Pollock's reputation became less controversial during the 1960s, his occasional articles on the artist turned to a more art historical re-evaluation. For example, in 1969 he reassessed Pollock's so-called black paintings of 1950 and 1951. The purpose of the text is art historical: he is disagreeing with Michael Fried that Pollock's abandonment of contour in his black paintings in 1951 represents a diminution of his avant-garde contribution. He provides a close analysis of several paintings and concludes that “a close look at the black paintings shows why Fried is wrong: as a rule, Pollock's iconography is not conveyed by volumeinducing lines. The lines not only have a non-directional property, as they stain out onto the canvas, but the sign system in use is not one based on the perception of solids and their translation into a two-dimensional system.” He explains why this matters: “I see the originality of the drip paintings, 1947–50, as extended unexpectedly, brilliantly, and successfully by Pollock through the first year of the black paintings, whereas Fried makes a 1950 cut-off point which I regard as brutally premature.”

Other Abstract Expressionists were re-evaluated. Just after the Arshile Gorky exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art in 1962–1963, Alloway wrote an analysis of the artist's work which shifted the emphasis away from his influence on Abstract Expressionism, toward a re-evaluation of his earlier work.

Type
Chapter
Information
Art and Pluralism
Lawrence Alloway’s Cultural Criticism
, pp. 263 - 269
Publisher: Liverpool University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×