Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T19:11:45.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Spatial integration III: reconstruction of settlement systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

Karl W. Butzer
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

Site location

Spatial behavior is fundamentally rational in economic terms, but it is not necessarily optimal and is never exclusively economic (see Chapter 13). The principle of least effort is not exclusively human: Cattle trails converging on a feedlot and animal tracks to waterholes run straight over as much as several kilometers. However, in more distant areas of reasonable grazing, such pathways are adjusted to surface roughness, and their normal sinuosity suggests a relationship to body momentum as well as a measure of random walk. Traditional roads suggest a similar compromise among minimal distance, topography, and a variety of less tangible factors. Consequently, human spatial behavior seldom truly approximates the optimization principle, that is, a minimum of effort for a maximum of return (McFarland, 1978). Two critical imponderables interpose themselves in the conception and implementation of mobility and subsistence strategies. First, the distribution, predictability, and competitive variables that control resource opportunities and limitations (see Table 13–3) require complex decisions that allow for multiple alternative choices. Second, cultural and socioeconomic variables increase the multiplicity of alternative choices that can be made with respect to perceived rather than real environments (see Table 13–4).

Accordingly, site location is essentially rational, often less than optimal, and always to some degree idiosyncratic. The decisions of hunter-gatherers relate to sites selected for relatively short time spans in relation to large resource spaces, and they involve elements of risk, diversity, and long-term productivity different from those that influence the decision making of farming communities.

Type
Chapter
Information
Archaeology as Human Ecology
Method and Theory for a Contextual Approach
, pp. 258 - 278
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×