Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T07:46:58.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2009

Guy R. McPherson
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Stephen DeStefano
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarssen, L. W. (1989). Competitive ability and species coexistence: a ‘plant's-eye’ view. Oikos 56:386–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aarssen, L. W. (1992). Causes and consequences of variation in competitive ability in plant communities. Journal of Vegetation Science 3:165–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aarssen, L. W., and Epp, G. A. (1990). Neighbour manipulations in natural vegetation: a review. Journal of Vegetation Science 1:13–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aarssen, L. W., and Turkington, R. (1985). Competitive relations among species from pastures of different ages. Canadian Journal of Botany 63:2319–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, L. B., and McPherson, G. R. (1999). Nonnative grasses in southern Arizona: historical and contemporary perspectives. In A Century of Parks in Southern Arizona: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Research and Resource Management in Southern Arizona National Park Areas eds. L. Benson and B. Gebow, pp 3–6. Tucson, AZ: National Park Service
Adamec, R. E. 1976. The interaction of hunger and preying in the domestic cat. Behavioral Biology 18:263–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alatalo, R. V. 1981. Problems in the measurement of evenness in ecology. Oikos 37:199–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, T. F. H., and Hoekstra, T. W. 1990. The confusion between scale-defined levels and conventional levels of organization in ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 1:5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, T. F. H., and Hoekstra, T. W. (1992). Toward a Unified Ecology. New York: Columbia University Press
Allen, T. F. H., O'Neill, R. V., and Hoekstra, T. W. (1984). Interlevel relations in ecological research and management: some working principles from hierarchy theory. USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RM-110, Fort Collins, CO
Alpert, P. (1995). Incarnating ecosystem management. Conservation Biology 9:952–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. R., and Burnham, K. P. (1992). Data-based selection of an appropriate biological model: the key to modern data analysis. In Wildlife 2001: Populations, eds. D. R. McCullough and R. H. Barrett, pp. 16–30. New York: Elsevier Applied Science
Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., Gould, W. R., and Cherry, S. 2001. Concerns about finding effects that are actually spurious. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:311–16Google Scholar
Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., and Thompson, W. L. 2000. Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. Journal of Wildlife Management 64:912–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrewartha, H. G. (1961). Introduction to the Study of Animal Populations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Archer, S. (1989). Have southern Texas savannas been converted to woodlands in recent history?American Naturalist 134:545–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, S. 1990. Development and stability of grass/woody mosaics in a subtropical savanna parkland, Texas, USA. Journal of Biogeography 17:453–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, S. 1993. Vegetation dynamics in changing environments. Rangelands Journal 15:104–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, S. (1994). Woody plant encroachment into southwestern grasslands and savannas: rates, patterns, and proximate causes. In Ecological Implications of Livestock Herbivory in the West., eds. M. Vavra, W. Laycock and R. Pieper, pp. 13–68. Denver: Society for Range Management
Archer, S. (1995a). Harry Stobbs Memorial Lecture, (1993): herbivore mediation of grass–woody plant interactions. Tropical Grasslands 29:218–35Google Scholar
Archer, S. (1995b). Tree-grass dynamics in a Prosopis-thornscrub savanna parkland: reconstructing the past and predicting the future. Ecoscience 2:83–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrhenius, O. 1921. Species and area. Journal of Ecology 9:95–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, W., and Mitchell, P. 1989. A revised scheme for the classification of population interactions. Oikos 56:141–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Askins, R. A. 2001. Sustaining biological diversity in early successional communities: the challenge of managing unpopular habitats. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:407–12Google Scholar
Aspinall, D., and Milthorpe, F. L. 1959. An analysis of competition between barley and white persicaria. I. The effects on growth. Annals of Applied Biology 47:156–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, M. P. 1976. Non-linear species response models in ordination. Vegetatio 33:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, M. P. 1977. Use of ordination and other multivariate descriptive methods to study succession. Vegetatio 35:165–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, M. P. 1986. The theoretical basis of vegetation science. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1:161–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Austin, M. P., and Gaywood, M. J. 1994. Current problems of environmental gradients and species response curves in relation to continuum theory. Journal of Vegetation Science 5:473–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, M. P., Nicholls, A. O., Doherty, M. D., and Meyers, J. A. (1994). Determining species response functions to an environmental gradient by means of β-function. Journal of Vegetation Science 5:215–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahre, C. J. (1991). A Legacy of Change: Historic Human Impact on Vegetation in the Arizona Borderlands. Tucson AZ: University of Arizona Press
Banks, P. B., Dickman, C. R., and Newsome, A. E. 1998. Ecological costs of feral predator control: foxes and rabbits. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:766–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, M. S. 1947. The use of transformations. Biometrics 3:39–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartolome, J. W., Klukkert, S. E., and Barry, W. J. 1986. Opal phytoliths as evidence for displacement of native Californian grassland. Madroño 33:217–22Google Scholar
Bazzaz, F. A. 1975. Plant species diversity in old-field successional ecosystems. Ecology 56:485–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, C. 1990. The great chain of being. New Scientist 125:60–1Google Scholar
Beissinger, S. R., and Westphal, M. I. 1998. On the use of demographic models of population viability in endangered species management. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:821–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, E. A., Case, T. J., and Gilpin, M. E. 1984. Perturbation experiments in community ecology: theory and practice. Ecology 65:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betancourt, J. L., Van Devender, T. R., and Martin, P. S. (1990). Packrat Middens: The Last 40,000 Years of Biotic Change. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press
Bibby, C. J., Burgess, N. D., and Hill, D. A. (1992). Bird Census Techniques. London: Academic Press
Blackburn, T. M., and Gaston, K. J. 1996. Abundance–body size relationships: the area you census tells you more. Oikos 75:303–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boertje, R. D., Valkenburg, P., and McNay, M. E. 1996. Increases in moose, caribou, and wolves following wolf control in Alaska. Journal of Wildlife Management 60:474–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonham, C. D. (1989). Measurements for Terrestrial Vegetation. New York: Wiley
Boutin, S., Krebs, C. J., Sinclair, A. R.et al. (1995). Population changes of the vertebrate community during a snowshoe hare cycle in Canada's boreal forest. Oikos 74:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, C. J., Keith, L. B., and Fischer, C. A. 1976. Lynx responses to changing snowshoe hare densities in Alberta. Journal of Wildlife Management 40:416–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, R., and McCann, M. T. 1985. Spacing in acorn woodpeckers. Ecology 66:307–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briske, D. D., and Richards, J. H. (1995). Plant responses to defoliation: a physiologic, morphologic and demographic evaluation. In Wildland Plants: Physiological Ecology and Developmental Morphology, eds. D. J. Bedunah and R. E. Sosebee, pp. 635–710. Denver: Society for Range Management
Bronstein, J. L. 1994. Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:214–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, D. (1954). Methods of Surveying and Measuring Vegetation. Bucks, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural
Brown, J. R., and MacLeod, N. D. 1996. Integrating ecology into natural resource management policy. Environmental Management 30:289–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, R. D., and Clark, T. W. 1997. A practice-based approach to ecosystem management. Conservation Biology 11:48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., and Laake, J. L. (1993). Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. London: Chapman and Hall
Bulla, L. 1994. An index of evenness and its associated diversity measure. Oikos 70:167–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, J. W. (1983). Reply to a comment by R. L. Mumme et al.Ecology 64:1307–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, J. W., Roulston, D., and Shaw, E. 1982. Territorial aggregation: an ecological spacing strategy in acorn woodpeckers. Ecology 63:575–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (1992). Data-based selection of an appropriate biological model: the key to modern data analysis. In Wildlife 2001: Populations, eds. D. R. McCullough, and R. H. Barrett, pp. 16–30. New York: Elsevier Applied ScienceCrossRef
Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (1998). Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information Theoretic Approach. New York: Springer-Verlag
Burrows, C. J. (1990). Processes of Vegetation Change. London: Unwin Hyman
Burton, P. J., Balisky, A. C., Coward, L. P., Cumming, S. G., and Kneeshaw, D. D. 1992. The value of managing for biodiversity. Forestry Chronicle 68:225–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camargo, J. A. (1993). Must dominance increase with the number of subordinate species in competitive interactions?Journal of Theoretical Biology 161:537–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, B. D., Grime, J. P., Mackey, J. M. L., and Jalili, A. 1991. The quest for a mechanistic understanding of resource competition in plant communities: the role of experiments. Functional Ecology 5:241–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. J. 1995. Detecting regular spacing in patchy environments and estimating its density using nearest-neighbour graphical analysis. Oecologia 102:133–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canfield, R. H. 1941. Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation. Journal of Forestry 39:388–94Google Scholar
Cardinale, B. J., Nelson, K., and Palmer, M. A. 2000. Linking species diversity to the functioning of ecosystems: on the importance of environmental context. Oikos 91:175–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carleton, T. J., Stitt, R. H., and Nieppola, J. 1996. Constrained indicator species analysis (COINSPAN): an extension of TWINSPAN. Journal of Vegetation Science 7:125–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S. R. 1996. Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosytem ecology. Ecology 77:677–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S. R., Chisholm, S. W., Krebs, C. J., Schindler, D. W., and Wright, R. F. 1995. Ecosystem experiments. Science 269:324–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casado, M. A., Ramírez-Sanz, L., Castro, I., Miguel, J. M., and Pablo, C. L. 1997. An objective method for partitioning dendrograms based on entropy parameters. Plant Ecology 131:193–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo, D. (2001). Population estimates and behavioral analyses of managed cat colonies located in Miami-Dade County, Florida, Parks. M. S. Thesis, Miami: Florida International University
Causton, D. R. (1988). An Introduction to Vegetation Analysis: Principle, Practice, and Interpretation. London: Unwin Hyman
Cherry, S. 1996. A comparison of confidence interval methods for habitat use-availability studies. Journal of Wildlife Management 60:653–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherry, S. 1998. Statistical tests in publications of The Wildlife Society. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26:947–53Google Scholar
Clements, F. E. (1916). Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 242CrossRef
Clements, F. E., Weaver, J. E., and Hanson, H. C. (1929). Plant Competition: An Analysis of Community Functions. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 398
Cole, J., Lovett, G., and Findlay, S. (eds.) (1991). Comparative Analyses of Ecosystems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
Coleman, J. S., and Temple, S. A. 1993. Rural residents' free-ranging domestic cats: a survey. Wildlife Society Bulletin 21:381–90Google Scholar
Colinvaux, P. (1986). Ecology. New York: Wiley
Connell, J. H. (1961). The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology 42:710–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, J. H. (1990). Apparent vs. “real” competition in plants. In Perspectives on Plant Competition, eds. J. B. Grace and D. Tilman, pp. 9–26. New York: Academic Press
Connell, J. H., and Slatyer, R. O. 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. American Naturalist 111:1119–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conner, M. M., Jaeger, M. M., Weller, T. J., and McCullough, D. R. 1998. Effect of coyote removal on sheep depredation in northern California. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:690–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, E. F., and Simberloff, D. (1979). The assembly of species communities: chance or competition?Ecology 60:1132–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, J. G., Stutzman, T. W., Bowers, C. W., Brenner, K. A., and Irwin, L. L. 1995. Spherical densiometers produce biased estimates of forest canopy cover. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23:711–17Google Scholar
Cortwright, S. A. 1988. Intraguild predation and competition: an analysis of net growth shifts in larval amphibian prey. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66:1813–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottam, G., and Curtis, J. T. 1956. The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology 37:451–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowles, H. C. (1899). The ecological relations of the vegetation on the sand dunes of Lake Michigan. Parts 1, 2, 3, 4. Botanical Gazette 27:95–117, 167–202, 281–308, 361–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crooks, K. R., and Soulé, M. E. 1999. Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400:563–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, M. R. T. 1984. The continuity of upslope and downslope boundaries of species in a zoned community. Oikos 42:92–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daubenmire, R. (1968). Plant Communities. New York: Harper and Row
Daw, S. K., DeStefano, S., and Steidl, R. J. (1998). Does survey method bias the description of goshawk nest-site structure?Journal of Wildlife Management 62:1379–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, B. (1996). Discussion: should ecologists become Bayesians?Ecological Applications 6:1095–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeStefano, S. (1998). Determining the status of northern goshawks in the West: is our conceptual model correct?Journal of Raptor Research 32:342–8Google Scholar
DeStefano, S., and McCloskey, J. (1997). Does vegetation structure limit the distribution of northern goshawks in the Oregon Coast Ranges?Journal of Raptor Research 31:34–9Google Scholar
DeStefano, S., Thrailkill, J. A., Swindle, K. A., Miller, G. S., Woodbridge, B., and Meslow, E. C. (1995). Analysis of habitat quality and relative survival using capture–recapture data. In Integrating People and Wildlife for a Sustainable Future. eds. J. A. Bissonette and P. R. Krausman, pp. 466–9. Proceedings of the First International Wildlife Management Congress. Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society
Diamond, J. M. (1975). Assembly of species communities. In Ecology and Evolution of Communities, eds. M. L. Cody and J. M. Diamond, pp. 342–4. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, Harvard University Press
Diamond, J. M. (1986). Overview: laboratory experiments, field experiments and natural experiments. In Community Ecology, eds. J. M. Diamond and T. J. Case, pp. 3–22. New York: Harper and Row
Diamond, J. M., and Gilpin, M. 1982. Examination of the ‘null’ model of Connor and Simberloff for species co-occurrences on islands. Oecologia 52:64–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drake, J. A. (1990). Communities as assembled structures: do rules govern pattern?Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5:159–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drury, W. H., and Nisbet, I. C. 1973. Succession. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 54:331–68Google Scholar
Dueser, R. D., Porter, J. H., and Dooley, J. L., Jr. (1989). Direct tests for competition in North American rodent communities: synthesis and prognosis. In Patterns in the Structure of Mammalian Communities, eds. D. W. Morris, Z. Abramsky, B. J. Fox and M. R. Willig, pp. 105–25. Special Publication No. 28. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University Press
Dyksterhuis, E. J. 1949. Condition and management of rangeland based on quantitative ecology. Journal of Range Management 2:104–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzurec, R. S., Boutton, T. W., Caldwell, M. M., and Smith, B. N. 1985. Carbon isotope ratios of soil organic matter and their use in assessing community composition changes in Curlew Valley, Utah. Oecologia 66:17–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckblad, J. W. (1991). How many samples should be taken?BioScience 41:346–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egler, F. E. 1954. Vegetation science concepts. I. Initial floristic composition – a factor in old-field vegetation development. Vegetatio 4:412–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, E. W., and Seastedt, T. R. (1995). In Wildland Plants: Physiological Ecology and Developmental Morphology, eds. D. J. Bedunah and R. E. Sosebee, pp. 580–634. Denver: Society for Range Management
Forsman, E. D., S. DeStefano, S., Raphael, M. G., and Gutiérrez, R. J. (eds:) (1993). Demography of the northern spotted owl. Studies in Avian Biology 17:1–122Google Scholar
Fritts, H. C. (1976). Tree Rings and Climate. New York: Academic Press
Garrison, G. A. 1949. Uses and modifications for the “moosehorn” crown closure estimator. Journal of Forestry 47:733–5Google Scholar
Gauch, H. G., Jr. (1982). Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Gauch, H. G. Jr., and Stone, E. L. (1979). Vegetation and soil pattern in a mesophytic forest at Ithaca, New York. American Midland Naturalist 102:332–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauch, H. G. Jr., and Whittaker, R. H. 1981. Hierarchical classification of community data. Journal of Ecology 69:537–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gause, G. F. 1930. Studies on the ecology of the Orthoptera. Ecology 11:307–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavin, T. A. (1989). What's wrong with the questions we ask in wildlife research?Wildlife Society Bulletin 17:345–50Google Scholar
Gavin, T. A. 1991. Why ask “why”: the importance of evolutionary biology in wildlife science. Journal of Wildlife Management 55:760–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, M. E., and Diamond, J. M. 1982. Factors contributing to the non-randomness in species co-occurrences on islands. Oecologia 52:75–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gleason, H. A. 1917. The structure and development of the plant association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 43:463–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, H. A. 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 53:7–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golley, F. B. 1965. Structure and function of an old-field broomsedge community. Ecological Monographs 35:113–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golley, F. B. (1977). Ecological Succession. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross
Goodall, D. W. 1952. Some considerations of the use of point quadrats in the analysis of vegetation. Australian Journal of Scientific Research, Series B 5:1–41Google ScholarPubMed
Goodall, D. W. 1953. Point-quadrat methods for the analysis of vegetation. Australian Journal of Botany 1:457–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grace, J. B. 1995. In search of the Holy Grail: explanations for the coexistence of plant species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:263–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grace, J. B., and Tilman, D. (eds.) (1990). Perspectives on Plant Competition. New York: Academic Press
Grant, P. R., and Abbott, I. 1980. Interspecific competition, island biogeography and null hypotheses. Evolution 34:332–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grieg-Smith, P. (1983). Quantitative Plant Ecology, 3rd edn. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
Grime, J. P. (1979). Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. Chichester: Wiley
Grimm, V. (1994). Mathematical models and understanding in ecology. Ecological Modelling 75/76:641–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisebach, A. 1838. Ueber den Einfluss des Climas auf die Begranzung der naturlich Floren. Linnaea 12:159–200Google Scholar
Grubb, P. J. 1977. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biological Review 52:107–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grumbine, R. E. (1994). What is ecosystem management?Conservation Biology 8:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Q., and Rundel, P. W. 1997. Measuring dominance and diversity in ecological communities: choosing the right variables. Journal of Vegetation Science 8:405–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurevitch, J., and Collins, S. L. 1994. Experimental manipulation of natural plant communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:94–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gustafson, M. P. 1993. Intraguild predation among larval plethodontid salamanders: a field experiment in artificial stream pools. Oecologia 96:271–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hairston, N. G. Sr. (1989). Ecological Experiments: Purpose, Design, and Execution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hall, C. A. S. 1988. An assessment of several of the historically most influential theoretical models used in ecology and the data provided in their support. Ecological Modelling 43:5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, C. A. S. 1991. An idiosyncratic assessment of the role of mathematical models in environmental sciences. Environment International 17:507–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, L. S., Krausman, P. R., and Morrison, M. L. 1997. The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25:173–82Google Scholar
Harlow, L. L., Mulaik, S. A., and Steiger, J. H. (eds.). (1997). What If There Were No Significance Tests? Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Harper, J. L. (1977). Population Biology of Plants. New York: Academic Press
Harper, J. L. (1982). After description. In The Plant Community as a Working Mechanism ed. E. I. Newman, pp. 11–25. Oxford: Blackwell
Harris, L. D. (1990). The Fragmented Forest: Island Biogeography Theory and the Preservation of Biotic Diversity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Hastings, J. R., and Turner, R. M. (1965). The Changing Mile. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press
Hawking, S. W. (1988). A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. Bantam Books, New York
Hayek, L. -A. C., and Buzas, M. A. (1997). Surveying Natural Populations. New York: Columbia University Press
Heitschmidt, R. K., and Stuth, J. W. (eds.) (1991). Grazing Management: An Ecological Perspective. Portland, OR: Timber Press
Hill, M. O. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54:427–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, M. O. 1979. TWINSPAN: a FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Ithaca, NY: Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University
Hill, M. O. (1997). An evenness statistic based on the abundance-weighted variance of species proportions. Oikos 79:413–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, M. O., and Gauch, H. G. Jr. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, M. O., Bunce, R. G. H., and Shaw, M. W. 1975. Indicator species analysis, a divisive polythetic method of classification, and its application to a survey of native pinewoods in Scotland. Journal of Ecology 63:597–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. (1998). Managing ecological systems and processes. In Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications, eds. D. L. Peterson and V. T. Parker, pp. 459–84. New York: Columbia University Press
Hogeweg, P. 1976. Iterative character weighing in numerical taxonomy. Computers in Biology and Medicine 6:199–211CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holl, K. D. (1998). Do bird perching structures elevate seed rain and seedling establishment in abandoned tropical pasture?Restoration Ecology 6:253–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology 24:417–41, 498–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M. L. Jr. 1989. Aardvarks and arcadia: two principles of wildlife research. Wildlife Society Bulletin 17:350–1Google Scholar
Hunter, W. C., Buehler, D. A., Canterbury, R. A., Confer, J. L., and Hamel, P. B. 2001. Conservation of disturbance-dependent birds in eastern North America. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:440–55Google Scholar
Hurlbert, S. H. 1971. The non-concept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52:577–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurlbert, S. H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54:187–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. R. (1959). Homage to Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many kinds of animals?American Naturalist 93:145–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E. 1961. The paradox of the plankton. American Naturalist 95:137–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. A., and Somers, K. M. 1991. Putting things in order: the ups and downs of detrended correspondence analysis. American Naturalist 137:704–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, D. H. (1986). Guanacaste National Park: Tropical Ecological and Cultural Restoration. San José, Costa Rica: Editorial Universidad Estatal a Distancia
Joern, A. 1986. Experimental study of avian predation on coexisting grasshopper populations (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in a sandhills grassland. Oikos 46:243–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. H. 1999. The insignificance of statistical significance testing. Journal of Wildlife Management 63:763–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. A., and Gutsell, S. L. 1994. Fire frequency models, methods and interpretations. Advances in Ecological Research 25:239–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jongman, R. H. G., ter Braak, C. J. F., and van Tongeren, O. F. R. (1987). Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Pudoc
Joyce, L. A. 1992. The life cycle of the range condition concept. Journal of Range Management 46:132–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalisz, P. J., and Stone, E. L. 1984. The longleaf pine islands of the Ocala National Forest, Florida: a soil study. Ecology 65:1743–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keddy, P. A. (1989). Competition. New York: Chapman and Hall
Keddy, P. A. (1990). Competitive hierarchies and centrifugal organization in plant communities. In Perspectives on Plant Competition, eds. J. B. Grace and D. Tilman, pp. 265–90. New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Keddy, P. A. 1992. Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 3:157–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keddy, P. A., and MacLellan, P. 1990. Centrifugal organization in forests. Oikos 59:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiter, R. B. 1995. Greater Yellowstone: managing a charismatic ecosystem. Natural Resources and Environmental Issues 3:75–85Google Scholar
Keith, L. B. (1963). Wildlife's Ten-year Cycle. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press
Keith, L. B. 1983. Role of food in hare population cycles. Oikos 40:385–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, L. B., Cary, J. R., Rongstad, O. J., and Brittingham, M. C. 1984. Demography and ecology of a declining snowshoe hare population. Wildlife Monograph 90:1–43Google Scholar
Kenkel, N. C., Juhász-Nagy, P., and Podani, J. 1989. On sampling procedures in population and community ecology. Vegetatio 83:195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, P. L. (1997). The northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis atricapillus): is there evidence of a population decline?Journal of Raptor Research 31:95–106Google Scholar
Kent, M., and Coker, P. (1992). Vegetation Description and Analysis: A Practical Approach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
Kershaw, K. A., and Looney, J. H. H. (1985). Quantitative and Dynamic Plant Ecology. London: Edward Arnold
Kessler, W. B., Salwasser, H., Cartwright, W. C. Jr., and Caplan, J. A. 1992. New perspectives for sustainable natural resources management. Ecological Applications 2:221–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krebs, C. J. (1972). Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance. New York: Harper and Row
Krebs, C. J. (1989). Ecological Methodology. New York: Harper and Row
Krebs, C. J., Boutin, S., Boonstra, R.et al. 1995. Impact of food and predation on the snowshoe hare cycle. Science 269:1112–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lachenbruch, P. A. (1975). Discriminant Analysis. New York: Hafner Press
Langenheim, J. H. 1995. Early history and progress of women ecologists: emphasis upon research contributions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2:1–53Google Scholar
Lawton, J. H. 1995. Ecological experiments with model systems. Science 269:328–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawton, J. H. 1997. The science and non-science of conservation biology. Oikos 79:3–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebreton, J. D., Burnham, K. P.Clobert, J., and Anderson, D. R. 1992. Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs 62:67–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lélé, S., and Norgaard, R. B. 1996. Sustainability and the scientist's burden. Conservation Biology 10:354–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, A. 1924. Grass, brush, timber, and fire in southern Arizona. Journal of Forestry 22:1–10Google Scholar
Levin, S. A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, E. B., and Madden, E. A. 1933. The point method for passture analysis. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture 46:267–79Google Scholar
Likens, G. E. 1985. An experimental approach for the study of ecosystems. Journal of Ecology 73:381–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likens, G. E. (ed.) (1989). Long-Term Studies in Ecology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
Likens, G. E. (1998). Limitations to intellectual progress in ecosystem science. In Successes, Limitations, and Frontiers in Ecosystem Science, eds. M. Pace and P. Groffman, pp. 247–71. New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRef
Lindström, E. R., Brainerd, S. M., Helldin, J. O., and Overskaug, K. (1995). Pine marten-red fox interactions: a case of interguild predation?Annales Zoologici Fennici 32:123–30Google Scholar
Litvaitis, J. A. 2001. Importance of early successional habitats to mammals in eastern forests. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:466–73Google Scholar
Lloyd, J., Mannan, R. W., DeStefano, S., and Kirkpatrick, C. 1998. The effects of mesquite invasion on a southeastern Arizona grassland bird community. Wilson Bulletin 110:403–8Google Scholar
Longood, R., and Simmel, A. (1972). Organizational resistance to innovation suggested by research. In Evaluating Action Programs, ed. C. Weiss, pp. 311–17. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
Lubchenco, J., Olson, A. M., Brubaker, L. R.et al. 1991. The Sustainable Biosphere Initiative: an ecological research agenda. Ecology 72:371–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, J. A., and Reynolds, J. F. (1988). Statistical Ecology: A Primer on Methods and Computing. New York: Wiley Interscience
Luken, J. O. (1990). Directing Ecological Succession. New York: Chapman and Hall
MacArthur, R. H. 1957. On the relative abundance of bird species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 43:293–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacNally, R. C. 1983. On assessing the significance of interspecific competition to guild structure. Ecology 64:1646–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison Botanical Congress. (1894). Congress Proceedings. Madison, Wisconsin, 23–24 August 1893
Magurran, A. E. (1988). Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
Mahoney, M. J. (1976). Scientist as Subject: The Psychological Imperative. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Press
Major, J. (1951). A functional factorial approach to plant ecology. Ecology 32:392–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manly, B. F. J. (1986). Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer. New York: Chapman and Hall
Margalef, R. (1951). La teoria de la infomacion en ecoloaia. Memorias Real Academy Gencia Artes Barcelona 32:373–449Google Scholar
Matter, W. J., and Mannan, R. W. (1989). More on gaining reliable knowledge: a comment. Journal of Wildlife Management 53:1172–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. M. (1975). Patterns of species abundance and diversity. In Ecology and Evolution of Communities, eds. M. L. and J. M. Diamond, pp. 81–120. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, Harvard University Press
McAuliffe, J. R. 1988. Markovian dynamics of simple and complex desert plant communities. American Naturalist 131:459–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClanahan, T. R., and Wolfe, R. W. 1993. Accelerating forest succession in a fragmented landscape: the role of birds and perches. Conservation Biology 7:279–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClaran, M. P., and McPherson, G. R. (1995). Can soil organic carbon isotopes be used to describe grass-tree dynamics at a savanna-grassland ecotone and within the savanna?Journal of Vegetation Science 6:857–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune, B. 1997. Influence of noisy environmental data on canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 78:2617–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, R. P. 1967. An index of diversity and the relation of certain concepts to diversity. Ecology 48:392–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, R. P. (1980). The relationship between succession and the recovery process in ecosystems. In The Recovery Process in Damaged Ecosystems, ed. J. Cairns, pp. 11–62. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Science Publishers
McPherson, G. R. (1997). Ecology and Management of North American Savannas. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press
McPherson, G. R. (2001a). Teaching and learning the scientific method. American Biology Teacher 63:242–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, G. R. (2001b). Invasive plants and fire: integrating science and management: the need for integration. Tall Timbers Research Station Miscellaneous publication 11:141–6Google Scholar
McPherson, G. R., and Weltzin, J. F. 2000. Disturbance and climate change in United States/Mexico borderland plant communities: a state-of-the-knowledge review. USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-50, Fort Collins, CO
McPherson, G. R., Boutton, T. W., and Midwood, A. J. (1993). Stable carbon isotope analysis of soil organic matter illustrates vegetation change at the grassland/woodland boundary in southeastern Arizona, USA. Oecologia 93:95–101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McPherson, G. R., Rasmussen, G. A., Wester, D. B., and Masters, R. A. (1991). Vegetation and soil zonation associated with Juniper pinchotii Sudw. trees. Great Basin Naturalist 51:316–24Google Scholar
Medawar, P. (1984). Pluto's Republic. New York: Oxford University Press
Mehlert, S., and McPherson, G. R. 1996. Effects of basal area or density as sampling metrics on oak woodland cluster analyses. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26:38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menard, S. (1995). Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Miles, J. (1979). Vegetation Dynamics. London: Chapman and Hall
Milligan, G. W., and Cooper, M. C. 1985. An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika 50:159–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minchin, P. R. 1987. An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 69:89–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mobius, K. (1877). Die Auster and die Austerwirtschaft. Berlin: Wiegumdt, Hempel and Parey
Molinari, J. 1989. A calibrated index for the measurement of evenness. Oikos 56:319–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. R. J., and Keddy, P. A. 1989. The relationships between species richness and standing crop in wetlands: the importance of scale. Vegetatio 79:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. R. J., Keddy, P. A., Gaudet, C. L., and Wisheu, I. C. (1989). Conservation of wetlands: do infertile wetlands deserve a higher priority?Biological Conservation 47:203–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, M. L., Marcot, B., and Mannan, R. W. (1998). Wildlife-Habitat Relationships, 2nd edn. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press
Motomura, I. 1947. Further notes on the law of geometrical progression of the population density in animal association. Physiological Ecology 1:55–60Google Scholar
Mueller-Dombois, D., and Ellenberg, H. (1974). Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. New York: Wiley
Mumme, R. L., Koenig, W. D., and Pitelka, F. A. (1983). Are acorn woodpecker territories aggregated?Ecology 64:1305–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nee, S., Harvey, P. H., and Cotgreave, P. (1992). Population persistence and the natural relationship between body size and abundance. In Conservation of Biodiversity for Sustainable Development, eds. O. T. Sandlund, K. Hindar and A. H. D. Brown, pp. 124–36. Olso, Sweden: Scandinavian University Press
Neilson, R. P. 1986. High resolution climatic analysis and Southwest biogeography. Science 232:27–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neilson, R. P., and Wullstein, L. H. 1983. Biogeography of two southwest American oaks in relation to atmospheric dynamics. Journal of Biogeography 10:275–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, I. 1991. Habitat variation and population regulation in sparrowhawks. Ibis 133:76–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, I. (1993). Age and site fidelity in female sparrowhawks, Accipiter nisus. Animal Behaviour 46:161–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, I. R., and Slatyer, R. O. 1980. The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio 43:5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donoghue, M., Boutin, S., Krebs, C. J., and Hofer, E. J. 1997. Numerical responses of coyotes and lynx to the snowshoe hare cycle. Oikos 80:150–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donoghue, M., Boutin, S., Krebs, C. J., Zuleta, G., Murphy, D. L., and Hofer, E. J. 1998. Functional responses of coyotes and lynx to the snowshoe hare cycle. Ecology 79:1193–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, E. P. (1983). Basic Ecology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders College Publishing
Odum, H. T., Cantlon, J. E. and Kornicker, L. S. (1960). An organization hierarchy postulate for the interpretation
Økland, R. H. (1996). Are ordination and constrained ordination alternative or complementary strategies in general ecological studies?Journal of Vegetation Science 7:289–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. H., Mittelbach, G. G., and Osenberg, C. W. 1995. Competition between predator and prey: resource-based mechanisms and implications for stage-structured dynamics. Ecology 76:1758–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlóci, L. (1978). Multivariate Analysis in Vegetation Research, 2nd edn. The Hague, The Netherlands: Junk
Owen-Smith, N. (1989). Morphological factors and their consequences for resource partitioning among African savanna ungulates: a simulation modelling approach. In Patterns in the Structure of Mammalian Communities, eds. D. W. Morris, Z. Abramsky, B. J. Fox and M. R. Willig, pp. 155–65. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University Press
Owen-Smith, N., and Novellie, P. (1982). What should a clever ungulate eat?American Naturalist 119:151–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, R. T. 1963. Trophic relationships of eight sympatric predatory gastropods. Ecology 44:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, M. W. 1993. Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74:2215–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, M. A., and Root, R. B. (1981). Insect herbivores limit habitat distribution of a native composite Machaeranthera canescens. Ecology 62:1390–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmenter, R. R., and MacMahon, J. A. 1988. Factors influencing species composition and population sizes in a ground beetle community (Carabidae): predation by rodents. Oikos 52:350–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parzen, E., Tanabe, K., and Kitagawa, G. (eds.). (1998). Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaikie. New York: Springer-Verlag
Pearson, K. 1901. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine, Sixth Series 2:559–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peet, R. K. 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5:285–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peet, R. K., Knox, R. G., Case, J. S., and Allen, R. B. 1988. Putting things in order: the advantages of detrended correspondence analysis. American Naturalist 131:924–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentecost, A. 1980. Aspects of competition in saxicolous lichen communities. Lichenologist 12:135–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, R. H. 1980. Useful concepts for predictive ecology. Synthese 43:257–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, R. H. (1991). A Critique for Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Peters, D. P., and Ceci, S. J. 1982. Resubmitting previously published articles: a study of the journal review process in psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:187–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, D. L., and Parker, V. T. (eds.) (1998). Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications. New York: Columbia University Press
Petren, K., and Case, T. J. 1996. An experimental demonstration of exploitation competition in an ongoing invasion. Ecology 77:118–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, S. T. A. 1976. Succession: an evolutionary interpretation. American Naturalist 110:107–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, S. T. A., and White, P. S. (1985). The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. New York: Academic Press
Pickett, S. T. A., Collins, S. L., and Armesto, J. J. 1987. A hierarchical consideration of causes and mechanisms of succession. Vegetatio 69:109–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, S. T. A., Kolasa, J., and Jones, C. G. (1994). Ecological Understanding: The Nature of Theory and the Theory of Nature. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Pielou, E. C. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology 13:131–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielou, E. C. (1975). Ecological Diversity. New York: Wiley
Pielou, E. C. (1977). Mathematical Ecology. New York: Wiley
Pielou, E. C. 1979. On A. J. Underwood's model for a random pattern. Oecologia 44:143–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielou, E. C. 1981. The usefulness of ecological models: a stock-taking. Quarterly Review of Biology 56:17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielou, E. C. (1984). The Interpretation of Ecological Data: A Primer on Classification and Ordination. New York: Wiley
Platt, J. R. 1964. Strong inference. Science 146:347–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podani, J. 1984. Spatial processes in the analysis of vegetation: theory and review. Acta Botanica Hungarica 30:75–118Google Scholar
Polis, G. A., and McCormick, S. J. 1986. Scorpions, spiders, and solpugids: predation and competition among distantly related taxa. Oecologia 71:111–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polis, G. A., Myers, C. A., and Holt, R. D. 1989. The evolution and ecology of intraguild predation: competitors that eat each other. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20:297–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, K. H., Nichols, J. D., Brownie, C., and Hines, J. E. (1990). Statistical inference for capture–recapture experiments. Wildlife Monographs 107–1–97Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books
Popper, K. (1981). Science, pseudo-science, and falsifiability. In On Scientific Thinking, eds. R. D. Tweney, M. E. Doherty and C. R. Mynatt, pp. 92–9. New York: Columbia University Press
Prentice, I. C. 1986. Vegetation responses to past climatic variation. Vegetatio 67:131–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentice, I. C., and van der Maarel, E. (1987). Theory and Models in Vegetation Science. Reprinted from Vegetatio 69. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: JunkCrossRef
Preston, F. W. 1948. The commonnes, and rarity, of species. Ecology 29:254–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prodgers, R. A. 1984. Collection and analysis of baseline vegetation data. Minerals and the Environment 6:101–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, C. J., and Scott, J. M. 1981. Estimating numbers of terrestrial birds. Studies in Avian Biology 6:1–630Google Scholar
Ramensky, L. G. 1930. Zur Methodik der vergleichenden Bearbeitung und Ordnung von Pflanzenlisten und anderen Objekten, die durch mehrere, verschiedenartig wirkende Faktoren bestimmt werden. Bieträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 18:269–304Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. L., and Schafer, D. W. (1997). The Statistical Sleuth: A course in Methods of Data Analysis. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press
Rexstad, E. A., Miller, D. D., Flather, C. H., Anderson, E. M., Hupp, J. W., and Anderson, D. R. 1988. Questionable multivariate statistical inference in wildlife habitat and community studies. Journal of Wildlife Management 52:794–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risser, P. G. (ed.) (1991). Long-Term Ecological Research: An International Perspective. New York: Wiley
Robinson, G. R., and Handel, S. N. 1993. Forest restoration on a closed landfill: rapid addition of new species by bird dispersal. Conservation Biology 7:271–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romesburg, H. C. 1981. Wildlife science: gaining reliable knowledge. Journal of Wildlife Management 45:293–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romesburg, H. C. (1984). Cluster Analysis. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publications
Rosenzweig, M. L., and Abramsky, A. 1986. Centrifugal community organization. Oikos 46:339–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusch, D. H., Meslow, E. C., Doerr, P. D., and Keith, L. B. 1972. Response of great horned owl populations to changing prey densities. Journal of Wildlife Management 36:282–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackville Hamilton, N. R. 1994. Replacement and additive designs for plant competition studies. Journal of Applied Ecology 31:599–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholes, R. J., and Archer, S. R. 1997. Tree–grass interactions in savannas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:517–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seber, G. A. F. (1982). The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters, 2nd edn. New York: Macmillan
Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press
Sharitz, R. R., Boring, L. R., Lear, D. H., Pinder, J. E. III. 1992. Integrating ecological concepts with natural resource management of southern forests. Ecological Applications 2:226–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shipley, B., and Keddy, P. A. 1987. The individualistic and community-unit concepts as falsifiable hypotheses. Vegetatio 69:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shreve, F. (1915). The Vegetation of a Desert Mountain Range as Conditioned by Climatic Factors. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 217
Shreve, F. 1922. Conditions indirectly affecting vertical distribution on desert mountains. Ecology 3:269–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. 1983. Competition theory, hypothesis-testing, and other community ecology buzzwords. American Naturalist 122:626–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. 1984. The great god of competition. The Sciences 24:17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, A. R. E. 1975. The resource limitation of trophic levels in tropical grassland ecosystems. Journal of Animal Ecology 44:497–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, A. R. E. (1977). The African Buffalo: A Study of Resource Limitation of Populations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Sinclair, A. R. E., Krebs, C. J., and Smith, J. N. M. 1982. Diet quality and food limitation in herbivores: the case of the snowshoe hare. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60:889–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smallwood, K. S. 1995. Scaling Swainson's hawk population density for assessing habitat use across an agricultural landscape. Journal of Raptor Research 29:172–8Google Scholar
Smallwood, K. S., and Schonewald, C. 1996. Scaling population density and spatial pattern for terrestrial, mammalian carnivores. Oecologia 105:329–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smartt, P. F. M., Meacock, S. E. and Lambert, J. M. (1974). Investigations into the properties of quantitative
Snaydon, R. W. (1991). Replacement or additive designs for competition studies?Journal of Applied Ecology 28:930–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snaydon, R. W. 1994. Replacement and additive designs revisited: comments on the review paper by N. R. Sackville Hamilton. Journal of Applied Ecology 31:784–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneath, P. H. A., and Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco, CA: W H Freeman
Sokal, R. R., and Michener, C. D. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 38:1409–38Google Scholar
Spiller, D. A., and Schoener, T. W. 1998. Lizards reduce spider species richness by excluding rare species. Ecology 79:503–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spurr, S. H. 1952. Origin of the concept of forest succession. Ecology 33:426–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, T. R. Jr. 1995. Ecosystem management and the arrogance of humanism. Conservation Biology 9:255–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapp, P. (1997). Community structure of shortgrass-prairie rodents: competition or risk of intraguild predation?Ecology 78:1519–30Google Scholar
Tansley, A. G. 1914. Presidential address. Journal of Ecology 2:194–202Google Scholar
Taylor, J. 1990. Questionable multivariate statistical inference in wildlife habitat and community studies: a comment. Journal of Wildlife Management 54:186–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braak, C. J. F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ter Braak, C. J. F. 1988. CANOCO. Technical Report LWA-88-02, Agricultural Mathematics Group. Wageningen, The Netherlands
Braak, C. J. F., and Prentice, I. C. (1988). A theory of gradient analysis. Advances in Ecological Research 18:271–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, F. R. III, and DeGraaf, R. M. 2001. Conservation approaches for woody, early successional communities in the eastern United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:483–94Google Scholar
Thompson, W. L., White, G. C., and Gowan, C. (1998). Monitoring Vertebrate Populations. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Tilman, D. (1982). Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Tilman, D. 1985. The resource-ratio hypothesis of plant succession. American Naturalist 125:827–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D. (1988). Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Tilman, D. 1990. Constraints and trade-offs: toward a predictive theory of competition and succession. Oikos 58:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D., and Wedin, D. 1991. Oscillations and chaos in the dynamics of a perennial grass. Nature 353:653–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, A. W., Keith, L. B., and Fischer, C. A. 1981. Population ecology of coyotes during a cyclic fluctuation of snowshoe hares. Journal of Wildlife Management 45:629–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trani, M. K., Brooks, R. T., Schmidt, T. L., Rudis, V. A., and Gabbard, C. M. 2001. Patterns and trends of early successional forests in the eastern United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:413–24Google Scholar
Turkington, R., and Jolliffe, P. A. (1996). Interference in Trifolium repens–Lolium perenne mixtures: short- and long-term relationships. Journal of Ecology 84:563–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A. J. 1978. The detection of non-random patterns of distribution of species along an environmental gradient. Oecologia 36:317–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A. J. 1995. Ecological research and (and research into) environmental management. Ecological Applications 5:232–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallentine, J. F. (1990). Grazing Management. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Auken, O. W., and Bush, J. K. (1997). Growth of Prosopis glandulosa in response to changes in aboveground and belowground interference. Ecology 78:1222–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maarel, E. 1979. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio 39:97–114Google Scholar
Groenewoud, H. 1992. The robustness of correspondence analysis, detrended correspondence analysis, and TWINSPAN analysis. Journal of Vegetation Science 3:239–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horne, B. 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. Journal of Wildlife Management 47:893–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, M. R., and Keith, L. B. 1981. Demographic response of experimental snowshoe hare populations to overwinter food shortage. Journal of Wildlife Managment 45:354–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickery, P. D., Hunter, M. L. Jr., and Wells, J. V. (1992a). Is density an indicator of breeding success?Auk 109:706–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickery, P. D., Hunter, M. L. Jr., and Wells, J. V. (1992b). Use of a new reproductive index to evaluate relationships between habitat quality and breeding success. Auk 109:697–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., Ehrlich, P. R., Ehrlich, A. H., and Matson, P. A. 1986. Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. BioScience 36:368–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, D. A., and Kassebaum, G. S. (1972). On biting the hand that feeds: some implications of correctional effectiveness. In Evaluating Action Programs, eds. C. Weiss, pp. 300–10. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
Ward, J. H. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58:236–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, R. M. P., and Krebs, C. J. 1985. Behavioural responses of lynx to declining snowshoe hare abundance. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63:2817–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wartenberg, D., Ferson, S., and Rohlf, F. J. 1987. Putting things in order: a critique of detrended correspondence analysis. American Naturalist 129:434–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, A. J., and Wilson, J. B. 1994. Plant community structure, and its relation to the vertical complexity of communities: dominance/diversity and spatial rank consistency. Oikos 70:91–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, J. 1990. Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5:360–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiner, J. 1995. On the practice of ecology. Journal of Ecology 83:153–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weltzin, J. K., Archer, S. R., and Heitschmidt, R. K. 1997. Small-mammal regulation of vegetation structure in a temperate savanna. Ecology 78:751–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werger, M. J. A., Louppen, J. M. W., and Eppink, J. H. M. 1983. Species performance and vegetation boundaries along an environmental gradient. Vegetatio 52:141–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, P. A. 1977. Colonization success of a “biennial” plant species: experimental field studies of species cohabitation and replacement. Ecology 58:840–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, N. E., and Reese, G. A. 1991. Comparison of some methods for collecting and analyzing data on aboveground net production and diversity of herbaceous vegetation in a northern Utah subalpine context. Vegetatio 96:145–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wester, D. B., and Wright, H. A. 1987. Ordination of vegetation change in Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico, USA. Vegetatio 72:27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westoby, M., Walker, B ., and Noy-Meir, I. 1989. Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. Journal of Range Management 42:266–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitham, T. G., Maschinski, J., Larson, K. C., and Paige, K. N. (1991). Plant responses to herbivory: the continuum from negative to positive and underlying physiological mechanisms. In Plant-Animal Interactions: Evolutionary Ecology in Tropical and Temperate Regions, eds. P. W. Price, T. M. Lewinsohn, G. W. Fernandes and W. W. Benson, pp. 227–56. New York: Wiley
Whittaker, R. H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs 26:1–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs 30:279–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. 1962. Classification of natural communities. Botanical Review 28:1–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. 1965. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science 147:250–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittaker, R. H. 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biological Review 42:207–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittaker, R. H. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. (1975). Communities and Ecosystems, 2nd edn. New York: Macmillan
Whittaker, R. H., and Niering, W. A. 1965. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: a gradient analysis of the south slope. Ecology 46:429–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H., and Niering, W. A. 1975. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. V. Biomass, production, and diversity along the elevation gradient. Ecology 56:771–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicklum, D., and Davies, R. W. (1995). Ecosystem health and integrity?Canadian Journal of Botany 73:997–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. K. 1983. Some observations on the use of discriminant analysis in ecology. Ecology 64:1283–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. G., McPherson, G. R., and Weltzin, J. F. (1999). Stress in wildland plants: implications for ecosystem structure and function. In Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress, revised and expanded edition, ed. M. Pessarakli, pp. 907–29. New York: Marcel DekkerCrossRef
Willson, M. F. 1981. Commentary: ecology and science. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 62:4–12Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. 1997. Biological communities as functionally organized units. Ecology 78:2018–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S., and Sober, E. 1989. Reviving the superorganism. Journal of Theoretical Biology 136:337–56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, J. B. 1991. Methods for fitting dominance/diversity curves. Journal of Vegetation Science 2:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. B. (1993). Would we recognize a broken-stick community if we found one?Oikos 67:181–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. B., Wells, T. C. E., Trueman, I. C.et al. 1996. Are there assembly rules for plant species abundance? An investigation in relation to soil resources and successional trends. Journal of Ecology 84:527–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisheu, I. C., and Keddy, P. A. 1992. Competition and centrifugal organization of plant communities: theory and tests. Journal of Vegetation Science 3:147–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witty, J. E., and Knox, E. G. 1964. Grass opal in some chestnut and forested soils in north-central Oregon. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 28:685–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wondzell, S., and Ludwig, J. A. 1995. Community dynamics of desert grasslands: influences of climate, landforms, and soils. Journal of Vegetation Science 6:377–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. J., and Biehl, C. C. 1982. Island biogeographic distributions: testing for random, regular, and aggregated patterns of species occurrence. American Naturalist 119:345–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeaton, R. I., Travis, J., and Gilinsky, E. 1977. Competition and spacing in plant communities: the Arizona upland association. Journal of Ecology 65:587–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, C. C. 1998. Defining the range: the development of carrying capacity in management practice. Journal of the History of Biology 31:61–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aarssen, L. W. (1989). Competitive ability and species coexistence: a ‘plant's-eye’ view. Oikos 56:386–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aarssen, L. W. (1992). Causes and consequences of variation in competitive ability in plant communities. Journal of Vegetation Science 3:165–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aarssen, L. W., and Epp, G. A. (1990). Neighbour manipulations in natural vegetation: a review. Journal of Vegetation Science 1:13–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aarssen, L. W., and Turkington, R. (1985). Competitive relations among species from pastures of different ages. Canadian Journal of Botany 63:2319–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, L. B., and McPherson, G. R. (1999). Nonnative grasses in southern Arizona: historical and contemporary perspectives. In A Century of Parks in Southern Arizona: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Research and Resource Management in Southern Arizona National Park Areas eds. L. Benson and B. Gebow, pp 3–6. Tucson, AZ: National Park Service
Adamec, R. E. 1976. The interaction of hunger and preying in the domestic cat. Behavioral Biology 18:263–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alatalo, R. V. 1981. Problems in the measurement of evenness in ecology. Oikos 37:199–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, T. F. H., and Hoekstra, T. W. 1990. The confusion between scale-defined levels and conventional levels of organization in ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 1:5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, T. F. H., and Hoekstra, T. W. (1992). Toward a Unified Ecology. New York: Columbia University Press
Allen, T. F. H., O'Neill, R. V., and Hoekstra, T. W. (1984). Interlevel relations in ecological research and management: some working principles from hierarchy theory. USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RM-110, Fort Collins, CO
Alpert, P. (1995). Incarnating ecosystem management. Conservation Biology 9:952–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. R., and Burnham, K. P. (1992). Data-based selection of an appropriate biological model: the key to modern data analysis. In Wildlife 2001: Populations, eds. D. R. McCullough and R. H. Barrett, pp. 16–30. New York: Elsevier Applied Science
Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., Gould, W. R., and Cherry, S. 2001. Concerns about finding effects that are actually spurious. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:311–16Google Scholar
Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., and Thompson, W. L. 2000. Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. Journal of Wildlife Management 64:912–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrewartha, H. G. (1961). Introduction to the Study of Animal Populations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Archer, S. (1989). Have southern Texas savannas been converted to woodlands in recent history?American Naturalist 134:545–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, S. 1990. Development and stability of grass/woody mosaics in a subtropical savanna parkland, Texas, USA. Journal of Biogeography 17:453–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, S. 1993. Vegetation dynamics in changing environments. Rangelands Journal 15:104–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, S. (1994). Woody plant encroachment into southwestern grasslands and savannas: rates, patterns, and proximate causes. In Ecological Implications of Livestock Herbivory in the West., eds. M. Vavra, W. Laycock and R. Pieper, pp. 13–68. Denver: Society for Range Management
Archer, S. (1995a). Harry Stobbs Memorial Lecture, (1993): herbivore mediation of grass–woody plant interactions. Tropical Grasslands 29:218–35Google Scholar
Archer, S. (1995b). Tree-grass dynamics in a Prosopis-thornscrub savanna parkland: reconstructing the past and predicting the future. Ecoscience 2:83–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrhenius, O. 1921. Species and area. Journal of Ecology 9:95–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, W., and Mitchell, P. 1989. A revised scheme for the classification of population interactions. Oikos 56:141–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Askins, R. A. 2001. Sustaining biological diversity in early successional communities: the challenge of managing unpopular habitats. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:407–12Google Scholar
Aspinall, D., and Milthorpe, F. L. 1959. An analysis of competition between barley and white persicaria. I. The effects on growth. Annals of Applied Biology 47:156–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, M. P. 1976. Non-linear species response models in ordination. Vegetatio 33:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, M. P. 1977. Use of ordination and other multivariate descriptive methods to study succession. Vegetatio 35:165–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, M. P. 1986. The theoretical basis of vegetation science. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1:161–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Austin, M. P., and Gaywood, M. J. 1994. Current problems of environmental gradients and species response curves in relation to continuum theory. Journal of Vegetation Science 5:473–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, M. P., Nicholls, A. O., Doherty, M. D., and Meyers, J. A. (1994). Determining species response functions to an environmental gradient by means of β-function. Journal of Vegetation Science 5:215–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahre, C. J. (1991). A Legacy of Change: Historic Human Impact on Vegetation in the Arizona Borderlands. Tucson AZ: University of Arizona Press
Banks, P. B., Dickman, C. R., and Newsome, A. E. 1998. Ecological costs of feral predator control: foxes and rabbits. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:766–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, M. S. 1947. The use of transformations. Biometrics 3:39–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartolome, J. W., Klukkert, S. E., and Barry, W. J. 1986. Opal phytoliths as evidence for displacement of native Californian grassland. Madroño 33:217–22Google Scholar
Bazzaz, F. A. 1975. Plant species diversity in old-field successional ecosystems. Ecology 56:485–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, C. 1990. The great chain of being. New Scientist 125:60–1Google Scholar
Beissinger, S. R., and Westphal, M. I. 1998. On the use of demographic models of population viability in endangered species management. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:821–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, E. A., Case, T. J., and Gilpin, M. E. 1984. Perturbation experiments in community ecology: theory and practice. Ecology 65:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betancourt, J. L., Van Devender, T. R., and Martin, P. S. (1990). Packrat Middens: The Last 40,000 Years of Biotic Change. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press
Bibby, C. J., Burgess, N. D., and Hill, D. A. (1992). Bird Census Techniques. London: Academic Press
Blackburn, T. M., and Gaston, K. J. 1996. Abundance–body size relationships: the area you census tells you more. Oikos 75:303–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boertje, R. D., Valkenburg, P., and McNay, M. E. 1996. Increases in moose, caribou, and wolves following wolf control in Alaska. Journal of Wildlife Management 60:474–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonham, C. D. (1989). Measurements for Terrestrial Vegetation. New York: Wiley
Boutin, S., Krebs, C. J., Sinclair, A. R.et al. (1995). Population changes of the vertebrate community during a snowshoe hare cycle in Canada's boreal forest. Oikos 74:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, C. J., Keith, L. B., and Fischer, C. A. 1976. Lynx responses to changing snowshoe hare densities in Alberta. Journal of Wildlife Management 40:416–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, R., and McCann, M. T. 1985. Spacing in acorn woodpeckers. Ecology 66:307–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briske, D. D., and Richards, J. H. (1995). Plant responses to defoliation: a physiologic, morphologic and demographic evaluation. In Wildland Plants: Physiological Ecology and Developmental Morphology, eds. D. J. Bedunah and R. E. Sosebee, pp. 635–710. Denver: Society for Range Management
Bronstein, J. L. 1994. Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:214–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, D. (1954). Methods of Surveying and Measuring Vegetation. Bucks, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural
Brown, J. R., and MacLeod, N. D. 1996. Integrating ecology into natural resource management policy. Environmental Management 30:289–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, R. D., and Clark, T. W. 1997. A practice-based approach to ecosystem management. Conservation Biology 11:48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., and Laake, J. L. (1993). Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. London: Chapman and Hall
Bulla, L. 1994. An index of evenness and its associated diversity measure. Oikos 70:167–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, J. W. (1983). Reply to a comment by R. L. Mumme et al.Ecology 64:1307–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, J. W., Roulston, D., and Shaw, E. 1982. Territorial aggregation: an ecological spacing strategy in acorn woodpeckers. Ecology 63:575–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (1992). Data-based selection of an appropriate biological model: the key to modern data analysis. In Wildlife 2001: Populations, eds. D. R. McCullough, and R. H. Barrett, pp. 16–30. New York: Elsevier Applied ScienceCrossRef
Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (1998). Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information Theoretic Approach. New York: Springer-Verlag
Burrows, C. J. (1990). Processes of Vegetation Change. London: Unwin Hyman
Burton, P. J., Balisky, A. C., Coward, L. P., Cumming, S. G., and Kneeshaw, D. D. 1992. The value of managing for biodiversity. Forestry Chronicle 68:225–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camargo, J. A. (1993). Must dominance increase with the number of subordinate species in competitive interactions?Journal of Theoretical Biology 161:537–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, B. D., Grime, J. P., Mackey, J. M. L., and Jalili, A. 1991. The quest for a mechanistic understanding of resource competition in plant communities: the role of experiments. Functional Ecology 5:241–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. J. 1995. Detecting regular spacing in patchy environments and estimating its density using nearest-neighbour graphical analysis. Oecologia 102:133–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canfield, R. H. 1941. Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation. Journal of Forestry 39:388–94Google Scholar
Cardinale, B. J., Nelson, K., and Palmer, M. A. 2000. Linking species diversity to the functioning of ecosystems: on the importance of environmental context. Oikos 91:175–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carleton, T. J., Stitt, R. H., and Nieppola, J. 1996. Constrained indicator species analysis (COINSPAN): an extension of TWINSPAN. Journal of Vegetation Science 7:125–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S. R. 1996. Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosytem ecology. Ecology 77:677–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S. R., Chisholm, S. W., Krebs, C. J., Schindler, D. W., and Wright, R. F. 1995. Ecosystem experiments. Science 269:324–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casado, M. A., Ramírez-Sanz, L., Castro, I., Miguel, J. M., and Pablo, C. L. 1997. An objective method for partitioning dendrograms based on entropy parameters. Plant Ecology 131:193–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo, D. (2001). Population estimates and behavioral analyses of managed cat colonies located in Miami-Dade County, Florida, Parks. M. S. Thesis, Miami: Florida International University
Causton, D. R. (1988). An Introduction to Vegetation Analysis: Principle, Practice, and Interpretation. London: Unwin Hyman
Cherry, S. 1996. A comparison of confidence interval methods for habitat use-availability studies. Journal of Wildlife Management 60:653–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherry, S. 1998. Statistical tests in publications of The Wildlife Society. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26:947–53Google Scholar
Clements, F. E. (1916). Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 242CrossRef
Clements, F. E., Weaver, J. E., and Hanson, H. C. (1929). Plant Competition: An Analysis of Community Functions. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 398
Cole, J., Lovett, G., and Findlay, S. (eds.) (1991). Comparative Analyses of Ecosystems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
Coleman, J. S., and Temple, S. A. 1993. Rural residents' free-ranging domestic cats: a survey. Wildlife Society Bulletin 21:381–90Google Scholar
Colinvaux, P. (1986). Ecology. New York: Wiley
Connell, J. H. (1961). The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology 42:710–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, J. H. (1990). Apparent vs. “real” competition in plants. In Perspectives on Plant Competition, eds. J. B. Grace and D. Tilman, pp. 9–26. New York: Academic Press
Connell, J. H., and Slatyer, R. O. 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. American Naturalist 111:1119–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conner, M. M., Jaeger, M. M., Weller, T. J., and McCullough, D. R. 1998. Effect of coyote removal on sheep depredation in northern California. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:690–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, E. F., and Simberloff, D. (1979). The assembly of species communities: chance or competition?Ecology 60:1132–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, J. G., Stutzman, T. W., Bowers, C. W., Brenner, K. A., and Irwin, L. L. 1995. Spherical densiometers produce biased estimates of forest canopy cover. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23:711–17Google Scholar
Cortwright, S. A. 1988. Intraguild predation and competition: an analysis of net growth shifts in larval amphibian prey. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66:1813–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottam, G., and Curtis, J. T. 1956. The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology 37:451–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowles, H. C. (1899). The ecological relations of the vegetation on the sand dunes of Lake Michigan. Parts 1, 2, 3, 4. Botanical Gazette 27:95–117, 167–202, 281–308, 361–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crooks, K. R., and Soulé, M. E. 1999. Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400:563–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, M. R. T. 1984. The continuity of upslope and downslope boundaries of species in a zoned community. Oikos 42:92–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daubenmire, R. (1968). Plant Communities. New York: Harper and Row
Daw, S. K., DeStefano, S., and Steidl, R. J. (1998). Does survey method bias the description of goshawk nest-site structure?Journal of Wildlife Management 62:1379–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, B. (1996). Discussion: should ecologists become Bayesians?Ecological Applications 6:1095–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeStefano, S. (1998). Determining the status of northern goshawks in the West: is our conceptual model correct?Journal of Raptor Research 32:342–8Google Scholar
DeStefano, S., and McCloskey, J. (1997). Does vegetation structure limit the distribution of northern goshawks in the Oregon Coast Ranges?Journal of Raptor Research 31:34–9Google Scholar
DeStefano, S., Thrailkill, J. A., Swindle, K. A., Miller, G. S., Woodbridge, B., and Meslow, E. C. (1995). Analysis of habitat quality and relative survival using capture–recapture data. In Integrating People and Wildlife for a Sustainable Future. eds. J. A. Bissonette and P. R. Krausman, pp. 466–9. Proceedings of the First International Wildlife Management Congress. Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society
Diamond, J. M. (1975). Assembly of species communities. In Ecology and Evolution of Communities, eds. M. L. Cody and J. M. Diamond, pp. 342–4. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, Harvard University Press
Diamond, J. M. (1986). Overview: laboratory experiments, field experiments and natural experiments. In Community Ecology, eds. J. M. Diamond and T. J. Case, pp. 3–22. New York: Harper and Row
Diamond, J. M., and Gilpin, M. 1982. Examination of the ‘null’ model of Connor and Simberloff for species co-occurrences on islands. Oecologia 52:64–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drake, J. A. (1990). Communities as assembled structures: do rules govern pattern?Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5:159–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drury, W. H., and Nisbet, I. C. 1973. Succession. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 54:331–68Google Scholar
Dueser, R. D., Porter, J. H., and Dooley, J. L., Jr. (1989). Direct tests for competition in North American rodent communities: synthesis and prognosis. In Patterns in the Structure of Mammalian Communities, eds. D. W. Morris, Z. Abramsky, B. J. Fox and M. R. Willig, pp. 105–25. Special Publication No. 28. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University Press
Dyksterhuis, E. J. 1949. Condition and management of rangeland based on quantitative ecology. Journal of Range Management 2:104–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzurec, R. S., Boutton, T. W., Caldwell, M. M., and Smith, B. N. 1985. Carbon isotope ratios of soil organic matter and their use in assessing community composition changes in Curlew Valley, Utah. Oecologia 66:17–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckblad, J. W. (1991). How many samples should be taken?BioScience 41:346–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egler, F. E. 1954. Vegetation science concepts. I. Initial floristic composition – a factor in old-field vegetation development. Vegetatio 4:412–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, E. W., and Seastedt, T. R. (1995). In Wildland Plants: Physiological Ecology and Developmental Morphology, eds. D. J. Bedunah and R. E. Sosebee, pp. 580–634. Denver: Society for Range Management
Forsman, E. D., S. DeStefano, S., Raphael, M. G., and Gutiérrez, R. J. (eds:) (1993). Demography of the northern spotted owl. Studies in Avian Biology 17:1–122Google Scholar
Fritts, H. C. (1976). Tree Rings and Climate. New York: Academic Press
Garrison, G. A. 1949. Uses and modifications for the “moosehorn” crown closure estimator. Journal of Forestry 47:733–5Google Scholar
Gauch, H. G., Jr. (1982). Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Gauch, H. G. Jr., and Stone, E. L. (1979). Vegetation and soil pattern in a mesophytic forest at Ithaca, New York. American Midland Naturalist 102:332–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauch, H. G. Jr., and Whittaker, R. H. 1981. Hierarchical classification of community data. Journal of Ecology 69:537–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gause, G. F. 1930. Studies on the ecology of the Orthoptera. Ecology 11:307–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavin, T. A. (1989). What's wrong with the questions we ask in wildlife research?Wildlife Society Bulletin 17:345–50Google Scholar
Gavin, T. A. 1991. Why ask “why”: the importance of evolutionary biology in wildlife science. Journal of Wildlife Management 55:760–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, M. E., and Diamond, J. M. 1982. Factors contributing to the non-randomness in species co-occurrences on islands. Oecologia 52:75–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gleason, H. A. 1917. The structure and development of the plant association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 43:463–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, H. A. 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 53:7–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golley, F. B. 1965. Structure and function of an old-field broomsedge community. Ecological Monographs 35:113–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golley, F. B. (1977). Ecological Succession. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross
Goodall, D. W. 1952. Some considerations of the use of point quadrats in the analysis of vegetation. Australian Journal of Scientific Research, Series B 5:1–41Google ScholarPubMed
Goodall, D. W. 1953. Point-quadrat methods for the analysis of vegetation. Australian Journal of Botany 1:457–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grace, J. B. 1995. In search of the Holy Grail: explanations for the coexistence of plant species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:263–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grace, J. B., and Tilman, D. (eds.) (1990). Perspectives on Plant Competition. New York: Academic Press
Grant, P. R., and Abbott, I. 1980. Interspecific competition, island biogeography and null hypotheses. Evolution 34:332–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grieg-Smith, P. (1983). Quantitative Plant Ecology, 3rd edn. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
Grime, J. P. (1979). Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. Chichester: Wiley
Grimm, V. (1994). Mathematical models and understanding in ecology. Ecological Modelling 75/76:641–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisebach, A. 1838. Ueber den Einfluss des Climas auf die Begranzung der naturlich Floren. Linnaea 12:159–200Google Scholar
Grubb, P. J. 1977. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biological Review 52:107–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grumbine, R. E. (1994). What is ecosystem management?Conservation Biology 8:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Q., and Rundel, P. W. 1997. Measuring dominance and diversity in ecological communities: choosing the right variables. Journal of Vegetation Science 8:405–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurevitch, J., and Collins, S. L. 1994. Experimental manipulation of natural plant communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:94–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gustafson, M. P. 1993. Intraguild predation among larval plethodontid salamanders: a field experiment in artificial stream pools. Oecologia 96:271–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hairston, N. G. Sr. (1989). Ecological Experiments: Purpose, Design, and Execution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hall, C. A. S. 1988. An assessment of several of the historically most influential theoretical models used in ecology and the data provided in their support. Ecological Modelling 43:5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, C. A. S. 1991. An idiosyncratic assessment of the role of mathematical models in environmental sciences. Environment International 17:507–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, L. S., Krausman, P. R., and Morrison, M. L. 1997. The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25:173–82Google Scholar
Harlow, L. L., Mulaik, S. A., and Steiger, J. H. (eds.). (1997). What If There Were No Significance Tests? Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Harper, J. L. (1977). Population Biology of Plants. New York: Academic Press
Harper, J. L. (1982). After description. In The Plant Community as a Working Mechanism ed. E. I. Newman, pp. 11–25. Oxford: Blackwell
Harris, L. D. (1990). The Fragmented Forest: Island Biogeography Theory and the Preservation of Biotic Diversity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Hastings, J. R., and Turner, R. M. (1965). The Changing Mile. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press
Hawking, S. W. (1988). A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. Bantam Books, New York
Hayek, L. -A. C., and Buzas, M. A. (1997). Surveying Natural Populations. New York: Columbia University Press
Heitschmidt, R. K., and Stuth, J. W. (eds.) (1991). Grazing Management: An Ecological Perspective. Portland, OR: Timber Press
Hill, M. O. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54:427–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, M. O. 1979. TWINSPAN: a FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Ithaca, NY: Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University
Hill, M. O. (1997). An evenness statistic based on the abundance-weighted variance of species proportions. Oikos 79:413–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, M. O., and Gauch, H. G. Jr. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, M. O., Bunce, R. G. H., and Shaw, M. W. 1975. Indicator species analysis, a divisive polythetic method of classification, and its application to a survey of native pinewoods in Scotland. Journal of Ecology 63:597–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. (1998). Managing ecological systems and processes. In Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications, eds. D. L. Peterson and V. T. Parker, pp. 459–84. New York: Columbia University Press
Hogeweg, P. 1976. Iterative character weighing in numerical taxonomy. Computers in Biology and Medicine 6:199–211CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holl, K. D. (1998). Do bird perching structures elevate seed rain and seedling establishment in abandoned tropical pasture?Restoration Ecology 6:253–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology 24:417–41, 498–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M. L. Jr. 1989. Aardvarks and arcadia: two principles of wildlife research. Wildlife Society Bulletin 17:350–1Google Scholar
Hunter, W. C., Buehler, D. A., Canterbury, R. A., Confer, J. L., and Hamel, P. B. 2001. Conservation of disturbance-dependent birds in eastern North America. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:440–55Google Scholar
Hurlbert, S. H. 1971. The non-concept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52:577–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurlbert, S. H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54:187–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. R. (1959). Homage to Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many kinds of animals?American Naturalist 93:145–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E. 1961. The paradox of the plankton. American Naturalist 95:137–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. A., and Somers, K. M. 1991. Putting things in order: the ups and downs of detrended correspondence analysis. American Naturalist 137:704–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, D. H. (1986). Guanacaste National Park: Tropical Ecological and Cultural Restoration. San José, Costa Rica: Editorial Universidad Estatal a Distancia
Joern, A. 1986. Experimental study of avian predation on coexisting grasshopper populations (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in a sandhills grassland. Oikos 46:243–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. H. 1999. The insignificance of statistical significance testing. Journal of Wildlife Management 63:763–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. A., and Gutsell, S. L. 1994. Fire frequency models, methods and interpretations. Advances in Ecological Research 25:239–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jongman, R. H. G., ter Braak, C. J. F., and van Tongeren, O. F. R. (1987). Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Pudoc
Joyce, L. A. 1992. The life cycle of the range condition concept. Journal of Range Management 46:132–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalisz, P. J., and Stone, E. L. 1984. The longleaf pine islands of the Ocala National Forest, Florida: a soil study. Ecology 65:1743–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keddy, P. A. (1989). Competition. New York: Chapman and Hall
Keddy, P. A. (1990). Competitive hierarchies and centrifugal organization in plant communities. In Perspectives on Plant Competition, eds. J. B. Grace and D. Tilman, pp. 265–90. New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Keddy, P. A. 1992. Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 3:157–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keddy, P. A., and MacLellan, P. 1990. Centrifugal organization in forests. Oikos 59:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiter, R. B. 1995. Greater Yellowstone: managing a charismatic ecosystem. Natural Resources and Environmental Issues 3:75–85Google Scholar
Keith, L. B. (1963). Wildlife's Ten-year Cycle. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press
Keith, L. B. 1983. Role of food in hare population cycles. Oikos 40:385–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, L. B., Cary, J. R., Rongstad, O. J., and Brittingham, M. C. 1984. Demography and ecology of a declining snowshoe hare population. Wildlife Monograph 90:1–43Google Scholar
Kenkel, N. C., Juhász-Nagy, P., and Podani, J. 1989. On sampling procedures in population and community ecology. Vegetatio 83:195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, P. L. (1997). The northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis atricapillus): is there evidence of a population decline?Journal of Raptor Research 31:95–106Google Scholar
Kent, M., and Coker, P. (1992). Vegetation Description and Analysis: A Practical Approach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
Kershaw, K. A., and Looney, J. H. H. (1985). Quantitative and Dynamic Plant Ecology. London: Edward Arnold
Kessler, W. B., Salwasser, H., Cartwright, W. C. Jr., and Caplan, J. A. 1992. New perspectives for sustainable natural resources management. Ecological Applications 2:221–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krebs, C. J. (1972). Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance. New York: Harper and Row
Krebs, C. J. (1989). Ecological Methodology. New York: Harper and Row
Krebs, C. J., Boutin, S., Boonstra, R.et al. 1995. Impact of food and predation on the snowshoe hare cycle. Science 269:1112–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lachenbruch, P. A. (1975). Discriminant Analysis. New York: Hafner Press
Langenheim, J. H. 1995. Early history and progress of women ecologists: emphasis upon research contributions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2:1–53Google Scholar
Lawton, J. H. 1995. Ecological experiments with model systems. Science 269:328–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawton, J. H. 1997. The science and non-science of conservation biology. Oikos 79:3–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebreton, J. D., Burnham, K. P.Clobert, J., and Anderson, D. R. 1992. Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs 62:67–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lélé, S., and Norgaard, R. B. 1996. Sustainability and the scientist's burden. Conservation Biology 10:354–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, A. 1924. Grass, brush, timber, and fire in southern Arizona. Journal of Forestry 22:1–10Google Scholar
Levin, S. A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, E. B., and Madden, E. A. 1933. The point method for passture analysis. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture 46:267–79Google Scholar
Likens, G. E. 1985. An experimental approach for the study of ecosystems. Journal of Ecology 73:381–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likens, G. E. (ed.) (1989). Long-Term Studies in Ecology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
Likens, G. E. (1998). Limitations to intellectual progress in ecosystem science. In Successes, Limitations, and Frontiers in Ecosystem Science, eds. M. Pace and P. Groffman, pp. 247–71. New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRef
Lindström, E. R., Brainerd, S. M., Helldin, J. O., and Overskaug, K. (1995). Pine marten-red fox interactions: a case of interguild predation?Annales Zoologici Fennici 32:123–30Google Scholar
Litvaitis, J. A. 2001. Importance of early successional habitats to mammals in eastern forests. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:466–73Google Scholar
Lloyd, J., Mannan, R. W., DeStefano, S., and Kirkpatrick, C. 1998. The effects of mesquite invasion on a southeastern Arizona grassland bird community. Wilson Bulletin 110:403–8Google Scholar
Longood, R., and Simmel, A. (1972). Organizational resistance to innovation suggested by research. In Evaluating Action Programs, ed. C. Weiss, pp. 311–17. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
Lubchenco, J., Olson, A. M., Brubaker, L. R.et al. 1991. The Sustainable Biosphere Initiative: an ecological research agenda. Ecology 72:371–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, J. A., and Reynolds, J. F. (1988). Statistical Ecology: A Primer on Methods and Computing. New York: Wiley Interscience
Luken, J. O. (1990). Directing Ecological Succession. New York: Chapman and Hall
MacArthur, R. H. 1957. On the relative abundance of bird species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 43:293–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacNally, R. C. 1983. On assessing the significance of interspecific competition to guild structure. Ecology 64:1646–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison Botanical Congress. (1894). Congress Proceedings. Madison, Wisconsin, 23–24 August 1893
Magurran, A. E. (1988). Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
Mahoney, M. J. (1976). Scientist as Subject: The Psychological Imperative. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Press
Major, J. (1951). A functional factorial approach to plant ecology. Ecology 32:392–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manly, B. F. J. (1986). Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer. New York: Chapman and Hall
Margalef, R. (1951). La teoria de la infomacion en ecoloaia. Memorias Real Academy Gencia Artes Barcelona 32:373–449Google Scholar
Matter, W. J., and Mannan, R. W. (1989). More on gaining reliable knowledge: a comment. Journal of Wildlife Management 53:1172–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. M. (1975). Patterns of species abundance and diversity. In Ecology and Evolution of Communities, eds. M. L. and J. M. Diamond, pp. 81–120. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, Harvard University Press
McAuliffe, J. R. 1988. Markovian dynamics of simple and complex desert plant communities. American Naturalist 131:459–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClanahan, T. R., and Wolfe, R. W. 1993. Accelerating forest succession in a fragmented landscape: the role of birds and perches. Conservation Biology 7:279–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClaran, M. P., and McPherson, G. R. (1995). Can soil organic carbon isotopes be used to describe grass-tree dynamics at a savanna-grassland ecotone and within the savanna?Journal of Vegetation Science 6:857–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune, B. 1997. Influence of noisy environmental data on canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 78:2617–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, R. P. 1967. An index of diversity and the relation of certain concepts to diversity. Ecology 48:392–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, R. P. (1980). The relationship between succession and the recovery process in ecosystems. In The Recovery Process in Damaged Ecosystems, ed. J. Cairns, pp. 11–62. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Science Publishers
McPherson, G. R. (1997). Ecology and Management of North American Savannas. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press
McPherson, G. R. (2001a). Teaching and learning the scientific method. American Biology Teacher 63:242–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, G. R. (2001b). Invasive plants and fire: integrating science and management: the need for integration. Tall Timbers Research Station Miscellaneous publication 11:141–6Google Scholar
McPherson, G. R., and Weltzin, J. F. 2000. Disturbance and climate change in United States/Mexico borderland plant communities: a state-of-the-knowledge review. USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-50, Fort Collins, CO
McPherson, G. R., Boutton, T. W., and Midwood, A. J. (1993). Stable carbon isotope analysis of soil organic matter illustrates vegetation change at the grassland/woodland boundary in southeastern Arizona, USA. Oecologia 93:95–101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McPherson, G. R., Rasmussen, G. A., Wester, D. B., and Masters, R. A. (1991). Vegetation and soil zonation associated with Juniper pinchotii Sudw. trees. Great Basin Naturalist 51:316–24Google Scholar
Medawar, P. (1984). Pluto's Republic. New York: Oxford University Press
Mehlert, S., and McPherson, G. R. 1996. Effects of basal area or density as sampling metrics on oak woodland cluster analyses. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26:38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menard, S. (1995). Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Miles, J. (1979). Vegetation Dynamics. London: Chapman and Hall
Milligan, G. W., and Cooper, M. C. 1985. An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika 50:159–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minchin, P. R. 1987. An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 69:89–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mobius, K. (1877). Die Auster and die Austerwirtschaft. Berlin: Wiegumdt, Hempel and Parey
Molinari, J. 1989. A calibrated index for the measurement of evenness. Oikos 56:319–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. R. J., and Keddy, P. A. 1989. The relationships between species richness and standing crop in wetlands: the importance of scale. Vegetatio 79:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. R. J., Keddy, P. A., Gaudet, C. L., and Wisheu, I. C. (1989). Conservation of wetlands: do infertile wetlands deserve a higher priority?Biological Conservation 47:203–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, M. L., Marcot, B., and Mannan, R. W. (1998). Wildlife-Habitat Relationships, 2nd edn. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press
Motomura, I. 1947. Further notes on the law of geometrical progression of the population density in animal association. Physiological Ecology 1:55–60Google Scholar
Mueller-Dombois, D., and Ellenberg, H. (1974). Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. New York: Wiley
Mumme, R. L., Koenig, W. D., and Pitelka, F. A. (1983). Are acorn woodpecker territories aggregated?Ecology 64:1305–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nee, S., Harvey, P. H., and Cotgreave, P. (1992). Population persistence and the natural relationship between body size and abundance. In Conservation of Biodiversity for Sustainable Development, eds. O. T. Sandlund, K. Hindar and A. H. D. Brown, pp. 124–36. Olso, Sweden: Scandinavian University Press
Neilson, R. P. 1986. High resolution climatic analysis and Southwest biogeography. Science 232:27–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neilson, R. P., and Wullstein, L. H. 1983. Biogeography of two southwest American oaks in relation to atmospheric dynamics. Journal of Biogeography 10:275–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, I. 1991. Habitat variation and population regulation in sparrowhawks. Ibis 133:76–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, I. (1993). Age and site fidelity in female sparrowhawks, Accipiter nisus. Animal Behaviour 46:161–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, I. R., and Slatyer, R. O. 1980. The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio 43:5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donoghue, M., Boutin, S., Krebs, C. J., and Hofer, E. J. 1997. Numerical responses of coyotes and lynx to the snowshoe hare cycle. Oikos 80:150–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donoghue, M., Boutin, S., Krebs, C. J., Zuleta, G., Murphy, D. L., and Hofer, E. J. 1998. Functional responses of coyotes and lynx to the snowshoe hare cycle. Ecology 79:1193–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, E. P. (1983). Basic Ecology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders College Publishing
Odum, H. T., Cantlon, J. E. and Kornicker, L. S. (1960). An organization hierarchy postulate for the interpretation
Økland, R. H. (1996). Are ordination and constrained ordination alternative or complementary strategies in general ecological studies?Journal of Vegetation Science 7:289–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. H., Mittelbach, G. G., and Osenberg, C. W. 1995. Competition between predator and prey: resource-based mechanisms and implications for stage-structured dynamics. Ecology 76:1758–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlóci, L. (1978). Multivariate Analysis in Vegetation Research, 2nd edn. The Hague, The Netherlands: Junk
Owen-Smith, N. (1989). Morphological factors and their consequences for resource partitioning among African savanna ungulates: a simulation modelling approach. In Patterns in the Structure of Mammalian Communities, eds. D. W. Morris, Z. Abramsky, B. J. Fox and M. R. Willig, pp. 155–65. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University Press
Owen-Smith, N., and Novellie, P. (1982). What should a clever ungulate eat?American Naturalist 119:151–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, R. T. 1963. Trophic relationships of eight sympatric predatory gastropods. Ecology 44:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, M. W. 1993. Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74:2215–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, M. A., and Root, R. B. (1981). Insect herbivores limit habitat distribution of a native composite Machaeranthera canescens. Ecology 62:1390–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmenter, R. R., and MacMahon, J. A. 1988. Factors influencing species composition and population sizes in a ground beetle community (Carabidae): predation by rodents. Oikos 52:350–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parzen, E., Tanabe, K., and Kitagawa, G. (eds.). (1998). Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaikie. New York: Springer-Verlag
Pearson, K. 1901. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine, Sixth Series 2:559–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peet, R. K. 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5:285–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peet, R. K., Knox, R. G., Case, J. S., and Allen, R. B. 1988. Putting things in order: the advantages of detrended correspondence analysis. American Naturalist 131:924–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentecost, A. 1980. Aspects of competition in saxicolous lichen communities. Lichenologist 12:135–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, R. H. 1980. Useful concepts for predictive ecology. Synthese 43:257–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, R. H. (1991). A Critique for Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Peters, D. P., and Ceci, S. J. 1982. Resubmitting previously published articles: a study of the journal review process in psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:187–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, D. L., and Parker, V. T. (eds.) (1998). Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications. New York: Columbia University Press
Petren, K., and Case, T. J. 1996. An experimental demonstration of exploitation competition in an ongoing invasion. Ecology 77:118–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, S. T. A. 1976. Succession: an evolutionary interpretation. American Naturalist 110:107–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, S. T. A., and White, P. S. (1985). The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. New York: Academic Press
Pickett, S. T. A., Collins, S. L., and Armesto, J. J. 1987. A hierarchical consideration of causes and mechanisms of succession. Vegetatio 69:109–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, S. T. A., Kolasa, J., and Jones, C. G. (1994). Ecological Understanding: The Nature of Theory and the Theory of Nature. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Pielou, E. C. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology 13:131–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielou, E. C. (1975). Ecological Diversity. New York: Wiley
Pielou, E. C. (1977). Mathematical Ecology. New York: Wiley
Pielou, E. C. 1979. On A. J. Underwood's model for a random pattern. Oecologia 44:143–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielou, E. C. 1981. The usefulness of ecological models: a stock-taking. Quarterly Review of Biology 56:17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielou, E. C. (1984). The Interpretation of Ecological Data: A Primer on Classification and Ordination. New York: Wiley
Platt, J. R. 1964. Strong inference. Science 146:347–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podani, J. 1984. Spatial processes in the analysis of vegetation: theory and review. Acta Botanica Hungarica 30:75–118Google Scholar
Polis, G. A., and McCormick, S. J. 1986. Scorpions, spiders, and solpugids: predation and competition among distantly related taxa. Oecologia 71:111–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polis, G. A., Myers, C. A., and Holt, R. D. 1989. The evolution and ecology of intraguild predation: competitors that eat each other. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20:297–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, K. H., Nichols, J. D., Brownie, C., and Hines, J. E. (1990). Statistical inference for capture–recapture experiments. Wildlife Monographs 107–1–97Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books
Popper, K. (1981). Science, pseudo-science, and falsifiability. In On Scientific Thinking, eds. R. D. Tweney, M. E. Doherty and C. R. Mynatt, pp. 92–9. New York: Columbia University Press
Prentice, I. C. 1986. Vegetation responses to past climatic variation. Vegetatio 67:131–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentice, I. C., and van der Maarel, E. (1987). Theory and Models in Vegetation Science. Reprinted from Vegetatio 69. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: JunkCrossRef
Preston, F. W. 1948. The commonnes, and rarity, of species. Ecology 29:254–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prodgers, R. A. 1984. Collection and analysis of baseline vegetation data. Minerals and the Environment 6:101–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, C. J., and Scott, J. M. 1981. Estimating numbers of terrestrial birds. Studies in Avian Biology 6:1–630Google Scholar
Ramensky, L. G. 1930. Zur Methodik der vergleichenden Bearbeitung und Ordnung von Pflanzenlisten und anderen Objekten, die durch mehrere, verschiedenartig wirkende Faktoren bestimmt werden. Bieträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 18:269–304Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. L., and Schafer, D. W. (1997). The Statistical Sleuth: A course in Methods of Data Analysis. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press
Rexstad, E. A., Miller, D. D., Flather, C. H., Anderson, E. M., Hupp, J. W., and Anderson, D. R. 1988. Questionable multivariate statistical inference in wildlife habitat and community studies. Journal of Wildlife Management 52:794–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risser, P. G. (ed.) (1991). Long-Term Ecological Research: An International Perspective. New York: Wiley
Robinson, G. R., and Handel, S. N. 1993. Forest restoration on a closed landfill: rapid addition of new species by bird dispersal. Conservation Biology 7:271–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romesburg, H. C. 1981. Wildlife science: gaining reliable knowledge. Journal of Wildlife Management 45:293–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romesburg, H. C. (1984). Cluster Analysis. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publications
Rosenzweig, M. L., and Abramsky, A. 1986. Centrifugal community organization. Oikos 46:339–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusch, D. H., Meslow, E. C., Doerr, P. D., and Keith, L. B. 1972. Response of great horned owl populations to changing prey densities. Journal of Wildlife Management 36:282–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackville Hamilton, N. R. 1994. Replacement and additive designs for plant competition studies. Journal of Applied Ecology 31:599–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholes, R. J., and Archer, S. R. 1997. Tree–grass interactions in savannas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:517–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seber, G. A. F. (1982). The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters, 2nd edn. New York: Macmillan
Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press
Sharitz, R. R., Boring, L. R., Lear, D. H., Pinder, J. E. III. 1992. Integrating ecological concepts with natural resource management of southern forests. Ecological Applications 2:226–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shipley, B., and Keddy, P. A. 1987. The individualistic and community-unit concepts as falsifiable hypotheses. Vegetatio 69:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shreve, F. (1915). The Vegetation of a Desert Mountain Range as Conditioned by Climatic Factors. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 217
Shreve, F. 1922. Conditions indirectly affecting vertical distribution on desert mountains. Ecology 3:269–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. 1983. Competition theory, hypothesis-testing, and other community ecology buzzwords. American Naturalist 122:626–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. 1984. The great god of competition. The Sciences 24:17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, A. R. E. 1975. The resource limitation of trophic levels in tropical grassland ecosystems. Journal of Animal Ecology 44:497–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, A. R. E. (1977). The African Buffalo: A Study of Resource Limitation of Populations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Sinclair, A. R. E., Krebs, C. J., and Smith, J. N. M. 1982. Diet quality and food limitation in herbivores: the case of the snowshoe hare. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60:889–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smallwood, K. S. 1995. Scaling Swainson's hawk population density for assessing habitat use across an agricultural landscape. Journal of Raptor Research 29:172–8Google Scholar
Smallwood, K. S., and Schonewald, C. 1996. Scaling population density and spatial pattern for terrestrial, mammalian carnivores. Oecologia 105:329–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smartt, P. F. M., Meacock, S. E. and Lambert, J. M. (1974). Investigations into the properties of quantitative
Snaydon, R. W. (1991). Replacement or additive designs for competition studies?Journal of Applied Ecology 28:930–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snaydon, R. W. 1994. Replacement and additive designs revisited: comments on the review paper by N. R. Sackville Hamilton. Journal of Applied Ecology 31:784–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneath, P. H. A., and Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco, CA: W H Freeman
Sokal, R. R., and Michener, C. D. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 38:1409–38Google Scholar
Spiller, D. A., and Schoener, T. W. 1998. Lizards reduce spider species richness by excluding rare species. Ecology 79:503–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spurr, S. H. 1952. Origin of the concept of forest succession. Ecology 33:426–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, T. R. Jr. 1995. Ecosystem management and the arrogance of humanism. Conservation Biology 9:255–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapp, P. (1997). Community structure of shortgrass-prairie rodents: competition or risk of intraguild predation?Ecology 78:1519–30Google Scholar
Tansley, A. G. 1914. Presidential address. Journal of Ecology 2:194–202Google Scholar
Taylor, J. 1990. Questionable multivariate statistical inference in wildlife habitat and community studies: a comment. Journal of Wildlife Management 54:186–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braak, C. J. F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ter Braak, C. J. F. 1988. CANOCO. Technical Report LWA-88-02, Agricultural Mathematics Group. Wageningen, The Netherlands
Braak, C. J. F., and Prentice, I. C. (1988). A theory of gradient analysis. Advances in Ecological Research 18:271–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, F. R. III, and DeGraaf, R. M. 2001. Conservation approaches for woody, early successional communities in the eastern United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:483–94Google Scholar
Thompson, W. L., White, G. C., and Gowan, C. (1998). Monitoring Vertebrate Populations. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Tilman, D. (1982). Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Tilman, D. 1985. The resource-ratio hypothesis of plant succession. American Naturalist 125:827–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D. (1988). Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Tilman, D. 1990. Constraints and trade-offs: toward a predictive theory of competition and succession. Oikos 58:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D., and Wedin, D. 1991. Oscillations and chaos in the dynamics of a perennial grass. Nature 353:653–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, A. W., Keith, L. B., and Fischer, C. A. 1981. Population ecology of coyotes during a cyclic fluctuation of snowshoe hares. Journal of Wildlife Management 45:629–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trani, M. K., Brooks, R. T., Schmidt, T. L., Rudis, V. A., and Gabbard, C. M. 2001. Patterns and trends of early successional forests in the eastern United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:413–24Google Scholar
Turkington, R., and Jolliffe, P. A. (1996). Interference in Trifolium repens–Lolium perenne mixtures: short- and long-term relationships. Journal of Ecology 84:563–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A. J. 1978. The detection of non-random patterns of distribution of species along an environmental gradient. Oecologia 36:317–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A. J. 1995. Ecological research and (and research into) environmental management. Ecological Applications 5:232–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallentine, J. F. (1990). Grazing Management. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Auken, O. W., and Bush, J. K. (1997). Growth of Prosopis glandulosa in response to changes in aboveground and belowground interference. Ecology 78:1222–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maarel, E. 1979. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio 39:97–114Google Scholar
Groenewoud, H. 1992. The robustness of correspondence analysis, detrended correspondence analysis, and TWINSPAN analysis. Journal of Vegetation Science 3:239–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horne, B. 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. Journal of Wildlife Management 47:893–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, M. R., and Keith, L. B. 1981. Demographic response of experimental snowshoe hare populations to overwinter food shortage. Journal of Wildlife Managment 45:354–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickery, P. D., Hunter, M. L. Jr., and Wells, J. V. (1992a). Is density an indicator of breeding success?Auk 109:706–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickery, P. D., Hunter, M. L. Jr., and Wells, J. V. (1992b). Use of a new reproductive index to evaluate relationships between habitat quality and breeding success. Auk 109:697–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., Ehrlich, P. R., Ehrlich, A. H., and Matson, P. A. 1986. Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. BioScience 36:368–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, D. A., and Kassebaum, G. S. (1972). On biting the hand that feeds: some implications of correctional effectiveness. In Evaluating Action Programs, eds. C. Weiss, pp. 300–10. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
Ward, J. H. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58:236–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, R. M. P., and Krebs, C. J. 1985. Behavioural responses of lynx to declining snowshoe hare abundance. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63:2817–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wartenberg, D., Ferson, S., and Rohlf, F. J. 1987. Putting things in order: a critique of detrended correspondence analysis. American Naturalist 129:434–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, A. J., and Wilson, J. B. 1994. Plant community structure, and its relation to the vertical complexity of communities: dominance/diversity and spatial rank consistency. Oikos 70:91–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, J. 1990. Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5:360–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiner, J. 1995. On the practice of ecology. Journal of Ecology 83:153–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weltzin, J. K., Archer, S. R., and Heitschmidt, R. K. 1997. Small-mammal regulation of vegetation structure in a temperate savanna. Ecology 78:751–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werger, M. J. A., Louppen, J. M. W., and Eppink, J. H. M. 1983. Species performance and vegetation boundaries along an environmental gradient. Vegetatio 52:141–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, P. A. 1977. Colonization success of a “biennial” plant species: experimental field studies of species cohabitation and replacement. Ecology 58:840–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, N. E., and Reese, G. A. 1991. Comparison of some methods for collecting and analyzing data on aboveground net production and diversity of herbaceous vegetation in a northern Utah subalpine context. Vegetatio 96:145–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wester, D. B., and Wright, H. A. 1987. Ordination of vegetation change in Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico, USA. Vegetatio 72:27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westoby, M., Walker, B ., and Noy-Meir, I. 1989. Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. Journal of Range Management 42:266–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitham, T. G., Maschinski, J., Larson, K. C., and Paige, K. N. (1991). Plant responses to herbivory: the continuum from negative to positive and underlying physiological mechanisms. In Plant-Animal Interactions: Evolutionary Ecology in Tropical and Temperate Regions, eds. P. W. Price, T. M. Lewinsohn, G. W. Fernandes and W. W. Benson, pp. 227–56. New York: Wiley
Whittaker, R. H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs 26:1–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs 30:279–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. 1962. Classification of natural communities. Botanical Review 28:1–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. 1965. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science 147:250–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittaker, R. H. 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biological Review 42:207–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittaker, R. H. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. (1975). Communities and Ecosystems, 2nd edn. New York: Macmillan
Whittaker, R. H., and Niering, W. A. 1965. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: a gradient analysis of the south slope. Ecology 46:429–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H., and Niering, W. A. 1975. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. V. Biomass, production, and diversity along the elevation gradient. Ecology 56:771–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicklum, D., and Davies, R. W. (1995). Ecosystem health and integrity?Canadian Journal of Botany 73:997–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. K. 1983. Some observations on the use of discriminant analysis in ecology. Ecology 64:1283–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. G., McPherson, G. R., and Weltzin, J. F. (1999). Stress in wildland plants: implications for ecosystem structure and function. In Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress, revised and expanded edition, ed. M. Pessarakli, pp. 907–29. New York: Marcel DekkerCrossRef
Willson, M. F. 1981. Commentary: ecology and science. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 62:4–12Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. 1997. Biological communities as functionally organized units. Ecology 78:2018–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S., and Sober, E. 1989. Reviving the superorganism. Journal of Theoretical Biology 136:337–56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, J. B. 1991. Methods for fitting dominance/diversity curves. Journal of Vegetation Science 2:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. B. (1993). Would we recognize a broken-stick community if we found one?Oikos 67:181–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. B., Wells, T. C. E., Trueman, I. C.et al. 1996. Are there assembly rules for plant species abundance? An investigation in relation to soil resources and successional trends. Journal of Ecology 84:527–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisheu, I. C., and Keddy, P. A. 1992. Competition and centrifugal organization of plant communities: theory and tests. Journal of Vegetation Science 3:147–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witty, J. E., and Knox, E. G. 1964. Grass opal in some chestnut and forested soils in north-central Oregon. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 28:685–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wondzell, S., and Ludwig, J. A. 1995. Community dynamics of desert grasslands: influences of climate, landforms, and soils. Journal of Vegetation Science 6:377–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. J., and Biehl, C. C. 1982. Island biogeographic distributions: testing for random, regular, and aggregated patterns of species occurrence. American Naturalist 119:345–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeaton, R. I., Travis, J., and Gilinsky, E. 1977. Competition and spacing in plant communities: the Arizona upland association. Journal of Ecology 65:587–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, C. C. 1998. Defining the range: the development of carrying capacity in management practice. Journal of the History of Biology 31:61–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Guy R. McPherson, University of Arizona, Stephen DeStefano, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
  • Book: Applied Ecology and Natural Resource Management
  • Online publication: 11 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606489.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Guy R. McPherson, University of Arizona, Stephen DeStefano, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
  • Book: Applied Ecology and Natural Resource Management
  • Online publication: 11 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606489.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Guy R. McPherson, University of Arizona, Stephen DeStefano, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
  • Book: Applied Ecology and Natural Resource Management
  • Online publication: 11 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606489.007
Available formats
×