Ackerman, F. and Heinzerling, L., Priceless: On Knowing the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing, The New Press, 2004.
,Advisory Committee on Pesticides, A Guide to Pesticide Regulation in the UK and the Role of the Advisory Committee on Pesticides, ACP 19 (311/2005). Available at: www.pesticides.gov.uk/acp.asp (accessed 1 March 2010).
,Advisory Committee on Pesticides, Minutes of the 290th Meeting of the Advisory Committee on Pesticides (ACP) on 4 March 2002. Available at: www.pesticides.gov.uk/acp.asp?id=269 (accessed 1 March 2010).
Applegate, J. S., ‘The Perils of Unreasonable Risk: Information, Regulatory Policy and Toxic Substances Control’, Col L. Rev., 91:2 (1991).
Applegate, J. S., ‘Worst Things First: Risk, Information, and Regulatory Structure in Toxic Substances Control’, Yale J. on Reg., 9 (1992).
Applegate, J. S., ‘A Beginning and not an End in Itself: The Role of Risk Assessment in Environmental Decision-Making’, U. Cin. L. Rev., 63 (1994/1995).
Applegate, J. S., ‘Beyond the Usual Suspects: The Use of Citizens Advisory Boards in Environmental Decision-making’, Ind. L.J., 73 (1998).
Applegate, J. S., ‘The Precautionary Preference: An American Perspective on the Precautionary Principle’, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 6:3 (2000).
Anderson, E., Value in Ethics and Economics, Harvard University Press, 1993.
Anderson, F., Chirba-Martin, M. A., Elliott, E. D., Farina, C., Gellhorn, E., Graham, J. D., Gray, C. Boyden, Holmstead, J., Levin, R. M., Noah, L., Rhyne, K. and Wiener, J. B., ‘Regulatory Improvement Legislation: Risk Assessment, Cost-Benefit Analysis, and Judicial Review’, Duke Env. L. & Pol'y F., 11 (2000).
Antonopolou, L. and Meurs, P., ‘The Precautionary Principle within European Union Public Health Policy: The Implementation of the Principle under Conditions of Supranationality and Citizenship’, Health Policy, 66 (2003).
Arrow, K. I., ‘Know a Hawk from a Handsaw’, in Szenberg, M. (ed.), Eminent Economists: Their Life and Philosophies, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Asselt, M. B. A. van, Perspectives on Uncertainty and Risk: The PRIMA Approach to Decision Support, Kluwer, 2000.
Asselt, M. B. A. van and Vos, E., ‘The Precautionary Principle and the Uncertainty Paradox’, Journal of Risk Research, 9 (2006), 4.
Atik, J. and Wirth, D. A., ‘Science and International Trade – Third Generation Scholarship’, B.C Int'l & Comp. L. Rev., 26 (2003).
Babich, A., ‘Too Much Science in Environmental Law’, Colum. J. Envl. L., 28 (2003).
Beck, U., Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Sage Publishers, 1992.
Beck, U., World Risk Society. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 1999.
Bengtsson, B., Speciell fastighetsrätt, Iustus, 1999.
Bengtsson, B., Miljöbalkens återverkningar, Norstedts, 2001.
Bergkamp, L., ‘Understanding the Precautionary Principle (Parts I and II)’, Env. Liability, 10 (2002).
Bergkvist, P., ‘PM inför beslut om fortsatt godkännande för EBDC-medel’ (not published).
Bergqvist, U., et al., ‘Exponering för radiofrekventa fält och mobiltelefoni’, SSE rapport: 09 (April 2001) (2001).
Bernasconi-Osterwalder, N.et al., Environment and Trade: A Guide to WTO Jurisprudence, Earthscan, 2006.
Bernstein, P. L., Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1996.
Bisgaard, C., ‘Assessing the Standard of Review for Trade-Restrictive Measures in the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement’, in Brown Weiss, E. and Jackson, J. H., Reconciling Environment and Trade, Transnational Publishers, 2001.
Blank, M., ‘The Precautionary Principle Must Be Guided by EMF Research’, Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 25 (2006).
Bodansky, D., ‘Scientific Uncertainty and the Precautionary Principle’, Environment 33 (1991) 4–5.
Bodansky, D., ‘Commentary: The Precautionary Principle’, Environment, 34 (1992), 4–5.
Bohanes, J., ‘Risk Regulation in WTO Law: A Procedure-based Approach to the Precautionary Principle’, Colum. J. Transnat. L., 40 (2001–2002).
Bossche, P. van den, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization, Cambridge University Press, 1st edn 2005, 2nd edn 2008.
Bossche, P. van den and Prevost, D., ‘The Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phyto-sanitary Measures’, in P. Mcrory, , Appleton, A. and Plummer, M. (eds.), The World Trade Organisation: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis, Springer, 2005.
Breyer, S., Breaking the Vicious Circle: Towards Effective Risk Regulation, Harvard University Press, 1993.
Brickman, R., Jasanoff, S. and Ilgen, T., Controlling Chemicals: The Politics of Regulation in Europe and the United States, Cornell University Press, 1985.
Burgess, A., Cellular Phones, Public Fears, And a Culture of Precaution, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Button, C., The Power to Protect: Trade, Health and Uncertainty in the WTO, Hart, 2004.
Calster, G. van, International and EU Trade Law: The Environmental Challenge. Cameron/May, 2000.
Cameron, D. and Abouchar, J., ‘The Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law’, in Freestone, D. and Hey, E. (eds.), The Precautionary Principle in International Law: The Challenge of Implementation, Kluwer Law International, 1996.
Cameron, J., ‘The Precautionary Principle in International Law’, in O'Riordan, T., Cameron, J. and Jordan, A. (eds.), Reinterpreting the Precautionary Principle, Cameron May, 2001.
Cane, P., Administrative Law, Oxford University Press, 2004.
Carson, R., Silent Spring, Houghton Mifflin, 1962.
Cecot, C., Hahn, R., Renda, A. and Schrefler, L., ‘An Evaluation of the Quality of Impact Assessment in the European Union with Lessons for the US and the EU’, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Working Paper, December 2007.
Chittenden, F., Ambler, T. and Xiao, D., ‘Impact Assessment in the EU’, in S. Weatherill, Better Regulation, Hart Publishing, 2007.
Christoforou, T., ‘Science, Law and Precaution in Dispute Resolutions on Health and Environmental Protection: What Role for Scientific Experts?’, in J. Bourrinet and S. Maljean-Dubois, Le commerce international des organismes génétiquement modifies, Aix-Marseilles/Paris, 2002.
Coggon, D., ‘The Precautionary Principle and Pesticide Regulation’, Chairman's Paper for ACP Open Meeting 2001. Available at: www.pesticides.gov.uk/acp.asp?id=490 (accessed 1 March 2010).
Covello, V. T., ‘Risk Communication’, in P. Calow, , Handbook of Environmental Risk Assessment and Management, Wiley Blackwell, 1998.
Cranor, C. F., ‘Asymmetric Information, the Precautionary Principle, and Burdens of Proof’, in Raffensperger, C. and Tickner, J. (eds.), Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle, Island Press, 1999.
Croley, P. and Jackson, J. H., ‘WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review and Deference to National Governments’, AM. J. Int'l L., 90 (1996).
Croley, S., ‘White House Review of Agency Rulemaking: An Empirical Investigation’, U. Chi. L. Rev., 70 (2003).
Damon, W. A., ‘The Alkali Act: Its Administration and Relation to Chemical Industry’, Journal of the Society of Chemical Industry, 54:50 (2007), 1070–5. Published online 29 May 2007.
,Danish Environmental Assessment Institute, Getting Proportions Right: How Far Should the EU Impact Assessments Go?, Environmental Assessment Institute, 2006.
Sadeleer, N., ‘Procedures for Derogations from the Principle of Approximation of Laws under Article 95 EC’, CMLRev, 40 (2003).
Sadeleer, N., ‘The Precautionary Principle in European Community Health and Environmental Law’, ELJ, 12:2 (2006).
Sadeleer, N., Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Approaches from the Nordic Countries, the EU and the USA, Earthscan, 2007.
Sadeleer, N., ‘The Precautionary Principle in European Community Health and Environment Law: Sword or Shield for the Nordic Countries?’, in Sadeleer, N., Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Approaches from the Nordic Countries, EU and USA, Earthscan, 2007.
,Department for Environment: Food and Rural Affairs UK. A Guide to Risk Assessment and Risk Management for Environmental Protection, HMSO, 1995.
,Department for Environment: Food and Rural Affairs UK News Release, 19 April 2002. Available at: www.hse.gov.uk/press/2002/e02076.htm (accessed 1 March 2010).
,Department for Environment: Food and Rural Affairs UK Figure 2.1. Available at:www.defra.gov.uk/environment/quality/risk/eramguide/(accessed 1 March 2010).
,Department for Environment: Food and Rural Affairs UKGuidelines for Environmental Risk Assessment and Management. Available at:www.defra.gov.uk/environment/quality/risk/eramguide/ (accessed 1 March 2010).
Dinham, B., ‘Why Paraquat Should Be Banned’, Outlook on Pest Management, December 2004.
Douglas, M. and Wildawsky, A., Risk and Culture, University of California Press, 1992.
Douma, W., ‘The Precautionary Principle; Its Application in International, European and Dutch Law’, Proefshchrift Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 6 January 2003.
Dunkelberger, E. and Merrill, R. A., ‘The Delaney Paradox Re-examined: Regulating Pesticides in Processed Foods’, Food & Drug L. J., 48 (1993).
Duriodé, B., ‘Plastic Panics: European Risk Regulation in the Aftermath of BSE’, in Morris, J. (ed.), Rethinking Risk and the Precautionary Principle, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000.
Duriodé, B., ‘The True Cost of Precautionary Chemicals Regulation’, Risk Analysis, 23:2 (2003).
Dworkin, R., A Matter of Principle, Harvard University Press, 1985.
Ehlerman, C.-D., ‘The Internal Market Following the Single European Act’, CMLRev, 24 (1987).
Ehrlich, P. R. and Ehrlich, A., The End of Affluence: A Blueprint for your Future, Ballantine Books, 1974.
Ekelöf, P. O., Rättegång IV, Norstedts, 2009.
Ellis, E. (ed.), The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe, Oxford University Press, 1999.
Eriksson, M. Band, ‘Placera masten rätt: Miljö och naturskyddskrav på 3G-utbyggnaden’, Svenska Naturskyddsföreningen Rapport, Svenska Natuskyddsföreningen 2003.
Fidler, D. P., International Law and Public Health, Transnational Publishers Inc., 2000.
Finkel, A. M. and Golding, D., Worst Things First? The Debate over Risk-Based National Environmental Priorities, Resources for the Future, 1994.
Fischoff, B., ‘Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: Twenty Years of Process’, Risk Analysis, 15:2 (1995), 133–45.
Fisher, E., ‘Is the Precautionary Principle Justiciable?’, J. Env. L., 13:3 (2001).
Fisher, E., ‘The Rise of the Risk Commonwealth and the Challenge for Administrative Law’, Public Law (2003), 455–78.
Fisher, E., Risk Regulation and Administrative Constitutionalism, Hart Publishing, 2007.
Fisher, E., et al., Implementing the Precautionary Principle, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006.
Fitzmaurice, M., Contemporary Issues in International Environmental Law, Edgar Elgar Publishing, 2009.
Flick, C., ‘The Movement for Smoke Abatement in 19th-Century Britain’, Technology and Culture, 21:1 (1980), 29–50.
Ford, R., ‘Planning For a New Telecommunications Network in the UK’, J.P.L., September (2001).
Freestone, D. and Hey, E. (eds.), The Precautionary Principle in International Law: The Challenge of Implementation, Kluwer Law International, 1996.
Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J. R., Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy, Kluwer, 1990.
Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J. R., ‘Science for the Post-Normal Age’, Futures, 25:7 (1993), 739–55.
Furedi, F. ‘Precautionary Culture and the Rise of Possibilistic Risk Assessment’, Erasmus Law Review, 2:2 (2009).
Geiser, K., ‘Establish a General Duty of Precaution in Environmental Protection Policies in the United States: A Proposal’, in Raffensperger, C. and Tickner, J. (eds.), Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle, Island Press, 1999.
Gerber, B. M., ‘Case Comment: City of Rancho Palos Verdes, California v. Abrams’, Harv. Envtl. L. Rev., 30 (2006).
Gocha, N., Rohm and Haas Comments on DeZäta Granulat Registration withdrawal by KemI, 18 January 1995 (not published).
Goldstein, B. D., ‘The Interface Between Science and Law’, Colum. J. Envtl. L., 14 (1989).
Goldstein, B. D. and Carruth, R. S., ‘Science in the Regulatory Process: Implications of the Precautionary Principle for Environmental Regulation in the United States: Examples from the Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments’, Law & Contemp. Prob., 66 (2003).
Graf, M. W., ‘Regulating Pesticide Pollution in California Under the 1986 Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Exposure Act (Proposition 65)’, Ecology L.Q., 28 (2001).
Graham, J. D., ‘Legislative Approaches to Achieving More Protection Against Risk at Less Cost’, U Chi L F 13, (1997).
Graham, J. D., ‘The Perils of the Precautionary Principle: Lessons from the American and European Experience’, Speech before the Heritage Foundation, Washington DC, 20 October 2003. Available at: www.heritage.org/Research/Regulation/hl818.cfm (accessed 1 March 2010).
Graham, J. D., ‘The Evolving Regulatory Role of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget’, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1:2 (2007), 171–91.
Graham, J. D. and Hartwell, J. K., ‘The Risk Management Approach’, in: Graham, J. D. and Hartwell, J. K. (eds.), The Greening of Industry, Harvard University Press, 1997.
Graham, J. D. and Hsia, S.. ‘Europe's Precautionary Principle: Promise and Pitfalls’, Journal of Risk Research, 5:4 (2002).
Graham, J. D. and Wiener, J. B., Risk versus Risk: Tradeoffs in Protecting Health and the Environment, Harvard University Press, 1995.
Grando, M. T., ‘Allocating the Burden of Proof in WTO Disputes: A Critical Analysis, Journal of International Economic Law, 9:3 (2006).
Grasso, L., ‘Cellular Telephones and the Potential Hazards of RF Radiation: Responses to the Fear and Controversy’, Va. J.L. & Tech., 3 (1998).
Grimeaud, D. Hoofdstuk. ‘The Precautionary Principle in International Environmental and Trade Law’, in Faure, M. and Vos, E. (eds.), Juridische afbakening van het voorzorgbeginsel: mogelijkheden en grenzen, Achtergrondstudie voor de Nederlandse Gezondheidsraad, No. A03/03, 2003.
Gustin, T. L., ‘The Perpetual Growth and Controversy of the Cellular Superhighway: Cellular Tower Siting and the Telecommunications Act of 1969’, Wm. Mitchell L. Rev., 23 (1997).
Hafner, K., ‘First Come Cellphone Towers, then the Babel’, New York Times, Section 1, Page 1, 1 May 2005.
Hahn, R. W. and Hird, J. A., ‘The Costs and Benefits of Regulation: Review and Synthesis’, Yale J. on Reg., 8 (1991).
Hahn, R. W. and Sunstein, C. R., ‘A New Executive Order for Improving Federal Regulation? Deeper and Wider Cost-Benefit Analysis’, Chicago Working Paper in Law & Economics, No. 150, 04/2002, p. 1. Available at: www.law.uchicago.edu/Lawecon/wp1–50.html (accessed 1 March 2010).
Haigh, N., ‘The Introduction of the Precautionary Principle into the UK’, in O'Riordan, T. and Cameron, J. (eds.), Interpreting the Precautionary Principle, Earthscan, 1994.
Hajer, M., Environmental Discourse, Clarendon Press, 1995.
Hammitt, J. K., ‘Improving Comparative Risk Analysis’, Duke Envtl. L. & Pol'y F, 8 (1997).
Hanekamp, J. C., ‘Neither Acceptable nor Certain – Cold War Antics for 21st Century Precautionary Culture’, Erasmus Law Review, 2:2 (2009).
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law, Clarendon Press, 1961.
,Health Protection Agency. AGNIR reports. Available at: www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAweb&HPAwebStandard/HPAweb_C/1195733801791 (accessed 1 March 2010).
Heinzerling, L., ‘Regulatory Costs of Mythic Proportions’, Yale Law Journal, 107 (1981).
Hilson, C., ‘Planning Law and Public Perceptions of Risk: Evidence of Concern or Concern Based on Evidence’, J.P.L (2004).
Treasury, HM, The Green Book, Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government, 2003. Available at: www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/green_book_complete.pdf (accessed 1 March 2010).
Treasury, HM, Managing Risks to the Public: Appraisal Guidance, 2005. Available at: www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/consult_greenbook_index.htm (accessed 1 March 2010).
Horn, H. and Mavroidis, P. C., ‘Burden of Proof in Environmental Disputes in the WTO: Legal Aspects’, EELR, 18:2 (2009).
,House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee Publications, Third Report, printed on 2 September 1999, Annex 2. Available at: www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmsctech/489/48902.htm (accessed 1 March 2010).
,House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee Publications, Scientific Advice, Risk and Evidence Based Policy Making, 7th Report of Session 2005–2006, Vol. I, Authority of the House of Commons, 2006. Available at: www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmselect/cmsctech/900/900-i.pdf (accessed 1 March 2010).
,House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee Publications, ‘Government Policy on the Management of Risk’, 5th Report of Session 2005–2006, Vol. I and II: Minutes of Evidence, Authority of the House of Lords, 2006. Available at: www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldeconaf/183/183ii.pdf (accessed 1 March 2010).
Howse, R., ‘Democracy, Science, and Free Trade: Risk Regulation on Trial at the World Trade Organization’, Mich. L. Rev., 98 (2000), 2333–8.
,Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones. Homepage. Available at: www.iegmp.org.uk (accessed 1 March 2010).
,Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones ‘Mobile Phones and Health’, 11 May 2000, 1.30–1.48. Available at: www.iegmp.org.uk/report/text.htm (accessed 1 March 2010).
,International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, ‘Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300 GHZ)’, Health Physics, 74:4 (1998).
,International Program on Chemical Safety (INCHEM) Poison Information Monograph (PIM) Nr. 399. Available at: www.inchem.org/documents/pims/chemical/pim399.htm (accessed 1 March 2010).
Jaeger, C. C., Renn, O., Rosa, E. A. and Webler, T., Risk, Uncertainty and Rational Action, Earthscan, 2001.
Jans, J. ‘Proportionality Revisited’, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 27:3 (2000), 239–65.
Jasanoff, S.The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers, Harvard University Press, 1990.
Jasanoff, S.Science at the Bar, Harvard University Press, 1995.
Johnston, B. L., Environmental Policy and Public Health, CRC Press, 2007.
Johnston, J. C., ‘A Game Theoretic Analysis of Alternative Institutions for Regulatory Cost-Benefit Analysis’, U. Pa. L Rev., 150:5 (2002).
Johnston, J. C., ‘Paradoxes of the Safe Society: A Rational Actor Approach to the Reconceptualization of Risk and the Reformation of Risk Regulation’, U. Pa. L Rev., 151:5 (2003).
Jordan, A., ‘The Precautionary Principle in the European Union’, in O'Riordan, T., Cameron, J. and Jordan, A. (eds.), Reinterpreting the Precautionary Principle, Cameron May, 2001.
Jowell, J. ‘Of Vires and Vacuums: The Constitutional Context of Judicial Review’, in Forsyth, C. (ed.), Judicial Review and the Constitution, Hart Publishing. 2000.
Kagan, E. ‘Presidential Administration’, Harv. L. Rev., 114 (2001).
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk’, Econometrica, 47:2 (1979).
Kannan, P. M., ‘The Precautionary Principle: More than a Cameo Appearance in United States Environmental Law’, Wm. & Mary Envtl. L & Pol'y Rev, 31 (2007).
Karlsson, M., ‘The Precautionary Principle, Swedish Chemicals Policy and Sustainable Development’, Journal of Risk Research, 9:4 (2006), 344–8.
Kelly, C. R., ‘Power, Linkage and Accommodation: The WTO as an International Actor and Its Influence on Other Actors and Regimes’, Berkely J. Int'l L., 24 (2006).
,KEMI Swedish Chemicals Agency, Principles for Identifying Unacceptable Pesticides, KemI Report, No. 4/ 92, National Swedish Chemical Inspectorate, 1992.
,KEMI Swedish Chemicals Agency, Statement of 16 September 2003. Available at: www.kemi.se/templates/News____3090.aspx (accessed 1 March 2010).
Kent, C. W. and Allen, F. W., ‘An Overview of Risk-Based Priority Setting at EPA’, in Finkel, A. M. and Golding, D., Worst Things First? The Debate Over Risk-Based National Environmental Priorities, Resources for the Future, 1994.
Keynes, J. M. ‘The General Theory of Employment’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 51 (1937).
King, J. ‘Application of Risk Assessment in Policy and Legislation in the European Union and in the United Kingdom’, in Calow, P., Handbook of Environmental Risk Assessment and Management, Blackwell Science, 1998.
Kiss, A. C. and Shelton, D.., International Environmental Law, Transnational Publishers, 1994.
Knight, F., Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Houghton Mifflin Co., 1933.
Krämer, L., EC Environmental Law, Sweet and Maxwell, 2000.
Kriebel, D., ‘How Much Evidence is Enough? Conventions of Causal Inference’, Law & Contemp. Probs., 72 (2009).
Kuhn, T., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, 1962.
Ladeur, K.-H. ‘The Introduction of the Precautionary Principle into EU Law: A Pyrrhic Victory for Environmental and Public Health Law? Decision-making Under Conditions of Complexity in Multi-level Political Systems’, CMLR, 40:6 (2003).
Lavranos, N., ‘The Epilogue in the MOX Plant Dispute: An End Without Findings’, EELR, 18:3 (2009).
Lehrberg, B., Praktisk juridisk metod, Iustus Förlag, 2001.
Lemons, J., Schrader-Frechette, K. and Cranor, C., ‘The Precautionary Principle: Scientific Uncertainty and Type I and Type II Errors’, Foundations of Science, 2:2 (1997).
Lindblom, P. H., Miljöprocess Del II, Iustus, 2002.
Loewenberg, S., ‘Precaution is for Europeans’, New York Times, Section 4, p. 14, 18 May 2003.
Löfstedt, R., ‘The Changing Character of Regulation: A Comparison of Europe and the United States’, Risk Analysis, 21 (2002).
Löfstedt, R., ‘Risk Communication and Management in the Twenty-First Century’, 7:3 International Public Management Journal 335, 2004.
Löfstedt, R., ‘The Swing of the Regulatory Pendulum in Europe: From Precautionary Principle to (Regulatory) Impact Analysis’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 28:2 (2004).
Löfstedt, R., Risk Management in Post-Trust Societies, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
Löfstedt, R., ‘The Plateau-ing of the European Better Regulation Agenda: An analysis of Activities Carried out by the Barroso Commission’, Journal of Risk Research, 10:4 (2007).
Löfstedt, R. and Fairman, R., ‘Scientific Peer Review to Inform Regulatory Decision Making: A European Perspective’, Risk Analysis, 26:1 (2006), 25–31.
Löfstedt, R. and Vogel, D. ‘The Changing Character of Consumer and Environmental Regulation: A Comparison of Europe and the United States’, Risk Analysis, 21:3 (2001).
Lorde Martin, S., ‘Communication Tower Sitings: the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the Battle for Community Control’, B.T.L.J., 12:2 (1997). Available at: www.law.berkeley.edu/journals/btlj/articles/vol12/index.htm (accessed 1 March 2010).
MacCormack, G., ‘Scandinavian Realism’, The Juridical Review, 1970.
Madeley, J., ‘Paraquat – Syngenta's controversial herbicide’, SSNC Report 2002, pp. 10–12. Available at www.chemsec.org/images/stories/news_publications/rap-inter-syngenta-paraquat.pdf (accessed 1 March 2010).
Majone, G., ‘The Precautionary Principle and Regulatory Impact Analysis’. Paper presented at the International Seminar on Regulatory Impact Analysis. Rome 15 June 2001.
Marchant, G. E. and Mossman, K. L., Arbitrary and Capricious: The Precautionary Principle in the European Union Courts, American Enterprise Institute Press, 2004.
Marr, S., The Precautionary Principle in the Law of the Sea: Modern Decision Making in International Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2003.
McElveen, J. C. and Amatea, C., ‘Risk Symposium: Legislating Risk Assessment’, U. Cin. L. Rev., 63 (1995).
McNelis, N., ‘EU Communication on the Precautionary Principle’, JIEL, 3:3 (2000).
Meadows, D.et al., The Limits to Growth: A report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind, Universe Books, 1974.
Meddelandeblad från Socialstyrelsen till kommunala miljö- och hälsoskyddsnämnder, länsstyrelser och andra berörda myndigheter, June 2008. Available at: www.fas.se/upload/dokument/särskilda_områden/eloverkanslighet/2008–1-11_2008112.pdf (accessed 1 March 2010).
Meuwese, A. C. M., ‘Inter-institutionalising EU Impact Assessment’, in Weatherill, S., Better Regulation, Hart Publishing, 2007.
Michanek, G., ‘Att väga säkert och vikten av att säkra’, in Basse, E. M.et al. (eds.), Fågelperspektiv på rättsordningen: Vänbok till Staffan Westerlund, Iustus Förlag, 2002.
Michanek, G., ‘Chapter 7: Sweden’, in Sadeleer, N. (ed.), Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Approaches form the Nordic Countries, EU and USA, Earthscan, 2007.
Miles, T. J. and Sunstein, C. R., ‘The Real World of Arbitrariness Review’, John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No. 368, November 2007.
Miljömål: Environmental Objectives Portal, Summary of environmental policy goals. Available at: www.miljomal.nu (accessed 1 March 2010).
Miljøstyrelsen, Vedrørende Dithane DG, 9 June 1993 (available from the author).
Miller, M. L. Esq., ‘Pesticides’, in Sullivan, T. F. P., Environmental Law Handbook, Government Institutes, 2003.
Montemarano, A., ‘The Delaney Paradox Resurfaces: Regulating Pesticides as Food Additives Under Federal Law’, Rutgers L.J., 25 (1993/1994).
Mooney, C., The Republican War on Science, Basic Books, 2005.
Morris, J., Rethinking Risk and the Precautionary Principle, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000.
Moss, D. A., When All Else Fails: Government as the Ultimate Risk Manager, Harvard University Press, 2002.
Nash, J. R., ‘Standing and the Precautionary Principle’, Colum. L. Rev., 108 (2008).
,National Radiological Protection Board, Report by the Board of NRPB, ‘Mobile Phones and Health’, Doc. of the NRPB, 15:5 (2004).
,National Research Council, Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, National Academy Press, 1983.
,National Research Council, The New Oxford Dictionary, Oxford University Press, 1998.
Newsweek, , ‘The Battle Over Caution’, Newsweek, 13 December 2003. Available at: www.newsweek.com/id/60863 (accessed 1 March 2010).
Nilsson, A., Att byta ut kemikalier, Nerenius och Santerus, 1997.
Nilsson, A., ‘The Precautionary Principle in Swedish Chemicals Law and Policy’, in Sadeleer, N., Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Approaches from the Nordic Countries, EU and USA, Earthscan, 2007.
Nilsson, R., ‘Science and Politics in the Regulation of Chemicals in Sweden’, in Gough, M. (ed.), Politicizing Science: The Alchemy of Policymaking, Hoover Institutions Press, 2003.
O'Brien, M., Making Better Environmental Decisions: An Alternative to Risk Assessment, MIT Press, 2000.
O'Riordan, C. and Jordan, A., The History and Contemporary Significance of the Precautionary Principle, in Interpreting the Precautionary Principle, Earthscan, 1994.
,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Council Recommendation C(90)164 on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, 31 January 1991.
Pak, M., ‘Note & Comment: An IQ Test for Federal Agencies? Judicial Review of the Information and Quality Act Under the APA’, Wash. L. Rev., 80 (2005).
Palmeter, D., ‘The WTO Standard of Review in Health and Safety’, in Bermann, G. A. and Mavroidis, P. C., Trade and Human Health and Safety, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Patterson, A., Risk Regulation and Scientific Expertise in the United Kingdom: The Precautionary Principle in Public Policy, Mellen Press, 2008.
Pauwelyn, J., ‘The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures As Applied in the First Three SPS Disputes’, JIEL, 2:4 (1999).
Pauwelyn, J., ‘The Use of Experts in WTO Dispute Settlement’, ICLQ, 51 (2002), 328–9.
Pauwelyn, J., ‘Expert Advice in WTO Dispute Settlement’, in Bermann, G. A. and Mavroidis, P. C., Trade and Human Health and Safety, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Peng, J.et al., ‘The Herbicide Paraquat Induces Dopaminergic Nigral Paoptosis through Sustained Activation of the JNK Pathway’, J. Bio. Chem., 279:31 (2004).
Pescatore, P., ‘Some critical remarks on the “Single European Act”’, CMLRev., 24 (1987).
Prevost, D., ‘Opening Pandora's Box: The Panel's Findings in the EC-Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products Dispute’, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 34:1 (2007), 73–8.
Raul, A. C. and Dwyer, J. Z., ‘Science in the Regulatory Process: “Regulatory Daubert”: A Proposal to Enhance Judicial Review of Agency Science by Incorporating Daubert Principles into Administrative Law’, Law & Contemp. Prob., 667 (2003).
,Regeringskansliet. Official English Translations of the Environmental Code. Available at: www.regeringen.se/content/1/c4/13/48/385ef12a.pdf (accessed 1 March 2010).
,Regeringskansliet The Swedish Judicial System – A Brief Presentation, published by the Swedish Ministry of Justice, available at: www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/01/62/79/023155e4.pdf (accessed 1 March 2010).
Renda, A., Impact Assessment in the EU: State of the Art and the Art of the State, Center for European Policy Studies, 2006.
Rohrmann, B. and Renn, O.. ‘Risk Perception Research – An Introduction’, in Renn, O. and Rohrman, B., Cross-cultural Risk Perception: A Survey of Empirical Studies, Kluwer, 2000.
Rotmans, J. and Asselt, M. B. A., ‘Uncertainty Management in Integrated Assessment Modeling: Towards a Pluralistic Approach’, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 69:2 (2001).
,The Royal Society, Risk: Analysis, Perception, Management, The Royal Society 1992.
Rozin, P., ‘Technological Stigma: Some Perspectives from the Study of Contagion’, in Flynn, J., Slovic, P. and Kunverther, H.. (eds.), Risk, Media, and Stigma: Understanding Public Challenges to Modern Science and Technology, Earthscan, 2001.
Ruessmann, L. A., ‘Reflections on the WTO Doha Ministerial Conference: Putting the Precautionary Principle in its Place: Parameters for the Proper Application of a Precautionary Approach and the Implications for Developing Countries in Light of the Doha WTO Ministerial’, Am. U. Int'l L. Rev., 17 (2002), 925–6.
Sadeleer, N., Environmental Principles: From Political Slogans to Legal Rules, Oxford University Press, 2002.
Sandin, P., ‘Dimensions of the Precautionary Principle’, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 5 (1999).
Sandin, P., ‘A Paradox Out of Context: Harris and Holm on the Precautionary Principle’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 15 (2006).
Sandin, P., Peterson, M., Hansson, S.-O., Rudén, C., and Juthe, A., ‘Five Charges Against the Precautionary Principle’, Journal of Risk Research, 5:4 (2002).
Schierow, L-J., ‘Environmental Risk and Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Review of Proposed Legislative Mandates, 1993–1998’, CRS Report for Congress, 22 January 1999.
,Science and Environmental Health Network (SEHN), Precautionary Principle FAQs. Available at: www.sehn.org/ppfaqs.html (accessed 1 March 2010).
,Scientific Committee for Animal Nutrition (SCAN), Opinion on the immediate and longer-term risk to the value of Streptogramins in Human Medicine posed by the use of Virginiamycin as an animal growth promoter of 10 July 1998.
Scott, J., ‘The European Regulation of GMOs and the WTO’, Colum. J. Eur. L., 9 (2003).
Scott, J., The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Oxford University Press, 2007.
Scott, J., ‘Of Kith and Kine (and Crustaceans): Trade and Environment in the EU and WTO’, available at: www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/99/990307.html (accessed 1 March 2010).
Scott, J. and Vos, E., ‘The Juridification of Uncertainty: Observations on the Ambivalence of the Precautionary Principle within the EU and the WTO’, in Joerges, Ch. and Dehousse, R., , R. (eds.), Good Governance in Europe's Integrated Market, Oxford University Press, 2002.
Sedman, R. M. and Hadley, P. W., ‘Risk Assessment and Risk Management: Mending the Schism’, Risk – Issues in Health & Safety, 3 (1992).
Shapiro, S. and Glicksman, R. L., ‘Congress, The Supreme Court and the Quiet Revolution in Administrative Law’, Duke L. J., 819 (1988), 819–20.
Shrader-Frechette, K., ‘Scientific Method, Anti-Foundationalism and Public Decision’, in Löfstedt, E. and Frewer, L. (eds.), The Earthscan Reader in Risk and Modern Society, Earthscan, 1998.
Slovic, P., ‘Perceptions of Risk’, Science, 236:4799 (1987), 280–5.
Slovic, P., ‘Informing and Educating the Public about Risk’, in Slovic, P., The Perception of Risk, Earthscan, 2000.
Slovic, P., ‘Perceived Risk, Trust and Democracy’, in Slovic, P., The Perception of Risk, Earthscan, 2000.
Slovic, P., The Perception of Risk, Earthscan, 2000.
Slovic, P., Fischoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S., ‘Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk’, in Slovic, P., The Perception of Risk, Earthscan, 2000.
Slovic, P., Fischoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S., ‘Rating the Risks’, in Slovic, P., The Perception of Risk, Earthscan, 2000.
Starr, C., ‘Social Benefit Versus Technological Risk’, Science, 165 (1969).
Stirling, A. ‘On Science and Precaution in the Management of Technological Risk’. An Esto Project, Prepared for the European Commission – JRC Institute Prospective Technological Studies Seville, May 1999 (available from author).
,Strategy Unit Report, ‘Risk: Improving Government's Capability to Handle Risk and Uncertainty’, November 2002, pp. 74–92. Available at: www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/cabinetoffice/strategy/assets/su%20risk%20summary.pdf (accessed 1 March 2010).
Sunstein, C., After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State, Harvard University Press, 1990.
Sunstein, C., ‘The Cost-Benefit State’, Chicago Working Paper in Law & Economics, No. 039, 05/1996, Available at: www.law.uchicago.edu/files/files/39.sunstein.pdf (accessed 1 March 2010).
Sunstein, C., ‘Cost/benefit Default Principles’, Chicago Working Paper in Law and Economics, No. 104, 3/6/01, p. 15. Available at: www.law.uchicago.edu/files/files/104.CRS_.Default.REVISED.pdf (accessed 1 March 2010).
Sunstein, C., ‘Health-Health Tradeoffs’, U. Chi. L. Rev., 63 (1996).
Sunstein, C., Risk and Reason: Safety, Law and the Environment, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Sunstein, C., The Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Sunstein, C., ‘On the Divergent American Reactions to Terrorism and Climate Change’, Colum. L. Rev., 107 (2007).
Svärd, S. O. and Rahm, T., Prövning enligt miljöskyddslagen, Gebers Förlag, 1975.
,Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs (EU Legal Secretariat), Letter To the Registrar at the Court of Justice of the European Communities, 26 February 2004 (available from the author).
Thiruchelvam, M.et al., ‘The Nigrostriatal Dopaminergic System as a Preferential Target of Repeated Exposures to Combined Paraquat and Maneb: Implications for Parkinson's Disease’, The Journal of Neuroscience, 20:24 (2000).
Trouwborst, A. ‘Overexpression of Superoxide Dismute or Glutathione Peroxidase Protects against the Paraquat + Maneb-induced Parkinson Disease Phenotype’, J. Biol. Chem., 280:23 (2005).
Thornton, J. and Beckwith, S., Environmental Law, Sweet & Maxwell, 2004.
Tickner, J and Raffensberger, C., ‘The Precautionary Principle in Action: A Handbook’, Science and Environmental Health Network, 13. Available at: www.mindfully.org/Precaution/Precaution-In-Action-Handbook.pdf (accessed 1 March 2010).
Tinari, N., ‘Cell Phone Towers in Residential Areas: Did Congress Let the Pig in the Parlor with the Telecommunication Act of 1996?’, Temp. L. Rev., 73 (2000).
Tengs, T. O., Adams, M. E., Pliskin, J. S., Safran, D. G., Siegel, J. E., Weinstein, M. C. and Graham, J. D., ‘Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness’, Risk Analysis 13 (1995).
Trouwborst, A.Evolution and Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law, Aspen Publishers, 2002.
Trouwborst, A. ‘The Precautionary Principle in General International Law: Combating the Babylonian Confusion’, RECIEL, 16:2 (2007).
Trouwborst, A. ‘Prevention, Precaution, Logic and Law: The Relationship Between the Precautionary Principle and the Preventative Principle in International Law and Associated Questions’, Erasmus Law Review, 2:2 (2009), 106–27.
,United States Environmental Protection Agency, ‘An Evaluation of EPA Risk Assessment Principles and Practices’, Staff Paper Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by members of the Risk Assessment Task Force, EPA/100/B-04/001.
,United States Environmental Protection Agency, Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by the Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/260R-02–008. Available at www.epa.gov/quality/informationguidelines/documents/EPA_InfoQualityGuidelines.pdf (accessed 1 March 2010)
,United States Environmental Protection Agency, Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1970, Special Message from the President to the Congress about Reorganization Plans to Establish the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 9 July 1970. Available at: www.epa.gov/history/org/origins/reorg.htm (accessed 1 March 2010).
,The Environmental Protection Agency, RCRA Public Participation Policy, 1981.
,The Environmental Protection Agency, Unfinished Business: A Comparative Assessment of Environmental Problems, February 1987. Available at http://yosemite.epa.gov/water/owrccatalog.nsf/9da204a4b4406ef885256ae0007a79c7/d8555a5ca86d824a85256b06007256d1!OpenDocument (accessed 1 March 2010).
,The Environmental Protection Agency, Reducing Risk: Setting Priorities and Strategies for Environmental Protection, September 1990. Executive summary available at www.epa.gov/history/topics/risk/01.htm (accessed 1 March 2010).
,United States Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Characterization Handbook, December 2000, available at www.epa.gov/OSA/spc/pdfs/rchandbk.pdf (accessed 1 March 2010).
,The Environmental Protection Agency, ‘Late Lessons From Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1896–2000’, Environmental Issue Report No. 22, 2002. Available at: http://reports.eea.europa.eu/environmental_issue_report_2001_22/en (accessed 1 March 2010).
,The Environmental Protection Agency, Public Involvement Policy of the Environmental Protection Agency, May 2003. p. 1 and Appendix 1. Available at: www.epa.gov/publicinvolvement/pdf/policy2003.pdf (accessed 1 March 2010).
,The Environmental Protection Agency, ‘An Evaluation of EPA Risk Assessment Principles and Practices’, Staff Paper Prepared for the US Environmental Protection Agency by members of the Risk Assessment Task Force, March 2004, available at: www.epa.gov/osa/pdfs/ratf-final.pdf (accessed 1 March 2010).
,The Environmental Protection Agency, ‘Changes Needed to Improve Public Confidence in EPA's Implementation of the Food Quality Protection Act’, Report No. 2006-P-00003, 19 October 2005.
,United States General Accounting Office, Telecommunications: Research and Regulatory Efforts on Mobile Phone Health Issues, Report to Congressional Requesters, AO-01–545, 2001 Available at www.gao.gov/new.items/d01545.pdf (accessed 1 March 2010).
,United States General Accounting Office, OMB's Role in Reviews of Agency's Draft Rules and the Transparency of Those Reviews, GAO-03–929, 2003. Available at: www.gao.gov/new.items/d03929.pdf (accessed 1 March 2010).
Viscusi, K., Rational Risk Policy, Oxford University Press, 1998.
Viscusi, K., ‘Monetizing the Benefits of Risk and Environmental Regulation’, Fordham Urb. L. J., 33 (2006), 1003–4.
Vogel, D., ‘Ships Passing in the Night: GMOs and the Politics of Risk Regulation in Europe and the United States’, Working Paper No 2001/16, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, 2001.
Moltke, K., ‘The Vorsorgeprinzip in West German Environmental Policy’, in Royal Commission On Environmental Pollution, Twelfth Report, HMSO 1988.
Vos, E., ‘EU Food Safety Regulation in the Aftermath of the BSE Crisis’, Journal of Consumer Policy, 23 (2000).
Vos, E., ‘Antibiotics, the Precautionary Principle and the Court of First Instance’, Maastricht Journal, 11:2 (2004).
Wahlström, B. ‘The Precautionary Approach to Chemicals Management: A Swedish Perspective’, in Raffensperger, C. and Tickner, J. (eds.), Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle, Island Press, 1999.
Walker, W. E., Harremoes, P., Rotman, J., Sluijs, J. P., Asselt, M. B. A., Janssen, P., and Krauss, M. P. Krayer von, ‘Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support’, Integrated Assessment, 4:1 (2003).
Walker, W. E., Harremoes, P., Rotman, J., Sluijs, J. P., Asselt, M. B. A., Janssen, P., Wall Street Journal, ‘Jolly Green Justices’, Editorial, 3 April 2007, p. A14.
Weale, A., ‘Ecological Modernisation and the Integration of European Environmental Policy’, in Lifferink, J. D., European Integration and Environmental Policy, Belhaven Press, 1993.
Weber, M., The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, Henderson and Parson, 1947.
Weiss, R., ‘Law is Nemesis of Regulation’, Washington Post, 16 August 2004, p. A01
Westerlund, S., Lag om kemiska produkter: Kommentar, C. E. Fritzes Förlag, 1985.
Westerlund, S., Miljöskyddslagen: En analytisk lagkommentar, Åmyra Förlag, 1990.
Wiener, J. ‘Precaution in a Multi-Risk World’, Duke Law School Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No. 23, December 2001.
Wiener, J. and Rogers, M. D., ‘Comparing precaution in the United States and Europe’, Journal of Risk Research, 5:4 (2002).
Wildawsky, A. ‘Trial and Error versus Trial Without Error’, in Morris, J., Rethinking Risk and the Precautionary Principle, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000.
Winickoff, D.et al., ‘Adjudicating the GM Food Wars: Science, Risk, and Democracy in World Trade Law’, Yale J. Int'l Law, 30 (2005).
Wood, S. G., Wood, S. Q. and Wood, R. A., ‘The Precautionary Principle? An American Assessment’, in Paques, M., Le Principe de precaution en droit administratif/Precautionary Principle and Administrative Law, National and International Reports, International Academy of Comparative Law, Bruylant, 2007.
Zander, J., ‘The Green Guarantee in Article 95 of the EC Treaty: Two Recent Cases’, Journal of Environmental Law, 16:1 (2004).
Zwanenberg, P. and Millstone, E., ‘Mad Cow Disease’ 1980s–2000: How Reassurances Undermined Precaution', in Late Lessons From Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1896–2000, Environmental Issue Report No. 22, 2002. Available at: http://reports.eea.europa.eu/environmental_issue_report_2001_22/en/ (accessed 1 March 2010).
