Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T06:24:33.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Coproducing Knowledge and Politics of the Anthropocene: The Case of the Future Earth Program

from Part III - The Practices of Political Study in the Anthropocene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2019

By
Silke Beck
Edited by
Frank Biermann  and
Eva Lövbrand
Frank Biermann
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Eva Lövbrand
Affiliation:
Linköpings Universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Anthropocene Encounters: New Directions in Green Political Thinking , pp. 191 - 211
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcamo, Joseph. 2017. Evaluating the Impacts of Global Environmental Assessments. Environmental Science and Policy 77: 268–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Silke, and Mahony, Martin. 2017. The IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] and the Politics of Anticipation. Nature Climate Change 7 (5): 311–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Silke, Tim Forsyth, Pia M. Kohler, Myanna Lahsen, and Mahony, Martin. 2016. The Making of Global Environmental Science and Politics. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (4th edition), edited by Felt, Ulrike, Fouché, Rayvon, Miller, Clark A., and Smith-Doerr, Laurel, chapter 36. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Belmont Forum. 2017. Transformations to Sustainability. Accessed April 5, 2017. http://www.belmontforum.org/news/the-transformations-2-sustainability-call-is-open-today/Google Scholar
Berkhout, Frans. 2012. Adaptation to Climate Change by Organizations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 3 (1): 91–106.Google Scholar
Berkhout, Frans. 2014. What Does Coordination Achieve. Accessed January 29, 2017. http://www.futureearth.org/blog/2014-may-30/what-does-coordination-achieveGoogle Scholar
Blicharska, Malgorzata, Smithers, Richard J., Kuchler, Magdalena, et al. 2017. Steps to Overcome the North-South Divide in Research Relevant to Climate Change Policy and Practice. Nature Climate Change 7 (1): 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brondizio, Eduardo S., O’Brien, Karen, Bai, Xuemei, et al. 2016. Re-conceptualizing the Anthropocene: A Call for Collaboration. Global Environmental Change 39: 318–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castree, Noel. 2016. Geography and the New Social Contract for Global Change Research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41 (3): 328–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilvers, Jason, and Kearnes, Matthew, eds. 2016. Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clark, William C., van Kerkhoff, Lorrae, Lebel, Louis, and Gallopin, Gilberto C.. 2016. Crafting Usable Knowledge for Sustainable Development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (17): 4570–4578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornell, Sarah, Berkhout, Frans, Tuinstra, Willemijn, et al. 2013. Opening up Knowledge Systems for Better Responses to Global Environmental Change. Environmental Science and Policy 28: 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilling, Lisa, and Lemos, Maria Carmen. 2011. Creating Usable Science: Opportunities and Constraints for Climate Knowledge Use and their Implications for Science Policy. Global Environmental Change 21 (2): 680–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felt, Ulrike, Barben, Daniel, Irwin, A., et al. 2013. Science in Society: Caring for Our Futures in Turbulent Times. Science Policy Briefing 50 for the European Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Felt, Ulrike, Igelsböck, Judith, Schikowitz, Andrea, and Thomas, Völker. 2016. Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice: Between Imaginaries of Collective Experimentation and Entrenched Academic Value Orders. Science, Technology and Human Values 41 (4): 732–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Future Earth. 2014. Impact. Accessed January 29, 2017. http://futureearth.org/impactGoogle Scholar
Future Earth. 2016. Future Earth Launches New Magazine for the Anthropocene. Accessed May 10, 2017. http://futureearth.org/news/future-earth-launches-new-magazine-anthropoceneGoogle Scholar
German Advisory Council on Global Change. 2011. World in Transition. A Social Contract for Sustainability. Accessed May 5, 2017. http://www.wbgu.de/en/flagship-reports/fr-2011-a-social-contract/Google Scholar
German Council of Science and Humanities. 2015. Grand Societal Challenges as a Topic for Science Policy. Positionspapier. https://www.wissenschaftsrat.de/download/archiv/4594–15_engl.pdf.Google Scholar
Hackmann, Heide, Moser, Susanne C., and St. Clair, Asunción Lera. 2014. The Social Heart of Global Environmental Change. Nature Climate Change 4 (8): 653–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajer, Maarten. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hulme, Mike. 2015. Changing What Exactly, and From Where? A Response to Castree. Dialogues in Human Geography 5 (3): 322–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ignacuik, Ada, Rice, Martin, Bogardi, Janos, Canadell, Josep G., Dhakal, Shobhakar, Ingram, John, Leemans, Rik, and Rosenberg, Mark. 2012. Responding to Complex Societal Challenges: A Decade of Earth System Science Partnership (ESSP) Interdisciplinary Research. Current Opinion on Environmental Sustainability 4: 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Council for Science. 2010. Grand Challenges in Global Sustainability Research: A Systems Approach to Research Priorities for the Decade. Prepublication Version. Paris: International Council for Science.Google Scholar
International Social Science Council and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 2013. World Social Science Report: Changing Global Environments. Paris: OECD Publishing and UNESCO Publishing.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila, ed. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. 2014. To Be Inclusive, You Need More Voices. Accessed May 10, 2016. http://www.futureearth.org/blog/2014-jul-23/be-inclusive-you-need-more-voices-qa-sheila-jasanoffGoogle Scholar
Jerneck, Anne, Olsson, Lennart, Ness, Barry, et al. 2011. Structuring Sustainability Science. Sustainability Science 6 (1): 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kates, Robert W., Clark, William C., Corell, Robert, et al. 2001. Sustainability Science. Science 292 (5517): 641–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klenk, Nicole L., and Meehan, Katie. 2015. Climate Change and Transdisciplinary Science: Problematizing the Integration Imperative. Environmental Science and Policy 54: 160–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahsen, Myanna. 2016. Toward a Sustainable Future Earth: Challenges for a Research Agenda. Science, Technology and Human Values 41 (5): 876–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2015. Telling Friends from Foes in the Time of the Anthropocene. In The Anthropocene and the Global Environment Crisis: Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch, edited by Hamilton, Clive, Bonneuil, Christophe, and Gemenne, François, 145–155. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, Melissa. 2014. Co-Design for Relevance and Usefulness. Accessed May 10, 2016. http://www.futureearth.org/blog/2014-jul-23/co-design-relevance-and-usefulness-qa-melissa-leachGoogle Scholar
Leemans, Rik. 2016. The Lessons Learned from Shifting from Global-Change Research Programmes to Transdisciplinary Sustainability Science. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 19: 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liverman, Diana M. 2009. Conventions of Climate Change: Constructions of Danger and the Dispossession of the Atmosphere. Journal of Historical Geography 35 (2): 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lövbrand, Eva, Beck, Silke, Chilvers, Jason, et al. 2015. Who Speaks for the Future of Earth? How Critical Social Science Can Extend the Conversation on the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change 32: 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Clark. 2009. Epistemic Constitutionalism in International Governance: The Case of Climate Change. In Foreign Policy Challenges in the 21st Century, edited by Heazle, Michael, Griffiths, Martin, and Conley, Tom, 141–163. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Moser, Susanne C. 2016. Can Science on Transformation Transform Science? Lessons from Co-Design. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 20: 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, Karen, and Barnett, John. 2013. Global Environmental Change and Human Security. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 38: 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, Linda S., Carlton, J. Stuart, Haigh, Tonya, et al. 2016. Useful to Usable: Developing Usable Climate Science for Agriculture. Climate Risk Management 15: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revkin, Andrew. 2016. An Anthropocene Journey. Accessed May 10, 2017. http://anthropocenemagazine.org/anthropocenejourney/Google Scholar
Stafford-Smith, Mark, Gaffney, Owen, Brito, Lidia, Ostrom, Elinor, and Seitzinger, Sybil. 2012. Interconnected Risks and Solutions for a Planet under Pressure – Overview and Introduction. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4: 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffen, William L., Sanderson, Angelina, Tyson, Peter D., et al. 2004. Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet under Pressure. Executive Summary Stockholm, International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stilgoe, Jack, Owen, Richard, and Macnaghten, Phil. 2013. Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation. Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, Andrew. 2015. Time to Rei(g)n Back the Anthropocene? Accessed January 29, 2017. http://steps-centre.org/2015/blog/time-to-reign-back-the-anthropoceneGoogle Scholar
Strohschneider, Peter. 2014. Zur Politik der Transformativen Wissenschaft. In Die Verfassung des Politischen. Festschrift für Hans Vorländer, edited by Brodocz, André, Herrmann, Dietrich, Schmidt, Rainer, Schulz, Daniel, and Schulze, Julia, 175–194. Berlin: Wessel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strohschneider, Peter. 2016. Foreword – The Contribution of Science in Implementing the SDGs [Sustainable Development Goals]. Accessed May 5, 2017. http://www.dkn-future-earth.org/aktuelles/news/deutschland/new-dkn-future-earth-report-out-now-the-contribution-of-science-in-implementing-the-sdgs.htmlGoogle Scholar
Turnhout, Esther, Dewulf, Art, and Hulme, Mike. 2016. What Does Policy-Relevant Global Environmental Knowledge Do? The Cases of Climate and Biodiversity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 18: 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Outcome Document for the UN Summit to Adopt the Post-2015 Development Agenda: Draft for Adoption. New York. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdfGoogle Scholar
van der Hel, Sandra. 2016. New Science for Global Sustainability? The Institutionalisation of Knowledge Co-production in Future Earth. Environmental Science and Policy 61: 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×