Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:35:44.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The United Kingdom

from Part I - Twentieth century and the divergence in systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2011

Steven A. Bank
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

Although the United Kingdom formally maintained its shareholder imputation approach through much of the twentieth century, a variety of new challenges – wars, depressions, and emerging political and economic forces – led it to try alternative methods of corporate taxation. During large swaths of the century, the UK deviated from its pure imputation system, either by adopting an additional entity-level tax as an overlay on the shareholder imputation system or by adopting an entirely new system of entity-focused taxation. In large part, the UK was motivated to adopt these fairly radical innovations during periods in which it sought to dampen the amount of dividends and increase the tendency of corporations to plow back earnings into the business.

1900–18

The major innovation in the British income tax system between 1842 and 1918 was the introduction of the principle of graduation in 1909. Graduated rates had been introduced indirectly starting in 1853 with the use of abatements, but this was found to be impractical for reaching higher incomes without completely exempting lower incomes. For most of this earlier period, all attempts to explicitly introduce progressivity beyond an exemption or abatement amount were rejected. Seligman reported that during the nineteenth century “the principle of progressive or graduated taxation . . . had been uniformly reprobated not only by all English statesmen, but by the great mass of important British thinkers.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Anglo-American Corporate Taxation
Tracing the Common Roots of Divergent Approaches
, pp. 49 - 69
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Seligman, Edwin R. A.The Income Tax: A Study of the History, Theory, and Practice of Income Taxation at Home and AbroadNew YorkThe MacMillan Co 1911Google Scholar
Shehab, FakhriProgressive Taxation: A Study in the Development of the Progressive Principle in the British Income TaxOxfordClarendon Press 1953 222Google Scholar
Magill, RoswellParker, L.King, EldonA Summary of the British Tax System, With Special Reference to Its AdministrationWashington, DCUS Government 1934 24Google Scholar
Spaulding, HarrisonThe Income Tax in Great Britain and the United StatesLondonP. S. King & Son, Ltd 1927Google Scholar
Stamp, Josiah C.The Special Taxation of Business Profits in relation to the Present Position of National FinanceThe Economic Journal 29 1919 407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daunton, Martin J.How to Pay for the War: State, Society and Taxation in Britain, 1917–24The English Historical Review 111 1996 882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taxes throttling industry – A £910,000,000 Budget – Chambers of Commerce proposalThe TimesLondon 1920 9
Daunton, Martin J.Just Taxes: The Politics of Taxation in Britain, 1914–1979Cambridge University Press 2002 89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Rufus S.The British Finance Act, 1920Quarterly Journal of Economics 35 1920 167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Excess Profits a ‘lottery’ – manufacturers and the Corporation TaxThe TimesLondon 1920 11
Lighter burden of taxes – Appeal by FBI to government – Cooperators’ quotaThe TimesLondon 1923 7
Sabine, Basil E. V.A History of Income TaxLondonGeorge Allen & Unwin Ltd 1966 165Google Scholar
City notes – Budget reception – Effect on marketsThe TimesLondon 1923 18
Harris, PeterCorporate/Shareholder Income Taxation and Allocating Taxing Rights Between Countries: A Comparison of Imputation SystemsAmsterdamIBFD Publications 1996 89Google Scholar
Coates, WillsonReport of the Committee on National Debt and TaxationJournal of the Royal Statistical Society 90 1927 353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. MaynardThe Colwyn Report on National Debt and TaxationThe Economic Journal 37 1927 198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strangman, H. ArnoldBritish and American TaxesTaxes 21 1943 208Google Scholar
Farnsworth, AlbertSome Reflections upon the Finance Act, 1937Modern Law Review 1 1938 290Google Scholar
Shay, Jr. RobertChamberlain’s Folly: the National Defence Contribution of 1937Albion 7 1975 317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The new excess profits taxThe TimesLondon 1937 22
Hicks, JohnHicks, UrsulaRostas, LaszloThe Taxation of War WealthOxfordClarendon Press 1942 90Google Scholar
Strangman, H. ArnoldGreat Britain’s National Defence ContributionTaxes 15 1937 694Google Scholar
ParliamentThe TimesLondon 1947 6
Profits, taxes and dividendsThe TimesLondon 1947 7
Tax on undistributed profits, manufacturers’ call for abolitionThe TimesLondon 1951 3
Rogow, ArnoldTaxation and ‘Fair Shares’ under the Labour GovernmentCanadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 21 1955 213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubner, A.The Irrelevancy of the British Differential Profits TaxEconomic Journal 74 1964 347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D.Some Economic Aspects of the Taxation of CompaniesManchesterManchester School 1954Google Scholar
Tiley, JohnUnited KingdomAult, HughComparative Income Taxation: A Structural AnalysisBostonKluwer Law International 1997 113Google Scholar
Balogh, ThomasDifferential Profits TaxThe Economic Journal 68 1958 528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaghan, JamesThe New United Kingdom Tax Structure in Relation to the Needs of the EconomyEuropean Taxation 5 1965 212Google Scholar
Whiting, R. C.Ideology and Reform in Labour’s Tax Strategy, 1964–1970The Historical Journal 41 1998 1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilersic, A. R.Taxes 1964–66: an Interim AppraisalBritish Tax Review 1966 373Google Scholar
Tontsch, AndreasCorporation Tax Systems and Fiscal Neutrality: the UK and German Systems and Recent ChangesIntertax 30 2002 175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gammie, MalcolmUK Imputation, Past, Present and FutureBulletin for International Fiscal Documentation 52 1998 429Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The United Kingdom
  • Steven A. Bank, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: Anglo-American Corporate Taxation
  • Online publication: 07 October 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013284.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The United Kingdom
  • Steven A. Bank, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: Anglo-American Corporate Taxation
  • Online publication: 07 October 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013284.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The United Kingdom
  • Steven A. Bank, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: Anglo-American Corporate Taxation
  • Online publication: 07 October 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013284.003
Available formats
×