Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T20:58:08.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Power

from Part II - Explaining the divergence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2011

Steven A. Bank
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

The way corporations in the United States and the United Kingdom dealt with retained earnings and set dividend policy reflects an underlying difference in the location of power in corporations in the respective countries. This difference in the location of corporate power, in turn, contributed to the divergence of corporate income tax schemes. The notion is that the corporation itself was simply perceived differently in the two countries during the first half of the twentieth century when the income tax systems were still developing. Power in the large British public corporation was primarily located at the shareholder level, thus leading to a shareholder-focused corporate tax, while power in the large American public corporation was primarily located at the entity level, thus leading to an entity-focused corporate tax. These differences were then hard-wired into the respective national consciences and continued to influence corporate tax reform in ensuing years.

One possible version of this argument is that the UK and the USA each decided to treat corporations differently as a matter of law and this legal difference dictated the difference in tax schemes. This is the version that early twentieth-century commentators, influenced by entity theory conceptions of corporate development, forwarded in describing the two tax schemes. Under this argument, in the UK, the corporation was a mere aggregation of the individual shareholders and therefore was not itself subject to taxation. In his 1927 comparative study of the US and UK income tax systems Harrison Spaulding wrote that in the UK “[a] corporation is regarded merely as a device by means of which a number of individuals can conveniently do business, and it is not looked upon as a separate object of taxation. It is not in itself a potentially taxable person, but is an aggregation of persons who may or may not be taxable.” Although Spaulding conceded that “[i]t is necessary for some purposes that corporations be regarded as separate legal entities,” he explained that “the British do not extend this conception to the field of income tax.” This characterization continued to resonate in later descriptions. Jonathan Barron Baskin noted that the British income tax “was originally based on the idea that corporations should be treated similarly to partnerships.” Martin Daunton offered a more modern and nuanced version of this entity theory explanation, stating that “[c]orporate taxation did not have a purchase in British fiscal policy, for it contradicted the assumption that firms were agents rather than taxable entities. Corporation taxation did not, as in the United States, connect with hostility to big business or with opposition to a federal income tax.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Anglo-American Corporate Taxation
Tracing the Common Roots of Divergent Approaches
, pp. 142 - 187
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Spaulding, HarrisonThe Income Tax in Great Britain and the United StatesLondonP. S. King & Son, Ltd 1927 87Google Scholar
Baskin, Jonathan BarronThe Development of Corporate Financial Markets in Britain and the United States, 1600–1914: Overcoming Asymmetric InformationThe Business History Review 62 1988 214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daunton, Martin J.Just Taxes: The Politics of Taxation in Britain, 1914–1979Cambridge University Press 2002 93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, GeorgeShakow, DavidFederal Income Tax Project: Taxation of Private Business Enterprises: Reporter’s StudyPhiladelphiaAmerican Law Institute 1999 35Google Scholar
Westin, RichardMcNulty, JohnBeck, RichardFederal Income Taxation of Business Enterprises: Cases, Statutes, RulingsNew YorkLexis Publications 1999 649Google Scholar
Cheffins, Brian R.Corporate Ownership and Control: British Business TransformedOxford University Press 2008 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berglof, ErikA Note on the Typology of Financial SystemsHopt, Klaus J.Wymeersch, EddyComparative Corporate Governance: Essays and MaterialsBerlin, New YorkWalter de Gruyter 1997 152Google Scholar
Knoop, DouglasThe Royal Commission on the Income TaxThe Economic Journal 30 1920 271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daunton, Martin J.Trusting Leviathan: The Politics of Taxation in Britain, 1799–1914Cambridge University Press 2001 217Google Scholar
Comstock, AlzadaBritish Income Tax ReformThe American Economic Review 10 1920 503Google Scholar
Tucker, Rufus S.The British Finance Act, 1920The Quarterly Journal of Economics 35 1920 168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letter to the EditorCase of public utility companiesThe TimesLondon 1922 6Google Scholar
The Industrial and General Trust, Limited: Sir George Touche on the Corporation Profits TaxThe TimesLondon 1922 24
Avi-Yonah, Reuven S.Why was the US Corporate Tax Enacted in 1909?Tiley, JohnStudies in the History of Tax LawOxfordHart Publishing 2007 382Google Scholar
The financial situationThe Commercial and Financial Chronicle 88 1909 1525
Pleydall, A. C.Letter to the Editor: The corporate taxNew York Times 1909 6Google Scholar
What the states do in the way of taxing corporationsThe Commercial and Financial Chronicle 89 1909 133
Werner, WalterCorporation Law in Search of its FutureColumbia Law Review 81 1981 1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, Jonathan BarronMiranti, Jr. Paul J.A History of Corporate FinanceCambridge University Press 1997 193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, MaryThe Expansion of the US Stock Market, 1885–1930: Historical Facts and Theoretical FashionsEnterprise and Society 8 2007 499Google Scholar
Navin, Thomas R.Sears, Marian V.The Rise of a Market for Industrial Securities, 1887–1902The Business History Review 29 1955 136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, RobertInside Wall Street: Continuity and Change in the Financial DistrictNew YorkNorton 1977 45Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J.The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960: The Crisis of Legal OrthodoxyOxford University Press 1992 95Google Scholar
Hannah, LeslieThe Divorce of Ownership from Control from 1900: Recalibrating Imagined Global Historical TrendsBusiness History 49 2007 406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corey, LewisHow is Ownership Distributed?The New Republic 46 1926 322Google Scholar
Means, GardinerThe Diffusion of Stock Ownership in the United StatesThe Quarterly Journal of Economics 44 1930 595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Lawrence E.The Speculation Economy: How Finance Triumphed Over IndustrySan FranciscoBerrett-Koehler Publishers 2007 202Google Scholar
Berle, AdolfMeans, GardinerThe Modern Corporation and Private PropertyNew YorkThe Macmillan Co. 1933 55Google Scholar
Schmitz, ChristopherThe Growth of Big Business in the United States and Western Europe, 1850–1939BasingstokeMacmillan 1993 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Villiers, VictorThe growing army of ‘small investors’The Magazine of Wall Street 27 1920 30Google Scholar
Warshow, H. T.The Distribution of Corporate Ownership in the United StatesThe Quarterly Journal of Economics 39 1924 35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geisst, CharlesWall Street: A HistoryOxford University Press 1997 157Google Scholar
Read, JohnBringing Wall Street to the peopleThe Magazine of Wall Street 28 1921 212Google Scholar
Knappen, Theodore M.The silent revolution in American financeThe Magazine of Wall Street 35 1934 316Google Scholar
Powers, BarnardWho are the real owners of Wall Street?The Magazine of Wall Street 33 1924 1106Google Scholar
Jefferys, James B.Business Organisation in Great Britain, 1856–1914New YorkArno Press 1977 383Google Scholar
Franks, JulianMayer, ColinRossi, StefanoSpending Less Time with the Family: the Decline of Family Ownership in the United KingdomMorck, Randall K.A History of Corporate Governance around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional ManagersUniversity of Chicago Press 2005 588Google Scholar
Cheffins, Brian R.Bank, Steven A.Is Berle and Means really a Myth?The Business History Review 83 2009 443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michie, Ranald C.The London Stock Exchange: A HistoryOxford University Press 1999 70Google Scholar
Thomas, WilliamThe Provincial Stock ExchangesLondonCass 1973 133Google Scholar
Grossman, Richard S.New Indices of British Equity Prices, 1870–1913The Journal of Economic History 62 2002 124Google Scholar
Franks, JulianMayer, ColinRossi, StefanoOwnership: Evolution and RegulationThe Review of Financial Studies 22 2009 4017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrell, P. L.Industrial Finance, 1830–1914: The Finance and Organization of English Manufacturing IndustryLondonMethuen 1979 153Google Scholar
Cheffins, Brian R.Bank, Steven A.Corporate Ownership and Control in the UK: the Tax DimensionModern Law Review 70 2007 780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbot, Lorraine E.Enumerating Old Themes? Berle’s Concept of Ownership and the Historical Development of English Company Law in ContextSeattle University Law Review 33 2010 1218Google Scholar
Alford, B. W. E.W. D. & H. O. Wills and the Development of the UK Tobacco Industry, 1786–1965LondonMethuen 1973 184Google Scholar
Gourvish, T. R.British Business and the Transition to a Corporate Economy: Entrepreneurship and Management StructuresBusiness History 29 1987 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, CharlesThe History of Unilever: A Study of Economic Growth and Social ChangeLondonCassell 1954 46Google Scholar
Micklethwait, JohnWooldridge, AdrianThe Company: A Short History of a Revolutionary IdeaNew YorkThe Modern Library 2003 89Google Scholar
Nevins, AllanHill, Frank E.FordNew YorkScribner’s 1954 331Google Scholar
Chandler, AlfredThe Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American BusinessCambridge, Mass.Belknap Press 1977 381Google Scholar
Chandler, Jr. AlfredDaems, HermanManagerial Hierarchies: Comparative Perspectives on the Rise of the Modern Industrial EnterpriseCambridge, Mass.Harvard University Press 1980
Cheffins, Brian R.History and the Global Corporate Governance Revolution: the UK PerspectiveBusiness History 43 2001 90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Mary B.The Family Firm in British Business, 1780–1914Kirby, Maurice W.Rose, Mary B.Business Enterprise in Modern Britain: From the Eighteenth to the Twentieth CenturyLondon, New YorkRoutledge 1994 61Google Scholar
Hall, A. RupertThe English Capital Market before 1914 – a ReplyEconomica 25 1958 342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bank, Steven A.Cheffins, Brian R.The Corporate Pyramid FableBusiness History Review 84 2010 453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, A. W.British Attitudes toward Investment in North American RailroadsBusiness History Review 34 1960 214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D.Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial CapitalismCambridge, Mass.Belknap Press 1990 52Google Scholar
Ripley, William Z.Main Street and Wall StreetBostonLittle, Brown, and Co. 1927 131Google Scholar
Veblen, ThorsteinAbsentee Ownership and Business Enterprise in Recent Times: The Case of AmericaNew YorkB. W. Heubsch, Inc. 1923 5Google Scholar
Weidenhammer, RobertCauses and repercussions of the Faulty Investment of Corporate SavingsThe American Economic Review 23 1933 40Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert A.Ownership by Management and Control Groups in the Large CorporationThe Quarterly Journal of Economics 52 1938 395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, RaymondThe Distribution of Ownership in the Two Hundred Largest Nonfinancial CorporationsWashington, DC 1940 15Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert A.Business Leadership in the Large CorporationWashington, DCThe Brookings Institution 1945 42Google Scholar
Larner, Robert J.Management Control and the Large CorporationNew YorkDunellen Publishing Co 1970 7Google Scholar
Finnie, DavidCapital Underwriting: An Account of the Principles and Practice of Underwriting Capital Issues, Together with a Critical Analysis of the Main Underwriting and Sub-Underwriting AgreementsLondonSir Isaac Pitman & Sons 1934 28Google Scholar
Compton, M.Bott, E. H.British Industry: Its Changing Structure in Peace and WarLondonL. Drummond 1940 128Google Scholar
Florence, P. SargantOwnership, Control and Success of Large Companies: An Analysis of English Industrial Structure and Policy, 1936–1951LondonSweet & Maxwell 1961Google Scholar
Sampson, AnthonyThe Anatomy of BritainLondonHodder & Stoughton 1961 478Google Scholar
Sampson, AnthonyThe New Anatomy of BritainLondonHodder & Stoughton 1971 599, 602Google Scholar
Arthur Stone, DewingThe Financial Policy of CorporationsNew YorkRonald Press Co 1953 91Google Scholar
Cadman, Jr JohnThe Corporation in New Jersey: Business and Politics, 1791–1875Cambridge, MassHarvard University Press 1949 321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munson, Cyrus LaRueDividendsYale Law Journal 1 1891 196Google Scholar
, H.W.R.DividendsCentral Law Journal 9 1879 163Google Scholar
Arnold, A. JamesProfitability and capital accumulation in British industry during the Transwar Period, 1913–1924The Economic History Review 52 1999 48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuel, Horace B.Shareholders’ MoneyLondonSir Isaac Pitman and Sons 1933 145Google Scholar
Grinling, Charles H.British Railways as Business EnterprisesAshley, William J.British IndustriesNew YorkLongmans, Green & Co 1903 166Google Scholar
Buchanan, Norman S.Theory and Practice in Dividend DistributionThe Quarterly Journal of Economics 53 1938 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, GrahamDodd, David L.Security Analysis: Principle and TechniquesNew York, LondonWhittlesey House; McGraw-Hill Book Co 1940 383Google Scholar
Sears, John H.The New Place of the StockholderNew YorkHarper & Brothers Publishers 1929 148Google Scholar
Bruner, Christopher M.Power and Purpose in the ‘Anglo-American’ CorporationVirginia Journal of International Law 50 2010 604Google Scholar
Nolan, R. C.The Continuing Evolution of Shareholder GovernanceThe Cambridge Law Journal 65 2006 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, Harold M.Postwar Taxation and Economic ProgressNew YorkMcGraw-Hill Book Co 1946 69Google Scholar
Whiting, Richard C.The Labour Party and Taxation: Party Identity and Political Purpose in Twentieth-Century BritainCambridge University Press 2000 17Google Scholar
Daunton, Martin J.How to Pay for the War: State, Society, and Taxation in Britain, 1917–24The English Historical Review 111 1996 896Google Scholar
Jones, GeoffreySluyterman, KeetieBritish and Dutch Business HistoryAmatori, FrancoJones, GeoffreyBusiness History Around the WorldCambridge University Press 2003 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bank, Steven A.Tax, Corporate Governance, and NormsWashington & Lee Law Review 61 2004 1164Google Scholar
Fusfeld, DanielThe Economic Thought of Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Origins of the New DealNew YorkColumbia University Press 1954 207Google Scholar
Tugwell, Rexford G.The Industrial Discipline and the Governmental ArtsNew YorkColumbia University Press 1933 205Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Power
  • Steven A. Bank, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: Anglo-American Corporate Taxation
  • Online publication: 07 October 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013284.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Power
  • Steven A. Bank, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: Anglo-American Corporate Taxation
  • Online publication: 07 October 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013284.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Power
  • Steven A. Bank, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: Anglo-American Corporate Taxation
  • Online publication: 07 October 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013284.006
Available formats
×