Bibliography

Jonas Grethlein

doi:10.1017/9781009003513.012

Acosta-Hughes, B. and Stephens, S. A. (2012) Callimachus in Context. From Plato to the Augustan Poets. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Agapitos, P. (1998) ‘Narrative, rhetoric and “drama” rediscovered. Scholars and poets in Byzantium interpret Heliodorus’, in Studies in Heliodorus, ed. Hunter, R.. Cambridge: 125–56.Google Scholar

Albrecht, C. (2007) ‘Wörter lügen manchmal, Bilder immer. Wissenschaft nach der Wende zum Bild’, in Mit Bildern lügen, eds. Liebert, W.-A. and Metten, T.. Cologne: 29–49.Google Scholar

Allan, R. J. (2011) ‘The historical present in Thucydides. Capturing the case of αἱρεῖ and λαμβάνει’, in The Historical Present in Thucydides. Semantics and Narrative Function, ed. Lallot, J.. Leiden: 37–63.Google Scholar

Allan, R. J., de Jong, I. J. F. and de Jonge, C. C. (2017) ‘From enargeia to immersion. The ancient roots of a modern concept’, Style 51/1: 34–51.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. (1976) Studies in Lucian’s Comic Fiction. Leiden.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. (1978) ‘Lucian’s Nigrinus. The problem of form’, GRBS 19/4: 367–74.Google Scholar

Anderson, M., Cairns, D. and Sprevak, M. (eds.) (2019) Distributed Cognition in Classical Antiquity. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Anhalt, E. K. (2008) ‘Seeing is believing. Four women on display in Herodotus’ Histories’, New England Classical Journal 35/4: 269–80.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1981) An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (1992) ʻAn Epicurean survey of poetic theories (Philodemus On Poems 5, cols. 26–36)ʼ, CQ 42/2: 395–415.Google Scholar

Aujac, G. (1988) Denys d’Halicarnasse. Opuscules rhétoriques. Les orateurs antiques. Tome ii: Démosthène. Paris.Google Scholar

Bakker, E. J. (1997) ‘Verbal aspect and mimetic description in Thucydides’, in Grammar as Interpretation. Greek Literature in Its Linguistic Contexts, ed. Bakker, E. J.. Leiden: 7–54.Google Scholar

Banfield, A. (1982) Unspeakable Sentences. Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston.Google Scholar

Baraš, M. (1992) Icon. Studies in the History of an Idea. New York.Google Scholar

Barbantani, S. (2001) Φάτις νικηφόρος. Frammenti di elegia encomiastica nell’età delle Guerre Galatiche. Supplementum Hellenisticum 958 e 989. Milan.Google Scholar

Barish, J. A. (1981) The Antitheatrical Prejudice. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1982) The Pre-Socratic Philosophers. London.Google Scholar

Barrett, J. (2002) Staged Narrative. Poetics and the Messenger in Greek Tragedy. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1967) ‘The death of the author’, Aspen Magazine 5–6: Section 3.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1980) La chambre claire. Note sur la photographie. Paris.Google Scholar

Bartoš, H. (2014) ‘The concept of mimesis in the Hippocratic De victu’, CQ 64/2: 542–57.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (1989) Decoding the Ancient Novel. The Reader and the Role of Description in Heliodorus and Achilles Tatius. Princeton.Google Scholar

Batchelder, A. G. (1995) The Seal of Orestes. Self-Reference and Authority in Sophocles’ Electra. Lanham.Google Scholar

Baumbach, M. and von Möllendorff, P. (2017) Ein literarischer Prometheus. Lukian aus Samosata und die Zweite Sophistik. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Beaujeu, J. (1964) Marcus Minucius Felix. Octavius. Paris.Google Scholar

Becker, A. and Scholz, P. (eds.) (2004) Dissoi Logoi. Zweierlei Ansichten. Ein sophistischer Traktat. Berlin.Google Scholar

Belfiore, E. (1983) ‘Plato’s greatest accusation against poetry’, CJPh 13/1: 39–62.Google Scholar

Belfiore, E. (1984) ‘A theory of imitation in Plato’s Republic’, TAPhA 114: 121–46.Google Scholar

Bell, J. M. (1978) ‘Κίμβιξ ϰαὶ σοφός. Simonides in the anecdotal tradition’, QUCC 28: 29–86.Google Scholar

Belting, H. (2001) Bild-Anthropologie. Entwürfe für eine Bildwissenschaft. Munich.Google Scholar

Berdozzo, F. (2011) Götter, Mythen, Philosophen. Lukian und die paganen Göttervorstellungen seiner Zeit. Berlin.Google Scholar

Berthelot, K. (2011) ʻPhilon d’Alexandrie, lecteur d’Homère. Quelques éléments de réflexion’, in Prolongements et renouvellements de la tradition classique, eds. Balansard, A., Dorival, G. and Loubet, M.. Aix-en-Provence: 145–58.Google Scholar

Bierl, A. (1990) ‘Dionysus, wine and tragic poetry. A metatheatrical reading of P. Köln vi 242A = TrGF ii F646a’, GRBS 31/4: 353–91.Google Scholar

Billings, J. (2018) ‘Orestes’ urn in word and action’, in The Materialities in Greek Tragedy, eds. Mueller, M. and Telò, M.. London: 49–62.Google Scholar

Bing, P. (2009) The Scroll and the Marble. Studies in Reading and Reception in Hellenistic Poetry. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Bleicher, J. K. and Pörksen, B. (eds.) (2004) Grenzgänger. Formen des New Journalism. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Blum, W. (2004) Höhlengleichnisse. Thema mit Variationen. Bielefeld.Google Scholar

Blumenberg, H. (2001) ‘Wirklichkeitsbegriff und Möglichkeit des Romans’, in Hans Blumenberg. Ästhetische und metaphorologische Schriften, ed. Haverkamp, A.. Frankfurt: 47–73.Google Scholar

Blundell, M. W. (1989) Helping Friends and Harming Enemies. A Study in Sophocles and Greek Ethics. Cambridge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Boehm, G. (1994) ‘Die Wiederkehr der Bilder’, in Was ist ein Bild? ed. Boehm, G.. Munich: 11–38.Google Scholar

Bolens, G. (2012) The Style of Gestures. Embodiment and Cognition in Literary Narrative. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Bona, G. (1974) ‘ΛΟΓΟΣ e ΑΛΗΘΕΙΑ nell’Encomio di Elena di Gorgia’, RFIC 102/1: 5–33.Google Scholar

Bonnechere, P. (2009) ‘Notes trophoniaques iii. Héliodore, Éthiopiques, i.28.1–29.4; ii.11.5: La caverne des brigands égyptiens et Trophonios’, AC 78/1: 197–214.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. W. (1994) Fiction as History. Nero to Julian. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (1993) ‘Lies, fiction and slander in early Greek poetry’, in Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, eds. Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P.. Exeter: 1–37.Google Scholar

Brandão, J. L. (2001) A poética do hipocentauro. Literatura, sociedade e discurso ficcional em Luciano de Samósata. Belo Horizonte.Google Scholar

Branham, R. B. (1989) Unruly Eloquence. Lucian and the Comedy of Traditions. Cambridge, ma.Google Scholar

Bréchet, C. (1999) ‘Le De audiendis poetis de Plutarque et le procès platonicien de la poésie’, RPh 73/2: 209–44.Google Scholar

Bredekamp, H. (2003) ‘A neglected tradition? Art history as Bildwissenschaft’, Critical Inquiry 29/3: 418–28.Google Scholar

Bredekamp, H. (2004) ‘Drehmomente, Merkmale und Ansprüche des iconic turn’, in Iconic Turn. Die neue Macht der Bilder, ed. Maar, C.. Cologne: 15–27.Google Scholar

Bredekamp, H. (2010) Theorie des Bildakts. Berlin.Google Scholar

Brown, P. (1992) Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity. Towards a Christian Empire. Madison.Google Scholar

Bryson, N. (1983) Vision and Painting. The Logic of the Gaze. New Haven.Google Scholar

Buchheim, T. (1985) ‘Maler, Sprachbildner. Zur Verwandtschaft des Gorgias mit Empedokles’, Hermes 113/4: 417–29.Google Scholar

Buchheim, T. (ed.) (1989) Gorgias von Leontinoi. Reden, Fragmente und Testimonien (Griechisch–Deutsch). Hamburg.Google Scholar

Budelmann, F. and van Emde Boas, E. (2019) ‘Attending to tragic messenger speeches’, in Experience, Narrative, and Criticism in Ancient Greece. Under the Spell of Stories, ed. Grethlein, J., Huitink, L. and Tagliabue, A.. Oxford: 59–80.Google Scholar

Buffière, F. (1956) Les mythes d’Homère et la pensée grecque. Paris.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. (1999) ‘Culture and society in Plato’s Republic’, in The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 20, ed. Peterson, G. B.. Salt Lake City: 215–324.Google Scholar

Bussels, S. (2012) The Animated Image. Roman Theory on Naturalism, Vividness and Divine Power. Berlin.Google Scholar

Butterworth, G. W. (ed.) (1919) Clement of Alexandria. The Exhortation to the Greeks. The Rich Man’s Salvation. To the Newly Baptized. Cambridge, ma.Google Scholar

Büttner, S. (2000) Die Literaturtheorie bei Platon und ihre anthropologische Begründung. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Cairns, D. (2013) ‘A short history of shudders’, in Unveiling Emotions ii. Emotions in Greece and Rome. Texts, Images, Material Culture, eds. Chaniotis, A. and Ducrey, P.. Stuttgart: 85–108.Google Scholar

Cairns, D. (2017) ‘Horror, pity, and the visual in ancient Greek aesthetics’, in Emotions in the Classical World. Methods, Approaches, and Directions, eds. Cairns, D. and Nelis, D.. Stuttgart: 53–78.Google Scholar

Calame, C. (1991) ʻQuand dire c’est faire voir. L’évidence dans la rhétorique antiqueʼ, EL 49/4: 3–22.Google Scholar

Calogero, G. (1957) ‘Gorgias and the Socratic principle Nemo sua sponte peccat’, JHS 77: 12–17.Google Scholar

Cancik, H. (1998) ‘Lucian on conversion. Remarks on Lucian’s dialogue Nigrinos’, in Ancient and Modern Perspectives on the Bible and Culture. Essays in Honor of Hans Dieter Betz, ed. Collins, A. Y.. Atlanta: 26–48.Google Scholar

Capuccino, C. (2005) Filosofi e rapsodi. Testo, traduzione e commento dello Ione platonico. Bologna.Google Scholar

Caracciolo, M. (2014) The Experientiality of Narrative. An Enactivist Approach. Berlin.Google Scholar

Carroll, N. (2001) Beyond Aesthetics. Philosophical Essays. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Carson, A. (1992) ‘Simonides painter’, in Innovations of Antiquity, ed. Hexter, R.. New York: 51–68.Google Scholar

Cassin, B. (1995) L’effet sophistique. Paris.Google Scholar

Caster, M. (1935) ‘La composition du Nigrinos et les intentions ironiques attribuées à Lucien’, in Mélanges offerts à M. Octave Navarre. Toulouse: 471–85.Google Scholar

Cataudella, Q. (1931) ‘Sopra alcuni concetti della poetica antica. “Philanthropia”’, RFIC 59: 382–7.Google Scholar

Cave, T. (2016) Thinking with Literature. Towards a Cognitive Criticism. Oxford.Google Scholar

Chandler, C. (2006) Philodemus On Rhetoric. Books 1 and 2. Translation and Exegetical Essays. New York.Google Scholar

Chaston, C. (2010) Tragic Props and Cognitive Function. Aspects of the Function of Images in Thinking. Leiden.Google Scholar

Chrysanthou, C. (2018) Plutarch’s Parallel Lives. Narrative Technique and Moral Judgement. Berlin/Boston.Google Scholar

Clay, D. (1992) ‘Lucian of Samosata. Four philosophical lives (Nigrinus, Demonax, Peregrinus, Alexander Pseudomantis)’, in ANRW ii 36.5, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin: 3406–50.Google Scholar

Colonna, A. (ed.) (1987) Le Etiopiche di Eliodoro. Turin.Google Scholar

Conley, T. M. (1985) ‘Dating the so-called Dissoi Logoi. A cautionary note’, AncPhil 5/1: 59–65.Google Scholar

Connolly, J. (2001) ‘Reclaiming the theatrical in the Second Sophistic’, Helios 28/1: 75–96.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1996) The Hidden Author. An Interpretation of Petronius’ Satyricon. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Coxon, A. H. (ed.) (1986) The Fragments of Parmenides. A Critical Text with Introduction, Translation, the Ancient Testimonia and a Commentary. Assen.Google Scholar

Crotty, K. M. (2009) The Philosopher’s Song. The Poets’ Influence on Plato. Lanham.Google Scholar

Cullhed, A. (2015) The Shadow of Creusa. Negotiating Fictionality in Late Antique Latin Literature. Berlin/Boston.Google Scholar

D’Ancona, M. (2017) Post-truth. The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back. London.Google Scholar

Dachs, H. (1913) Die λύσις ἐκ τοῦ προσώπου. Ein exegetischer und kritischer Grundsatz Aristarchs und seine Neuanwendung auf Ilias und Odyssee. Erlangen.Google Scholar

Dalfen, J. (1974) Polis und Poiesis. Die Auseinandersetzung mit der Dichtung bei Platon und seinen Zeitgenossen. Munich.Google Scholar

Danto, A. C. (1997) After the End of Art. Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton.Google Scholar

Davidson, J. F. (1988) ‘Homer and Sophocles’ Electra’, BICS 35: 45–72.Google Scholar

Davidson, J. N. (1991) ʻThe gaze in Polybius’ Historiesʼ, JRS 81: 10–24.Google Scholar

de Carli, E. (1971) Aristofane e la sofistica. Florence.Google Scholar

de Jong, I. J. F. (1994) ‘Πιστὰ τεϰμήρια in Soph. El. 774’, Mnemosyne 47/5: 679–81.Google Scholar

de Jonge, C. C. (2008) Between Grammar and Rhetoric. Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Language, Linguistics and Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar

de Romilly, J. (1973) ‘Gorgias et le pouvoir de la poésie’, JHS 93: 155–62.Google Scholar

DeLacy, P. (1948) ʻStoic views of poetryʼ, AJPh 69/3: 241–71.Google Scholar

Demand, N. (1975) ‘Plato and the painters’, Phoenix 29/1: 1–20.Google Scholar

Denniston, J. D. (1927) ‘Technical terms in Aristophanes’, CQ 21/1: 113–21.Google Scholar

Desideri, P. (1989) ‘Teoria e prassi storiografica di Plutarco. Una proposta di lettura della coppia Emilio Paolo-Timoleonte’, Maia 41: 199–215.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. (1999) The Masters of Truth in Archaic Greece. New York.Google Scholar

di Benedetto, V. (1969) ‘[Hipp.] Reg. i 24.3’, Studi Classici e Orientali 18: 238.Google Scholar

Dickey, E. (2007) Ancient Greek Scholarship. A Guide to Finding, Reading, and Understanding Scholia, Commentaries, Lexica, and Grammatical Treatises, from Their Beginnings to the Byzantine Period. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. (1977) The Middle Platonists. A Study of Platonism, 80 bc to ad 220. London.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. (ed.) (1959) Plato. Gorgias. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M. (1993) Der Platonismus in der Antike, Vol. iii. Der Platonismus im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert nach Christus. Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt.Google Scholar

Dosi, A. (1968) ‘La definizione gorgiana della tragedia’, RIL 102: 35–90.Google Scholar

Dowden, K. (1996) ‘Heliodoros. Serious intentions’, CQ 46/1: 267–85.Google Scholar

Dowden, K. (2007) ‘Novel ways of being philosophical, or: A tale of two dogs and a phoenix’, in Philosophical Presences in the Ancient Novel, eds. Morgan, J. R. and Jones, M.. Groningen: 137–49.Google Scholar

Duff, T. E. (1999) Plutarch’s Lives. Exploring Virtue and Vice. Oxford.Google Scholar

Easterling, P. E. (1973) ‘Repetition in Sophocles’, Hermes 101/1: 14–34.Google Scholar

Eberwein, T. (2013) Literarischer Journalismus. Theorie – Traditionen – Gegenwart. Köln.Google Scholar

Ebner, M. (2001) ‘Einleitung’, in Lukian. Φιλοψευδεῖς ἢ Ἀπιστῶν. Die Lügenfreunde oder: Der Ungläubige, eds. Ebner, M., Gzella, H., Nesselrath, H.-G. and Ribbat, E.. Darmstadt: 35–61.Google Scholar

Elffers, J., Schuyt, M. and Leemann, F. (1981) Anamorphosen. Ein Spiel mit der Wahrnehmung, dem Schein und der Wirklichkeit. Cologne.Google Scholar

Elkins, J. (2003) Visual Studies. A Skeptical Introduction. New York.Google Scholar

Else, G. F. (1972) The Structure and Date of Book 10 of Plato’s Republic. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. (1993) ‘Seductions of art. Encolpius and Eumolpus in a Neronian picture gallery’, PCPhS 39: 30–47.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. (1995) Art and the Roman Viewer. The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. (2007) Roman Eyes. Visuality and Subjectivity in Art and Text. Princeton.Google Scholar

Esposito, G. (1995) ‘Il contenuto e le fonti scettiche dell’Ermotimo di Luciano’, RAAN 65: 163–84.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. L. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (1996) ‘Blending as a central process of grammar’, in Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, ed. Goldberg, A.. Stanford: 183–203.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1993) ‘Towards an account of the ancient world’s concept of fictive belief’, in Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, eds. Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P.. Exeter: 230–44.Google Scholar

Felski, R. (2008) Uses of Literature. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Felski, R. (2015) The Limits of Critique. Chicago.Google Scholar

Ferrari, G. R. F. (1989) ‘Plato and poetry’, in The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, Vol. i, ed. Kennedy, G. A.. Cambridge: 92–148.Google Scholar

Ferrari, P. F. and Rizzolatti, G. (2014) ‘Introduction. Mirror neuron research. The past and the future’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369/1644: 1–4.Google Scholar

Finglass, P. (2007) Sophocles, Electra. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Finkelberg, M. (1998) The Birth of Literary Fiction in Ancient Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar

Finney, P. C. (1987) ‘Images on finger rings and early Christian art’, DOP 41: 181–6.Google Scholar

Finney, P. C. (1994) The Invisible God. The Earliest Christians on Art. New York.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, J. T. and White, L. M. (1983) The Tabula of Cebes. Chico.Google Scholar

Flashar, H. (1956) ‘Die medizinischen Grundlagen der Lehre von der Wirkung der Dichtung in der griechischen Poetik’, Hermes 84/1: 12–48.Google Scholar

Flashar, H. (1958) Der Dialog Ion als Zeugnis platonischer Philosophie. Berlin.Google Scholar

Ford, A. L. (2002) The Origins of Criticism. Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton.Google Scholar

Forster, F. (2018). Die Polis im Wandel. Ehrendekrete für eigene Bürger im Kontext der hellenistischen Polisgesellschaft. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Frank, J. (2018) Poetic Justice. Rereading Plato’s Republic. Chicago.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. (1930) ‘Parmenidesstudien’, NAWG 5: 153–92.Google Scholar

Frassoni, M. (ed.) (2013) Vita Aeschyli. Lecce.Google Scholar

Freedberg, D. (1989) The Power of Images. Studies in the History and Theory of Response. Chicago.Google Scholar

Freeman, D., Reeve, S. et al (2017) ‘Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders’, Psychological Medicine 47: 2393–400.Google Scholar

Friis Johansen, H. (1964) ‘Die Elektra des Sophokles – Versuch einer neuen Deutung’ C&M 25: 8–32.Google Scholar

Fuchs, E. (1993) Pseudologia. Formen und Funktionen fiktionaler Trugrede in der griechischen Literatur der Antike. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Fuentes González, P. P. (2005) ‘Nigrinus’, in Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, Vol. iv, ed. Goulet, R.. Paris: 712–17.Google Scholar

Füsslin, G. and Hentze, E. (1999) Anamorphosen. Geheime Bilderwelten. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Gagné, R. and Hopman, M. (eds.) (2013) Choral Mediations in Greek Tragedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gaiser, K. (2004) ‘Das Höhlengleichnis (1985)’, in Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Szlezák, T. A.. St. Augustin: 401–10.Google Scholar

Gallagher, S. (2005) How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gallavotti, C. (1930) ‘Il Nigrino di Luciano’, A&R 11/4: 252–63.Google Scholar

Gallavotti, C. (1969) ʻProsa e poesia nella Poetica di Aristoteleʼ, Maia 21/1: 3–16.Google Scholar

Gallese, V., Fadiga, L. et al. (1996) ‘Action recognition in the premotor cortex’, Brain 119/2: 593–609.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gärtner, H. (1969) ‘Charikleia in Byzanz’, A&A 15/1: 47–69.Google Scholar

Gärtner, H. (1971) ‘Johannes Eugenikos, Protheoria zu Heliodors Aithiopika’, ByzZ 64/2: 322–5.Google Scholar

Garzya, A. (1987) ‘Gorgia e l’ἀπάτη della tragedia’, in Filologia e forme letterarie. Studi offerti a Francesco della Corte, Vol. i, ed. Boldrini, S.. Urbino: 245–60.Google Scholar

Gazzola, V. and Keysers, C. (2009) ‘The observation and execution of actions share motor and somatosensory voxels in all tested subjects. Single-subject analyses of unsmoothed fMRI data’, Cerebral Cortex 19/6: 1239–55.Google Scholar

Geffcken, J. (1916–19) ‘Der Bilderstreit des heidnischen Altertums’, Archiv für Religionswissenschaft 19: 286–315.Google Scholar

Gemeinhardt, P. (2007) Das lateinische Christentum und die antike pagane Bildung. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Genette, G. (1966) ‘Frontières du récit’, Communications 8: 152–63.Google Scholar

Genette, G. (1972) Figures iii. Paris.Google Scholar

Gentili, B. (ed.) (2013) Pindaro. Le Olimpiche. Rome.Google Scholar

Georgiadou, A. and Larmour, D. H. J. (1998) Lucian’s Science Fiction Novel True Histories. Interpretation and Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

Gianotti, G. F. (1975) Per una poetica pindarica. Turin.Google Scholar

Gianvittorio, L. (2015) ‘One deception, many lies: Frr. 301/302 Radt and Aeschylus’ Philoctetes’, WS 128: 19–26.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (1993) ‘Plato on falsehood, not fiction’, in Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, eds. Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P.. Exeter: 38–87.Google Scholar

Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (eds.) (1993) Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World. Exeter.Google Scholar

Gish, D. A. (2006) ‘Rivals in persuasion. Gorgianic sophistic versus Socratic rhetoric’, Polis 23: 46–73.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1986) Reading Greek Tragedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1990) ‘The Great Dionysia and civic ideology’, in Nothing to Do with Dionysus? eds. Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F.. Princeton: 97–129.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1994) ʻThe naive and knowing eye. Ecphrasis and the culture of viewing in the Hellenistic worldʼ, in Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture, eds. Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R.. Cambridge: 197–223.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1995) Foucault’s Virginity. Ancient Erotic Fiction and the History of Sexuality. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1997) ‘The audience of Athenian tragedy’, in The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy, ed. Easterling, P. E.. Cambridge: 54–68.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (ed.) (2001) Being Greek under Rome. Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (2002) Sophocles and the Language of Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gordon, R. L. (1979) ‘The real and the imaginary. Production and religion in the Graeco-Roman world’, Art History 2: 5–34.Google Scholar

Gould, T. (1964) ‘Plato’s hostility to art’, Arion 3/1: 70–91.Google Scholar

Goward, B. (1999) Telling Tragedy. Narrative Technique in Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides. London.Google Scholar

Grady, J. E., Oakley, T. and Coulson, S. (1999) ‘Blending and metaphor’, in Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, eds. Steen, G. and Gibbs, R.. Philadelphia: 101–24.Google Scholar

Grau, O. (2003) Virtual Art. From Illusion to Immersion. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gray, B. (forthcoming) ‘Civic and counter-civic cosmopolitanism. Diodorus, Strabo and the later Hellenistic polis’, in Late Hellenistic Literature in Dialogue, eds. König, J. and Wiater, N.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Greenwood, E. (2006) Thucydides and the Shaping of History. London.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2003) Asyl und Athen. Die Konstruktion kollektiver Identität in der griechischen Tragödie. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2013) Experience and Teleology in Ancient Historiography. Futures Past from Herodotus to Augustine. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2015) ‘Vision and reflexivity in the Odyssey and early vase-painting’, Word & Image 31/3: 197–212.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2016) ‘Lucian’s response to Augustine. Conversion and narrative in Confessions and Nigrinus’, Religion in the Roman Empire 2/2: 256–78.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2017) Aesthetic Experiences and Classical Antiquity. The Significance of Form in Narratives and Pictures. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2019a) ‘Das Postfaktische. Sophistische Betrachtungen zum postmodernen Erbe’, Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte 13/2: 113–22.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2019b) ‘World and words. The limits to mimesis and immersion in Heliodorus’ Ethiopica’, in Experience, Narrative and Criticism in Ancient Greece. Under the Spell of Stories, eds. Grethlein, J., Huitink, L. and Tagliabue, A.. Oxford: 127–47.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2020) ‘Plato in therapy. A cognitivist reassessment of the Republic’s idea of mimesis’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78/2: 157–70.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2021) ‘Author and characters. Ancient, narratological, and cognitive views on a tricky relationship’, CPh 116/2: 208–30.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (forthcoming) ‘Thisbe’s intrigue. A plot between deception and illusion (Heliod. 1.15–17)’, in Reading Heliodorus. The Jewel in the Ring, eds. Repath, I. and Whitmarsh, T.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. and Huitink, L. (2017) ‘Homer’s vividness. An enactive approach’, JHS 137: 67–91.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J., Huitink, L. and Tagliabue, A. (eds.) (2019) Experience, Narrative, and Criticism in Ancient Greece. Under the Spell of Stories. Oxford.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. (1990) ‘Contest and contradiction in early Greek poetry’, in Cabinet of the Muses. Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer, eds. Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. J.. Atlanta: 185–207.Google Scholar

Groeneboom, P. (1935) Sophocles’ Electra. Groningen.Google Scholar

Grünbaum, T. (2007) ‘Action between plot and discourse’, Semiotica 165/1–4: 295–314.Google Scholar

Gudeman, A. (1921) Aristoteles. Über die Dichtkunst. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. J. (2007) A Guide to Hellenistic Literature. Malden, MA.Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. J. (2010) ʻLiterary criticismʼ, in A Companion to Hellenistic Literature, eds. Clauss, J. J. and Cuypers, M.. Malden, ma: 337–65.Google Scholar

Habermehl, P. (2006) Petronius, Satyrica 79–141. Band 1: Sat. 79–110. Berlin.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (2002) What Is Ancient Philosophy?. Cambridge, ma.Google Scholar

Hamburger, K. (1993 [1957]) The Logic of Literature, tr. Rose, M. J., 2nd ed. Bloomington.Google Scholar

Hall, J. (1981) Lucian’s Satire. New York.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (1986) Aristotle’s Poetics. A Study of Philosophical Criticism. London.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (ed.) (1993) Plato. Republic 10. Warminster.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (2002) The Aesthetics of Mimesis. Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (2009) ‘The theory and practice of narrative in Plato’, in Narratology and Interpretation. The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature, eds. Grethlein, J. and Rengakos, A.. Berlin/New York: 15–42.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (2011) Between Ecstasy and Truth. Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (2015) ‘Fiction’, in A Companion to Ancient Aesthetics, eds. Destrée, P. and Murray, P.. Chichester: 341–53.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (1998) ‘A reading of Heliodorus, Aithiopika 3.4.1–3.5.2’, in Studies in Heliodorus, ed. Hunter, R.. Cambridge: 19–39.Google Scholar

Hasenclever, L. (1908) Über Lukians Nigrinos. Munich.Google Scholar

Havelock, E. A. (1963) Preface to Plato. Oxford.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (1985) ‘Hesiod’s didactic poetry’, CQ 35: 245–63.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (1987) The Poetics of Greek Tragedy. London.Google Scholar

Heirman, L. J. R. (ed.) (1972) Plutarchus, De audiendis poetis. Introduction, Translation, Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

Helm, R. W. O. (1906) Lucian und Menipp. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Hercher, R. (1869) ‘Τῆς Χαρικλείας ἑρμήνευμα τῆς σώφρονος ἐκ φωνῆς Φιλίππου τοῦ φιλοσόφου’, Hermes 3: 382–8.Google Scholar

Herrmann, F.-G. (2011) ‘Poetry in Plato’s Gorgias’, in Plato and the Poets, eds. Destrée, P. and Herrmann, F.-G.. Leiden: 21–40.Google Scholar

Hesk, J. P. (2000) Deception and Democracy in Classical Athens. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hickok, G. (2009) ‘Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21/7: 1229–43.Google Scholar

Hirsch-Luipold, R. (2002) Plutarchs Denken in Bildern. Studien zur literarischen, philosophischen und religiösen Funktion des Bildhaften. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Hirsch-Luipold, R. (2005) ‘Einleitung’, in Die Bildtafel des Kebes. Allegorie des Lebens, eds. Hirsch-Luipold, R., Feldmeier, R., Hirsch, B., Koch, L. and Nesselrath, H.-G.. Darmstadt: 11–37.Google Scholar

Hogan, P. C. (2011) Affective Narratology. The Emotional Structure of Stories. Lincoln.Google Scholar

Hogan, P. C. (2018) Literature and Emotion. London.Google Scholar

Holmes, B. A. (2010) The Symptom and the Subject. The Emergence of the Physical Body in Ancient Greece. Princeton.Google Scholar

Hölscher, F. (2017) Die Macht der Gottheit im Bild. Archäologische Studien zur griechischen Götterstatue. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Hölscher, T. (2018) Visual Power in Ancient Greece and Rome. Between Art and Social Reality. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Hölscher, U. (1952) ‘Der Logos bei Heraklit’, in Varia Variorum. Festgabe für Karl Reinhardt, dargebracht von Freunden und Schülern zum 14. Februar 1951. Münster: 69–81.Google Scholar

Hölscher, U. (1989) Die Odyssee. Epos zwischen Märchen und Roman. Munich.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. and Pelling, C. (eds.) (2017) Herodotus. Histories. Book vi. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hose, M. (2014) ‘Klemens von Alexandrien und die Grenze zwischen Christen und Heidentum’, in Grenzen der Antike. Die Produktivität von Grenzen in Transformationsprozessen, ed. Heinze, A.. Berlin: 39–54.Google Scholar

Huitink, L. (2019) ‘Enargeia, enactivism and the ancient readerly imagination’, in Distributed Cognition in Classical Antiquity, eds. Anderson, M., Cairns, D. and Sprevak, M.. Edinburgh: 173–93.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (2005) ‘“Philip the Philosopher” on the Aithiopika of Heliodorus’, in Metaphor and the Ancient Novel, eds. Harrison, S., Paschalis, M. and Frangoulidis, S.. Groningen: 123–38.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (2008) On Coming After. Studies in Post-Classical Greek Literature and Its Reception. i–ii. Berlin.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (2009) Critical Moments in Classical Literature. Studies in the Ancient View of Literature and Its Uses. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (2012) Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature. The Silent Stream. Cambridge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hunter, R. and de Jonge, C. C. (eds.) (2018) Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Augustan Rome. Rhetoric, Criticism and Historiography. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. and Russell, D. (eds.) (2011) Plutarch, How to Study Poetry (De audiendis poetis). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P. et al. (1999) ‘Cortical mechanisms of human imitation’, Science 286/5449: 2526–8.Google Scholar

Ihde, D. (1971) Hermeneutic Philosophy. The Philosophy of Paul Ricœur. Evanston.Google Scholar

Immisch, O. (ed.) (1927) Gorgiae Helena. Kleine Texte für Vorlesungen und Übungen, Vol. clviii. Berlin.Google Scholar

Ioli, R. (2018) Il felice inganno. Poesia, finzione e verità nel mondo antico. Milan.Google Scholar

Iribarren, L. (2013) ‘Les peintres d’Empédocle (DK 31 B23). Enjeux et portée d’une analogie préplatonicienne’, Philosophie Antique 13: 83–115.Google Scholar

Iser, W. (1972) Der implizite Leser. Kommunikationsformen des Romans von Bunyan bis Beckett. Munich.Google Scholar

Iser, W. (1976) Der Akt des Lesens. Theorie ästhetischer Wirkung. Munich.Google Scholar

Jacobson, H. (2004) ʻA Philonic rejection of Platoʼ, Mnemosyne 57/4: 488.Google Scholar

Jaeger, W. (1933–47) Paideia. i–iii. Berlin.Google Scholar

Janaway, C. (1995) Images of Excellence. Plato’s Critique of the Arts. Oxford.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (1984) Aristotle on Comedy. Towards a Reconstruction of Poetics ii. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (2000) Philodemus. On Poems. Book 1. Oxford.Google Scholar

Jaubert, A., Geiger, W. and Hissen, S. (1989) Fotos, die lügen. Politik mit gefälschten Bildern. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Jensen, R. M. (2005) Face to Face. Portraits of the Divine in Early Christianity. Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. (2016) ‘Parmenides’ likely story’, OSAPh 50: 1–29.Google Scholar

Joly, R. (1963) Le Tableau de Cébès et la philosophie religieuse. Brussels.Google Scholar

Joly, R. and Byl, S. (eds.) (1984) Hippocrates. Du régime (Hippocratis De diaeta). Corpus Medicorum Graecorum 1.2.4. Berlin.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. (1984) ‘Tarsos in the Amores ascribed to Lucian’, GRBS 25/2: 177–81.Google Scholar

Jones, M. (2004) ‘The wisdom of Egypt. Base and heavenly magic in Heliodoros’ Aithiopika’, Ancient Narrative 4: 79–98.Google Scholar

Jones, M. (2012) Playing the Man. Performing Masculinities in the Ancient Greek Novel. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kaibel, G. (1896) Elektra. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Kaiser, E. (1964) ‘Odyssee-Szenen als Topoi’, MH 21/2: 109–36.Google Scholar

Kamerbeek, J. C. (1974) The Electra. The Plays of Sophocles, Vol. v. Leiden.Google Scholar

Kamesar, A. (ed.) (2009) The Cambridge Companion to Philo. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kamtekar, R. (2008) ‘Plato on education and art’, in The Oxford Handbook of Plato, ed. Fine, G.. Oxford: 336–59.Google Scholar

Karavas, O. (2005) Lucien et la tragédie. Berlin.Google Scholar

Kasprzyk, D. (2017) ‘Les Aigyptiaka de Cnémon (Héliodore, Éthiopiques)’, AN 14: 149–47.Google Scholar

Kassel, R. (1958) Untersuchungen zur griechischen und römischen Konsolationsliteratur. Munich.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (1988) Guardians of Language. The Grammarian and Society in Late Antiquity. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Kastner, W. (1977) ‘ἀπάτη’, MH 34: 199–202.Google Scholar

Kasulke, C. T. (2005) Fronto, Marc Aurel und kein Konflikt zwischen Rhetorik und Philosophie im 2. Jh. n. Chr. Munich.Google Scholar

Keen, S. (2007) Empathy and the Novel. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kells, J. H. (1973) Electra. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kerferd, G. B. (1981) The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kim, L. (2010) Homer Between History and Fiction in Imperial Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kim, L. (2014) ʻArchaizing and classicism in the literary historical thinking of Dionysius of Halicarnassusʼ, in Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World, eds. Ker, J. and Pieper, C.. Leiden: 357–87.Google Scholar

Kim, L. (2017) ʻLiterary history in imperial Greece. Dionysius’ On Ancient Orators, Plutarch’s On the Oracles of the Pythia, Philostratus’ Lives of the Sophistsʼ, in Griechische Literaturgeschichtsschreibung. Traditionen, Probleme und Konzepte, eds. Grethlein, J. and Rengakos, A.. Berlin: 212–47.Google Scholar

Kim, L. (2018) ‘The trouble with Calasiris. Duplicity and autobiographical narrative in Heliodorus and Galen’, Mnemosyne 72/2: 229–49.Google Scholar

Kirk, G. S. (1950) ‘The Michigan Alcidamas-Papyrus; Heraclitus fr. 56d; The riddle of the lice’, CQ 44: 149–67.Google Scholar

Kitzinger, R. (1991) ‘Why mourning becomes Elektra’, ClAnt 10/2: 298–327.Google Scholar

Klauk, T. and Köppe, T. (eds.) (2014) Fiktionalität. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch (= Revisionen, Vol. iv). Berlin.Google Scholar

Koch, L. (2005) ‘Der Weg zur Bildung. Die Tabula Cebetis aus pädagogischer Sicht’, in Die Bildtafel des Kebes. Allegorie des Lebens, eds. Hirsch-Luipold, R., Feldmeier, R. et al. Darmstadt: 194–221.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (1998) ‘The invention of fiction’ in Ancient Fiction and Early Christian Narrative, eds. Hock, R. F. et al. Atlanta: 3–17.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2001) Pity Transformed. London.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2004) ‘“The birth of the reader”. Plutarch as a literary critic’, Scholia 13: 3–27.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2006) The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks. Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature. Toronto.Google Scholar

Korenjak, M. (2000) Publikum und Redner. Ihre Interaktion in der sophistischen Rhetorik der Kaiserzeit. Munich.Google Scholar

Kranz, W. (1933) Stasimon. Untersuchungen zu Form und Gehalt der griechischen Tragödie. Berlin.Google Scholar

Kristeller, P. O. (1951) ‘The modern systems of the arts. A study in the history of aesthetics’, JHI 12/4: 496–527.Google Scholar

Kristeller, P. O. (1952) ‘The modern systems of the arts. A study in the history of aesthetics (ii)’, JHI 13/1: 17-46.Google Scholar

Kukkonen, K. (2014) ‘Presence and prediction. The embodied reader’s cascades of cognition’, Style 48/3: 367–84.Google Scholar

Kukkonen, K. and Caracciolo, M. (2014) ‘Introduction. What is the “Second Generation”?’, Style 48/3: 261–74.Google Scholar

Kuzmičová, A. (2012) ‘Presence in the reading of literary narrative. A case for motor enactment’, Semiotica 189: 23–48.Google Scholar

Kuzmičová, A. (2013) ‘Outer vs inner reverberations. Verbal auditory imagery and meaning-making in literary narrative’, Journal of Literary Theory 7/1–2: 111–34.Google Scholar

Kyriakou, P. (1997) ʻAristotle’s Poetics and Stoic literary theoryʼ, RhM 140/3–4: 257-80.Google Scholar

Lada-Richards, I. (1993) ‘Empathic understanding. Emotion and cognition in classical dramatic audience-response’, PCPhS 39: 94–140.Google Scholar

Lada-Richards, I. (1997) ‘“Estrangement” or “reincarnation”? Performers and performance on the classical Athenian stage’, Arion 5/2: 66-107.Google Scholar

Lada-Richards, I. (1999) Initiating Dionysus. Ritual and Theatre in Aristophanes’ Frogs. Oxford.Google Scholar

Laird, A. (2003) ‘Fiction as a discourse of philosophy in Lucian’s Verae historiae’, in The Ancient Novel and Beyond, eds. Panayotakis, S., Zimmerman, M. and Keulen, W.. Leiden: 115–27.Google Scholar

Lamberton, R. (1986) Homer the Theologian. Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Lamberton, R. (ed.) (1992) Homer’s Ancient Readers. The Hermeneutics of Greek Epic’s Earliest Exegetes. Princeton.Google Scholar

Lanata, G. (ed.) (1963) Poetica pre-platonica. Testimonianze e frammenti. Florence.Google Scholar

Lattmann, C. (2010) Das Gleiche im Verschiedenen. Metapher des Sports und Lob des Siegers in Pindars Epinikien. Berlin.Google Scholar

Le Boulluec, A. (1998) ‘La place des concepts philosophiques dans la réflexion de Philon sur le plaisirʼ, in Philon d’Alexandrie et la langage de la philosophie, ed. Lévy, C.. Turnhout: 129–52.Google Scholar

Lechner, T. (2015) ‘Bittersüße Pfeile. Protreptische Rhetorik und platonische Philosophie in Lukians Nigrinus’, Millennium 12/1: 1–40.Google Scholar

Lechner, T. (2016) ‘Bittersüße Pfeile. Protreptische Rhetorik und platonische Philosophie in Lukians Nigrinus (2. Teil)’, Millennium 13/1: 67–140.Google Scholar

Ledbetter, G. M. (2003) Poetics before Plato. Interpretation and Authority in Early Greek Theories of Poetry. Princeton.Google Scholar

Lefkowitz, M. R. (1981) The Lives of the Greek Poets. London.Google Scholar

Lefteratou, A. (2018) Mythological Narratives. The Bold and Faithful Heroines of the Greek Novel. Berlin.Google Scholar

Leszl, W. (1985) ‘Il potere della parola in Gorgia e in Platone’, in Gorgia e la sofistica. Atti del convegno internazionale (Lentini-Catania 1983), eds. Montoneri, L. and Romano, F.. Catania: 65–80.Google Scholar

Levine, C. (2015) Forms. Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton.Google Scholar

Levinson, J. (ed.) (1998) Aesthetics and Ethics. Essays at the Intersection. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lévy, C. (1993) ʻLe concept de doxa de Stoïciens à Philon d’Alexandrie. Essai d’étude diachroniqueʼ, in Passions and Perceptions. Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Hellenisticum, eds. Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M. C.. Cambridge: 250–84.Google Scholar

Liebert, R. S. (2017) Tragic Pleasure from Homer to Plato. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lissarrague, F. (1987) Un flot d’images. Une esthétique du banquet grec. Paris.Google Scholar

Lissarrague, F. (1992), ‘Graphein: écrire et dessiner’, in L’image en jeu. De l’antiquité à Paul Klee, eds. Bron, C. and Kassapoglou, E.. Yens-sur-Morges: 189–203.Google Scholar

Litt, T. (1909) ‘Lucians Nigrinus’, RhM 64: 98–107.Google Scholar

Lloyd, M. (2005) Sophocles, Electra. London.Google Scholar

Longrigg, J. (1976) ‘The “roots of all things”’, Isis 67/3: 420–38.Google Scholar

Lowe, N. J. (2000) ‘Comic plots and the invention of fiction’, in The Rivals of Aristophanes. Studies in Athenian Old Comedy, eds. Harvey, D. and Wilkins, J.. London: 259–72.Google Scholar

Lucas, D. W. (ed.) (1968) Aristotle. Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Luther, W. (1935) ‘Wahrheit’ und ‘Lüge’ im ältesten Griechentum. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Maar, C. and Burda, H. (eds.) (2006) Iconic Worlds. Neue Bilderwelten und Wissensräume. Cologne.Google Scholar

Macé, A. (2007) ‘Gorgias, le Gorgias et l’ordre de l’âme’, in Gorgias – Menon. Selected Papers from the Seventh Symposium Platonicum, ed. Erler, M. and Brisson, L.. Sankt Augustin: 83–9.Google Scholar

MacLeod, C. W. (1978) ‘Reason and necessity. Thucydides iii 9–14, 37–48’, JHS 98: 64–78.Google Scholar

MacLeod, L. (2001) Dolos and Dike in Sophokles’ Elektra. Leiden.Google Scholar

Maehler, H. (1963) Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum bis zur Zeit Pindars. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Manieri, A. (1998) L’immagine poetica nella teoria degli antichi. Phantasia ed enargeia. Pisa.Google Scholar

Männlein-Robert, I. (2007) Stimme, Schrift und Bild. Zum Verhältnis der Künste in der hellenistischen Dichtung. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

March, J. R. (2001) Electra. Warminster.Google Scholar

Marchand, S. and Ponchon, P. (eds.) (2016) Platon, Gorgias, suivi de l’Éloge d’Hélène de Gorgias. Paris.Google Scholar

Marcovich, M. (ed.) (1967) Heraclitus. Fragmenta. Merida.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2013) ʻPolybius, Phylarchus, and “tragic history”. A reconsiderationʼ, in Polybius and His World. Essays in Memory of F. W. Walbank, eds. Gibson, B. and Harrison, T.. Oxford: 73–90.Google Scholar

Marrou, H.-I. (1948) Histoire de l’éducation dans l’antique. Paris.Google Scholar

Marshall, C. W. (2006) ‘How to write a messenger speech (Sophocles, Electra 680-763)’, in Greek Drama iii. Essays in honour of Kevin Lee, ed. Davidson, J.. London: 203–22.Google Scholar

Maso, S. (2018) Dissoi Logoi. Edizione criticamente rivista, introduzione, traduzione, commento. Rome.Google Scholar

Mastrangelo, M. and Harris, J. (1997) ‘The meaning of Republic 606a3–b5’, CQ 47/1: 301–5.Google Scholar

McGing, B. (2010) Polybius’ Histories. Oxford.Google Scholar

McIntyre, L. (2018) Post-truth. Cambridge, ma.Google Scholar

Méasson, A. (1980) ʻUn aspect de la critique du polythéisme chez Philon d᾽Alexandrie. Les acceptions du mot μῦθος dans son œuvreʼ, Mémoires (Centre Jean Palerne) 2: 75–107.Google Scholar

Méasson, A. (1986) Du char ailé de Zeus à l᾽arche d᾽alliance. Images et mythes Platoniciens chez Philon d᾽Alexandrie. Paris.Google Scholar

Mecella, L. (2014) ‘L’enigmatica figura di Eliodoro e la datazione delle Etiopiche’, Mediterraneo Antico 17/2: 633–58.Google Scholar

Meijering, R. (1987) Literary and Rhetorical Theories in Greek Scholia. Groningen.Google Scholar

Merkelbach, R. (1962) Roman und Mysterium in der Antike. Munich.Google Scholar

Mirzoeff, N. (1999) An Introduction to Visual Culture. London.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. J. T. (2005) What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago.Google Scholar

Mommsen, T. (1890) ‘Der Religionsfrevel nach römischem Recht’, HZ 64: 389–429.Google Scholar

Montiglio, S. (2013) Love and Providence. Recognition in the Ancient Novel. New York.Google Scholar

Moreno, J. (2019) Tausend Zeilen Lüge. Das System Relotius und der deutsche Journalismus. Berlin.Google Scholar

Morgan, J. R. (1982) ‘History, romance and realism in the Aithiopika of Heliodorus’, ClAnt 1: 221–65.Google Scholar

Morgan, J. R. (1989) ‘The story of Knemon in Heliodoros’ Aithiopika’, JHS 109: 99–113.Google Scholar

Morgan, J. R. (1991) ‘Reader and audiences in the Aithiopika of Heliodoros’, Groningen Colloquia on the Novel 4: 85–103.Google Scholar

Morgan, J. R. (1993) ‘Make-believe and make believe. The fictionality of the Greek novels’, in Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, eds. Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P.. Exeter: 175–229.Google Scholar

Morgan, J. R. (2012a) ‘Heliodorus’ in Space in Ancient Greek Literature, ed. de Jong, I. J. F.. Leiden: 557–77.Google Scholar

Morgan, J. R. (2012b) ‘Le culte du Nil chez Héliodore’, in Les hommes et les dieux dans l’ancien roman, eds. Bost-Pouderon, C. and Pouderon, B.. Lyon: 255–67.Google Scholar

Morgan, J. R. and Repath, I. (2019) ‘Mistresses and servant-women, and the slavery and mastery of love in Heliodoros’, in Slaves and Masters in the Ancient Novel, eds. Panayotakis, S. and Paschalis, M.. Groningen: 139–60.Google Scholar

Morgan, M. L. (1990) ‘Plato, inquiry, and painting’, Apeiron 23/2: 121–45.Google Scholar

Morina, N., Brinkman, W.-P. et al. (2015) ‘Social interactions in virtual reality exposure therapy. A proof-of-concept pilot study’, Technology and Health Care 23/5: 581–9.Google Scholar

Moss, L. (1971) ‘Plato and the Poetics’, PhQ 50: 533–42.Google Scholar

Most, G. W. (1985) The Measures of Praise. Structure and Function in Pindar’s Second Pythian and Seventh Nemean Odes. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Muecke, F. (1977) ‘Playing with the play. Theatrical self-consciousness in Aristophanes’, Antichthon 11: 52–67.Google Scholar

Munteanu, D. L. (2012) Tragic Pathos. Pity and Fear in Greek Philosophy and Tragedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Murray, J. S. (1988) ‘Disputation, deception, and dialectic. Plato on the true rhetoric (Phaedrus 261–266)’, Ph&Rh 21/4: 279–89.Google Scholar

Murray, O. (ed.) (1990) Sympotica. A Symposium On the Symposion. Oxford.Google Scholar

Murray, P. (ed.) (1996) Plato on Poetry. Ion; Republic 376e–398b9; Republic 595–608b10. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Murray, S. C. (1977) ‘Art and the early church’, JThS 28: 303–45.Google Scholar

Naddaff, R. A. (2002) Exiling the Poets. The Production of Censorship in Plato’s Republic. Chicago.Google Scholar

Nasrallah, L. S. (2010) Christian Responses to Roman Art and Architecture. The Second Century Church amid the Spaces of Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Nehamas, A. (1999a) ‘Plato on imitation and poetry in Republic x’, in Virtues of Authenticity. Essays on Plato and Socrates, ed. Nehamas, A.. Princeton: 251–78.Google Scholar

Nehamas, A. (1999b) ‘Plato and the mass media’, in Virtues of Authenticity. Essays on Plato and Socrates, ed. Nehamas, A.. Princeton: 279–99.Google Scholar

Nehamas, A. (2002) ‘Parmenidean being/Heraclitean fire’, in Presocratic Philosophy. Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, eds. Caston, V. and Graham, D. W.. Aldershot: 45–64.Google Scholar

Nenci, G. (1953) ‘Il motivo dell’autopsia nella storiografia greca’, SCO 3: 14–46.Google Scholar

Nesselrath, H.-G. (1992) ‘Kaiserzeitlicher Skeptizismus in platonischem Gewand. Lukians Hermotimos’, in ANRW ii 36.5, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin: 3451–82.Google Scholar

Nesselrath, H.-G. (2001) ‘Lukian und die Magie’, in Lukian. Φιλοψευδεῖς ἢ Ἀπιστῶν. Die Lügenfreunde oder: Der Ungläubige, eds. Ebner, M., Gzella, H., Nesselrath, H.-G. and Ribbat, E.. Darmstadt: 153–66.Google Scholar

Nesselrath, H.-G. (2005) ‘Von Kebes zu Pseudo-Kebes’, in Die Bildtafel des Kebes. Allegorie des Lebens, eds. Hirsch-Luipold, R., Feldmeier, R., Hirsch, B., Koch, L. and Nesselrath, H.-G.. Darmstadt: 38–66.Google Scholar

Nesselrath, H.-G. (ed.) (2016) Gegen falsche Götter und falsche Bildung. Tatian, Rede an die Griechen. Eingeleitet, übersetzt und mit interpretierenden Essays versehen. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Nestle, W. (1941) Vom Mythos zum Logos. Die Selbstentfaltung des griechischen Denkens von Homer bis auf die Sophistik und Sokrates. Aalen.Google Scholar

Newby, Z. (2009) ‘Absorption and erudition in Philostratus’ Imagines’, in Philostratus, eds. Bowie, E. and Elsner, J.. Cambridge: 322–42.Google Scholar

Ní Mheallaigh, K. (2005) ‘“Plato alone was not there …” Platonic presences in Lucian’, Hermathena 179: 89–103.Google Scholar

Ní Mheallaigh, K. (2014) Reading Fiction with Lucian. Fakes, Freaks and Hyperreality. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Niehoff, M. R. (2011) Jewish Exegesis and Homeric Scholarship in Alexandria. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Niehoff, M. R. (2012) ‘Philo and Plutarch on Homer’, in Homer and the Bible in the Eyes of Ancient Interpreters, ed. Niehoff, M. R.. Leiden: 127–54.Google Scholar

Niehoff, M. R. (2018) Philo of Alexandria. An Intellectual Biography. New Haven.Google Scholar

Nielsen, H. S., Phelan, J. and Walsh, R. (2015) ‘Ten theses about fictionality’, Narrative 23/1: 61–73.Google Scholar

Nieto Hernández, P. (2014) ʻPhilo and Greek poetryʼ, StudPhilon 26: 135–49.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F. (1988) Sämtliche Werke. Kritische Studienausgabe in 15 Bänden, Vol. iii. Morgenröte; Idyllen aus Messina; Die fröhliche Wissenschaft, eds. Colli, G. and Montinari, M.. Munich.Google Scholar

Noë, A. (2004) Action in Perception. Cambridge, ma.Google Scholar

Nünlist, R. (2009) The Ancient Critic at Work. Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. (1993) ʻPoetry and the passions. Two Stoic viewsʼ, in Passions and Perceptions. Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Hellenisticum, eds. Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M. C.. Cambridge: 97–149.Google Scholar

O’Brien, M. J. (1967) The Socratic Paradoxes and the Greek Mind. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, N. (1992) Alcidamas, Aristophanes and the Beginnings of Greek Stylistic Theory. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Ober, J. (1998) Political Dissent in Democratic Athens. Intellectual Critics of Popular Rule. Princeton.Google Scholar

Ogden, D. (2004) ‘Eucrates and Demainete. Lucian, Philopseudes 27–8’, CQ 54/2: 484–93.Google Scholar

Ogden, D. (2007a) ‘The love of wisdom and the love of lies. The philosophers and philosophical voices of Lucian’s Philopseudes’, in Philosophical Presences in the Ancient Novel, eds. Morgan, J. R. and Jones, M.. Groningen: 177–204.Google Scholar

Ogden, D. (2007b) In Search of the Sorcerer’s Apprentice. The Traditional Tales of Lucian’s Lover of Lies. Swansea.Google Scholar

Osborne, R. (1994) ‘Framing the centaur. Reading fifth-century architectural sculpture’, in Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture, eds. Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R.. Cambridge: 52–84.Google Scholar

Osborne, R. (2017) ‘How the Gauls broke the frame. The political and theological impact of taking battle scenes off Greek temples’, in The Frame in Classical Art. A Cultural History, eds. Platt, V. and Squire, M.. Cambridge: 425–56.Google Scholar

Otto, N. (2009) Enargeia. Untersuchung zur Charakteristik alexandrinischer Dichtung. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Pace, C. (2008) ‘Tragedia, ἔκπληξις e ἀπάτη nell’ anonima Vita di Eschilo’, SemRom 11: 229–54.Google Scholar

Palmer, A. (2004) Fictional Minds. Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar

Panayotakis, C. (1995) Theatrum arbitri. Theatrical Elements in the Satyrica of Petronius. Leiden.Google Scholar

Papadimitropoulos, L. (2013) ‘Love and the reinstatement of the self in Heliodorus’ Aethiopica’, G&R 60: 101–13.Google Scholar

Parlavantza-Friedrich, U. (1969) Täuschungsszenen in den Tragödien des Sophokles. Berlin.Google Scholar

Paulsen, T. (1992) Inszenierung des Schicksals. Tragödie und Komödie im Roman des Heliodor. Trier.Google Scholar

Paulsen, T. (2009) ‘“Ambrosia floss aus seinen Reden”. Scherz, Satire, Ironie und tiefere Bedeutung in Lukians Nigrinos’, in Ironie. Griechische und lateinische Fallstudien, ed. Glei, R. F.. Trier: 229–45.Google Scholar

Payne, M. (2007) Theocritus and the Invention of Fiction. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pedrique, N. (2011) Logos dynastes. Dichtung und Rhetorik in Platons Gorgias. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (ed.) (1997) Greek Tragedy and the Historian. Oxford.Google Scholar

Peponi, A.-E. (2012) Frontiers of Pleasure. Models of Aesthetic Response in Archaic and Classical Greek Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar

Peretti, A. (1946) Luciano. Un intellettuale greco contro Roma. Florence.Google Scholar

Pesce, D. (ed.) (1982) La Tavola di Cebete. Brescia.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, R. (1968) History of Classical Scholarship. From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford.Google Scholar

Philippovich, E. von (1966) Kuriositäten/Antiquitäten. Braunschweig.Google Scholar

Platt, V. (2011) Facing the Gods. Epiphany and Representation in Graeco-Roman Art, Literature and Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Platt, V. and Squire, M. (eds.) (2010) The Art of Art History in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. Arethusa 43/2: 133–344. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Podlecki, A. J. (1969) ‘The Peripatetics as literary critics’, Phoenix 23/1: 114–37.Google Scholar

Pohlenz, M. (1920) ‘Die Anfänge der griechischen Poetik’, NGG, Phil.-Hist.: 142–78.Google Scholar

Pohlenz, M. (1954) Die griechische Tragödie, Vol. ii. Erläuterungen. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Polletta, F. and Callahan, J. (2017) ‘Deep stories, nostalgia narratives, and fake news. Storytelling in the Trump era’, American Journal of Cultural Sociology 5/3: 392–408.Google Scholar

Porter, J. I. (1995) ʻΟἱ κριτικοί. A reassessmentʼ, in Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle. A Collection of Papers in Honour of D. M. Schenkeveld, eds. Abbenes, J. G. J., Slings, S. R. and Sluiter, I.. Amsterdam: 83–109.Google Scholar

Porter, J. I. (ed.) (2006) Classical Pasts. The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar

Porter, J. I. (2009a) ‘Is art modern? Kristeller’s “Modern system of the arts” reconsidered’, British Journal of Aesthetics 49/1: 1–24.Google Scholar

Porter, J. I. (2009b) ‘Reply to Shiner’, British Journal of Aesthetics 49/2: 171–8.Google Scholar

Porter, J. I. (2010a) The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece. Matter, Sensation, and Experience. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Porter, J. I. (2010b) ʻWhy art has never been autonomousʼ, Arethusa 43/2: 165–80.Google Scholar

Porter, J. I. (2016) The Sublime in Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Praechter, K. (1885) Cebetis tabulam quanam aetate conscripta esse videatur. Karlsruhe.Google Scholar

Praechter, K. (1892) ‘Skeptisches bei Lukian’, Philologus 51: 284–93.Google Scholar

Praechter, K. (1898) ‘Zur Frage nach Lukians philosophischen Quellen’, AGPh 11: 505–16.Google Scholar

Pratt, L. H. (1993) Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar. Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Pucci, P. (1977) Hesiod and the Language of Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Puelma, M. (1989) ‘Der Dichter und die Wahrheit in der griechischen Poetik von Homer bis Aristoteles’, MH 46/2: 65–100.Google Scholar

Pujiula, M. (2006) Körper und christliche Lebensweise. Clemens von Alexandreia und sein Paidagogos. Berlin.Google Scholar

Radermacher, L. (1902) ‘Aus Lucians Lügenfreund’, in Festschrift Theodor Gomperz, dargebacht zum siebzigsten Geburtstage am 29. März 1902 von Schülern, Freunden, Collegen. Vienna: 197–207.Google Scholar

Radt, S. L. (1981) ‘Vita Aeschyli §6. ἕως τρίτου μέρους / ἕως τρίτης ἡμέρας’, ZPE 42: 1–7.Google Scholar

Reardon, B. P. (1971) Courants littéraires grecs des 2e et 3e siècles après J.-C. Paris.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, K. (1947) Sophokles. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, K. (1959) Parmenides und die Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Reitzenstein, R. (1906) Hellenistische Wundererzählungen. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Richardson, N. J. (1980) ‘Literary criticism in the exegetical scholia to the Iliad. A sketch’, CQ 30/2: 265–87.Google Scholar

Richardson, N. J. (1985) ‘Pindar and later literary criticism in antiquity’, Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 5: 383–401.Google Scholar

Richardson, N. J. (1994) ʻAristotle and Hellenistic scholarshipʼ, in La philologie grecque à l’époque hellénistique et romaine. Sept exposés suivis de discussions, ed. Montanari, F.. Geneva: 7–28.Google Scholar

Ricœur, P. (1965) De l’interprétation. Essai sur Freud. Paris.Google Scholar

Rimell, V. (2002) Petronius and the Anatomy of Fiction. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ringer, M. (1998) Electra and the Empty Urn. Metatheater and Role Playing in Sophocles. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Rispoli, G. M. (1984) ‘φαντασία ed ἐνάργεια negli scolî all’Iliade’, Vichiana 13: 311–39.Google Scholar

Rispoli, G. M. (1988) Lo spazio del verisimile. Il racconto, la storia e il mito. Naples.Google Scholar

Robert, L. (1930) ‘Pantomimen im griechischen Orient’, Hermes 65: 106–22.Google Scholar

Robinson, T. M. (ed.) (1979) Contrasting Arguments. An Edition of the Dissoi Logoi. Salem.Google Scholar

Rosenbloom, D. (1993) ‘Shouting “fire” in a crowded theater. Phrynichos’s Capture of Miletos and the politics of fear in early Greek tragedy’, Philologus 137: 159–96.Google Scholar

Rosenmeyer, T. G. (1955) ‘Gorgias, Aeschylus and apate’, AJPh 76/3: 225–60.Google Scholar

Rosenmeyer, T. G. (2002) ‘“Metatheater”. An essay on overload’, Arion 10/2: 87–119.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2017) ʻNutritious milk from Hagar’s school. Philo’s Reception of Homerʼ, StudPhilon 29: 1–32.Google Scholar

Rösler, W. (1980) ‘Die Entdeckung der Fiktionalität in der Antike’, Poetica 12/3–4: 283–319.Google Scholar

Rostagni, A. (1955) Scritti Minori, Vol. i. Aesthetica. Turin.Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (1986) Philo of Alexandria and the Timaeus of Plato. Leiden.Google Scholar

Russell, D. (ed.) (1964) Longinus. On the Sublime (De sublimitate). Oxford.Google Scholar

Russell, D. (1981) Criticism in Antiquity. London.Google Scholar

Rutherford, I. (1988) ‘Ἔμφασις in ancient literary criticism and Tractatus Coislinianus c. 7’, Maia 40: 125–9.Google Scholar

Ryan, M.-L. (2001) Narrative as Virtual Reality. Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Sandnes, K. O. (2009) The Challenge of Homer. School, Pagan Poets and Early Christianity. London.Google Scholar

Sandy, G. N. (1982) Heliodorus. Boston.Google Scholar

Sandy, G. N. (2001) ‘A neoplatonic interpretation of Heliodorus’ Ethiopian Story’, in ΟΠΩΡΑ. La belle saison de l’hellénisme. Études de littérature antique offertes au Recteur Jacques Bompaire, ed. Billaut, A.. Paris: 169–78.Google Scholar

Schadewaldt, W. (1926) Monolog und Selbstgespräch. Untersuchungen zur Formgeschichte der griechischen Tragödie. Berlin.Google Scholar

Schadewaldt, W. (1955) ‘Furcht und Mitleid? Zur Deutung des Aristotelischen Tragödiensatzes’, Hermes 83/2: 129–71.Google Scholar

Schaeffer, J.-M. (2012) ‘Fictional vs. factual narration’, in The Living Handbook of Narratology, eds. Hühn, P. et al. www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/node/56.html.Google Scholar

Schäublin, C. (1985) ‘Konversionen in antiken Dialogen?’, in Catalepton. Festschrift für Bernhard Wyss zum 80. Geburtstag, ed. Schäublin, C.. Basel: 117–31.Google Scholar

Schein, S. L. (1982) ‘Electra. A Sophoclean problem play’, A&A 28: 69–80.Google Scholar

Scheller, P. (1911) De hellenistica historiae conscribendae arte. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Schenkeveld, D. M. (1982) ‘The structure of Plutarch’s De audiendis poetis’, Mnemosyne 35/1–2: 60–71.Google Scholar

Schlapbach, K. (2010) ‘The logoi of philosophers in Lucian of Samosata’, ClAnt 29/2: 250–77.Google Scholar

Schleier, R. (1973) Tabula Cebetis oder ‘Spiegel des Menschlichen Lebens/darin Tugent und untugent abgemalet ist’. Studien zur Rezeption einer antiken Bildbeschreibung im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert. Berlin.Google Scholar

Schlemm, A. (1893) De fontibus Plutarchi commentationum De audiendis poetis et De fortuna. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Schmid, W., Stählin, O. and von Christ, W. (eds.) (1929–48) Geschichte der griechischen Literatur. 7 vols. Munich.Google Scholar

Schmitt, A. (ed.) (2008) Aristoteles. Poetik. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Schmitz, T. A. (1997) Bildung und Macht. Zur sozialen und politischen Funktion der zweiten Sophistik in der griechischen Welt der Kaiserzeit. Munich.Google Scholar

Schollmeyer, J. (2021) Gorgias’ Lobrede auf Helena. Berlin.Google Scholar

Schröder, B.-J. (2000) ‘“Eulen nach Athen”. Ein Vorschlag zu Lukians Nigrinus’, Hermes 128: 435–42.Google Scholar

Schubert, C. (2014) Minucius Felix. Octavius. Freiburg.Google Scholar

Schuhl, P.-M. (1952) Platon et l’art de son temps. Arts plastiques. Paris.Google Scholar

Schwartz, A. (1863) Über Lukians Nigrinus. Trieste.Google Scholar

Schwarz, B. (1914) Lukians Verhältnis zum Skeptizismus. Königsberg.Google Scholar

Sciolla, L. (1988) Gli artifici della finzione poetica nella Storia Vera di Luciano. Foggia.Google Scholar

Scodel, R. (1984) Sophocles. Woodbridge.Google Scholar

Scott-Baumann, A. (2009) Ricœur and the Hermeneutics of Suspicion. London.Google Scholar

Seale, D. (1982) Vision and Stagecraft in Sophocles. London.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1975) ‘The logical status of fictional discourse’, New Literary History 6/2: 319–32.Google Scholar

Seddon, K. (2005) Epictetus’ Handbook and the Tablet of Cebes. Guides to Stoic Living. London.Google Scholar

Segal, C. P. (1962) ‘Gorgias and the psychology of the logos’, HSPh 66: 99–155.Google Scholar

Segal, C. P. (1966) ‘The Electra of Sophocles’, TAPhA 97: 473–545.Google Scholar

Segal, C. P. (1981) Tragedy and Civilization. An Interpretation of Sophocles. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sheppard, A. (2014) The Poetics of Phantasia. Imagination in Ancient Aesthetics. London.Google Scholar

Shiner, L. (2009) ‘Continuity and discontinuity in the concept of art’, British Journal of Aesthetics 49/2: 159–69.Google Scholar

Sicking, C. M. J. (1962) Aristophanes’ Ranae. Assen.Google Scholar

Sider, S. (1979) Cebes’ Tablet. Facsimiles of the Greek Text, and of Selected Latin, French, English, Spanish, Italian, German, Dutch and Polish Translations. New York.Google Scholar

Sier, K. (2000) ‘Gorgias über die Fiktionalität der Tragödie’, in Dramatische Wäldchen. Festschrift für Eckard Lefèvre zum 65. Geburtstag, eds. Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G.. Hildesheim: 575–618.Google Scholar

Slater, N. W. (1987) ‘“Against interpretation”. Petronius and art criticism’, Ramus 16/1–2: 165–76.Google Scholar

Slater, N. W. (1990) Reading Petronius. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Slings, S. (1989) ‘Critical notes on Plato’s Politeia ii’, Mnemosyne 42/3–4: 380–97.Google Scholar

Smith, G. A. (2008) ‘How thin is a demon?’, JECS 16: 479–512.Google Scholar

Squire, M. (2009) Image and Text in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Squire, M. (2010a) ʻIntroduction. The art of art history in Greco-Roman antiquityʼ, Arethusa 43/2: 133–63.Google Scholar

Squire, M. (2010b) ʻMaking Myron’s cow moo? Ecphrastic epigram and the poetics of simulationʼ, AJPh 131/4: 589–634.Google Scholar

Squire, M. (2013) ʻApparitions apparent. Ekphrasis and the parameters of vision in the Elder Philostratus’s Imaginesʼ, Helios 40/1–2: 97–140.Google Scholar

Squire, M. and Grethlein, J. (2014) ‘“Counterfeit in character but persuasive in appearance”. Reviewing the ainigma of the Tabula Cebetis’, CPh 109/4: 285–324.Google Scholar

Stehle, E. (1997) Performance and Gender in Ancient Greece. Princeton.Google Scholar

Steiner, D. T. (2001) Images in Mind. Statues in Archaic and Classical Greek Literature and Thought. Princeton.Google Scholar

Stenger, J. (2004) Poetische Argumentation. Die Funktion der Gnomik in den Epinikien des Bakchylides. Berlin.Google Scholar

Stenger, J. (2015) ‘John Chrysostom and the power of literary imagination’, in Spätantike Konzeptionen von Literatur, ed. Stenger, J.. Heidelberg: 207–26.Google Scholar

Stenger, J. (2016) ‘Athens and/or Jerusalem? Basil’s and Chrysostom’s views on the didactic use of literature and stories, in Education and Religion in Late Antique Christianity, eds. Gemeinhardt, P., van Hoof, L. and van Nuffelen, P.. London: 86–100.Google Scholar

Sterling, G. E. (2014) ‘“The Jewish philosophy”. Reading Moses via Hellenistic philosophy according to Philo’, in Reading Philo. A Handbook to Philo of Alexandria, ed. Seland, T.. Grand Rapids: 129–54.Google Scholar

Stoevesandt, M. (2004) Feinde – Gegner – Opfer. Zur Darstellung der Troianer in den Kampfszenen der Ilias. Basel.Google Scholar

Stramaglia, A. (1999) Res inauditae, incredulae. Storie di fantasmi nel mondo greco-latino. Bari.Google Scholar

Strang, C. (1986) ‘Plato’s analogy of the cave’, OSAPh 4: 19–34.Google Scholar

Süß, W. (1910) Ethos. Studien zur älteren griechischen Rhetorik. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Suwajanakorn, S., Seitz, S. M. and Kemelmacher-Shlizerman, I. (2017) ‘Synthesizing Obama: Learning lipsync from audio’, ACM Transactions on Graphics 36/4: 1–13.Google Scholar

Swain, S. (1996) Hellenism and Empire. Language, Classicism, and Power in the Greek World, ad 50–250. Oxford.Google Scholar

Szlagor, B. (2005) Verflochtene Bilder. Lukians Porträtierung ‘göttlicher Männer’. Trier.Google Scholar

Szlezák, T. A. (2011) ‘Das Höhlengleichnis (Buch vii 514a–521b, 539d–541b)’, in Platon. Politeia, ed. Höffe, O.. Berlin: 155–74.Google Scholar

Tackaberry, W. H. (1930) Lucian’s Relation to Plato and the Post-Aristotelian Philosophers. Toronto.Google Scholar

Tagliasacchi, A. M. (1960) ‘Plutarco e la tragedia greca’, Dioniso 34: 124–42.Google Scholar

Tanner, J. (2006) The Invention of Art History in Ancient Greece. Religion, Society and Artistic Rationalisation. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Taplin, O. (1977) The Stagecraft of Aeschylus. The Dramatic Use of Exits and Entrances in Greek Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Taplin, O. (1978) Greek Tragedy in Action. London.Google Scholar

Too, Y. L. (ed.) (2001) Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity. Leiden.Google Scholar

Tor, S. (2017) Mortal and Divine in Early Greek Epistemology. A Study of Hesiod, Xenophanes and Parmenides. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Trapp, M. B. (1997) ‘On the Tablet of Cebes’, in Aristotle and After, ed. Sorabji, R.. London: 159–80.Google Scholar

Troscianko, E. T. (2014) Kafka’s Cognitive Realism. New York.Google Scholar

Tucker, G. H. (2003) Homo Viator. Itineraries of Exile, Displacement and Writing in Renaissance Europe. Geneva.Google Scholar

Ugolini, G. (1923) ‘L’evoluzione della critica letteraria d’Aristofane’, SIFC, N.S. 3/4: 215–46; 259–91.Google Scholar

Untersteiner, M. (1949) I sofisti. Testimonianze e frammenti, Vol. ii. Gorgia, Licofrone e Prodico. Florence.Google Scholar

Untersteiner, M. (1954) The Sophists. Oxford.Google Scholar

Valgiglio, E. (ed.) (1973) Plutarco. De audiendis poetis. Turin.Google Scholar

van den Hoek, A. (1988) Clement and His Use of Philo in the Stromateis. Leiden.Google Scholar

van der Stockt, L. (1992) Twinkling and Twilight. Plutarch’s Reflections on Literature. Brussels.Google Scholar

van Groningen, B. A. (1948) ‘Simonide et les Thessaliens’, Mnemosyne 1/1: 1–7.Google Scholar

van Groningen, B. A. (1964) Over Hellas en Hellenen. Verspreide opstellen. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Verdenius, W. J. (1981) ‘Gorgias’ doctrine of deception’, in The Sophists and Their Legacy, ed. Kerferd, G. B.. Wiesbaden: 116–28.Google Scholar

Vetta, M. (ed.) (1995) Poesia e simposio nella Grecia antica. Guida storica e critica. Bari.Google Scholar

Veyne, P. (1988) Did the Greeks Believe in Their Myths? An Essay on the Constitutive Imagination. Chicago.Google Scholar

Vööbus, A. (1979) The Didascalia Apostolorum in Syriac Translated. i–ii. Louvain.Google Scholar

von Möllendorff, P. (2000a) Auf der Suche nach der verlogenen Wahrheit. Lukians Wahre Geschichten. Tübingen.Google Scholar

von Möllendorff, P. (ed.) (2000b) Lukian. Hermotimos oder Lohnt es sich, Philosophie zu studieren? Darmstadt.Google Scholar

von Möllendorff, P. (2006) ‘Sophistische Phantastik. Lukians Lügenfreunde’, in Fremde Wirklichkeiten. Literarische Phantastik und antike Literatur, eds. Hörnke, N. and Baumbach, M.. Heidelberg: 187–201.Google Scholar

von Reutern, G. (1933) Plutarchs Stellung zur Dichtkunst. Interpretation der Schrift De audiendis poetis. Kiel.Google Scholar

von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, T. (1917) Die dramatische Technik des Sophokles. Berlin.Google Scholar

von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1913) Sappho und Simonides. Untersuchungen über griechische Lyriker. Berlin.Google Scholar

Walbank, F. W. (1960) ʻHistory and tragedyʼ, Historia 9: 216–34.Google Scholar

Waldock, A. J. (1951) Sophocles the Dramatist. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Walker, A. D. (1993) ‘Enargeia and the spectator in Greek historiography’, TAPhA 123: 353–77.Google Scholar

Walsh, G. B. (1984) The Varieties of Enchantment. Early Greek Views of the Nature and Function of Poetry. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Walsh, R. (2007) The Rhetoric of Fictionality. Narrative Theory and the Idea of Fiction (Theory and Interpretation of Narrative Series). Columbus.Google Scholar

Walton, K. L. (1990) Mimesis as Make-Believe. On the Foundations of Representational Arts. Cambridge, ma.Google Scholar

Wardy, R. (1996) The Birth of Rhetoric. Gorgias, Plato and Their Successors. London.Google Scholar

Webb, R. (2006) ʻThe Imagines as a fictional text. Ekphrasis, apatē and illusionʼ, in Le défi de l’art. Philostrate, Callistrate et l’image sophistique, ed. Costantini, M., Graziani, F. and Rolet, S.. Rennes: 113–36.Google Scholar

Webb, R. (2008) Demons and Dancers. Performance in Late Antiquity. Cambridge, ma.Google Scholar

Webb, R. (2009) Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Farnham.Google Scholar

Weber, G. (1993) Dichtung und höfische Gesellschaft. Die Rezeption von Zeitgeschichte am Hof der ersten drei Ptolemäer. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Weber, H. (1998) ‘Bildpropaganda und Bildfälschung im Stalinismus’, in Bilder, die lügen. Begleitbuch zur Ausstellung der Stiftung Haus der Geschichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, ed. Hütter, H.W.. Bonn: 82–92.Google Scholar

Węcowski, M. (2014) The Rise of the Greek Aristocratic Banquet. Oxford.Google Scholar

Wedner, S. (1994) Tradition und Wandel im allegorischen Verständnis des Sirenenmythos. Ein Beitrag zur Rezeptionsgeschichte Homers. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Wehrli, F. (1946) ‘Der erhabene und der schlichte Stil in der poetisch-rhetorischen Theorie der Antike’, in Phyllobolia. Für Peter von der Mühll zum 60. Geburtstag am 1. Aug. 1945, eds. Gigon, O., Meuli, K. et al. Basel: 9–34.Google Scholar

Weinstock, S. (1927) ʻDie platonische Homerkritik und ihre Nachwirkungʼ, Philologus 82: 121–53.Google Scholar

Whitman, C. H. (1951) Sophocles. A Study of Heroic Humanism. Cambridge, ma.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (2001) Greek Literature and the Roman Empire. The Politics of Imitation. Oxford.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (2005a) The Second Sophistic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (2005b) ‘Heliodorus smiles’, in Metaphor and the Ancient Novel, eds. Harrison, S., Paschalis, M. and Frangoulidis, S.. Groningen: 87–105.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (2011) Narrative and Identity in the Ancient Greek Novel. Returning Romance. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Wigodsky, M. (1995) ʻThe alleged impossibility of philosophical poetryʼ, in Philodemus and Poetry. Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace, ed. Obbink, D.. New York: 58–68.Google Scholar

Willi, A. (2002) ‘Languages on stage. Aristophanic language, cultural history and Athenian identity’, in The Language of Greek Comedy, ed. Willi, A.. Oxford: 111–49.Google Scholar

Willi, A. (2003) The Languages of Aristophanes. Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Classical Attic Greek. Oxford.Google Scholar

Willi, A. (2008) Sikelismos. Sprache, Literatur und Gesellschaft im griechischen Sizilien (8.–5. Jh. v. Chr.). Bibliotheca Helvetica Romana, Vol. 29. Basel.Google Scholar

Wilson, E. (2012) ‘Sophocles and philosophy’, in Brill’s Companion to Sophocles, ed. Markantonatos, A.. Leiden: 537–62.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. R. S. (1976) ‘The contents of the cave’, in New Essays on Plato and the Pre-Socratics, eds. Shiner, R. and King-Farlow, J.. Guelph: 117–27.Google Scholar

Wilson, P. (2000) The Athenian Institution of the Khoregia. The Chorus, the City and the Stage. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Wilson, P. (ed.) (2007) Greek Theatre and Festivals. Documentary Studies. Oxford.Google Scholar

Winkler, J. J. (1982) ‘The mendacity of Kalasiris and the narrative strategy of Heliodoros’ Aithiopika’, YClS 27: 93–158.Google Scholar

Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. I. (eds.) (1990) Nothing to Do with Dionysus? Athenian Drama in Its Social Context. Princeton.Google Scholar

Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1954–5) ‘The Electra of Sophocles. Prolegomena to an interpretation’, PCPhS 3: 20–6.Google Scholar

Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1980) Sophocles. An Interpretation. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Winter, B. W. (1997) Philo and Paul among the Sophists. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Wolf, W. (1993) Ästhetische Illusion und Illusionsdurchbrechung in der Erzählkunst. Theorie und Geschichte mit Schwerpunkt auf englischem illusionsstörenden Erzählen. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Wolf, W. (2008) ‘Is aesthetic illusion “illusion référentielle”? “Immersion” in (narrative) representations and its relationship to fictionality and factuality’, Journal of Literary Theory 2/1: 99–126.Google Scholar

Wolf, W. (2013a) ‘Preface’, in Immersion and Distance. Aesthetic Illusion in Literature and Other Media. Studies in Intermediality 6, eds. Wolf, W., Bernhart, W. and Mahler, A.. Amsterdam: v–vi.Google Scholar

Wolf, W. (2013b) ‘Aesthetic illusion’, in Immersion and Distance. Aesthetic Illusion in Literature and Other Media. Studies in Intermediality 6, eds. Wolf, W., Bernhart, W. and Mahler, A.. Amsterdam: 1–63.Google Scholar

Wollheim, R. (1980) Art and Its Objects. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Wollheim, R. (1987) Painting as an Art. London.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (1988) Rhetoric in Classical Historiography. Four Studies. London.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. and Martin, R. H. (1996) The Annals of Tacitus. Book 3. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Worman, N. (2015) Landscape and the Spaces of Metaphor in Ancient Literary Theory and Criticism. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Wytzes, J. (1957) ‘The twofold way (i). Platonic influences in the work of Clement of Alexandria’, VChr 11: 226–45.Google Scholar

Wytzes, J. (1960) ‘The twofold way (ii). Platonic influences in the work of Clement of Alexandria’, VChr 14: 129–53.Google Scholar

Zadorojnyi, A. (2002) ‘Safe drugs for the good boys. Platonism and pedagogy in Plutarch’s De audiendis poetis’, in Sage and Emperor. Plutarch, Greek Intellectuals, and Roman Power in the Time of Trajan (98–117 ad), eds. Stadter, P. A. and Van der Stockt, L.. Leuven: 297–314.Google Scholar

Zangara, A. (2008) ʻVoir l’histoire. Théories anciennes du récit historique. Présentationʼ, Anabases 7: 249–56.Google Scholar

Zanker, A. T. (2019) Metaphor in Homer. Time, Speech, and Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Zanker, G. (1981) ‘Enargeia in the ancient criticism of poetry’, RhM 124/3–4: 297–311.Google Scholar

Zanker, G. (2015) ‘The contexts and experience of poetry and art in the Hellenistic world’, in A Companion to Ancient Aesthetics, eds. Destrée, P. and Murray, P.. Chichester: 47–67.Google Scholar

Zeitlin, F. (1981) ‘Travesties of gender and genre in Aristophanes’ Thesmophoriazousae’, Critical Inquiry 8/2: 301–27.Google Scholar

Ziegler, K. (1937) ‘Tragoedia’, RE 6 A.2: 1899–2075.Google Scholar

Zipfel, F. (2001) Fiktion, Fiktivität, Fiktionalität: Analysen zur Fiktion in der Literatur und zum Fiktionsbegriff in der Literaturwissenschaft (= Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft: Wuppertaler Schriften, Vol. ii). Berlin.Google Scholar

Zunshine, L. (ed.) (2015) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Literary Studies. Oxford.Google Scholar

Zwaan, R. A. (2003) ‘The immersed experiencer. Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension’, Psychology of Learning and Motivation 44: 35–62.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive