Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T18:39:55.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Entry #2 - Mutual Partner Control: I Scratch Your Back, You Scratch Mine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

Harold H. Kelley
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
John G. Holmes
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo, Ontario
Norbert L. Kerr
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Harry T. Reis
Affiliation:
University of Rochester, New York
Caryl E. Rusbult
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Paul A. M. Van Lange
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Examples

The Mutual Partner Control situation rests on each individual's preferences and aversion regarding the partner's possible behaviors. Each person's concern is “How do my partner's actions affect me, and how do my actions affect him or her?” This situation exists when people can benefit each other or not. For example, colleagues may (or may not) compliment each other's writing style, lovers may (or may not) exchange endearments, and cousins may (or may not) send each other greeting cards at Christmas. This situation also exists when people can harm each other or not. Members of opposing political parties may (or may not) deliver gratuitous insults and young siblings may (or may not) hurtfully poke each other. In each case, each person's choice is whether or not to have a positive or negative effect on the partner's outcomes.

Conceptual Description

There are two essential requirements for an ideal or “pure” situation of Mutual Partner Control. First, the outcome of each individual must be entirely in the hands of the interaction partner. Each individual's well-being is entirely under the control of the partner's actions. The individual can do nothing to enhance or ameliorate the partner's effect. For example, under many circumstances the two siblings can avoid or dodge each other's blows. To consider that as a situation of Mutual Partner Control, we would have to imagine their being in some confined space (e.g., the back seat of the family car) where such dodging is not possible.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×