Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T20:55:46.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition

The Case of Members of the United States House of Representatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Steven S. Smith
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Jason M. Roberts
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Ryan J. Vander Wielen
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Rohde offers a theory of progressive ambition, the decision of political actors to seek higher elected office. He posits that actors employ a decision calculus in which they jointly consider the probability of winning office, the utility of office, and the costs of running. Actors will seek higher office when these factors are favorable for doing so. Rohde tests a series of hypotheses related to the decision calculus by examining the decisions of House members whether or not to run for Senate seats or governorships.

“Ambition lies at the heart of politics. Politics thrive on the hope of preferment and the drive for office.” Since Joseph Schlesinger wrote those introductory lines to his superb study of career patterns in the United States, a substantial amount of research has been conducted on ambition and office-seeking behavior. Most of this research has, however, been primarily empirical in nature, and has not attempted to provide a more explicit theoretical framework for ambition analysis. In addition, most of this research has followed Schlesinger's example in selecting for analysis persons who actually achieved or tried for an office, and examining their career patterns and character-istics.

The present study departs from both of these trends. The theoretical focus is progressive ambition; the focus of the empirical analysis is on members of the U.S. House of Representatives between 1954 and 1974 and their decisions on whether or not to seek either a U.S. Senate seat or the governorship of their state.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rohde, David W., 1979. “Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of Members of the United States House of Representatives”American Journal of Political Science 23: 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×