Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:31:42.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Distributive and Partisan Issues in Agriculture Policy in the 104th House

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Steven S. Smith
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Jason M. Roberts
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Ryan J. Vander Wielen
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

The authors test the competing theories of legislative organization – distributive, informational, and partisan – by examining the decisions and policies of the House Agriculture Committee. They argue that under certain conditions each of the theories offers some insight into committee behavior. Specifically, they find that the committee's policy space is multidimensional and that there are instances of both partisan and distributive considerations. Moreover, there are circumstances in which the committee acts in accordance with chamber preferences as well as instances in which high demanders on the committee take policy stances that are inconsistent with the floor.

There has been substantial debate among students of Congress concerning the theoretical and empirical applicability of various theories of legislative behavior and organization. Some scholars contend that one perspective is a sufficient explanation of legislative organization and decision making, but others argue that various theories apply at varying times and under differing circumstances. “Rather than seek a single, universal account of congressional politics – whether distributive, informational, partisan, or anything else – we should recognize that all of these considerations operate in varying degrees and that the variation is systematic and predictable.” This study is an effort to extend and apply the latter view.

We want to assist in the effort to see that these varying legislative theories are “knitted together.” To that end, we analyze agriculture policymaking in the 104th House. The House Agriculture Committee is considered a classic constituency committee.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×