Abel, N. H. (1826a). Démonstration de l’impossibilité delarésolution algébrique des equations générales qui passent le quatrième degré. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 1, 65–84. Oeuvres Complètes 1: 66–87.Google Scholar

Abel, N. H. (1826b). Mémoire sur une propiété générale d’une classe très étendue de fonctions transcendantes. Mémoire des Savants Étrangers, 1841 7, 176–264. Oeuvres Complètes 2: 145–211.Google Scholar

Artin, E. (1942). Galois Theory, Notre Dame Mathematical Lectures, no. 2. University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN. Edited and supplemented with a section on applications by Arthur N. Milgram.Google Scholar

Bashmakova, I. G. and Smirnova, G. S. (2000). The Beginnings and Evolution of Algebra, Volume 23 of The Dolciani Mathematical Expositions. Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC. Translated from the Russian by Abe Shenitzer with the editorial assistance of David A. Cox.Google Scholar

Bernoulli, J. (1704). Positionum de seriebus infinitis …pars quinta. In his Werke, 4, 127–147.Google Scholar

Blass, A. (1984). Existence of bases implies the axiom of choice. In Axiomatic Set Theory (Boulder, Colorado, 1983), Volume 31 of Contemporary Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 31–33.Google Scholar

Cantor, G. (1874). Über eine Eigenschaft des Inbegriffes aller reellen algebraischen Zahlen. Journal für reine und angewandte Mathematik 77, 258–262. English translation by W. Ewald in Ewald (1996), Vol. II, 840–843.Google Scholar

Cantor, G. (1883). Grundlagen einer allgemeinen Mannigfaltigkeitslehre. Teubner, Leipzig. In his Gesammelte Abhandlungen, Springer, Berlin, 165–204. English translation by W. Ewald in Ewald (1996), Vol. II, 878–919.Google Scholar

Cantor, G. (1891). Über eine elementare Frage der Mannigfaltigkeitslehre. Jahresbericht deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 1, 75–78. English translation by W. Ewald in Ewald (1996), Vol. II, 920–922.Google Scholar

Cardano, G. (1545). Ars Magna or The Rules of Algebra. Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1993. Translated from the Latin and edited by Witmer, T. Richard, With a foreword by Oystein Ore.Google Scholar

Cauchy, A.-L. (1847). Mémoire sur la théorie des équivalences algébriques, substituée à lathéorie des imaginaires. In Exercises d’analyse et de physique mathématique, Tome 4, Bachelier, Paris, 87–110.Google Scholar

Cayley, A. (1855). Remarques sur la notation des fonctions algébriques. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 50, 282–285.Google Scholar

Chevalley, C. (1943). On the theory of local rings. Annals of Mathematics. Second Series 44, 690–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, P. (1963). The independence of the continuum hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 50, 1143–1148.Google Scholar

Cramer, G. (1750). Introduction à l’analyse des lignes courbes algébriques. Geneva.Google Scholar

Dedekind, R. (1871). Supplement X. In Dirichlet’s Vorlesungen uber Zahlentheorie, 2nd ed., Vieweg 1871.Google Scholar

Dedekind, R. (1894). Supplement XI. In Dirichlet’s Vorlesungen über Zahlentheorie, 4th ed., Vieweg 1894.Google Scholar

Dedekind, R. (1996). Theory of Algebraic Integers. Cambridge Mathematical Library. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Translated from the 1877 French original and with an introduction by John Stillwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dedekind, R. and Weber, H. (1882). Theorie der algebraischen Functionen einer Veränderlichen. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 92, 181–291.Google Scholar

Dedekind, R. and Weber, H. (2012). Theory of Algebraic Functions of One Variable, Volume 39 of History of Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; London Mathematical Society, London. Translated from the 1882 German original and with an introduction, bibliography and index by John Stillwell.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. (1637). The Geometry of René Descartes. (With a Facsimile of the First edition, 1637.). Dover Publications Inc., New York. Translated by David Eugene Smith and Marcia L. Latham, 1954.Google Scholar

Dieudonné, J. (1985). History of Algebraic Geometry: An Outline of the History and Development of Algebraic Geometry. Wadsworth Mathematics Series. Wadsworth International Group, Belmont, CA. Translated from the French by Judith D. Sally.Google Scholar

Dirichlet, P. G. L. (1863). Vorlesungen über Zahlentheorie. F. Vieweg und Sohn, Braunschweig. English translation Lectures on Number Theory, with Supplements by R. Dedekind, translated from the German and with an introduction by John Stillwell, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, G. (1850). Über einige allgemeine Eigenschaften der Gleichung, von welcher die Theorie der ganzen Lemniscate abhängt. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 39, 556–619.Google Scholar

Euler, L. (1747). Theoremata circa divisors numerorum. Novi commentarii academiae scientiarum Petropolitanae 1, 20–48.Google Scholar

Euler, L. (1748). Letter to Goldbach, 4 May 1748. In Fuss (1968), 1, 450–455.Google Scholar

Euler, L. (1770). Elements of Algebra. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984. Translated from the German by John Hewlett. Reprint of the 1840 edition, with an introduction by C. Truesdell.Google Scholar

Ewald, W. (1996). From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics. Vols. I, II. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Fermat, P. (1640). Letter to Mersenne, 25 December 1640. Œuvres 2: 212.Google Scholar

Fermat, P. (1654). Letter to Pascal, 25 September 1654. Œuvres 2: 310–314.Google Scholar

Fermat, P. (1657). Letter to Frenicle, February 1657. Œuvres 2: 333–334.Google Scholar

Fermat, P. (1670). Observations sur Diophante. Œuvres 3: 241–276.Google Scholar

Fibonacci, L. P. (1225). Liber quadratorum. Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1987. Translated from the Latin as The Book of Squares and with a preface, introduction and commentaries by L. E. Sigler.Google Scholar

Friedman, H. M., Simpson, S. G., and Smith, R. L. (1983). Countable algebra and set existence axioms. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 25(2), 141–181.Google Scholar

Fuss, P.-H. (1968). Correspondance mathématique et physique de quelques célèbres géomètres du XVIIIème siècle. Tomes I, II. Johnson Reprint Corp., New York. Reprint of the Euler correspondence originally published by l’Académie Impériale des Sciences de Saint-Pétersbourg. The Sources of Science, No. 35.Google Scholar

Gauss, C. F. (1801). Disquisitiones Arithmeticae. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986. Translated and with a preface by Arthur A. Clarke. Revised by William C. Water-house, Cornelius Greither and A. W. Grootendorst and with a preface by Waterhouse.Google Scholar

Gauss, C. F. (1816). Demonstratio nova altera theorematis omnem functionem algebraicum rationalem integram unius variabilis in factores reales primi vel secundi gradus resolvi posse. Commentationes Societatis Regiae Scientiarum Gottingensis recentiores 3, 107–142. In his Werke 3: 31–56.Google Scholar

Gödel, K. (1938). The consistency of the axiom of choice and of the generalized continuum-hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 24, 556–557.Google Scholar

Grassmann, H. (1844). Die lineale Ausdehnungslehre. Otto Wigand, Leipzig. English translation in Grassmann (1995), 1–312.Google Scholar

Grassmann, H. (1861). Lehrbuch der Arithmetic. Enslin, Berlin.Google Scholar

Grassmann, H. (1862). Die Ausdehnungslehre. Enslin, Berlin. English translation of 1896 edition in Grassmann (2000).Google Scholar

Grassmann, H. (1995). A New Branch of Mathematics. Open Court Publishing Co., Chicago, IL. The Ausdehnungslehre of 1844 and other works, Translated from the German and with a note by Lloyd C. Kannenberg. With a foreword by Albert C. Lewis.Google Scholar

Grassmann, H. (2000). Extension Theory. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; London Mathematical Society, London. Translated from the 1896 German original and with a foreword, editorial notes and supplementary notes by Lloyd C. Kannenberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, J. (2018). A History of Abstract Algebra. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.Google Scholar

Halmos, P. R. (1942). Finite Dimensional Vector Spaces. Annals of Mathematics Studies, no. 7. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Hamel, G. (1905). Eine Basis aller Zahlen und die unstetigen Lösungen der Funktionalgleichung f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y). Mathematische Annalen 60, 459–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, T. L. (1964). Diophantus of Alexandria: A Study in the History of Greek Algebra. Second edition. With a supplement containing an account of Fermat’s theorems and problems connected with Diophantine analysis and some solutions of Diophantine problems by Euler. Dover Publications, Inc., New York.Google Scholar

Hilbert, D. (1890). Über die Theorie der algebraischen formen. Mathematische Annalen 36, 473–534.Google Scholar

Hilbert, D. (1897). Zahlbericht. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998. Translated from the German as The Theory of Algebraic Number Fields and with a preface by Iain T. Adamson, With an introduction by Franz Lemmermeyer and Norbert Schappacher.Google Scholar

Hodges, W. (1979). Krull implies Zorn. The Journal of the London Mathematical Society. Second Series 19(2), 285–287.Google Scholar

Jacobson, N. (1985). Basic Algebra I (Second ed.). W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.Google Scholar

Kaplansky, I. (1991). Reminiscences. In Paul Halmos. Celebrating 50 Years of Mathematics, 297–304. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Katz, V. J. and Parshall, K. H. (2014). Taming the Unknown: A History of Algebra from Antiquity to the Early Twentieth Century. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Knobloch, E. (2013). Leibniz’s theory of elimination and determinants. In Seki, Founder of Modern Mathematics in Japan, Volume 39 of Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, 229–244. Springer, Tokyo.Google Scholar

Kolmogorov, A. N. and Yushkevich, A. P. (Eds.) (2001). Mathematics of the 19th Century (revised ed.). Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel. Mathematical logic. Algebra. Number theory. Probability theory, Translated from the 1978 Russian original by A. Shenitzer, H. Grant and O. B. Sheinin, Translation edited by Shenitzer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kronecker, L. (1870). Auseinandersetzung einige Eigenschaften der Klassenzahl idealer complexer Zahlen. Monatsbericht der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 881–889. In his Werke 1, 271–282.Google Scholar

Kronecker, L. (1887). Ein Fundamentalsatz der allgemeinen Arithmetik. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 100, 490–510.Google Scholar

Krull, W. (1928). Zur Theorie der allgemeinen Zahlringe. Mathematischen Annalen 99, 51–70.Google Scholar

Krull, W. (1929). Idealtheorie in Ringen ohne Endlichkeitsbedingungen. Mathematischen Annalen 101, 729–744.Google Scholar

Krull, W. (1935). Idealtheorie. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Kummer, E. E. (1844). De numeris complexis, qui radicibus unitatis et numeris realibus constant. Gratulationschrift der Universität Breslau zur Jubelfeier der Universität Königsberg. Also in Kummer (1975), vol. 1, 165–192.Google Scholar

Kummer, E. E. (1975). Collected Papers. Volume 1, Contributions to Number Theory. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York. Edited and with an introduction by André Weil.Google Scholar

Kuratowski, C. (1922). Une méthode d’elimination des nombres transfinis des raisonnements mathématiques. Fundamenta Mathematicae 3, 76–108.Google Scholar

Lagrange, J. L. (1768). Solution d’un problème d’arithmétique. Miscellanea Taurinensia 4, 19ff. In his Œuvres 1: 671–731.Google Scholar

Lagrange, J. L. (1773). Recherches d’arithmétique. Nouveaux mémoires de l’Académie royale des sciences et belles-lettres de Berlin, 265ff. In his Œuvres 3: 695–795.Google Scholar

Laplace, P.-S. (1772). Researches sur le calcul intégral et sur le systéme du monde. Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, Paris, 267–376.Google Scholar

Muir, T. (1960). The Theory of Determinants in the Historical Order of Development. Dover Publications, Inc., New York. Four volumes bound as two.Google Scholar

Neumann, C. (1865). Vorlesungen über Riemann’s Theorie der Abelschen Integralen. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Noether, E. (1921). Idealtheorie in Ringbereichen. Mathematischen Annalen 83, 24–66.Google Scholar

Noether, E. (1926). Abstrakter Aufbau der Idealtheorie in algebraischen Zahl- und Funktionenkörpern. Mathematischen Annalen 96, 26–61.Google Scholar

Pascal, B. (1654). Traité dutrianglearithmétique, avec quelques autres petits traités sur la même manière. English translation in Great Books of the Western World, Encyclopedia Britannica, London, 1952, 447–473.Google Scholar

Peano, G. (1888). Calcolo Geometrico secondo l’Ausdehnungslehre di H. Grassmann, preceduto dalle operazioni della logica deduttiva. Bocca, Turin. English translation in Peano (2000).Google Scholar

Peano, G. (2000). Geometric Calculus: According to the Ausdehnungslehre of H. Grassmann. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA. Translated from the Italian by Lloyd C. Kannenberg.Google Scholar

Rothe, H. A. (1800). Ueber Permutationen, in Beziehung auf die Stellen ihrer Elemente. Anwendung der daraus abgeleiteten Sätze auf das Eliminationsproblem. In Hindenburg, Carl, ed., Sammlung Combinatorisch-Analytischer Abhandlungen, 263–305, Bey G. Fleischer dem jüngern, 1800.Google Scholar

Rotman, J. J. (2015). Advanced Modern Algebra, Part 1 (Third ed.), Volume 165 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Samuel, P. (1970). Algebraic Theory of Numbers. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, MA. Translated from the French by Allan J. Silberger.Google Scholar

Simpson, S. G. (2009). Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic (Second ed.). Perspectives in Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; Association for Symbolic Logic, Poughkeepsie, NY.Google Scholar

Smith, D. E. (1959). A Source Book in Mathematics. 2 vols. Dover Publications Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar

Solovay, R. M. (1970). A model of set-theory in which every set of reals is Lebesgue measurable. Annals of Mathematics. Second Series 92, 1–56.Google Scholar

Steinitz, E. (1910). Algebraische Theorie der Körper. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 137, 167–302.Google Scholar

Stillwell, J. (1994). Elements of Algebra: Geometry, Numbers, Equations. Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar

Stillwell, J. (2018). Reverse Mathematics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

van der Waerden, B. L. (1931). Moderne Algebra II Teil. Unter Benutzung von Vorlesungen von E. Artin und E. Noether. Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften in Einzeldarstellungen mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Anwendungsgebiete. Bd. 34. Julius Springer, Berlin, vii, 216 S. (1931).Google Scholar

van Heijenoort, J. (1967). From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Vandermonde, A.-T. (1771). Memoire sur la résolution des équations. Mémoires de l’Academie royale des sciences à Paris, 365–416.Google Scholar

Viète, F. (1591). De aequationum recognitione et emendatione. In his Opera, 82–162. English translation in Viète (1983).Google Scholar

Viète, F. (1615). Ad angularium sectionum analyticen theoremata. In his Opera, 287–304.Google Scholar

Viète, F. (1983). The Analytic Art: Nine studies in algebra, geometry and trigonometry from the Opus restitutae mathematicae analyseos, seu algebrâ novâ. Kent State University Press, Kent, OH. Translated from the Latin and with an introduction by T. Richard Witmer.Google Scholar

Vitali, G. (1905). Sul problema della misura dei gruppi di punti di una retta. Bologna.Google Scholar

Weil, A. (1974). Two lectures on number theory, past and present. L’Enseignement Mathématique. Revue Internationale. Ile Série 20, 87–110.Google Scholar

Weil, A. (1975). Introduction to Kummer (1975).Google Scholar

Weil, A. (1984). Number Theory: An Approach through History, from Hammurapi to Legendre. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Wessel, C. (1797). Om Directionens analytiske Betegning, et Forsøg anvendt fornemmelig til plane og sphæriske Polygoners Opløsning. Danske Selsk. Skr. N. Samml. 5. English translation in Smith (1959), vol. 1, 55–66.Google Scholar

Wiles, A. (1995). Modular elliptic curves and Fermat’s last theorem. Annals of Mathematics (2) 141(3), 443–551.Google Scholar

Ycart, B. (2013). A case of mathematical eponymy: The Vandermonde determinant. Revue d’Histoire des Mathématiques 19(1), 43–77.Google Scholar

Zariski, O. and Samuel, P. (1958). Commutative Algebra, Volume I. The University Series in Higher Mathematics. D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., Princeton, NJ. With the cooperation of I. S. Cohen.Google Scholar

Zermelo, E. (1904). Beweis dass jede Menge wohlgeordnet werden kann. Mathematische Annalen 59, 514–516. English translation in van Heijenoort (1967).Google Scholar

Zorn, M. (1935). A remark on method in transfinite algebra. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 41, 667–670.Google Scholar