Book contents
- Agricultural Resilience
- Ecological Reviews
- Agricultural Resilience
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface and acknowledgements
- Chapter One Introducing resilience
- Part I Biodiversity, ecosystem services and resilience in agricultural systems
- Part II Integrating biodiversity and building resilience into agricultural systems
- Chapter Ten Delivering sustainability in agricultural systems: some implications for institutional analysis
- Chapter Eleven The resilience of Australian agricultural landscapes characterised by land-sparing versus land-sharing
- Chapter Twelve Ecological–economic modelling for designing cost-effective incentives to conserve farmland biodiversity
- Chapter Thirteen Viability analysis as an approach for assessing the resilience of agroecosystems
- Chapter Fourteen Integrating economics and Resilience Thinking: the context of natural resource management in Australia
- Chapter Fifteen Integrating biodiversity and ecosystem services into European agricultural policy: a challenge for the Common Agricultural Policy
- Chapter Sixteen Using environmental metrics to promote sustainability and resilience in agriculture
- Chapter Seventeen Conclusions on agricultural resilience
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Chapter Thirteen - Viability analysis as an approach for assessing the resilience of agroecosystems
from Part II - Integrating biodiversity and building resilience into agricultural systems
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2019
Book contents
- Agricultural Resilience
- Ecological Reviews
- Agricultural Resilience
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface and acknowledgements
- Chapter One Introducing resilience
- Part I Biodiversity, ecosystem services and resilience in agricultural systems
- Part II Integrating biodiversity and building resilience into agricultural systems
- Chapter Ten Delivering sustainability in agricultural systems: some implications for institutional analysis
- Chapter Eleven The resilience of Australian agricultural landscapes characterised by land-sparing versus land-sharing
- Chapter Twelve Ecological–economic modelling for designing cost-effective incentives to conserve farmland biodiversity
- Chapter Thirteen Viability analysis as an approach for assessing the resilience of agroecosystems
- Chapter Fourteen Integrating economics and Resilience Thinking: the context of natural resource management in Australia
- Chapter Fifteen Integrating biodiversity and ecosystem services into European agricultural policy: a challenge for the Common Agricultural Policy
- Chapter Sixteen Using environmental metrics to promote sustainability and resilience in agriculture
- Chapter Seventeen Conclusions on agricultural resilience
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Agricultural ResiliencePerspectives from Ecology and Economics, pp. 273 - 294Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Alvarez, I., de Aldama, R., Martin, S. & Reuillon, R. (2013). Assessing the resilience of bilingual societies: coupling viability and active learning with kd-tree. application to bilingual societies. In: IJCAI 2013 AI and Computational Sustainability Track. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press/IJCAI, pp. 2776–2782.Google Scholar
Anderies, J.M., Janssen, M.A. & Walker, B.H. (2002). Grazing management, resilience, and the dynamics of a fire-driven rangeland system. Ecosystems, 5, 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrès-Domenech, P., Saint-Pierre, P. & Zaccour, G. (2011). Forest conservation and CO2 emissions: a viable approach. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 16(6), 519–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubin, J. & Saint-Pierre, P. (2006). An introduction to viability theory and management of renewable resources. Advanced Methods for Decision Making and Risk Management, 44, 52–96.Google Scholar
Aubin, J.-P., Pujal, D. & Saint-Pierre, P. (2005a). Dynamic management of portfolios with transaction costs under tychastic uncertainty. In: Numerical Methods in Finance, edited by Breton, M. & Ben-Ameur, H.. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubin, J.-P., Bernado, T. & Saint-Pierre, P. (2005b). A viability approach to global climate change issues. In: The Coupling of Climate and Economic Dynamics, edited by Haurie, A. & Viguier, L., Vol. 22 of Advances in Global Change Research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 113–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubin, J., Bayen, A. & Saint-Pierre, P. (2011). Viability Theory: new directions. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barreteau, O. (2003). The joint use of role-playing games and models regarding negotiation processes: characterization of associations. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 6(2).Google Scholar
Beddington, J., Free, C. & Lawton, J. (1976). Concepts of stability and resilience in predator-prey models. Journal of Animal Ecology, 45, 791–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béné, C., Doyen, L. & Gabay, D. (2001). A viability analysis for a bio-economic model. Ecological Economics, 36, 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, C. & Martin, S. (2012). Building strategies to ensure language coexistence in presence of bilingualism. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(17), 8825–8841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, C. & Martin, S. (2013). Comparing the sustainability of different action policy possibilities: application to the issue of both household survival and forest preservation in the corridor of Fianarantsoa. Mathematical Biosciences, 245(2), 322–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneuil, N. & Saint-Pierre, P. (2000). Protected polymorphism in the two-locus haploid model with unpredictable fitnesses, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 40(3), 251–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonneuil, N. & Saint-Pierre, P. (2008). Beyond optimality: managing children, assets, and consumption over the life cycle. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 44, 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckner, T., Petschel-Held, G., Leimbach, M. & Toth, F.L. (2003). Methodological aspects of the tolerable windows approach. Climatic Change, 56, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. & Abel, N. (2001). From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems, 4, 765–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casagrandi, R. & Rinaldi, S. (2002). A theoretical approach to tourism sustainability. Conservation Ecology, 6(1), 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapel, L., Castello, X., Bernard, C., et al. (2010). Viability and resilience of languages in competition. PLoS ONE, 5(1), e8681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collings, J. & Wollkind, D. (1990). A global analysis of a temperature-dependent model system for a mite predator–prey interaction. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 50(5), 1348–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lara, M. & Martinet, V. (2009). Multi-criteria dynamic decision under uncertainty: a stochastic viability analysis and an application to sustainable fishery management. Mathematical Biosciences, 217(2), 118–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyen, L. & Saint-Pierre, P. (1997). Scale of viability and minimal time of crisis. Journal of Set-Valued Analysis, 5, 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deffuant, G., Chapel, L. & Martin, S. (2007). Approximating viability kernels with support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52(5), 933–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. (1996). Engineering resilience vs. ecological. In: Engineering within Ecological Constraints, edited by Schulze, P.. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 31–43.Google Scholar
Janssen, M.A. & Carpenter, S.R. (1999). Managing the resilience of lakes: a multi-agent modeling approach. Conservation Ecology, 3(2), 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacitignola, D., Petrosillo, I., Cataldi, M. & Zurlini, G. (2007). Modelling socio-ecological tourism-based systems for sustainability. Ecological Modelling, 206, 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, S., Barrett, S., Aniyar, S., et al. (1998). Resilience in natural and socioeconomic systems. Environment and Development Economics, 3(2), 222–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, J., Walker, B. & Holling, C. (1997). Sustainability, stability and resilience. Conservation Ecology, 1(1), 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynam, T., Jong, W.D., Sheil, D., Kusumanto, T. & Evans, K. (2007). A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, S. (2004). The cost of restoration as a way of defining resilience: a viability approach applied to a model of lake eutrophication. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, S., Deffuant, G. & Calabrese, J. (2011). Defining resilience mathematically: from attractors to viability. In: Viability and Resilience of Complex Systems, edited by Deffuant, G. and Gilbert, N.. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, V. & Doyen, L. (2007). Sustainability of an economy with an exhaustible resource: a viable control approach. Resources, Energy and Economics, 29(1), 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsinos, Y.G. & Troumbis, A.Y. (2002). Modeling competition, dispersal and effects of disturbance in the dynamics of a grassland community using a cellular automaton. Ecological Modelling, 149, 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesmoudi, S., Alvarez, I., Martin, S., Reuillon, R., Sicard, M. & Perrot, N. (2014). Coupling geometric analysis and viability theory for system exploration: application to a living food system. Journal of Process Control, 24(12), 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neubert, M. & Caswell, H. (1997). Alternatives to resilience for measuring the responses of ecological systems to perturbations. Ecology, 78(3), 653–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz, M. & Wolff, M. (2002). Dynamical simulation of mass-balance trophic models for benthic communities of north-central Chile: assessment of resilience time under alternative management scenarios. Ecological Modelling, 148, 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrot, N., Vries, H.D., Lutton, E., et al. (2016). Some remarks on computational approaches towards sustainable complex agri-food systems. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 48, 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, G., Allen, C. & Holling, C. (1998). Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems, 1, 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimm, S. & Lawton, J. (1977). Number of trophic levels in ecological communities. Nature, 268, 329–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapaport, A., Terreaux, J. & Doyen, L. (2006). Viability analysis for the sustainable management of renewable resources. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 43, 466–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Pierre, P. (1994). Approximation of viability kernel. Applied Mathematics and Optimization, 29, 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sicard, N., Perrot, N., Reuillon, R., Mesmoudi, S., Alvarez, I. & Martin, S. (2012). A viability approach to control food processes: application to a camembert cheese ripening process. Food Control, 23(2), 312–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susi, T., Johannesson, M. & Backlund, P. (2007). Serious Games: an overview. Skövde: University of Skövde.Google Scholar
Tomlin, C., Mitchell, I., Bayen, A. & Oishi, M. (2003). Computational techniques for the verification of hybrid systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 91(7), 986–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Coller, L. (1997). Automated techniques for the qualitative analysis of ecological models: continuous models. Conservation Ecology, 1(1), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, W., Alvarez, I., Martin, S., Briot, J.-P., Irving, M. & Melo, G. (2012). Integration of viability models in a serious game for the management of protected areas. In: IADIS Intelligent Systems and Agents Conference 2012, Lisbonne, Portugal, edited by Palma dos Reis, A. & Wang, P.S.P..Google Scholar
Wei, W., Alvarez, I. & Martin, S. (2013). Sustainability analysis: viability concepts to consider transient and asymptotical dynamics in socio-ecological tourism-based systems, Ecological Modelling, 251, 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar