Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T17:16:07.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Getting markets to work in the countryside

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2010

Yiping Huang
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

The ‘dilemma’ posed by China's agricultural reform

Why was China's agricultural reform so successful before 1985 but frequently problematic after that? In which policy direction should China proceed in the 1990s – introducing agricultural protection or internationalising agricultural production? And what is the best strategy for achieving domestic food security as well as sustaining rapid economic growth? These are questions that puzzle many Chinese policy analysts and Western economists who are closely watching China's economic reform and development.

Agricultural reform in China started at the end of 1978. Reform in the early stages, mainly the giving back of responsibility to farming households and increases in state purchase prices for agricultural products, led to large improvements in agricultural production. From 1979 to 1984, agricultural production expanded by 7.4 per cent per annum and grain output grew at an annual rate of 5 per cent. From 1982 to 1984 growth was spectacular with grain output increasing, on average, by 27 million tonnes a year (about 8 per cent of the annual output) (figure 1.1). Agricultural reform was widely regarded as being very successful, with the extraordinary growth recorded in the wake of the initial reforms being called a ‘miracle’ (Longworth 1989; Huang 1993a).

After 1985, when the government pushed forward with market reforms, problems were felt in agricultural performance. Growth rates in agriculture dropped back to less than 4 per cent. The average annual growth rate of agriculture was 3.8 per cent during the period 1984–94. Although not low by international standards, this rate of growth represented a considerable slowdown. Grain output increased by only 0.9 per cent per annum.

Type
Chapter
Information
Agricultural Reform in China
Getting Institutions Right
, pp. 1 - 16
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×