Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:28:18.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - The age discrimination debate, from the 1920s to 1967

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

John Macnicol
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In 1967, America passed its historic Age Discrimination in Employment Act (the ADEA). With subsequent amendments, this Act has outlawed age discrimination in employment (with some exceptions) and has abolished mandatory retirement for all but a few stipulated occupations. It stands as the most comprehensive legislative action against age discrimination, and is often referred to in the British debate. This two-chapter section will trace the long-term origins of the Act (going back to the 1920s), including the lively debate on age discrimination and the problems of older workers that took place in the 1950s and 1960s. It will then consider the reasons behind the 1967 Act – itself something of an aberration in a country with far less employment protection than Britain. The operation of the Act from 1967 to the present will then be examined, and its ‘success’ in relation to its notional aims will be evaluated. An examination of the ADEA tells us much about the dilemmas and difficulties of action against age discrimination.

The spread of retirement in the USA

In common with all advanced industrial societies, the United States of America experienced a steady fall in the labour force participation rates of men aged 65+ from the late nineteenth century to the 1990s. Basically, retirement has slowly spread down the age structure. Bearing in mind all the caveats about using census data as an indicator of actual labour force participation, we can see a steady downward trajectory in the labour force participation rates of men aged 65+ between 1890 and 1970 (Table 8.1).

Type
Chapter
Information
Age Discrimination
An Historical and Contemporary Analysis
, pp. 209 - 233
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×