Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:27:48.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - On applying synthetic indices of multidimensional well-being: health and income inequalities in France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

Reiko Gotoh
Affiliation:
Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto
Paul Dumouchel
Affiliation:
Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The multidimensional view of human well-being has had a growing influence on research on inequality and poverty. This development owes much to the conceptualization of the ‘capability approach’ by Sen (1985; 1987), but the shift has not been confined to academic circles and has extended to policy-oriented analysis. Since 1990 the United Nations Development Programme has challenged the primacy of GDP per capita as the measure of progress by proposing the Human Development Index (HDI), which combines income with life expectancy and educational achievement (e.g. UNDP 2005). The World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty opened with the statement that: ‘This report accepts the now traditional view of poverty … as encompassing not only material deprivation (measured by an appropriate concept of income or consumption), but also low achievements in education and health … This report also broadens the notion of poverty to include vulnerability and exposure to risk – and voicelessness and powerlessness’ (World Bank 2001: 15). The European Commission has long favoured the concept of social exclusion since ‘more clearly than the concept of poverty, understood far too often as referring exclusively to income, it also states out the multidimensional nature of the mechanisms whereby individuals and groups are excluded from taking part in the social exchanges’ (Commission of the European Communities 1992: 8).

Type
Chapter
Information
Against Injustice
The New Economics of Amartya Sen
, pp. 221 - 251
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alkire, S. 2002. Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, S., and Sen, A. K. 1994. ‘Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement’. United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report Office, Occasional Paper No. 12, July, New York: UNDP.
Anand, S., and Sen, A. K. 2000, “The Income Component of the Human Development Index,” Journal of Human Development, 1: 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. 1970. ‘On the Measurement of Inequality’, Journal of Economic Theory, 2: 244–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. 1992. ‘Measuring Poverty and Differences in Family Composition’, Economica, 59: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. 2002. ‘Social Inclusion and the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40: 625–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. 2003. ‘Multidimensional Deprivation: Contrasting Social Welfare and Counting Approaches’, Journal of Economic Inequality, 1: 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. and Bourguignon, F. 1982. ‘The Comparison of Multi-Dimensioned Distributions of Economic Status’, Review of Economic Studies, 49: 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. and Bourguignon, F. 1987. ‘Income Distribution and Differences in Needs’, in Feiwel, G. R. (ed.), Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy, Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 350–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. and Brandolini, A. 2004. ‘Global World Inequality: Absolute, Relative or Intermediate?’, paper presented at the 28th General Conference of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, Cork, Ireland, 22–28 August.
Atkinson, T., Cantillon, B., Marlier, E. and Nolan, B. 2002. Social Indicators: The EU and Social Inclusion, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibi, S. 2005a. ‘Measuring Poverty in a Multidimensional Perspective: A Review of Literature’, PEP Working Paper No. 2005–07, November, Quebec, Canada: Poverty and Economic Policy.
Bibi, S. 2005b. ‘Multidimensional Poverty: A Comparison between Egypt and Tunisia’, paper presented at the international conference on ‘The Many Dimensions of Poverty’, Brasilia, Brazil, 29–31 August. French version: Bibi, S., and El Lahga, A.-R. (2008), ‘Comparaisons ordinales robustes de la pauvreté multidimensionnelle: Afrique du Sud et Égypte’, Revue d'économie du développement, 22: 5–36.
Bourguignon, F. 1999. ‘Comment on “Multidimensioned Approaches to Welfare Analysis” by E. Maasoumi’, in Silber, J. (ed.), Handbook of Income Inequality Measurement, Boston: Kluwer, pp. 477–84.Google Scholar
Bourguignon, F. and Chakravarty, S. R. 2002. ‘Multi-Dimensional Poverty Orderings’, DELTA Working Paper No. 22, April, Paris: Départment et laboratoire d'économie théoretique et appliquée, ENS.
Bourguignon, F. and Chakravarty, S. R. 2003. ‘The Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty’, Journal of Economic Inequality, 1: 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradburd, R. M. and Ross, D. R. 1988. ‘A General Measure of Multidimensional Inequality’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 50: 429–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandolini, A. and D'Alessio, G. 1998. ‘Measuring Well-Being in the Functioning Space’ (mimeo). Rome: Bank of Italy. Reproduced in Chiappero Martinetti, E. (ed.) (2009), Debating Global Society: Reach and Limits of the Capability Approach, Milan: Feltrelini Editore.Google Scholar
Brandolini, A. and Smeeding, T. M. 2006. ‘Inequality: International Evidence’, in Durlauf, S. N., and Blume, L. E. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 273–82.Google Scholar
Cerioli, A. and Zani, S. 1990. ‘A Fuzzy Approach to the Measurement of Poverty’, in Dagum, C., and Zenga, M. (eds.), Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 272–84.Google Scholar
Cherchye, L., Moesen, W. and Puyenbroeck, T. 2004. ‘Legitimately Diverse, yet Comparable: On Synthesizing Social Inclusion Performance in the EU’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 42: 919–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Commission of the European Communities 1992. Toward a Europe of Solidarity: Intensifying the Fight against Social Exclusion, Fostering Integration. COM (92) 542, Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Currie, J. and Madrian, B. C. 1999. ‘Health, Health Insurance and the Labor Market’, in Ashenfelter, O. C., and Card, D. (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. III, part 3, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 3309–416.Google Scholar
Desai, M. and Shah, A. 1988. ‘An Econometric Approach to the Measurement of Poverty’, Oxford Economic Papers, 40: 505–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, J. and Silber, J. 2005. ‘Measuring Multidimensional Poverty: An Empirical Comparison of Various Approaches’, Review of Income and Wealth, 51: 145–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duclos, J.-Y., Sahn, D. E. and Younger, S. D. 2006. ‘Robust Multidimensional Poverty Comparisons’, Economic Journal, 116: 943–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, R. 1993. ‘Description of Inequality: The Swedish Approach to Welfare Research’, in Nussbaum, M., and Sen, A. K. (eds.), The Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 66–83.Google Scholar
Eurostat, 2000. European Social Statistics. Income Poverty and Social Exclusion, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Fahey, T., Whelan, C. T. and Maître, B. 2005. First European Quality of Life Survey: Income inequalities and deprivation, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Fluckiger, Y. and Silber, J. 1994. ‘The Gini Index and the Measurement of Multidimensional Inequality’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 56: 225–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, J. E., Greer, J. and Thorbecke, E. 1984. ‘A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures’, Econometrica, 52: 761–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, J. E. and Sen, A. K. 1997. ‘On Economic Inequality after a Quarter Century’, in Sen, A. K., On Economic Inequality, expanded edn with a substantial annexe by Foster, J. E. and Sen, A. K., Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 107–219.Google Scholar
Gaertner, W. 1993. ‘Commentary to: “Amartya Sen: Capability and Well–Being”’, in Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A. K. (eds.), The Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 62–6.Google Scholar
Gajdos, T. and Weymark, J. A. 2005. ‘Multidimensional generalized Gini indices’, Economic Theory, 26: 471–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guio, A.-C. 2005. ‘Material Deprivation in the EU’, Statistics in Focus, Population and Social Conditions, 21/2005, Luxembourg: Eurostat.Google Scholar
Hirschberg, J. G., Maasoumi, E. and Slottje, D. J. 1991. ‘Cluster Analysis for Measuring Welfare and Quality of Life Across Countries’, Journal of Econometrics, 50: 131–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, S. P. and Lambert, P. J. 1993. ‘Ranking Income Distributions When Needs Differ’, Review of Income and Wealth, 39: 337–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, M. 1975. Multivariate Analysis, London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Kolm, S.-C. 1969. ‘The Optimal Production of Social Justice’, in Margolis, J. and Guitton, H. (eds.), Public Economics. An Analysis of Public Production and Consumption and Their Relations to the Private Sectors, London: Macmillan, pp. 145–200.Google Scholar
Kolm, S.-C. 1977. ‘Multidimensional Egalitarianisms’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklys, W. 2005. Amartya Sen's Capability Approach, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Lelli, S. 2005. ‘Using Functionings to Estimate Equivalence Scales’, Review of Income and Wealth, 51: 255–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, C. 1999. ‘Multidimensional Inequality Measurement: A Proposal’, Nuffield College Working Paper in Economics, November, Oxford: Nuffield College.
Lovell, C. A. K., Richardson, S., Travers, P. and Wood, L. 1994. ‘Resources and Functionings: A New View of Inequality in Australia’, in Eichhorn, W. (ed.), Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 787–807.Google Scholar
Lugo, M. A. 2007. ‘Comparing Multidimensional Indices of Inequality: Methods and Application’, in Bishop, J. and Amiel, Y. (eds.), Inequality and Poverty – Papers from the Society for the Study of Economic Inequality's Inaugural Meeting. Research on Economic Inequality, Amsterdam: Elsevier JAI, vol. XIV, pp. 213–36.Google Scholar
Maasoumi, E. 1986. ‘The Measurement and Decomposition of Multi–Dimensional Inequality’, Econometrica, 54: 991–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maasoumi, E. 1999. ‘Multidimensioned Approaches to Welfare Analysis’, in Silber, J. (ed.), Handbook of Income Inequality Measurement, Boston: Kluwer, pp. 437–77.Google Scholar
Maasoumi, E. and Nickelsburg, G. 1988. ‘Multivariate Measures of Well-Being and an Analysis of Inequality in the Michigan Data’, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 6: 327–34.Google Scholar
Mayer, S. E. and Jencks, C. 1989. ‘Poverty and the Distribution of Material Hardship’, Journal of Human Resources, 21: 88–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mejer, L. 2000. ‘Social Exclusion in the EU Member States’, Statistics in Focus, Population and Social Conditions, Theme 3, No. 1, Luxembourg: EurostatGoogle Scholar
Micklewright, J. 2001. ‘Should the UK Government Measure Poverty and Social Exclusion with a Composite Index?’, in Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, Indicators of Progress: A Discussion of Approaches to Monitor the Government's Strategy to Tackle Poverty and Social Exclusion, CASE Report No. 13, London School of Economics, pp. 45–50.
Nolan, B. and Whelan, C. T. 1996a. Resources, Deprivation, and Poverty, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nolan, B. and Whelan, C. T. 1996b. ‘The Relationship between Income and Deprivation: A Dynamic Perspective’, Revue économique, 3: 709–17.Google Scholar
Ramos, X. and Silber, J. 2005. ‘On the Application of Efficiency Analysis to the Study of the Dimensions of Human Development’, Review of Income and Wealth, 51: 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2006. ‘The Capability Approach in Practice’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 14: 351–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schokkaert, E. and Ootegem, L. 1990. ‘Sen's Concept of the Living Standard Applied to the Belgian Unemployed’, Recherches Economiques de Louvain, 56: 429–50.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1978. ‘Ethical Measurement of Inequality: Some Difficulties’, in Krelle, W. and Shorrocks, A. F. (eds.), Personal Income Distribution, Amsterdam: North–Holland, pp. 81–94.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1985. Commodities and Capabilities, Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1987. The Standard of Living, with contributions by Muellbauer, J., Kanbur, R., Hart, K. and Williams, B.. Ed. Hawthorn, G., Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1998. ‘Mortality as an Indicator of Economic Success and Failure’, Economic Journal, 108: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S. 1996. Applied Multivariate Techniques, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, T. N. 1994. ‘Human Development: A New Paradigm or Reinvention of the Wheel?’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 84: 238–43.Google Scholar
Streeten, P. 1994. ‘Human Development: Means and Ends’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 84: 232–37.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. 1993. ‘Welfare, Resources, and Capabilities: A Review of Inequality Reexamined by Amartya Sen’, Journal of Economic Literature, 31: 1947–62.Google Scholar
Townsend, P. 1979. Poverty in the United Kingdom: A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Tsui, K.-Y. 1995. ‘Multidimensional Generalizations of the Relative and Absolute Inequality Indices: The Atkinson–Kolm–Sen Approach’, Journal of Economic Theory, 67: 251–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, K.-Y. 1999. ‘Multidimensional Inequality and Multidimensional Generalized Entropy Measures: An Axiomatic Derivation’, Social Choice and Welfare, 16: 145–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, K.-Y. 2002. ‘Multidimensional Poverty Indices’, Social Choice and Welfare, 19: 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) 2005. Human Development Report 2005, International Cooperation at a Crossroads: Aid, Trade and Security in an Unequal World, New York and Oxford: United Nations Development Programme and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weymark, J. A. 2006. ‘The normative approach to the measurement of multidimensional inequality’, in Farina, F. and Savaglio, E. (eds.), Inequality and Economic Integration, London: Routledge, pp. 303–28.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. G. 1996. Unhealthy Societies. The Afflictions of Inequality, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,World Bank 2001. World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×