Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2009
  • Online publication date: September 2009

FIVE - From the Ashes of the Post–September 11th Era: Lessons for the Human Rights Project

Summary

In the post–September 11th era, the international human rights project has been faced with formidable challenges, arguably even crises. Although linkages between human rights and hegemonic discourses can hardly be considered unique to this era, their manifestations have rarely been so transparent and centrally positioned in global affairs. Middle Eastern governments' violations of a full array of internationally recognized rights persist. American violations have included torture, egregious denials of due process, and, even more troubling the suffering and denials of human dignity stemming from war that often do not even appear on global human rights radars.

Despite these concerning trends, developments since September 11th demonstrate that power dynamics can hardly be reduced to a simple one-dimensional calculus of domination and resistance. They can also be subverted and entrapped by their own confines. Accordingly, the post–September 11th era has also seen Arabs and Muslims returning the human rights gaze after Abu Ghraib, a Yemeni human rights nongovernmental organization (NGO) calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to restore American adherence to the rule of law, Americans seeking refuge in relativism and Middle Easterners seeking refuge in universalism, and both societies engaging with human rights in new and unprecedented ways. Perhaps more importantly, it has provided key lessons for rights advocates about how emancipatory and hegemonic human rights currents are intertwined and revealed the need for the interrogation of old assumptions and strategies.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Cowan, Jane K., Dembour, Marie Benedicte, and Wilson, Richard, Introduction, inCulture and Rights30 (Cowan, Jane K., Dembour, Marie Benedicte, and Wilson, Richard eds., 2001).
An-Naim, Abdullahi A., Introduction: “Area Expressions” and the Universality of Human Rights: Mediating a Contingent Relationship, inHuman Rights and Diversity: Area Studies Revisited3 (Forsythe, David P. and MacMahon, Patrice C. eds., 2003).
Forsythe, David P., U.S. Foreign Policy and Human Rights in an Era of Insecurity: The Bush Administration and Human Rights after September 11th, inWars on Terrorism and Iraq: Human Rights, Unilateralism and U.S. Foreigh Policy91 (Weiss, Thomas G. et al. eds., 2004).
Kessler, Glenn, Rice Criticizes Allies in Call for Democracy, Washington Post, Jun. 21, 2005
Kuwait Chastises US over Guantanamo, Agence France Presse, Sept. 21, 2005
Poll Finds Broad Approval of Terrorist Torture, The Associated Press, Dec. 9, 2005
Merry, Sally Engle, Human Rights Law and the Demonizing of Culture (and Anthropology along the Way), 26:1 Pol.Legal Anthropology Rev. 55 (2003).
Lowry, Rich, Abu Ghraib and US: Don't Judge Us by Those Photos, National Review, May 11, 2004
Chenoweth, Karin, Fallout from Abu Ghraib, N.Y. Times May 7, 2004
Kristof, Nicholas, Jesus and Jihad, N.Y. Times, Jul. 17, 2004.
Bartholomew, Amy, Introduction, inEmpire's Law: The American Imperial Project and the War to Remake the World8 (Bartholomew, Amy ed., 2006).
Choudhury, Cyra A., Comprehending “Our” Violence: Reflections on the Liberal Universalist Tradition, National Identity and the War on Iraq, 3:1 Muslim World J. Hum. Rts, 9 (2006)
Roth, Ken, War in Iraq Not a Humanitarian Intervention, Human Rights Watch World Report (2004).
Krisch, Nico, International Law in Times of Hegemony, 16:3 Eur. J. Int'l L. 369, 369 (2005).
Chase, Anthony, The Transnational Muslim World, the Foundations and Origins of Human Rights, and Their Ongoing Intersections, 4:1 Muslim World Journal of Human Rights, 8 (2007)