Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T16:58:04.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Real-time segmentation and tracking of brain metabolic state in ICU EEG recordings of burst suppression

from Part II - State space methods for clinical data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2015

M. B. Westover
Affiliation:
Massachusetts General Hospital
S. Ching
Affiliation:
Washington University at St Louis
M. M. Shafi
Affiliation:
Massachusetts General Hospital
S. S. Cash
Affiliation:
Massachusetts General Hospital
E. N. Brown
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Zhe Chen
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Burst suppression – a discontinuous electroencephalographic (EEG) pattern in which flatline (suppression) and higher voltage (burst) periods alternate systematically but with variable burst and suppression durations (see Figure 14.1) – is a state of profound brain inactivation. Burst suppression is inducible by high doses of most anesthetics (Clark & Rosner 1973) or in profound hypothermia (e.g. used for cerebral protection in cardiac bypass surgeries) (Stecker et al. 2001); may occur pathologically in patients with coma after cardiac arrest or trauma as a manifestation of diffuse cortical hypoxicischemic injury (Young 2000), or in a form of early infantile encephalopathy (“Othahara syndrome”) (Ohtahara & Yamatogi 2006); and as a non-pathological finding in the EEGs of premature infants known as “trace alternant” or “trace discontinu.” The fact that these diverse etiologies produce similar brain activity have led to the current consensus view that (i) burst suppression reflects the operation of a low-order dynamic process which persists in the absence of higher-level brain activity, and (ii) there may be a common pathway to the state of brain inactivation.

Four cardinal phenomenological features of burst suppression have been established through a variety of EEG and neurophysiological studies (Akrawi et al. 1996; Amzica 2009; Ching et al. 2012). First, burst onsets are generally spatially synchronous (i.e., bursts begin and end nearly simultaneously across the entire scalp), except in cases of large-scale cortical deafferentation (Niedermeyer 2009), in which cases regional differences in blood supply and autoregulation may prevent the uniformity typically associated with burst suppression. A caveat here is related to recent evidence that suggests that, on a local circuit level, the onset of bursts may exhibit significant heterogeneity (Lewis et al. 2013). Second, the fraction of time spent in suppression– classically quantified using the burst suppression ratio (BSR) – increases monotonically with the level of brain inactivation. For example, the BSR increases with increasing doses of anesthetic or hypothermia, eventually reaching 100% as the EEG becomes isoelectric (flatline).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akrawi, W. P., Drummond, J. C., Kalkman, C. J. & Patel, P. M. (1996). A comparison of the electrophysiologic characteristics of EEG burst-suppression as produced by isoflurane, thiopental, etomidate, and propofol. Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology 8(1), 40–46.Google Scholar
Amzica, F. (2009). Basic physiology of burst-suppression. Epilepsia 50, 38–39.Google Scholar
Chemali, J., Ching, S., Purdon, P. L., Solt, K. & Brown, E. N. (2013). Burst suppression probability algorithms: state-space methods for tracking EEG burst suppression. Journal of Neural Engineering 10(5), 056017.Google Scholar
Chemali, J. J., Wong, K. F. K., Solt, K. & Brown, E.N. (2011). A state-space model of the burst suppression ratio. In Proceedings of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, pp. 1431–1434.Google Scholar
Ching, S. & Brown, E. N. (2014). Modeling the dynamical effects of anesthesia on brain circuits. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 25, 116–122.Google Scholar
Ching, S., Liberman, M. Y., Chemali, J. J., Westover, M. B., Kenny, J., Solt, K., Purdon, P. L. & Brown, E. N. (2013). Real-time closed-loop control in a rodent model of medically induced coma using burst suppression. Anesthesiology 119, 848–860.Google Scholar
Ching, S., Purdon, P. L., Vijayan, S., Kopell, N. J. & Brown, E.N. (2012). A neurophysiologicalmetabolic model for burst suppression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109(8), 3095–3100.Google Scholar
Clark, D. L. & Rosner, B. S. (1973). Neurophysiologic effects of general anesthetics. I. the electroencephalogram and sensory evoked responses in man. Anesthesiology 38(6), 564–582.Google Scholar
Hall, R. & Murdoch, J. (1990). Brain protection: physiological and pharmacological considerations. Part II: The pharmacology of brain protection. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 37(7), 762–777.Google Scholar
Kroeger, D. & Amzica, F. (2007). Hypersensitivity of the anesthesia-induced comatose brain. Journal of Neuroscience 27(39), 10597–10607.Google Scholar
Lewis, L. D., Ching, S., Weiner, V. S., Peterfreund, R. A., Eskandar, E. N., Cash, S. S., Brown, E. N. & Purdon, P. L. (2013). Local cortical dynamics of burst suppression in the anaesthetized brain. Brain 136(9), 2727–2737.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. Y., Ching, S., Chemali, J. & Brown, E. N. (2013). A closed-loop anesthetic delivery system for real-time control of burst suppression. Journal of Neural Engineering 10(4), 046004.Google Scholar
Löfhede, J., Löfgren, N., Thordstein, M., Flisberg, A., Kjellmer, I. & Lindecrantz, K. (2008). Classification of burst and suppression in the neonatal electroencephalogram. Journal of Neural Engineering 5(4), 402–410.Google Scholar
Niedermeyer, E. (2009). The burst-suppression electroencephalogram. American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology 49(4), 333–341.
Ohtahara, S. & Yamatogi, Y. (2006). Ohtahara syndrome: with special reference to its developmental aspects for differentiating from early myoclonic encephalopathy. Epilepsy Research 70, S58–S67.Google Scholar
Särkelä, M., Mustola, S., Seppänen, T., Koskinen, M., Lepola, P., Suominen, K., Juvonen, T., Tolvanen-Laakso, H. & Jäntti, V. (2002). Automatic analysis and monitoring of burst suppression in anesthesia. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 17(2), 125–134.Google Scholar
Shanechi, M. M., Chemali, J. J., Liberman, M., Solt, K. & Brown, E.N. (2013). A brainmachine interface for control of medically-induced coma. PLoS Computational Biology 9(10), e1003284.Google Scholar
Stecker, M. M., Cheung, A. T., Pochettino, A., Kent, G. P., Patterson, T., Weiss, S. J. & Bavaria, J. E. (2001). Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest: II. Changes in electroencephalogram and evoked potentials during rewarming. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 71(1), 22–28.Google Scholar
Steriade, M., Amzica, F. & Contreras, D. (1994). Cortical and thalamic cellular correlates of electroencephalographic burst-suppression. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 90(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Westover, M., Shafi, M. M., Ching, S., Chemali, J. J., Purdon, P. L., Cash, S. S. & Brown, E. N. (2013). Real-time segmentation of burst suppression patterns in critical care EEG monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 219(1), 131–141.Google Scholar
Young, G. B. (2000). The EEG in coma. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 17(5), 473–485.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×