Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T23:42:05.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Take-Off and Field Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

Antonio Filippone
Antonio Filippone
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

Overview

This chapter deals with a realistic model of the aircraft at take-off conditions. After an introduction to general take-off procedures, we deal with transport-type airplanes (§ 9.1) and write the general take-off equations (§ 9.2).We carry out numerical solutions with all-engines operating §9.3 and consider the case of one-engine inoperative, both accelerate-and-go and abort-and-stop (§ 9.4). The takeoff of a turboprop aircraft is solved in §9.5. Lateral control issues in both cases are dealt with in the analysis of the minimum control speed (§ 9.6). We discuss the important cases of aircraft braking (§ 9.7) and performance on contaminated runways (§ 9.8), including extreme cases such as hydroplaning and other forms of contamination. For the sake of completeness, we present more rapid closed-form solutions (§ 9.9). The chapter ends with considerations on field performance, including taxiing and turning (§ 9.10) and the effects of bird strike (§ 9.10.2).

KEY CONCEPTS: Take-Off Equations, Normal Take-Off, OEI Take-Off, Balanced Field Length, Decelerate-Stop, Accelerate-Go, Minimum Control Speed, Contaminated Runways, Ground Manoeuvring, Bird Strike.

Take-Off of Transport-Type Airplane

The take-off phase is dependent on a vast array of aircraft parameters and external circumstances – including the pilot's skills. Take-off lasts little time and burns a considerable amount of fuel.

There are several different types of aircraft take-off and landing. We will refer exclusively to Conventional Take-Off and Landing (CTOL). This class includes most civil, commercial and military vehicles, that is, subsonic jet transport, turboprop airplanes, and cargo airplanes that take off and land horizontally.

Type
Chapter
Information
Advanced Aircraft Flight Performance , pp. 224 - 268
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] ESDU. Example of Take-off Field Length Calculations for a Civil Transport Aeroplane. Data Item 87018. ESDU International, London, Oct. 1987.
[2] ESDU. Calculation of Ground Performance in Take-off and Landing. Data Item 85029. ESDU International, London, Mar. 2006.
[3] ESDU. Force and Moment Components in Take-off and Landing Calculations. Data Item 85030. ESDU International, London, Nov. 1985.
[4] Powers, SA. Critical field length calculations for preliminary design. J. Aircraft, 18(2):103–107, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Krenkel, AR and Salzman, A. Take-off performances of jet-propelled conventional and vectored-thrust STOL aircraft. J. Aircraft, 5(5):429–436, Sept. 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] ESDU. Comprehensive Method for Modelling Performance of Aircraft Type Tyres Rolling or Braking on Runways Contaminated with Water. Data Item 05011. ESDU International, London, May 2005.
[7] Pacejka, HB. Tyre and Vehicle Dynamics. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002.Google Scholar
[8] Pritchard, JI. An overview of landing gear dynamics. Technical Report TM-1999-209143, NASA, 1999.
[9] Fallah, MS and Bhat, R. Robust model predictive control of shimmy vibration in aircraft landing gears. J. Aircraft, 45(6):1872–1880, Nov. 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Gordon, J. Perturbation analysis of non-linear wheel shimmy. J. Aircraft, 39(2):305–317, Mar. 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] ESDU. Frictional and Retarding Forces on Aircraft Tyres, Part IV: Estimation of Effects of Yaw. Data Item 86016. ESDU International, London, Oct. 1992.
[12] Dreher, RC and Tanner, JA. Experimental investigation of the braking and cornering characteristics of 30 11.5 × 14.5 type VIII aircraft tires with different tread patterns. Technical Report TN D-7743, NASA, Oct. 1974.
[13] Wetmore, JW. The rolling friction of several airplane wheels and tires and the effect of rolling friction on take-off. Technical Report R-583, NACA, 1937.
[14] Harrin, EN. Low tire friction and cornering forces on a wet surface. Technical Report TN-4406, NACA, Sept. 1958.
[15] Yager, TS. Factors influencing aircraft ground handling performance. Technical Report TM-85652, NASA, June 1983.
[16] Agrawal, SK. Braking performance of aircraft tires. Progress Aerospace Sciences, 23(2):105–150, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] ESDU. Frictional and Retarding Forces on Aircraft Tyres. Part V: Estimation of Fluid Forces. Data Item 90035. ESDU International, London, 1990.
[18] ESDU. Estimation of spray patterns generated from the sides of aircraft tyres running in water or slush. Data Item 83042. ESDU International, London, 1983.
[19] ESDU. Estimation of airframe skin-friction drag due to impingement of tyre spray. Data Item 98001. ESDU International, London, 1998.
[20] Giesberts, MKH. Test and evaluation of precipitation drag on an aircraft caused by snow and standing water on a runway. Technical Report NLR-TP-2001-490, NLR, Amsterdam, NL, Nov. 2001.Google Scholar
[21] Gooden, JHM. CRspray – Impingement drag calculation of aircraft on watercontaminated runways. Technical Report NLR-TP-2001-204, NLR, Amsterdam, NL, Oct. 2001.Google Scholar
[22] Pinsker, WJG. The dynamics of aircraft rotation and liftoff and its implication for tail clearance especially with large aircraft. Technical Report ARC R&M 3560, Aeronautical Research Council, 1967.Google Scholar
[23] Van Hengst, J. A erodynamic effects of ground de/anti-icing fluids on Fokker 50 and Fokker 100. J. Aircraft, 30(1):35–40, Jan. 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24] Perelmuter, A. On the determination of the take-off characteristics of a seaplane. Technical Report TM-863, NACA, May 1938.
[25] Parkinson, J, Olson, R, and House, R. Hydrodynamic and aerodynamic tests of a family of models of seaplane floats with varying angles of dead rise – NACA models 57-A, 57-B, and 57-C. Technical Report TN-716, NACA, 1939.
[26] De Remer, D. Seaplane takeoff performance – Using delta ratio as a method of correlation. J. Aircraft, 25(8):765–766, Aug. 1987.Google Scholar
[27] Anon. Bird strikes found most common at low altitude in daylight. Flight Safety Foundation Digest, 19(2):14–16, 2000.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×