Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:06:26.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Symmetry, Asymmetry, and Beyond: The Crucial Role of Interaction Strength in the Complexity–Stability Debate

from Part I - Food Webs: Complexity and Stability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2017

John C. Moore
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Peter C. de Ruiter
Affiliation:
Wageningen Universiteit, The Netherlands
Kevin S. McCann
Affiliation:
University of Guelph, Ontario
Volkmar Wolters
Affiliation:
Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Germany
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Adaptive Food Webs
Stability and Transitions of Real and Model Ecosystems
, pp. 31 - 44
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allesina, S. and Tang, S. (2012). Stability criteria for complex ecosystems. Nature, 483, 205208.Google Scholar
Banašek-Richter, C., Cattin, M. F., and Bersier, L.-F. (2004). Sampling effects and the robustness of quantitative and qualitative food-web descriptors. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 226, 2332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banašek-Richter, C., Bersier, L.-F., Cattin, M.-F., et al. (2009). Complexity in quantitative food webs. Ecology, 90, 14701477.Google Scholar
Berlow, E. L., Neutel, A. M., Cohen, J. E., et al. (2004). Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and opportunities. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73, 585598.Google Scholar
Bersier, L. F., Banašek-Richter, C., and Cattin, M. F. (2002). Quantitative descriptors of food-web matrices. Ecology, 83, 23942407.Google Scholar
Brose, U., Williams, R. J., and Martinez, N. D. (2006). Allometric scaling enhances stability in complex food webs. Ecology Letters, 9, 12281236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dambacher, J. M., Luh, H. K., Li, H. W., and Rossignol, P. A. (2003). Qualitative stability and ambiguity in model ecosystems. American Naturalist, 161, 876888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeAngelis, D. L. (1975). Stability and connectance in food web models. Ecology, 56, 238243.Google Scholar
DeAngelis, D. L. (1992). Dynamics of Nutrient Cycling and Food Webs. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Ruiter, P. C., Neutel, A. M., and Moore, J. C. (1995). Energetics, patterns of interaction strengths, and stability in real ecosystems. Science, 269, 12571260.Google Scholar
Drossel, B., McKane, A. J., and Quince, C. (2004). The impact of nonlinear functional responses on the long-term evolution of food web structure. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 229, 539548.Google Scholar
Elton, C. (1927). Animal Ecology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Emmerson, M. C. and Raffaelli, D. (2004). Predator prey body size, interaction strength and the stability of a real food web. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73, 399409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, M. R. and Ashby, W. R. (1970). Connectance of large dynamic (cybernetic) systems: critical values for stability. Nature, 228, 784.Google Scholar
Grime, J. P. (1977). Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist, 111, 11691194.Google Scholar
Grime, J. P. and Pierce, S. (2012). The Evolutionary Strategies That Shape Ecosystems. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grimm, V. and Wissel, C. (1997). Babel, or the ecological stability discussions: an inventory and analysis of terminology and a guide for avoiding confusion. Oecologia, 109, 323334.Google Scholar
Gross, T., Rudolf, L., Levin, S. A., and Dieckmann, U. (2009). Generalized models reveal stabilizing factors in food webs. Science, 325, 747750.Google Scholar
Hastings, H. M. (1982). The May–Wigner stability theorem. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 97, 155166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquet, C., Moritz, C., Morissette, L., et al. (2013). No complexity-stability relationship in natural communities. q-bio, arXiv:1307.5364.Google Scholar
James, A., Plank, M. J., Rossberg, A., et al. (2015). Constructing random matrices to represent real ecosystems. American Naturalist, 185, 680692.Google Scholar
Kondoh, M. (2003). Foraging adaptation and the relationship between food-web complexity and stability. Science, 299, 13881391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levins, R. (1968). Evolution in Changing Environments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levins, R. (1974). The qualitative analysis of partially specified systems. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 231, 123138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levins, R. (1977). Quantitative analysis of complex systems. In Mathematics and the Life Sciences, ed. Matthews, D. E., Vol. 18 of Lecture Notes in Biomathematics. New York: SpringerVerlag, pp. 152199.Google Scholar
Lindeman, R. L. (1942). The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology, 23, 399417.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R. (1955). Fluctuations of animal populations, and a measure of community stability. Ecology, 36, 533536.Google Scholar
Maruyama, M. (1963). The second cybernetics: deviation-amplifying mutual causal processes. American Scientist, 51, 164179.Google Scholar
May, R. M. (1972). Will a large complex system be stable? Nature, 238, 413414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. M. (1973). Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, K. S. (2000). The diversity–stability debate. Nature, 405, 228233.Google Scholar
McCann, K., Hastings, A. G., and Huxel, R. (1998). Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature, 395, 794798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menge, B. A. (1995). Indirect effects in marine rocky intertidal interaction webs: patterns and importance. Ecological Monographs, 65, 2174.Google Scholar
Mitchell, E. G. and Neutel, A. M. (2012). Feedback spectra of soil food webs across a complexity gradient, and the importance of three-species loops to stability. Theoretical Ecology, 5, 153159.Google Scholar
Montoya, J. M., Pimm, S. L., and Solé, R. V. (2006). Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature, 442, 259264.Google Scholar
Montoya, J. M., Woodward, G., Emmerson, M. C., and Solé, R. V. (2009). Press perturbations and indirect effects in real food webs. Ecology, 90, 24262433.Google Scholar
Moore, J. C., de Ruiter, P. C., and Hunt, H. W. (1993). Influence of productivity on the stability of real and model ecosystems. Science, 261, 906908.Google Scholar
Moore, J. C., Berlow, E. L., Coleman, D. C., et al. (2004). Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 7, 584600.Google Scholar
Neutel, A. M. and Thorne, M. A. S. (2014). Interaction strengths in balanced carbon cycles and the absence of a relation between ecosystem complexity and stability. Ecology Letters, 17, 651661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neutel, A. M., Roerdink, J. B. T. M., and de Ruiter, P. C. (1994). Global stability of two-level detritus-decomposer food chains. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 171, 351353.Google Scholar
Neutel, A. M., Heesterbeek, J. A. P., and de Ruiter, P. C. (2002). Stability in real food webs: weak links in long loops. Science, 296, 11201123.Google Scholar
Neutel, A. M., Heesterbeek, J. A. P., van de Koppel, J., et al. (2007). Reconciling complexity with stability in naturally assembling food webs. Nature, 449, 599602.Google Scholar
Novak, M., Wootton, J. T., Doak, D. F., et al. (2011). Predicting community responses to perturbations in the face of imperfect knowledge and network complexity. Ecology, 92, 836846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Odum, E. P. (1971). Fundamentals of Ecology, 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.Google Scholar
Paine, R. T. (1988). Food webs: road maps of interactions or grist for theoretical development? Ecology, 69, 16481654.Google Scholar
Pimm, S. L. (1982). Food Webs. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Pimm, S. L. and Lawton, J. H. (1977). Number of trophic levels in ecological communities. Nature, 268, 329331.Google Scholar
Pimm, S. L. and Lawton, J. H. (1978). On feeding on more than one trophic level. Nature, 275, 542544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polis, G. A. and Strong, D. R. (1996). Food web complexity and community dynamics. American Naturalist, 147, 813846.Google Scholar
Rooney, N., McCann, K., Gellner, G., and Moore, J. C. (2006). Structural asymmetry and the stability of diverse food webs. Nature, 442, 265269.Google Scholar
Tang, S., Pawar, S., and Allesina, S. (2014). Correlation between interaction strengths drives stability in large ecological networks. Ecology Letters, 17, 10941100.Google Scholar
Ulanowicz, R. E., Holt, R. D., and Barfield, M. (2014). Limits on ecosystem trophic complexity: insights from ecological network analysis. Ecology Letters, 17, 127136.Google Scholar
Winemiller, K. O. and Rose, K. A. (1992). Patterns of life-history diversification in North American fishes: implications for population regulation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 49, 21962218.Google Scholar
Wootton, J. T. (1994). Predicting direct and indirect effects: an integrated approach using experiments and path analysis. Ecology, 75, 151165.Google Scholar
Wootton, J. T. and Emmerson, M. (2005). Measurement of interaction strength in nature. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 36, 419444.Google Scholar
Yodzis, P. (1981). The stability of real ecosystems. Nature, 289, 674676.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×