Book contents
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Food Webs: Complexity and Stability
- Part II Food Webs: From Traits to Ecosystem Functioning
- 8 Integrating Food-Web and Trait-Based Ecology to Investigate Biomass-Trait Feedbacks
- 9 Including the Life Cycle in Food Webs
- 10 Importance of Trait-Related Flexibility for Food-Web Dynamics and the Maintenance of Biodiversity
- 11 Ecological Succession Investigated Through Food-Web Flow Networks
- 12 Statistical Approaches for Inferring and Predicting Food-Web Architecture
- 13 Global Metawebs of Spider Predation Highlight Consequences of Land-Use Change for Terrestrial Predator–Prey Networks
- 14 Ecological Networks in Managed Ecosystems: Connecting Structure to Services
- 15 Trait-Based and Process-Oriented Modeling in Ecological Network Dynamics
- 16 Empirical Methods of Identifying and Quantifying Trophic Interactions for Constructing Soil Food-Web Models
- Part III Food Webs and Environmental Sustainability
- Index
- References
14 - Ecological Networks in Managed Ecosystems: Connecting Structure to Services
from Part II - Food Webs: From Traits to Ecosystem Functioning
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2017
Book contents
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Food Webs: Complexity and Stability
- Part II Food Webs: From Traits to Ecosystem Functioning
- 8 Integrating Food-Web and Trait-Based Ecology to Investigate Biomass-Trait Feedbacks
- 9 Including the Life Cycle in Food Webs
- 10 Importance of Trait-Related Flexibility for Food-Web Dynamics and the Maintenance of Biodiversity
- 11 Ecological Succession Investigated Through Food-Web Flow Networks
- 12 Statistical Approaches for Inferring and Predicting Food-Web Architecture
- 13 Global Metawebs of Spider Predation Highlight Consequences of Land-Use Change for Terrestrial Predator–Prey Networks
- 14 Ecological Networks in Managed Ecosystems: Connecting Structure to Services
- 15 Trait-Based and Process-Oriented Modeling in Ecological Network Dynamics
- 16 Empirical Methods of Identifying and Quantifying Trophic Interactions for Constructing Soil Food-Web Models
- Part III Food Webs and Environmental Sustainability
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Adaptive Food WebsStability and Transitions of Real and Model Ecosystems, pp. 214 - 227Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Alemanno, S., Mancinelli, G., and Basset, A. (2007). Effects of invertebrate patch use behaviour and detritus quality on reed leaf decomposition in aquatic systems: a modelling approach. Ecological Modelling, 205, 492–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, A. P. and Gillooly, J. F. (2009). Towards an integration of ecological stoichiometry and the metabolic theory of ecology to better understand nutrient cycling. Ecology Letters, 12, 369–384.Google Scholar
Allison, S. D. (2006). Brown ground: a soil carbon analogue for the green world hypothesis? American Naturalist, 167, 619–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beare, M. H., Parmelee, R. W., Hendrix, P. F., et al. (1992). Microbial and faunal interactions and effects on litter nitrogen and decomposition in agroecosystems. Ecological Monographs, 62, 569–591.Google Scholar
Berlow, E. L., Neutel, A.-M., Cohen, J. E., et al. (2004). Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and opportunities. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73, 585–598.Google Scholar
Bohan, D. A., Raybould, A., Mulder, C., et al. (2013). Networking agroecology: integrating the diversity of agroecosystem interactions. Advances in Ecological Research, 49, 1–67.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. E. (1978). Food Webs and Niche Space. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. E. and Carpenter, S. R. (2005). Species’ average body mass and numerical abundance in a community food web: statistical questions in estimating the relationship. In Dynamic Food Webs: Multispecies Assemblages, Ecosystem Development, and Environmental Change, ed. de Ruiter, P. C., Wolters, V., and Moore, J. C., San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 137–156.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. E. and Mulder, C. (2014). Soil invertebrates, chemistry, weather, human management, and edaphic food webs at 135 sites in the Netherlands: SIZEWEB. Ecology, 95, 578.Google Scholar
Coleman, D. C., Crossley, D. A. Jr., and Hendrix, P. F. (2004). Fundamentals of Soil Ecology, 2nd edn. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
De Visser, S. N., Freymann, B. P., and Olff, H. (2011). The Serengeti food web: empirical quantification and analysis of topological changes under increasing human impact. Journal of Animal Ecology, 80, 484–494.Google Scholar
Duncan, C., Thompson, J. R., and Pettorelli, N. (2015). The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20151348.Google Scholar
Fitter, A. H., Gilligan, C. A., Hollingworth, K., et al. (2005). Biodiversity and ecosystem function in soil. Functional Ecology, 19, 369–377.Google Scholar
Gray, C., Baird, D. J., Baumgartner, S., et al. (2014). Ecological networks: the missing links in biomonitoring science. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51, 1444–1449.Google Scholar
Hagen, M., Kissling, W. D., Rasmussen, C., et al. (2012). Biodiversity, species interactions and ecological networks in a fragmented world. Advances in Ecological Research, 46, 89–210.Google Scholar
Hairston, N. G., Smith, F. E., and Slobodkin, L. B. (1960). Community structure, population control, and competition. American Naturalist, 94, 421–425.Google Scholar
Hieber, M. and Gessner, M. O. (2002). Contribution of stream detrivores, fungi, and bacteria to leaf breakdown based on biomass estimates. Ecology, 83, 1026–1038.Google Scholar
Hladyz, S., Ǻbjörnsson, K., Chauvet, E., et al. (2011). Stream ecosystem functioning in an agricultural landscape: the importance of terrestrial–aquatic linkages. Advances in Ecological Research, 44, 211–276.Google Scholar
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S. III, Ewel, J. J., et al. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge and needs for future research. Ecological Monographs, 75, 3–35.Google Scholar
Hsu, S. C., Liu, S. C., Huang, Y.-T., et al. (2009). Long-range southeastward transport of Asian biosmoke pollution: signature detected by aerosol potassium in Northern Taiwan. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 114, D14301.Google Scholar
Hudson, L. N., Emerson, R., Jenkins, G. B., et al. (2013). Cheddar: analysis and visualisation of ecological communities in R. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, H. W., Coleman, D. C., Ingham, E. R., et al. (1987). The detrital food web in a shortgrass prairie. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 3, 57–68.Google Scholar
Kapo, K. E., Holmes, C. M., Dyer, S. D., De Zwart, D., and Posthuma, L. (2014). Developing a foundation for eco-epidemiological assessment of aquatic ecological status over large geographic regions utilizing existing data resources and models. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 33, 1665–1677.Google Scholar
Kaspari, M. and Weiser, M. (2007). The size–grain hypothesis: do macroarthropods see a fractal world? Ecological Entomology, 32, 279–282.Google Scholar
Kaspari, M. and Yanoviak, S. P. (2009). Biogeochemistry and the structure of tropical brown food webs. Ecology, 90, 3342–3351.Google Scholar
Kattge, J., Díaz, S., Lavorel, S., et al. (2011). TRY: a global database of plant traits. Global Change Biology, 17, 2905–2935.Google Scholar
Lavorel, S., McIntyre, S., Landsberg, J., and Forbes, T. D. A. (1997). Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 12, 474–478.Google Scholar
Lavorel, S., Storkey, J., Bardgett, R. D., et al. (2013). A novel framework for linking functional diversity of plants and other trophic levels for the quantification of ecosystem services. Journal of Vegetation Science, 22, 942–948.Google Scholar
Leitch, A. R., Leitch, I. J., Trimmer, M., Guignard, M. S., and Woodward, G. (2014). Impact of genomic diversity in river ecosystems. Trends in Plant Science, 19, 361–366.Google Scholar
Levins, R. (1974). The qualitative analysis of partially specified systems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 231, 123–138.Google Scholar
Loreau, M. (2009). Linking biodiversity and ecosystems: towards a unifying ecological theory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 49–60.Google Scholar
Loreau, M., Downing, A. L., Emmerson, M. C., et al. (2002). A new look at the relationship between diversity and stability. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning. Synthesis and Perspectives, ed. Loreau, M., Naeem, S., and Inchausti, P., Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfadyen, S., Gibson, R. H., Symondson, W. O. C., and Memmott, J. (2011). Landscape structure influences modularity patterns in farm food webs: consequences for pest control. Ecological Applications, 21, 516–524.Google Scholar
Mahowald, N., Jickells, T. D., Baker, A. R., et al. (2008). Global distribution of atmospheric phosphorus sources, concentrations and deposition rates, and anthropogenic impacts. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 22, GB4026.Google Scholar
Martin, L. J., Blossey, B., and Ellis, E. (2012). Mapping where ecologists work: biases in the global distribution of terrestrial ecological observations. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 195–201.Google Scholar
McMahon, T. A., Halstead, N. T., Johnson, S., et al. (2012). Fungicide-induced declines of freshwater biodiversity modify ecosystem functions and services. Ecology Letters, 15, 714–722.Google Scholar
Moore, J. C. and de Ruiter, P. C. (2012). Energetic Food Webs: An Analysis of Real and Model Ecosystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, J. C., Berlow, E. L., Coleman, D. C., et al. (2004). Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 7, 584–600.Google Scholar
Mulder, C. (2010). Soil fertility controls the size–specific distribution of eukaryotes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1195, E74–81.Google Scholar
Mulder, C. and Elser, J. J. (2009). Soil acidity, ecological stoichiometry and allometric scaling in grassland food webs. Global Change Biology, 15, 2730–2738.Google Scholar
Mulder, C., Boit, A., Mori, S., et al. (2012). Distributional (in)congruence of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning. Advances in Ecological Research, 46, 1–88.Google Scholar
Mulder, C., Ahrestani, F. S., Bahn, M., et al. (2013). Connecting the green and brown worlds: elemental factors and trait-driven predictability of ecological networks. Advances in Ecological Research, 49, 67–173.Google Scholar
Mulder, C., Bennett, E. M., Bohan, D. A., et al. (2015). Ten years later: revisiting priorities for science and society a decade after the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Advances in Ecological Research, 53, 1–53.Google Scholar
Neutel, A.-M. and Thorne, M. A. S. (2014). Interaction strengths in balanced carbon cycles and the absence of a relation between ecosystem complexity and stability. Ecology Letters, 17, 651–661.Google Scholar
Peñuelas, J., Poulter, B., Sardans, J., et al. (2013). Human-induced nitrogen–phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe. Nature Communications, 4, 2934.Google Scholar
Perrings, C., Naeem, S., Ahrestani, F. S., et al. (2011). Ecosystem services, targets, and indicators for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9, 512–520.Google Scholar
Pocock, M. J. O., Evans, D. M., and Memmott, J. (2012). The robustness and restoration of a network of ecological networks. Science, 335, 973–977.Google Scholar
Posthuma, L., Bjørn, A., Zijp, M. C., et al. (2014). Beyond safe operating space: finding chemical footprinting feasible. Environmental Science and Technology, 38, 6057–6059.Google Scholar
QUINTESSENCE Consortium (2016). Networking our way to better ecosystem service provision. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 31. 10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.003.Google Scholar
Rzanny, M., Kuu, A., and Voigt, W. (2013). Bottom–up and top–down forces structuring consumer communities in an experimental grassland. Oikos, 122, 967–976.Google Scholar
Scherber, C., Eisenhauer, N., Weisser, W. W., et al. (2010). Bottom–up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment. Nature, 468, 553–556.Google Scholar
Schröter, D., Wolters, V., and de Ruiter, P. C. (2003). C and N mineralisation in the decomposer food webs of a European forest transect. Oikos, 102, 294–308.Google Scholar
Sechi, V., Brussaard, L., De Goede, R. G. M., Rutgers, M., and Mulder, C. (2015). Choice of resolution by functional trait or taxonomy affects allometric scaling in soil food webs. American Naturalist, 185, 142–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solé, R. V. and Montoya, J. M. (2001). Complexity and fragility in ecological networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 268, 2039–2045.Google Scholar
Sterner, R. W. and Elser, J. J. (2002). Ecological Stoichiometry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. I. A., Dossena, M., Bohan, D. A., et al. (2013). Mesocosm experiments as a tool for ecological climate-change research. Advances in Ecological Research, 48, 71–181.Google Scholar
Strong, D. R. and Frank, K. T. (2010). Human involvement in food webs. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 1–23.Google Scholar
Struebig, M. J., Kingston, T., Petit, E. J., et al. (2011). Parallel declines in species and genetic diversity in tropical forest fragments. Ecology Letters, 14, 582–590.Google Scholar
Thébault, E. and Fontaine, C. (2010). Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks. Science, 329, 853–856.Google Scholar
Urabe, J., Naeem, S., Raubenheimer, D., and Elser, J. J. (2010). The evolution of biological stoichiometry under global change. Oikos, 119, 737–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Carlowitz, H. C. (1713). Sylvicultura oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur wilden Baum-Zucht. Leipzig: Johann Friedrich Braun.Google Scholar
Von Liebig, J. (1840). Die Organische Chemie in ihrer Anwendung auf Agricultur und Physiologie. Braunschweig: Vieweg.Google Scholar
Wall, D. H., Nielsen, U. N., and Six, J. (2015). Soil biodiversity and human health. Nature, 528, 69–76.Google Scholar
Wardle, D. A. (2002). Communities and Ecosystems: Linking the Aboveground and Belowground Components. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wolters, V., Silver, W. L., Bignell, D. E., et al. (2000). Effects of global changes on above- and belowground biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems: implications for ecosystem functioning. BioScience, 50, 1089–1098.Google Scholar
Woodward, G., Gessner, M. O., Giller, P. S., et al. (2012). Continental-scale effects of nutrient pollution on stream ecosystem functioning. Science, 336, 1438–1440.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by