Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:28:15.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Trendsetter for projects: the Clean Development Mechanism

from Part III - MRV at offset project scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Igor Shishlov
Affiliation:
CDC Climat
Valentin Bellassen
Affiliation:
CDC Climat, Paris
Nicolas Stephan
Affiliation:
CDC Climat, Paris
Get access

Summary

Context

The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) in brief

The existing international climate regime set up by the Kyoto Protocol in 1997 imposed quantitative limits on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of developed countries and economies in transition that are included in Annex B to the Kyoto Protocol. These limits are enounced in countries’ emissions quotas–Assigned Amount Units (AAU). The Kyoto Protocol (UN, 1998) incorporates four flexibility mechanisms that are supposed to help governments maximize the economic efficiency of achieving their commitments:

  1. “Bubbling” (article 4) permits a group of Annex B countries to redistribute their GHG emissions reduction commitments, as it was done by the European Union countries;

  2. Joint Implementation (article 6) permits Annex B countries to host emissions reduction projects that generate tradable Emission Reduction Units (ERU);

  3. The Clean Development Mechanism (article 12) permits developing (non-Annex B) countries to host emissions reduction projects that generate tradable Certified Emission Reductions (CERs);

  4. International Emissions Trading (article 17) permits Annex B countries to directly trade their Kyoto allowances (AAUs).

With over 6,500 registered projects and over 1.3 billion tCO2e of GHG emissions reduced in developing countries as of June 2013 (UNEP Risoe, 2014), the CDM is the largest carbon offset scheme in the world. According to the CDM Policy Dialogue report (UNFCCC, 2012), the CDM raised over US$215 billion in mostly private investments in climate change mitigation over ten years. This figure is 10–20 times higher than the value of 1.3 billion tons CO2e of carbon assets generated. Indeed, the leverage effect of carbon finance enables raising private investments in climate-friendly projects that may significantly exceed revenues from the sale of carbon credits (Shishlov and Bellassen,2013).

Being an offsetting mechanism, the CDM represents an environmental “zero-sum” game, whereby emissions reductions generated in developing countries can be used for compliance by developed countries and individual companies (Figure 11.1).

Type
Chapter
Information
Accounting for Carbon
Monitoring, Reporting and Verifying Emissions in the Climate Economy
, pp. 341 - 389
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beaurain, F. and Schmidt-Traub, G., 2010. Developing CDM Programmes of Activities: A Guidebook. South Pole Carbon Asset Management Ltd, Zurich, 75pp.Google Scholar
CAR, 2011. Program Manual. Climate Action Reserve, Los Angeles, 42pp.
CCX, 2009. Forestry Carbon Sequestration Project Protocol. Chicago Climate Exchange, Inc., 70pp.
Cormier, A. and Bellassen, V., 2013. The risks of CDM projects: how did only 30% of expected credits come through?Energy Policy 54 (March): 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinar, A., Rahman, S.M., Larson, D. and Ambrosi, P., 2008. Factors affecting levels of international cooperation in carbon abatement projects. Policy Research Working Paper No. 4786. World Bank, 38pp.
Flues, F., 2010. Who hosts the Clean Development Mechanism?: Determinants of CDM project distribution. Working Paper No. 53. Center for Comparative and International Studies (ETH Zurich and University of Zurich), 41pp.
Guigon, P., Bellassen, V. and Ambrosi, P., 2009. Voluntary carbon markets: what the standards say… Working Paper No. 4, Mission Climat. Caisse des Depots. Paris, 46pp.
IETA, 2011. Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV) Considerations for Offset Projects. International Emissions Trading Association, 16pp.
IGES, 2013a. CDM Project Database. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. http://pub.iges.or.jp/modules/envirolib/view.php?docid=968. Accessed October 2013.
IGES, 2013b. One Hundred Questions & Answers about MRV in Developing Countries. v.1.2. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, 135pp.
IGES, 2013c. Measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) for low carbon development: learning from experience in Asia. Policy Report. Edited by: K., Koakutsu, K., Usui, A., Watarai, Y., Takagi. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, 149pp.
Jung, M., 2006. Host country attractiveness for CDM non-sink projects. Energy Policy 34(15: 2173–2184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krey, M., 2005. Transaction costs of unilateral CDM projects in India-results from an empirical survey. Energy Policy 33(18): 2385–2397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelowa, A. and Michaelowa, K., 2013. Bureaucratic influence when secretariats grow: the example of the UNFCCC. CIS Working Paper No. 80. University of Zurich, Switzerland, 31pp.
Michaelowa, A. and Stronzik, M., 2002. Transaction costs of the Kyoto mechanisms. HWWA Discussion Paper, No. 175, 36pp.
Philp, L., 2013. Stranded Costs on the Demise of the Clean Development Mechanism. CO2 Spain, 12pp. www.co2spain.com/strandedcosts.php. Accessed April 2014.
Replogle, M. and Bakker, S., 2011. Can the Clean Development Mechanism be made more effective for the transportation sector? Report to the UNFCCC Practitioner Workshop on the Improvement of CDM Methodologies for Transportation. Bonn, Germany.
Schneider, L., 2009. Assessing the additionality of CDM projects: practical experiences and lessons learned. Climate Policy 9(3) (May 1): 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shishlov, I. and Bellassen, V., 2012. 10 lessons from 10 years of the CDM. Climate Report No. 37. CDC Climat Research, Paris, 39pp.
Shishlov, I. and Bellassen, V., 2013. Unlocking private investments in energy efficiency through carbon finance. Climate Brief No. 27. CDC Climat Research, Paris, 5pp.
Shishlov, I. and Bellassen, V., 2014. Review of monitoring uncertainty requirements in the CDM. Working Paper No. 16. CDC Climat Research, Paris, 33pp.
UN, 1998. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 20pp.
UNEP, 2007. Guidebook to Financing CDM Projects. United Nations Environment Programme, 104pp.
UNEP Risoe, 2014. CDM/JI Pipeline Databases. United Nations Environment Programme. www.cdmpipeline.org/. Accessed April 2014.
UNFCCC, 2002. Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Seventh Session, Held at Marrakesh from 29 October to 10 November 2001. UNFCCC, 72pp.
UNFCCC, 2006. Report of the Conference of the Parties Serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol on Its First Session, Held at Montreal from 28 November to 10 December 2005. UNFCCC, 100pp.
UNFCCC, 2012. Synthesis Report of the Call for Input on the CDM Policy Dialogue. UNFCCC, 28pp.
UNFCCC, 2013a. Official CDM website. https://cdm.unfccc.int/. Accessed October 2013.
UNFCCC, 2013b. CDM Methodology Booklet – Fifth Edition. Accessed April 2014.
VCS, 2012a. VCS Program Guide. Version 3. Verified Carbon Standard, 21pp. www.v-c-s.org/sites/v-c-s.org/files/VCS%20Program%20Guide%2C%20v3.5.pdf. Accessed October 2013.
VCS, 2012b. VCS Standard. Version 3. Verified Carbon Standard, 50pp. www.v-c-s.org/sites/v-c-s.org/files/VCS%20Standard%2C%20v3.4.pdf. Accessed October 2013.
Vine, E.L. and Sathaye, J.A., 2000. The monitoring, evaluation, reporting, verification, and certification of energy-efficiency projects. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 5(2): 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warnecke, C., 2014. Can CDM monitoring requirements be reduced while maintaining environmental integrity?Climate Policy:1–24.Google Scholar
Warnecke, C., Klein, N., Perroy, R. and Tippmann, R., 2013. CDM Market Support Study. KFW. www.jiko-bmub.de/files/basisinformationen/application/pdf/kfw_cdm_market_support_study.pdf.
Winkelman, A.G. and Moore, M.R., 2011. Explaining the differential distribution of Clean Development Mechanism projects across host countries. Energy Policy 39(3): 1132–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×