Alston, William. 1967. “Motives and Motivation.” The Encyclopedia of Philosophy 5: 399–409. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company and The Free Press

Alston, William. 1983. “What's Wrong With Immediate Knowledge?” Synthese 55: 73–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, William. 1985. “Concepts of Epistemic Justification.” Monist 68: 57–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, William. 1988. “An Internalist Externalism.” Synthese 74: 265–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Audi, Robert. 1997. Moral Knowledge and Ethical Character. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press

Aune, Bruce. 1967. “Intention.” The Encyclopedia of Philosophy 4: 198–201. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company and The Free Press

Beanblossom, Ronald E. 1983. Introduction to Thomas Reid's Inquiry and Essays: ⅹ–ⅼⅶ. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company

Beanblossom, Ronald E, and Keith Lehrer, eds. 1983. Thomas Reid's Inquiry and Essays. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company

Beardsley, Monroe C. 1975. Thinking Straight: Principles of Reasoning for Readers and Writers 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

Blair, J. Anthony. 1986. “Acceptability as the Criterion of Premise Adequacy in Arguments.” Unpublished manuscript

Blair, J. Anthony. 1995. “Premiss Adequacy,” in Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles A. Willard, eds., Analysis and Evaluation: Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation 2: 191–202. Amsterdam: Sic Sat

Blair, J. Anthony, and Ralph, H. Johnson. 1987. “Argumentation as Dialectical.” Argumentation 1: 41–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

BonJour, Laurence. 1978. “Can Empirical Knowledge Have a Foundation?” American Philosophical Quarterly 15: 1–13Google Scholar

BonJour, Laurence. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Bradley, Raymond, and Norman Swartz. 1979. Possible Worlds: An Introduction to Logic and Its Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company

Broad, C. D. 1952. “Some Reflections on Moral-Sense Theories in Ethics.” in Wilfrid Sellars and John Hospers, eds. Readings in Ethical Theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts

Burks, Arthun W. 1951. “The Logic of Causal Propositions.” Mind 60: 363–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. 1947. Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Cederblom, Jerry, and David Paulsen. 1988. “Making Reasonable Decisions as an Amateur in a World of Experts,” in Trudy Govier, ed. Selected Issues in Logic and Communication. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company

Clarke, D. S., Jr. 1989. Rational Acceptance and Purpose: An Outline of a Pragmatist Epistemology. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers

Coady, C. A. J. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Cohen, L. Jonathan. 1986. The Dialogue of Reason: An Analysis of Analytical Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Cohen, L. Jonathan. 1992. An Essay on Belief and Acceptance. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Conee, Earl. 1988. “The Basic Nature of Epistemic Justification.” Monist 71: 389–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damasio, Antonio R. 1994. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: G. P. Putnam

Daniels, Charles B., and James, B. Freeman. 1980. “An Analysis of the Subjunctive Conditional.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 21: 639–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Descartes, Rene. 1960. Discourse on Method and Meditations. Indianapolis and New York: Bobbs-Merrill

Fahnestock, Jeanne, and Marie Secor. 1982. A Rhetoric of Argument. New York: Random House

Feldman, Richard, and Earl, Conee. 1985. “Evidentialism.” Philosophical Studies 48: 15–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Firth, Roderick. 1978. “Are Epistemic Concepts Reducible to Ethical Concepts?” in A. Goldman and J. Kim, eds., Values and Morals: 215–29. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing

Fisher, Alec. 2000. “Informal Logic and Its Implications for Philosophy.” Informal Logic 20: 109–15Google Scholar

Fogelin, Robert J. 1982. Understanding Arguments: An Introduction to Informal Logic 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company

Frankena, William K. 1973. Ethics 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

Freeman, James B. 1983. “Logical Form, Probability Interpretations, and the Inductive/Deductive Distinction.” Informal Logic Newsletter 5: 2–10Google Scholar

Freeman, James B. 1991. Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments. Berlin and New York: Foris Publications

Freeman, James B. 1993. Thinking Logically: Basic Concepts for Reasoning 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

Freeman, James B. 1996. “Epistemic Justification and Premise Acceptability.” Argumentation 10: 59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, James B. 2000. “What Types of Statements Are There?” Argumentation 14: 135–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, James B. 2003. “The Pragmatic Dimension of Premise Acceptability,” in Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles Willard, and A. Francisca Snoeck-Henkemans, eds., Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation: 17–26. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 17–26

Gettier, Edmund L. 1963. “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Analysis 23: 121–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Govier, Trudy. 1981. “Theory, Common Sense, and Certainty.” Metaphilosophy 12: 31–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Govier, Trudy. 1985. A Practical Study of Argument. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company

Govier, Trudy. 1987. Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. Dordrecht and Providence: Foris Publications

Grennan, Wayne. 1984. Argument Evaluation. Lanham, MD: University Press of America

Grennan, Wayne. 1987. “A ‘Logical Audit’ Scheme for Argument Evaluation,” in Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles A. Willard, eds., Argumentation: Analysis and Practices: Proceedings of the Conference on Argumentation 1986: 17–24. Dordrecht and Providence: Foris Publications

Hallie, Philip P. 1967. “Pyrrho.” Encyclopedia of Philosophy 7: 36–37, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company and The Free Press

Hamblin, C. L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd

Harrison, Jonathan. 1967. “Ethical Objectivism.” Encyclopedia of Philosophy 3: 71–75, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company and The Free Press

Heysse, T. 1991. “Truth and a Theory of Argumentation,” in Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles A. Wlllard, eds., Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation: 84–91. Amsterdam: International Society for the Study of Argumentation

Hitchcock, David. 1985. “Enthymematic Arguments.” Informal Logic 7: 83–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hume, David. 1875. Essays: Moral, Political and Literary2. London: Longmans, Green

Hume, David. 1888. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Johnson, Ralph H. 1990. “Acceptance is Not Enough: A Critique of Hamblin.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 23 271–87Google Scholar

Jung, C. G. 1944. Psychological Types or The Psychology of Individuation. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company

Kornblith, Hilary. 1993. Inductive Inference and Its Natural Ground: An Essay in Naturalistic Epistemology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Kruger, Arthur N. 1975. “The Nature of Controversial Statements.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 8: 137–58Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Laplace, Pierre Marquis de. 1951. A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. New York: Dover Publications

Leblanc, Hugues and William A. Wisdom. 1976. Deductive Logic 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon

Lehrer, Keith. 1989. Thomas Reid. London and New York: Routledge

Lennox, James G. 1992. “Philosophy of Biology,” in Merrilee H. Salmon, John Earman, Clark Glymour, James G. Lennox, Peter Machamer, J. E. Mc Guire, John D. Norton, Wesley C. Salmon, and Kenneth F. Schaffner, Intro-duction to the Philosophy of Science: 269–309. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

Locke, John. 1961. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: J. M. Dent

MacLagan, W. G. 1960a. “Respect for Persons as a Moral Principle – I.” Philosophy 35: 193–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacLagan, W. G. 1960b. “Respect for Persons as a Moral Principle – II.” Philosophy 35: 280–305Google Scholar

McKeon, Richard, ed. 1941. The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York: Random House

Medin, Douglas L. 1989. “Concepts and Conceptual Structure.” American Psychologist 44: 1469–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Medin, Douglas L., and Andrew Ortony. 1989. “Comments on Part I: Psychological Essentialism,” in S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony, eds., Similarity and Analogical Reasoning: 179–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Meilaender, Gilbert C. 1991. Faith and Faithfulness: Basic Themes in Christian Ethics. Notre Dame and London: University of Notre Dame Press

Moore, Brooke Noel, and Richard Parker. 1986. Critical Thinking: Evaluating Claims and Arguments in Everyday Life. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company

Moore, George Edward. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Myers, Isabel Briggs. 1980. Introduction to Type 3rd ed. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press

Nagel, Ernest. 1961. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & Company

Nolt, John Eric. 1984. Informal Logic: Possible Worlds and Imagination. New York: McGraw-Hill

Paton, H. J. 1948. The Moral Law: Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. London: Hutchinson University Library

Peirce, Charles S. 1955. Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover Publications

Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame and London: University of Notre Dame Press

Pinto, R. C. 1984. “Dialectic and the Structure of Argument.” Informal Logic 6: 16–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin. 1993a. Warrant: The Current Debate. New York: Oxford University Press

Plantinga, Alvin. 1993b. Warrant and Proper Function. New York: Oxford University Press

Popkin, Richard H. 1967. “Skepticism.” Encyclopedia of Philosophy 7: 449–61. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company and The Free Press

Quine, Willard van Orman. 1961. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” in From a Logical Point of View 2nd ed.: 20–46. New York: Harper Torchbooks

Quine, Willard van Orman. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press

Quine, Willard van Orman. 1970. Philosophy of Logic. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

Quine, Willard van Orman, and J. S. Ullian. 1978. The Web of Belief 2nd ed. New York: Random House

Quinton, Anthony. 1967. “The A Priori and the Analytic,” in P. F. Strawson, ed., Philosophical Logic: 107–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Randall, John Herman, Jr. 1960. Aristotle. New York: Columbia University Press

Raphael, D. Daiches. 1947. The Moral Sense. London: Oxford University Press

Rescher, Nicholas. 1977a. Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge. Albany: State University of New York Press

Rescher, Nicholas. 1977b. Methodological Pragmatism. New York: New York University Press

Rescher, Nicholas. 1988. Rationality: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature and the Rationale of Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Ross, W. D. 1930. The Right and the Good. Oxford: The Clarendon Press

Ryle, Gilbert. 1949. The Concept of Mind. New York: Barnes and Noble

Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Searle, John R. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Secor, Marie. 1998. “Response to Freeman,” in Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, and Athena V. Colman, eds., Argumentation & Rhetoric. St. Catharines, Canada: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation

Skagestad, Peter. 1981. The Road of Inquiry: Charles Peirce's Pragmatic Realism. New York: Columbia University Press

Skyrms, Brian. 1986. Choice and Chance: An Introduction to Inductive Logic 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company

Smith, Adam. 1976. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Sprague, Elmer. 1967. “Moral Sense.” Encyclopedia of Philosophy 5: 385–7. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company and The Free Press

Sproule, J. Michael. 1976. “The Psychological Burden of Proof: On the Evolutionary Development of Richard Whatley's Theory of Presumption.” Communication Monographs 43: 115–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sproule, J. Michael. 1980. Argument: Language and Its Influence. New York: McGraw-Hill

Stevenson, Charles L. 1944. Ethics and Language. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press

Stough, Charlotte L. 1969. Greek Skepticism: A Study in Epistemology. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press

Swinburne, Richard. 1996. Is There a God? Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press

Thomas, Stephen Naylor. 1991. Argument Evaluation. Tampa, FL: Worthington Publishing Company

Toulmin, Stephen. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Ullmann-Margalit, Edna. 1983. “On Presumption.” The Journal of Philosophy 80: 143–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walton, Douglas N. 1988. “Burden of Proof.” Argumentation 2: 233–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wellman, Carl. 1971. Challenge and Response: Justification in Ethics. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press

Whatley, Richard. 1968. “Presumption and Burden of Proof,” in Jerry Anderson and Paul J. Dovre, eds. 1968. Readings in Argumentation: 26–29. Boston: Allyn and Bacon

Wilson, James Q. 1993. The Moral Sense. New York: The Free Press