Book contents
- Senses, Cognition, and Ritual Experience in the Roman World
- Ancient Religion and Cognition
- Senses, Cognition, and Ritual Experience in the Roman World
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction Experiencing Rituals
- Chapter 1 Remembering the Rites: Religious Learning Network Model and Transmission of Religious Rituals in the Worship of Nutrices Augustae (Poetovio, Pannonia Superior)
- Chapter 2 The Haptic Production of Religious Knowledge among the Vestal Virgins: A Hands-On Approach to Roman Ritual
- Chapter 3 Haptic Colour: Experiential Viewing in Graeco-Roman Sacred Spaces
- Chapter 4 Nobody Is Gonna Rain on My Parade: Experiencing Salutaris’s Procession As a Ritual Event
- Chapter 5 Objects and Ritual in Egeria’s Fourth-Century Pilgrimage: The Props of My Faith
- Conclusion (Re)Creating Ritual Experiences
- Index
- References
Chapter 1 - Remembering the Rites: Religious Learning Network Model and Transmission of Religious Rituals in the Worship of Nutrices Augustae (Poetovio, Pannonia Superior)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2024
By
Book contents
- Senses, Cognition, and Ritual Experience in the Roman World
- Ancient Religion and Cognition
- Senses, Cognition, and Ritual Experience in the Roman World
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction Experiencing Rituals
- Chapter 1 Remembering the Rites: Religious Learning Network Model and Transmission of Religious Rituals in the Worship of Nutrices Augustae (Poetovio, Pannonia Superior)
- Chapter 2 The Haptic Production of Religious Knowledge among the Vestal Virgins: A Hands-On Approach to Roman Ritual
- Chapter 3 Haptic Colour: Experiential Viewing in Graeco-Roman Sacred Spaces
- Chapter 4 Nobody Is Gonna Rain on My Parade: Experiencing Salutaris’s Procession As a Ritual Event
- Chapter 5 Objects and Ritual in Egeria’s Fourth-Century Pilgrimage: The Props of My Faith
- Conclusion (Re)Creating Ritual Experiences
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter explores how religious knowledge, including rituals, was learned and transmitted by putting forward a novel, cognitive-based, theoretical framework for analysing ritual practices in the Graeco-Roman world. This framework, termed the Religious Learning Network (RLN) theoretical model, is tested within a case study of archaeological and epigraphic evidence of Nutrices Augustae, a cult of local Pannonian healing mother-goddesses. Applying the Religious Learning Network model provides an insight into the types of rituals that may have taken place within this cult as well as the cognitive and social effects that these rituals may have produced upon the ritual participants. This chapter demonstrates that rituals were learned and transmitted within intimate circles through cult members’ interaction with objects, places, and events; forming a dynamic network of memory associations that helped in the encoding, storage, and retrieval of religious and ritual memories.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Beck, R. 2004. ‘Four men, two sticks, and a whip: image and doctrine in a Mithraic ritual’, in Whitehouse, H. and Martin, L. H., eds. Theorizing Religions Past: Archaeology, History, and Cognition, 87–103. Walnut Creek.Google Scholar
Belak, M. 1993. ‘Med Nutricami in Mitro’, in Lamut, B., ed. Ptujski Arheološki Zbornik Ob 100- letnici muzeja in Muzejskega društva, 233–9. Ptuj.Google Scholar
Bourbou, C. and Dasen, V. 2018. ‘Enfance en péril: les maladies infantiles à l’époque romaine’, Archéologia 564: 58–65.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. and Liénard, P. 2020. ‘Ingredients of “rituals” and their cognitive underpinnings’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375(1805): 20190439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0439Google Scholar
Carroll, M. 2014. ‘Mother and infant in Roman funerary commemoration’, in Carroll, M. and Graham, E. J., eds. Infant Health and Death in Roman Italy and Beyond. Journal of Roman Archaeology. Supplementary Series Number 96, 159–78. Portsmouth.Google Scholar
Clegg, J. M. and Legare, C. H. 2016. ‘A cross-cultural comparison of children’s imitative flexibility’, Developmental Psychology 52(9): 1435–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clegg, J. M., Wen, N. J., DeBaylo, P. H., Alcott, A., Keltner, E. C. and Legare, C. H. 2021. ‘Teaching through collaboration: flexibility and diversity in caregiver-child interactions across cultures’, Child Development 92(1): e56–e75.Google Scholar
Dasen, V. 2011. ‘Childbirth and infancy in Greek and Roman antiquity’, in Rawson, B., ed. A Companion to Families in the Greek and Roman Worlds, 291–314. Oxford.Google Scholar
Day, J. 2013. ‘Introduction: making senses of the past’, in Day, J., ed. Making Senses of the Past: Toward a Sensory Archaeology, 1–31. Carbondale.Google Scholar
Derks, T. 2014. ‘Seeking divine protection against untimely death: infant votives from Roman Gaul and Germany’, in Carroll, M. and Graham, E. J., eds. Infant Health and Death in Roman Italy and Beyond. Journal of Roman Archaeology. Supplementary Series Number 96, 47–68. Portsmouth.Google Scholar
Diez, E. 1993. ‘Magna Mater oder Nutrix?’, in Lamut, B., ed. Ptujski Arheološki Zbornik Ob 100-letnici muzeja in Muzejskega društva, 251–62. Ptuj.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. 2021. ‘Religiosity and religious attendance as factors in wellbeing and social engagement’, Religion, Brain & Behavior 11(1): 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2020.1712618Google Scholar
Eagleman, D. and Montague, R. 2002. ‘Learning and memory, models of’, in Nadel, L., ed. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, 806–12. London. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470018860.s00368Google Scholar
Eidinow, E. 2022. ‘Ancient Greek smellscapes and divine fragrances: anthropomorphizing the gods in Ancient Greek culture’, in Eidinow, E., Geertz, A. W. and North, J., eds. Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience, 69–95. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Eidinow, E., Geertz, A. W., Deeley, Q. and North, J. 2022. ‘Introduction’, in Eidinow, E., Geertz, A. W. and North, J., eds. Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience, 1–16. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, A. W. 2017. ‘Religious bodies, minds and places: a cognitive science of religion perspective’, in Carnevale, L., ed. Spazi e luoghi sacri espressioni ed esperienze di vissuto religioso, 35–52. Bari Santo Spirito.Google Scholar
Graham, E. J. 2014. ‘Infant votives and swaddling in Hellenistic Italy’, in Carroll, M. and Graham, E. J., eds. Infant Health and Death in Roman Italy and Beyond. Journal of Roman Archaeology. Supplementary Series Number 96, 23–46. Portsmouth.Google Scholar
Gurlitt, W. 1896. ‘Pettauer antiken. I. Die Nutrices Augustae’, Archäolog.-epigraph. Mittheilungen aus Oesterreich-Ungarn 19(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Hall, C. R., Mack, D., Paivio, A. and Hausenblas, H. A. 1998. ‘Imagery use by athletes: development of the sport imagery questionnaire’, International Journal of Sport Psychology 29: 73–89.Google Scholar
Hamilakis, Y. 2013. ‘Afterword: eleven theses on the archaeology of the senses’, in Day, J., ed. Making Senses of the Past: Toward a Sensory Archaeology, 409–19. Carbondale.Google Scholar
Harris, C. B., Sutton, J. and Barnier, A. J. 2010. ‘Autobiographical forgetting, social forgetting, and situated forgetting: forgetting in context’, in Della Sala, S., ed. Forgetting, 253–84. Hove.Google Scholar
Herrmann, P. A., Legare, C. H., Harris, P. L. and Whitehouse, H. 2013. ‘Stick to the script: the effect of witnessing multiple actors on children’s imitation’, Cognition 129: 536–43.Google Scholar
Hobson, N. M., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Xygalatas, D. and Inzlicht, M. 2017. ‘The psychology of rituals: an integrative review and process-based framework’, Personality and Social Psychology Review 00(0): 1–25.Google Scholar
Högberg, A., Gärdenfors, P. and Larsson, L. 2015. ‘Knowing, learning and teaching: how Homo became Docens’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal 25(4): 847–58.Google Scholar
Huet, V. 2008. ‘L’encens sur les reliefs sacrificiels romains’, in Bodiou, L., Frère, D. and Mehl, V., eds. Parfums et Odeurs dans l’Antiquité, 105–16. Rennes.Google Scholar
Hull, K. 2014. ‘Ritual as performance in small-scale societies’, World Archaeology 46(2): 164–77.Google Scholar
Hupbach, A., Gomez, R., Hardt, O. and Nadel, L. 2007. ‘Reconsolidation of episodic memories: a subtle reminder triggers integration of new information’, Learning & Memory 14: 47–53.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, J. 2004. ‘Introduction’, in Whitehouse, H. and Laidlaw, J., eds. Ritual and Memory: Toward a Comparative Anthropology of Religion, 1–9. Walnut Creek.Google Scholar
Lang, M., Krátký, J., Shaver, J. H., Jerotijević, D. and Xygalatas, D. 2015. ‘Effects of anxiety on spontaneous ritualized behavior’, Current Biology 25: 1892–7.Google Scholar
Lang, M., Krátký, J. and Xygalatas, D. 2020. ‘The role of ritual behaviour in anxiety reduction: an investigation of Marathi religious practices in Mauritius’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375(1805): 20190431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0431Google Scholar
Legare, C. H. and Harris, P. L. 2016. ‘The ontogeny of cultural learning’, Child Development 87(3): 633–42.Google Scholar
Legare, C. H. and Nielsen, M. 2015. ‘Imitation and innovation: the dual engines of cultural learning’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(11): 688–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.005Google Scholar
Legare, C. H. and Nielsen, M. 2020. ‘Ritual explained: interdisciplinary answers to Tinbergen’s four questions’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375(1805): 20190419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0419CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, D. E., Young, A. G. and Keil, F. C. 2007. ‘The hidden structure of overimitation’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 104(50): 19751–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Mackey, J. 2017. ‘Roman children as religious agents: the cognitive foundations of cult’, in Vuolanto, V. and Laes, C., eds. Children and Everyday Life in the Roman and Late Antique World, 179–97. London.Google Scholar
Martin, L. H. 2022. ‘Identifying symptoms of religious experience from ancient material culture: the example of cults of the Roman Mithras’, in Eidinow, E., Geertz, A. W. and North, J., eds. Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience, 218–42. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McCauley, R. N. 2020. ‘Recent trends in the cognitive science of religion: neuroscience, religious experience, and the confluence of cognitive and evolutionary research’, Zygon 55(1): 97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misic, B. 2015. ‘Cognitive theory and religious integration: the case of the Poetovian Mithraea’, in Brindle, T., Allen, M., Durham, E. and Smith, A., eds. TRAC 2014. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, Reading 2014, 31–40. Oxford. http://doi.org/10.16995/TRAC2014_31_40Google Scholar
Misic, B. 2022. ‘Worship of the Nymphs at Aquae Iasae (Roman Pannonia Superior): cognition, ritual and sacred space’, in Henig, M. and Lundock, J., eds. Water in the Roman World: Engineering, Trade, Religion and Daily Life, 157–74. Oxford.Google Scholar
Montague, R., Eagleman, D., McClure, S. and Berns, G. 2002. ‘Reinforcement learning: a biological perspective’, in Nadel, L., ed. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, 908–13. London. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470018860.s00373Google Scholar
Moser, C. 2019. The Altars of Republican Rome and Latium. Sacrifice and the Materiality of Roman Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nielsen, M., Kapitány, R. and Elkins, R. 2015. ‘The perpetuation of ritualistic actions as revealed by young children’s transmission of normative behavior’,Evolution and Human Behavior 36(3): 191–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.11.002Google Scholar
Panagiotidou, O. and Beck, R. 2017. The Roman Mithras Cult: A Cognitive Approach. London.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. 2014. ‘Learning by observing and pitching in to family and community endeavors: an orientation’, Human Development 57: 69–81.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B., Najafi, B. and Mejía-Arauz, R. 2014. ‘Constellations of cultural practices across generations: indigenous American heritage and learning by observing and pitching in’, Human Development 57: 82–95.Google Scholar
Rossano, M. J. 2020. ‘Ritual as resource management’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375(1805): 20190429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0429Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. 2020. ‘Establishing self-world relations in socio-religious practices: looking at Roman religious communication’, ARYS 18: 19–50.Google Scholar
Sara, S. J. 2000. ‘Retrieval and reconsolidation: toward a neurobiology of remembering’, Learning & Memory 7: 73–84.Google Scholar
Siebert, A. V. 2015. ‘Instruments and vessels’, in Raja, R. and Rüpke, J., eds. A Companion to the Archaeology of Religion in the Ancient World, 388–96. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sosis, R. 2020. ‘The last Talmudic demon? The role of ritual in cultural transmission’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375(1805): 20190425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutton, J. 2020. ‘Place and Memory: History, Cognition, Phenomenology’, in Sullivan, G. A. and Floyd-Wilson, M., eds. Geographies of Embodiment in Early Modern England, 113–33. Oxford.Google Scholar
Šašel-Kos, M. 2016. ‘Nutrices: the most popular goddesses at Poetovio’, in Lehner, M. and Schrettle, B., eds. Zentralort und Tempelberg: Siedlungs- und Kultentwicklung am Frauenberg bei Leibnitz im Vergleich, 167–74. Wien.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. and Thomson, D. 1973. ‘Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory’, Psychological Review 80(5): 352–73.Google Scholar
Van Cappellen, P. and Edwards, M. E. 2022. ‘The embodiment of worship: relations among postural, psychological, and physiological aspects of religious practice’, in Geertz, A. W., Ambasciano, L., Eidinow, E., Martin, L. H., Laigaard Nielbo, K., Roubekas, N. P., van Mulukom, V. and Xygalatas, D., eds. Studying the Religious Mind: Methodology in the Cognitive Science of Religion, 115–38. Sheffield.Google Scholar
Van der Ploeg, G. 2016. ‘Reconstructing the sensory experience of Caracalla’s supplication at the Pergamene Asclepieion’, Exchanges: The Warwick Research Journal 3(2): 185–98.Google Scholar
van Mulukom, V. 2017. ‘Remembering religious rituals: autobiographical memories of high-arousal religious rituals considered from a narrative processing perspective’, Religion, Brain & Behavior 7(3): 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1232304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weddle, C. 2013. ‘The sensory experience of blood sacrifice in the Roman imperial cult’, in Day, J., ed. Making Senses of the Past: Toward a Sensory Archaeology, 137–59. Carbondale.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M. 1986. ‘Transactive memory: a contemporary analysis of the group mind’, in Mullen, B. and Goethals, G. R., eds. Theories of Group Behaviour, 185–208. New York.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M., Giuliano, T. and Hertel, P. T. 1985. ‘Cognitive interdependence in close relationships’, in Ickes, W., ed. Compatible and Incompatible Relationships, 253–76. New York.Google Scholar
Wen, N. J., Willard, A. K., Caughy, M. and Legare, C. H. 2020. ‘Watch me, watch you: ritual participation increases in-group displays and out-group monitoring in children’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375(1805): 20190437. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0437CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, C. 2021. An Introduction to the Cognitive Science of Religion. Connecting Evolution, Brain, Cognition, and Culture. New York.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H. 2004. Modes of Religiosity: A Cognitive Theory of Religious Transmission. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H. and Laidlaw, J. 2004. Ritual and Memory: Towards a Comparative Anthropology of Religion. Walnut Creek.Google Scholar
Wigand, K. 1915. ‘Die Nutrices Augustae von Poetovio’, Jahreshefte des Österreichischen Archäologischen Institutes 18: 188–218.Google Scholar
Xygalatas, D. 2022. Ritual. How Seemingly Senseless Acts Make Life Worth Living. New York.Google Scholar