Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-n4bck Total loading time: 1.301 Render date: 2022-08-09T04:52:45.257Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Section 3 - Professionally Responsible Clinical Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2019

Laurence B. McCullough
Affiliation:
Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell
John H. Coverdale
Affiliation:
Baylor College of Medicine, Texas
Frank A. Chervenak
Affiliation:
Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Engel, GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977; 196: 129136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engelhardt, H.T Jr. The discourses of Orthodox Christian medical ethics. In Baker, RB, McCullough, LB, eds. Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 211217.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion. Condom availability for adolescents. Int J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 49: 347351.CrossRef
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 392. Intrauterine device and adolescents. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 14931495.CrossRef
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Store. Available at https://sales.acog.org/Default/aspx. (Accessed March 1, 2019)
Coverdale, J, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Bayer, T. Ethically justified clinically comprehensive guidelines for the management of the depressed pregnant patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 169173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coverdale, J, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA, Bayer, T, Weeks, S. Clinical implications of respect for autonomy in the psychiatric treatment of pregnant patients with depression. Psychiatr Serv 1997; 48: 209212.Google ScholarPubMed
McCullough, LB, Coverdale, J, Chervenak, FA. Ethical challenges of decision making with pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 696702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coverdale, J, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Assisted and surrogate decision making for pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2004; 30: 659664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 314317.
Katz, AL, Webb, SA. Committee on Bioethics. American Academy of Pediatrics. Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2016; 138: pii: e20161485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Board of Trustees. American Medical Association. Requirements or incentives for the use of long-acting contraceptives. JAMA 1992; 267: 18181821.CrossRef
Percival, T. Medical Ethics; or, A Code of Institutes and Precepts, adapted to the Professional Conduct of Physicians and Surgeons. London: Johnson & Bickerstaff, 1803.Google Scholar
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Embryo. In “Topics.” Available at www.sart.org/topics/topics-index/embryo/ (accessed March 1, 2019).
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. How your fetus grows during pregnancy. Frequently Asked Questions. 156 Pregnancy. Available at www.acog.org/-/media/For-Patients/faq156.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20180615T1523286650 (accessed March 1, 2019).
Gracia, JE. Introduction to the Problem of Individuation in the Early Middle Ages, 2nd ed. Munich: Philosophia Verlag, 1988.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, HT Jr. The Foundations of Bioethics, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Griswold v. Connecticut 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Performing the embryo transfer: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2017; 107: 882896.CrossRef
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 144: Multifetal gestation: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 11181132.CrossRef
European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. ESHRE Revised Guidelines for Good Practice in IVF Laboratories. Available at file:///C:/Users/mccullou/Documents/Downloads/ESHRE_IVF_labs_guideline_15122015_FINAL.pdf (accessed March 1, 2019).
Faden, RR, Becker, C, Lewis, C, Freeman, J, et al. Disclosure of information to patients in medical care. Med Care 1981; 19: 718733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullough, LB, Brothers, KB, Chung, WK, Joffe, S, Koenig, BA, Wilfond, B, Yu, JH. Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium Pediatrics Working Group. Professionally responsible disclosure of genome sequencing results in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2015; 136: e974982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Brent, RL. The perils of the imperfect expectation of the perfect baby. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 101.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Preventing enthusiasm in response to clinical advances. BJOG 2019; 126: 890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Brent, RL. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics: avoiding the perils of clashing rights. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 515.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. An ethically justified practical approach to offering, recommending, performing, and referring for induced abortion and feticide. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201: 560.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Medical Association. Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 4.2.7. Abortion. Available at www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/abortion (accessed March 1, 2019).
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Ethics. Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Available at www.acog.org/-/media/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Ethics/co390.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20181231T2040174286 (accessed March 1, 2019).
Stedman’s Medical Dictionary. Available at online.statref.com/DictionaryHelp/DictionaryHelp (accessed March 1, 2019).
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Ethics. Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction. ACOG Committee Opinion Number 369. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 15111515.CrossRef
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Campbell, S. Is third trimester abortion justified? Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 434435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Campbell, S. Third trimester abortion: is compassion enough? Brit J Obstet Gynæcol 1999; 106: 293296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Knapp, RC, Caputo, TA, Barber, HR. A clinically comprehensive ethical framework for offering and recommending cancer treatment before and during pregnancy. Cancer 2004; 100(2): 215222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Sharma, G, Davis, J, Gross, S. Enhancing patient autonomy with risk assessment and invasive diagnosis: an ethical solution to a clinical challenge. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 19.e1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coverdale, J, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Bayer, T. Ethically justified clinically comprehensive guidelines for the management of the depressed pregnant patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 169173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coverdale, J, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA, Bayer, T, Weeks, S. Clinical implications of respect for autonomy in the psychiatric treatment of pregnant patients with depression. Psychiatr Serv 1997; 48: 209212.Google ScholarPubMed
McCullough, LB, Coverdale, J, Chervenak, FA. Ethical challenges of decision making with pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 696702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coverdale, J, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Assisted and surrogate decision making for pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2004; 30: 659664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. The ethics of direct and indirect referral for termination of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 232.e1–232.e3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Does obstetric ethics have any role to place in the obstetrician’s response to the abortion controversy? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 14251429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Dudenhausen, J. Fetal analysis with invasive method (FA-I) and fetal analysis with non-invasive method (FA-NI): replacing current, deceptively imprecise clinical nomenclature. J Perinal Med 2017; 45: 985987.Google ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Ethical dimensions of first-trimester aneuploidy screening. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2014; 57: 226231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chervenak, J, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Surgery without consent or miscommunication? A new look at a landmark case. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 586590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wielgos, M, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Dudenhausen, JW. Deliberative clinical ethical judgment: an essential component of contemporary obstetrics. J Perinat Med 2013; 41: 627630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Brent, RL. The perils of the imperfect expectation of the perfect baby. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 101.e15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engel, G. A unified concept of health and disease. IRE Trans Med Electron 2009; 10.1109/IRET-ME.1960.5008004. Originally appeared in Perspect Biol Med 1960; 13: 4857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kon, AA. The shared decision-making continuum. JAMA 2010; 304: 903904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Sharma, G, Davis, J. Gross, G. Enhancing patient autonomy with risk assessment and invasive diagnosis: an ethical solution to a clinical challenge. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 19.e1–19.e4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faden, RR, Becker, C, Lewis, C, Freeman, J, et al. Disclosure of information to patients in medical care. Med Care 1981; 19: 718733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Practice Bulletins. Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 217227.CrossRef
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Genetics. The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Publications Committee. Noninvasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 15321534.CrossRef
Norton, ME, Rose, NC, Benn, P. Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy: clinical assessment and a plea for restraint. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121; 847850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolaides, KH, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Avgidou, K, Papageorghiou, A. Evidence-based obstetrics ethics and informed decision-making by pregnant woman about invasive diagnosis after first-trimester assessment of risk for trisomy 21. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 322326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Levene, MI. An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive approach to peri-viability: gynaecological, obstetric, perinatal, and neonatal dimensions. J Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 21: 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
Oklahoma State Department of Health. Definition of Live Birth. Available at www.ok.gov/health/Birth_and_Death_Certificates/Birth_and_Death_Registration_(ROVER)/Stillbirth_Registration_Training/Definition_of_Live_Birth.html (accessed March 1, 2019).
World Health Organization. 1950 definition of live birth. Available at www.gfmer.ch/Medical_education_En/Live_birth_definition.htm (accessed March 1, 2019).
Tyson, JE, Parikh, NA, Langer, J, et al. Intensive care for extreme prematurity – moving beyond gestational age. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 16721681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. NICHD Neonatal Research Network (NRN). Extremely preterm birth outcome data. Available at www1.nichd.nih.gov/epbo-calculator/Pages/epbo_case.aspx (accessed March 1, 2019).
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Ecker, JL, Kaimal, A, Mercer, BM, Blackwell, SC, et al. Obstetric Care Consensus. #6 Periviable Birth. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130: e187e198.Google Scholar
Raju, TNK, Mercer, BM, Burchfield, DJ, Joseph, GF. Periviable birth. Executive summary of a joint workshop by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 10831096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric Care Consensus, Number 6: Periviable Birth. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130: 926928.CrossRef
American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 314317.
American Academy of Pediatrics. Katz, AL, Webb, SA, AAP Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2016; 138: e20161485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skupski, DW, McCullough, LB, Levene, M, Chervenak, FA. Improving obstetric estimation of outcomes of extremely premature neonates: an evolving challenge. J Perinat Med 2010; 38: 1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, AS, McCullough, LB. When patients request specific interventions: defining the limits of the physician’s obligation. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 13471351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brett, AS, McCullough, LB. Addressing requests by patients for nonbeneficial interventions. JAMA 2012; 307: 149150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitney, SN, McCullough, LB, Frugé, E, McGuire, AL, Volk, RJ. Beyond breaking bad news: the roles of hope and hopefulness. Cancer 2008; 114: 442445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalish, RB, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Decision-making about caesarean delivery. Lancet 2006; 367: 883–845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, MT, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. The importance of clinically and ethically fine-tuning decision-making about cesarean delivery. J Perinat Med 2017; 45: 551557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullough, LB. The professional medical ethics model of decisionmaking under conditions of uncertainty. Med Care Rev Res 2013; 70(1 Suppl): 141S–58S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kon, AA. The shared decision-making continuum. JAMA 2010; 304: 903904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. The unlimited-rights model of obstetric ethics threatens professionalism. BJOG 2017; 124: 11441147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitney, SN, McGuire, AL, McCullough, LB. A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Ann Intern Med 2003; 140: 5459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Clinical guides to preventing ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 303307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolaides, KH, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, et al. Evidence-based obstetric ethics and informed decision-making about invasive diagnosis after first-trimester assessment for risk of trisomy 21. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 322326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmeen, K, Brincat, C. Time from consent to cesarean delivery during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 212.e16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Ventura, SJ, Osterman, MJK, Wilson, EC, Mathews, TJ. Births: final data for 2010. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Vital Statistics Report. August 28, 2012; 61(1): 172. Available at www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_01.pdf (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar
National Institutes of Health consensus development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights, March 8–10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 12791295.CrossRef
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. An ethical framework for the informed consent process for trial of labor after cesarean delivery. Clin Perinatol 2011; 38: 227231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Preventive ethics for cesarean delivery: the time has come. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 166167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, Romero, R. Is there a role for fetal cephalocentesis in modern obstetrics? Am J Perinatol 1984; 1: 170173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chasen, S, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. The role of cephalocentesis in modern obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 734736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, Isaacson, G, Campbell, S. Anomalies of the cranium and its contents. In Textbook of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Boston: Little, Brown, 1993: 825852.Google Scholar
Chervenak, FA, Berkowitz, RL, Tortora, M, et al. Management of fetal hydrocephalus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 933937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raimondi, AJ, Soare, P. Intellectual development in shunted hydrocephalic children. Am J Dis Child 1974; 127: 664.Google ScholarPubMed
McCullough, DC, Balzer-Martin, LA. Current prognosis in overt neonatal hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 1982; 57: 378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutton, LN, Bruce, DA, Schut, L. Hydranencephaly versus maximal hydrocephalus: an important clinical distinction. Neurosurgery 1980; 6: 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorber, J. The results of early treatment on extreme hydrocephalus. Med Child Neurol (Suppl) 1968; 16: 21.Google Scholar
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive management strategy for third-trimester pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 311316.Google ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Justified limits on refusing intervention. Hastings Cent Rep 1991; 21: 1218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brett, AS, McCullough, LB. When patients request specific interventions: defining the limits of the physician’s obligation. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 13471351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brett, AS, McCullough, LB. Addressing requests by patients for non-beneficial interventions. JAMA 2012; 307: 149150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, LB. Was bioethics founded on historical and conceptual mistakes about medical paternalism? Bioethics 2011; 25: 6674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Annas, GJ. Protecting the liberty of pregnant patients. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 12131214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minkoff, H, Marshal, MF, Liashenko, J. The fetus and the “potential child,” and the ethical obligations of obstetricians. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 11001103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeSisto, MJ, Harding, CM, McCormick, RV, et al. The Maine and Vermont three-decade studies of serious mental illness.I. Matched comparison of cross-sectional outcome. Brit J Psychiatry 1995; 167: 331338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard, LM, Kumar, C, Leese, M, et al. The general fertility rate in women with psychotic disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159: 991997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, LJ, Finnerty, M. Sexuality, pregnancy, and childrearing among women with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Psychiatr Serv 1996; 47: 502506.Google ScholarPubMed
Teplin, LA, McClelland, GM, Abram, KM, et al. Crime victimization in adults with severe mental illness: comparison with the National Crime Victimization Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62: 911921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullough, LB, Coverdale, JH, Chervenak, FA. Ethical challenges of decision making with pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 696702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullough, LB, Coverdale, J, Bayer, T, Chervenak, FA. Ethically justified guidelines for family planning interventions to prevent pregnancy in female patients with chronic mental illness. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 1925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, LJ. Psychotic denial of pregnancy: phenomenology and clinical management. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1990; 41: 1233–1137.Google ScholarPubMed
Webb, R, Abel, K, Pickles, A, Appleby, L. Mortality in offspring of parents with psychotic disorders: a critical review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162: 10451056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jablensky, AV, Morgan, V, Zubrick, SR, Bower, C, Yellachich, L-A. Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal complications in a population cohort of women with schizophrenia and major affective disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 62: 7991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneid-Kofman, N, Sheiner, E, Levy, A. Psychiatric illness and adverse pregnancy outcome. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2008; 101: 5256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spielvogel, A, Wile, J. Treatment and outcomes of psychotic patients during pregnancy and childbirth. Birth 1992; 19: 131137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coverdale, JH, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Assisted and surrogate decision making for pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2004; 30: 659664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babbitt, KE, Bailey, KJ, Coverdale, JH, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Professionally responsible management of patients with major mental disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 2731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Use of psychiatric medications during pregnancy and lactation. ACOG Pract Bull 2008; 111: 10011020.
Ryding, EL, Wijma, B, Wijma, K. Posttraumatic stress reactions after emergency cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76: 856861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giacino, JT, Katz, DI, Schiff, ND, Whyte, J, et al. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: disorders of consciousness: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. Neurology 2018; 91: 450460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, JA, Epstein, LG, MD, Greer, DM, Kirschen, M, et al., on behalf of the Brain Death Working Group. AAN Position Statement. Brain death, the determination of brain death, and member guidance for brain death accommodation requests. Neurology 2019; 92: 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esmaeilzadeh, M, Dictus, C, Kayvanpour, E, et al. One life ends, another begins: management of a brain-dead pregnant mother – a systematic review. BMC Medicine 2010; 8: 74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion Number 761. Cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133: e.7377.CrossRef
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. An ethically justified algorithm for offering, recommending, and performing cesarean delivery and its application in managed care practice. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 302305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingwani, P. Risk Management – An Analytical Study. IOSR Journal of Business and Management. February 2014, 8389. Available at http://iosrjournals.org/iosr-jbm/papers/Vol16-issue3/Version-3/K016338389.pdf (accessed July 31, 2019).
Sheen, JJ, Wright, JD, Goffman, D, et al. Maternal age and risk for adverse outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219: 390.e115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tita, ATN, Jablonski, KA, Bailit, JL, et al. Neonatal outcomes of elective early-term births after demonstrated fetal lung maturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219: 296.e18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, JK, Miller, SH, Horowitz, SD. Systems-based practice: improving the safety and quality of patient care by recognizing and improving the systems in which we work. In Henriksen, K, Battles, JB, Keyes, MA, et al., eds. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 2: Culture and Redesign). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); August 2008. Available at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43731/ (accessed January 13, 2019).Google Scholar
Grünebaum, A, McCullough, LB, Sapra, KJ, et al. Early and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States, 2006–2009. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 390.e1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grünebaum, A, McCullough, LB, Sapra, KJ, et al. Apgar score of 0 at 5 minutes and neonatal seizures or serious neurologic dysfunction in relation to birth setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 323.e16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grünebaum, A, McCullough, LB, Brent, RL, Arabin, B, Levene, MI, Chervenak, FA. Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 350.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wax, JR, Lucas, FL, Lamont, M, Cartin, A, Blackstone, J. Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 243.e18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snowden, JM, Tilden, EL, Snyder, J, Quigley, B, Caughey, AB, Cheng, YW. Planned out-of-hospital birth and birth outcomes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 26422653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Academy of Pediatrics: Policy Statement Planned Home Birth. Pediatrics 2013; 131: 10161020.CrossRef
Gigerenzer, G, Galesic, M. Why do single event probabilities confuse patients? statements of frequency are better for communicating risk. BMJ; 2012; 344: e245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Publications Committee, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 430439.CrossRef
ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 450463.CrossRef
Rasmussen, SA, Jamieson, DJ, Uyeki, TM. Effects of influenza on pregnant women and infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207: S38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farr, A, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Baergen, RN, Grünebaum, A. Human placentophagy: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 218: 401.e1–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Ecker, J. Minkoff home birth: what are physicians’ ethical obligations when patient choices may carry increased risk? Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 11791182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minkoff, H, Ecker, J. A reconsideration of home birth in the United States. J Clin Ethics 2013; 24: 207214.Google ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. The unlimited-rights model of obstetric ethics threatens professionalism. BJOG 2017; 124: 11441147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Brent, RL. The perils of the imperfect expectation of the perfect baby. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 101.e1101.e5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawthorne, N. The Birth-Mark. 1843. www.online-literature.com/hawthorne/125/ (accessed March 1, 2019).
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Clinical guides to preventing ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 303307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foucault, M. Naissance de la Clinique: une archéologie du régard médical 1963. Translated as The Birth of the Clinic: An Archeology of Medical Perception. Sheridan Smith AM, trans. New York: Pantheon, 1973.Google Scholar
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Brent, RL. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics: avoiding the perils of clashing rights. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 315.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brent, RL. Saving lives and changing family histories: appropriate counseling of pregnant women and men and women of reproductive age, concerning the risk of radiation exposures during and before pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200: 424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brent, RL, Oakley, GP. Triumph or tragedy: the present FDA program of enriching grains with folic acid. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 930932,CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, KN, Oakley, GP Jr. Update on prevention of folic acid-preventable spina bifida and anencephaly. Birth Defects Res (Pt A) 2009; 85: 102107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, M. A miracle, and yet. New York Times Magazine. July 15, 2001. www.nytimes.com/2001/07/15/magazine/a-miracle-and-yet.html?scp=1&sq=A%20Miracle,%20and%20Yet&st=cse (accessed March 1, 2019).
Kalish, RB, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Decision-making about cesarean delivery. Lancet 2006; 367(9514): 883885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brent, RL. Utilization of developmental basic science principles in the evaluation of reproductive risks from pre- and postconception environmental radiation exposures. Paper presented at the Thirty-third Annual Meeting of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. The Effects of Pre- and Postconception Exposure to Radiation, April 2–3, 1997, Arlington, Virginia. Teratology 1999; 59: 182204.Google ScholarPubMed
Brent, RL. Environmental causes of human congenital malformations: the pediatrician’s role in dealing with these complex clinical problems caused by a multiplicity of environmental and genetic factors. Pediatrics 2004; 113(4 Suppl.): 957968.Google ScholarPubMed
Brent, RL, Oakley, GP Jr. Commentary: The FDA must require the addition of more folic acid in “enriched” flour and other grains. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 753755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brent, RL. How does the physician avoid prescribing drugs and medical procedures that have reproductive and developmental risks? Medical legal issues in perinatal medicine. Clin Perinatol 2007; 34: 233262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brent, RL. Litigation-produced pain, disease and suffering: an experience with congenital malformation lawsuits. Teratology 1977; 16: 114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papp, Z and International Academy of Perinatal Medicine. Ethical challenges of genomics for perinatal medicine: the Budapest Declaration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lidz, CW, Appelbaum, PS, Grisso, T, Renaud, M. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 16891697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hippocrates. The Art. In WHS Jones, trans. Hippocrates, Vol. I. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nicolaides, KH, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Avgidou, K, Papageorghiou, A. Evidence-based obstetric ethics and informed decision-making by pregnant women about invasive diagnosis after first-trimester risk assessment of risk of trisomy 21. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 322326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Knapp, RC, Caputo, TA, Barber, HRK. A clinically comprehensive ethical framework for offering and recommending cancer treatment before and during pregnancy. Cancer 2004; 100: 215222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jemal, A, Thomas, A, Murray, T, et al: Cancer statistics, 2002. CA, A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2002; 52: 3435.Google ScholarPubMed
Barber, HRK. Malignant disease in pregnancy. J Perinat Med 29; 2001: 97106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botha, MH, Rajaram, R, Karunaratne, K. Cancer in pregnancy. In J Gynecol Obstet 2018; 143 (Suppl. 2): 137142.Google ScholarPubMed
Salani, R, Billingsley, CC, Crafton, SM. Cancer and pregnancy: an overview for obstetricians and gynecologists. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albright, CM, Wenstrom, KD. Malignancies in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 2016; 33: 218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorny, S, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Ethical and spiritual considerations for treatment decision associated with cancer in pregnancy. Cancer Bull 1994; 5: 391394.Google Scholar
Sood, AK, Sorosky, JI. Invasive cervical cancer complicating pregnancy. How to manage the dilemma. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1998; 2: 343352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zemlickis, D, Lishner, M, Degendorfer, P, et al. Maternal and fetal outcome after invasive cervical cancer in pregnancy. J Clin Oncol 1991;9:1956–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berek, J, Hacker, NF, eds. Practical Gynecologic Oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000.Google Scholar
Weisz, B, Schiff, E, Lishner, M. Cancer in pregnancy: maternal and fetal implications. Hum Reproduct Update 2001; 7: 390393.Google ScholarPubMed
Aulisio, MP. Double effect, principle or doctrine of. In Jennings, B, ed. Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 4th ed. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale, Cengage Learning 2014, 889894.Google Scholar
McCormick, RA. To save or let die: the dilemma of modern medicine. JAMA 1974; 229: 172176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, RB, McCullough, LB. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Hippocrates. The Art. In Reiser, SJ, Dyck, AJ, Curran, WJ, eds. Ethics in Medicine: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Concerns. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1977: 6.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. Lectures on the Duties and Qualifications of a Physician. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell, 1772. Reprinted in McCullough LB, ed. John Gregory’s Writings on Medical Ethics and the Philosophy of Medicine. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998: 161–248.Google Scholar
Placencia, FX, McCullough, LB. The history of ethical decision making in neonatal intensive care. J Intensive Care Med 2011; 26: 368384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Placencia, FX, McCullough, LB. Biopsychosocial risks of parental care for high-risk neonates: implications for evidence-based parental counseling. J Perinatol 2012; 32: 381386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
In re Quinlan. 70 N.J. 10; 355 A.2d 647 (1976).
Rabeneck, L, McCullough, LB, Wray, NP. Ethically justified, clinically comprehensive guidelines for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement. Lancet 1997; 349: 496498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackhall, L. Must we always use CPR? N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 12811285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kon, AA, Shepard, EK, Sederstrom, NO, Swoboda, SM, et al. Defining futile and potentially inappropriate interventions: a policy statement from the Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee. Crit Care Med 2016; 44: 16791774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullough, LB, Jones, JW. Postoperative futility: a clinical algorithm for setting limits. Brit J Surg 2001; 88: 11531154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saigal, S, Tyson, J. Measurement of quality of life of survivors of neonatal intensive care: critique and implications. Semin Perinatol 2008; 32: 5966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leplège, A, Hunt, S. The problem of quality of life in medicine. JAMA 1997; 278: 4750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consensus statement of the Society of Critical Care Medicine’s Ethics Committee regarding futile and other possibly inadvisable treatments. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 887891.CrossRef
Verhagen, E, Sauer, PJJ. The Groningen Protocol: euthanasia in severely ill newborns. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 959962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verhagen, AAE, Sol, JJ, Brouwer, OF, Sauer, PJ. Actieve levens-beendiging bij pasgeborenen in Nederland, Een analyse can alle meldingen van 1997–2004. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2005; 149: 183188.Google Scholar
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Arabin, B. Why the Groningen Protocol should be rejected. Hastings Cent Rep 2006; 36: 3033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kon, AA. Neonatal euthanasia is unsupportable: the Groningen Protocol should be abandoned. Theor Med Bioeth 2007; 28: 453463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kodish, E. Paediatric ethics: a repudiation of the Groningen Protocol. Lancet 2008; 371: 892893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braun, UK, McCullough, LB. Preventing pathways to life-sustaining treatment by default. Ann Fam Med 2011; 9: 250256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lantos, JD. Ethical problems in decision making in the neonatal ICU. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 18511860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 314317.
Katz, AL, Webb, SA. Committee on Bioethics. American Academy of Pediatrics. Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2016; 138: pii: e20161485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Justified limits on refusing intervention. Hastings Cent Rep 1991; 21: 1218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brett, A, McCullough, LB. When patients request specific interventions: defining the limits of the physician’s obligations. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 13471351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, AS, McCullough, LB. Addressing requests by patients for non-beneficial interventions. JAMA 2012; 307: 149150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, UK, Beyth, RJ, Ford, ME, McCullough, LB. Voices of African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic surrogates on the burdens of end-of-life decision-making. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23: 267274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braun, UK, Naik, AD, McCullough, LB. Reconceptualizing the experience of surrogate decision making: reports vs genuine decisions. Ann Fam Med 2009; 7: 249253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×