Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7f7b94f6bd-q7wkk Total loading time: 1.711 Render date: 2022-06-30T23:35:31.541Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Book contents

Chapter 19 - DNA Damage: TdT-Mediated dUTP Nick-End-Labelling Assay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2021

Ashok Agarwal
Affiliation:
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
Ralf Henkel
Affiliation:
University of the Western Cape, South Africa
Ahmad Majzoub
Affiliation:
Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha
Get access

Summary

Male infertility affects men worldwide with about 20 percent of couples having male factor infertility [1]. The routine semen analysis is the first step in the assessment of male infertility. However, conventional semen analysis does not provide a complete understanding of fertility potential, especially in patients with idiopathic infertility [2]. In this scenario, DNA integrity is the most important feature to ensure normal fertilization, implantation, pregnancy and embryonic development. Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) can be due to several intrinsic factors such as varicocele, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and chromatin packaging defects. Further, SDF can be caused by extrinsic factors such as lifestyle alterations, infections, exposure to xenobiotics, etc. [3–7].

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarwal, A, Gupta, S, Sharma, R. (2016) Measurement of DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa by TUNEL assay using bench top flow cytometer. In Agarwal, A, Gupta, S, Sharma, R, eds., Andrological Evaluation of Male Infertility: A Laboratory Guide. Geneva: Springer International Publishing, pp. 181203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agarwal, A, Majzoub, A, Esteves, SC, Ko, E, Ramasamy, R, Zini, A. Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios. Trans Androl Urol 2016; 5(6): 935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tremellen, K. Oxidative stress and male infertility – a clinical perspective. Hum Reprod Update 2008; 14(3): 243–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agarwal, A, Mulgund, A, Alshahrani, S, Assidi, M, Abuzenadah, AM, Sharma, R, Sabanegh, E. Reactive oxygen species and sperm DNA damage in infertile men presenting with low level leukocytospermia. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014; 12: 126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakkas, D, Seli, E, Tarozzi, Bizzaro D Manicardi, N GC. Abnormal spermatozoa in the ejaculate: abortive apoptosis and faulty nuclear remodelling during spermatogenesis. Reprod Biomed Online 2003; 7: 428–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, SE, Aitken, RJ. DNA damage to spermatozoa has impacts on fertilization and pregnancy. Cell Tissue Res 2005; 322(1): 3341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitken, RJ, Smith, TB, Jobling, MS, Baker, MA, De Iuliis, GN. Oxidative stress and male reproductive health. Asian J Androl 2014; 16(1): 31–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aitken, RJ, De Iuliis, GN. On the possible origins of DNA damage in human spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod 2010; 16: 313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ollero, M, Gil-Guzman, E, Lopez, MC, Sharma, RK, Agarwal, A, Larson, K, Evenson, D, Thomas, AJ Jr, Alvarez, JG. Characterization of subsets of human spermatozoa at different stages of maturation: implications in the diagnosis and treatment of male infertility. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1912–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aitken, RJ, Sawyer, D. The human spermatozoon-not waving but drowning. Adv Exp Med Biol 2003; 518: 8598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saleh, RA, Agarwal, A, Nada, EA, El-Tonsy, MH, Sharma, RK, Meyer, A, Nelson, DR, Thomas, AJ, Jr. Negative effects of increased sperm DNA damage in relation to seminal oxidative stress in men with idiopathic and male factor infertility. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 15971605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Iuliis, GN, Thomson, LK, Mitchell, LA, Finnie, JM, Koppers, AJ, Hedges, A, Nixon, B, Aitken, RJ. DNA damage in human spermatozoa is highly correlated with the efficiency of chromatin remodeling and the formation of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine, a marker of oxidative stress. Biol Reprod 2009; 81: 517–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakkas, D, Mariethoz, E, Manicardi, G, et al. Origin of DNA damage in ejaculated human spermatozoa. Rev Reprod 1999; 4: 31–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcon, L, Boissonneault, G. Transient DNA strand breaks during mouse and human spermiogenesis: new insights in stage specificity and link to chromatin remodeling. Biol Reprod 2004; 70: 910–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weng, SL, Taylor, SL, Morshedi, M, Schuffner, A, Duran, EH, Beebe, S, Oehninger, S. Caspase activity and apoptotic markers in ejaculated human sperm. Mol Hum Reprod 2002; 8: 984–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsuda, Y, Tobari, I, Maemori, M, Seki, N. Mechanism of chromosome aberration induction in the mouse egg fertilized with sperm recovered from postmeiotic germ cells treated with methyl methanesulfonate. Mutat Res 1989; 214: 165–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aitken, RJ. Founders’ Lecture. Human spermatozoa: fruits of creation, seeds of doubt. Reprod Fertil Dev 2004; 16: 655–64.Google Scholar
Steele, EK, Lewis, SE, McClure, N. Science versus clinical adventurism in treatment of azoospermia. Lancet 1999; 13(353): 516–17.Google Scholar
O’Connell, M, McClure, N, Powell, LA, Steele, EK, Lewis, SE. Differences in mitochondrial and nuclear DNA status of high-density and low-density sperm fractions after density centrifugation preparation. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 754–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Lewis, SE, O’Connell, M, Stevenson, M, Thompson-Cree, L, McClure, N. An algorithm to predict pregnancy in assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 1385–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suganuma, R, Yanagimachi, R, Meistrich, ML. Decline in fertility of mouse sperm with abnormal chromatin during epididymal passage as revealed by ICSI. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 3101–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sergerie, M, Laforest, G, Bujan, L, Bissonnette, F, Bleau, G. Sperm DNA fragmentation: threshold value in male fertility. Hum Reprod 2005; 20(12): 3446–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharma, RK, Sabanegh, E, Mahfouz, R, Gupta, S, Thiyagarajan, A, Agarwal, A. TUNEL as a test for sperm DNA damage in the evaluation of male infertility. Urology 2010; 76(6): 1380–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ribas-Maynou, J, Garcia-Peiro, A, Fernandez-Encinas, A, Abad, C, Amengual, MJ, Prada, E, Navarro, J, Benet, J. Comprehensive analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation by five different assays: TUNEL assay, SCSA, SCD test and alkaline and neutral Comet assay. Andrology 2013; 1(5): 715–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feijo, CM, Esteves, SC. Diagnostic accuracy of sperm chromatin dispersion test to evaluate sperm deoxyribonucleic acid damage in men with unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 2014; 101(1): 5863.e53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Majzoub, A, Esteves, SC, Gosálvez, J, Agarwal, A. Specialized sperm function tests in varicocele and the future of andrology laboratory. Asian J Androl 2016; 18(2): 205–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ni, K, Steger, K, Yang, H, Wang, H, Hu, K, Zhang, T, Chen, B. A comprehensive investigation of sperm DNA damage and oxidative stress injury in infertile patients with subclinical, normozoospermic, and astheno/oligozoospermic clinical varicocoele. Andrology 2016; 4(5): 816–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spanò, M, Bonde, JP, Hjøllund, HI, Kolstad, HA, Cordelli, E, Leter, G. The Danish First Pregnancy Planner Study Team. Sperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 4350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zini, A, Fischer, MA, Sharir, S, Shayegan, B, Phang, D, Jarvi, K. Prevalence of abnormal sperm DNA denaturation in fertile and infertile men. Urology 2002; 60(6): 1069–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, CL, Agarwal, A. Role of sperm DNA fragmentation in male factor infertility: a systematic review. Arab J Urol 2017; 16(1): 2134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rai, R, Regan, L. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet 2006; 368(9535): 601–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkman-Brown, JC, De Jonge, C. Sperm DNA fragmentation in miscarriage: a promising diagnostic, or a test too far? Reprod Biomed Online 2017; 34(1): 34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. The clinical utility of sperm DNA integrity testing: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 673–7.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2012; 98(5): 1103–11.Google Scholar
Zini, A. Are sperm chromatin and DNA defects relevant in the clinic? Syst Biol Reprod Med 2011; 57(1–2): 7885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharma, R, Ahmad, G, Esteves, SC, Agarwal, A. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay using bench top flow cytometer for evaluation of sperm DNA fragmentation in fertility laboratories: protocol, reference values, and quality control. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016; 33(2): 291300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ribeiro, S, Sharma, R, Gupta, S, Cakar, Z, De Geyter, C, Agarwal, A. Inter- and intra-laboratory standardization of TUNEL assay for assessment of sperm DNA fragmentation. Andrology 2017; 5(3): 477–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, S, Sharma, R, Agarwal, A. Inter-and intra-laboratory standardization of TUNEL assay for assessment of sperm DNA fragmentation. Curr Protoc Toxicol 2017; 74: 116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anzar, M, He, L, Buhr, MM, Kroetsch, TG, Pauls, KP. Sperm apoptosis in fresh and cryopreserved bull semen detected by flow cytometry and its relationship with fertility. Biol Reprod 2002; 66(2): 354–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ribeiro, SC, Muratori, M, De Geyter, M, De Geyter, C. TUNEL labeling with BrdUTP/anti-BrdUTP greatly underestimates the level of sperm DNA fragmentation in semen evaluation. PLOS One 2017; 12(8): e0181802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domínguez-Fandos, D, Camejo, MI, Ballescà, JL, Oliva, R. Human sperm DNA fragmentation: correlation of TUNEL results as assessed by flow cytometry and optical microscopy. Cytometry 2007; 71: 1011–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Muratori, M, Piomboni, P, Baldi, E, Filimberti, E, Pecchioli, P, Moretti, E, Gambera, L, Baccetti, B, Biagiotti, R, Forti, G, Maggi, M. Functional and ultrastructural features of DNA-fragmented human sperm. J Androl 2000; 21: 903–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Muratori, M, Maggi, M, Spinelli, S, Filimberti, E, Forti, G, Baldi, E. Spontaneous DNA fragmentation in swim-up selected human spermatozoa during long term incubation. J Androl 2003; 24: 253–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopes, S, Jurisicova, A, Sun, J-G, Casper, RF. Reactive oxygen species: potential cause for DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1998; 13(4): 896900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barroso, G, Morshedi, M, Oehninger, S. Analysis of DNA fragmentation, plasma membrane translocation of phosphatidylserine and oxidative stress in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1338–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donnelly, ET, O’Connell, M, McClure, N, Lewis, SE. Differences in nuclear DNA fragmentation and mitochondrial integrity of semen and prepared human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1552–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gandini, L, Lombardo, F, Paoli, D, Caponecchia, L, Familiari, G, Verlengia, C, Dondero, F, Lenzi, A. Study of apoptotic DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 830–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oosterhuis, GJ, Mulder, AB, Kalsbeek-Batenburg, E, Lambalk, CB, Schoemaker, J, Sergerie, M, Ouhilal, S, Bissonnette, F, Brodeur, J, Bleau, G. Lack of association between smoking and DNA fragmentation in the spermatozoa of normal men. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1314–21.Google Scholar
Sergerie, M, Ouhilal, S, Bissonnette, F, Brodeur, J, Bleau, G. Lack of association between smoking and DNA fragmentation in the spermatozoa of normal men. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1314–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramos, L, Wetzels, AM. Low rates of DNA fragmentation in selected motile human spermatozoa assessed by the TUNEL assay. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1703–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zini, A, Bielecki, R, Phang, D, Zenzes MT.Correlations between two markers of sperm DNA integrity, DNA denaturation and DNA fragmentation, in fertile and infertile men. Fertil Steril 2001; 75: 674–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duran, EH, Morshedi, M, Taylor, S, Oehninger, S. Sperm DNA quality predicts intrauterine insemination outcome: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 3122–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakkas, D, Moffatt, O, Manicardi, GC, Mariethoz, E, Tarozzi, N, Bizzaro, D. Nature of DNA damage in ejaculated human spermatozoa and the possible involvement of apoptosis. Biol Reprod 2002; 66: 1061–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shen, HM, Dai, J, Chia, SE, Lim, A, Ong, CN. Detection of apoptotic alterations in sperm in subfertile patients and their correlations with sperm quality. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1266–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benchaib, M, Braun, V, Lornage, J, Hadj, S, Salle, B, Lejeune, H, Guérin, JF. Sperm DNA fragmentation decreases the pregnancy rate in an assisted reproductive technique. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1023–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrell, DT, Liu, L, Peterson, CM, Jones, KP, Hatasaka, HH, Erickson, L, Campbell, B. Sperm DNA fragmentation is increased in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Arch Androl 2003; 49: 4955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erenpreisa, J, Erenpreiss, J, Freivalds, T, Slaidina, M, Krampe, R, Butikova, J, Ivanov, A, Pjanova, D. Toluidine blue test for sperm DNA integrity and elaboration of image cytometry algorithm. Cytometry 2003; 52: 1927.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erenpreiss, J, Jepson, K, Giwercman, A, Tsarev, I, Erenpreisa, J, Spano, M. Toluidine blue cytometry test for sperm DNA conformation: comparison with the flow cytometric sperm chromatin structure and TUNEL assays. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 2277–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lachaud, C, Tesarik, J, Cañadas, ML, Mendoza, C. Apoptosis and necrosis in human ejaculated spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 607–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tesarik, J, Greco, E, Mendoza, C. Late, but not early, paternal effect on human embryo development is related to sperm DNA fragmentation. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 611–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, E, Iacobelli, M, Rienzi, L, Ubaldi, F, Ferrero, S, Tesarik, J. Reduction of the incidence of sperm DNA fragmentation by oral antioxidant treatment. J Androl 2005; 26: 349–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stahl, O, Eberhard, J, Jepson, K, Spano, M, Cwikiel, M, Cavallin Stahl, E, Giwercman, A. The impact of testicular carcinoma and its treatment on sperm DNA integrity. Cancer 2004; 100: 1137–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sépaniak, S, Forges, T, Monnier-Barbarino, P. Cigarette smoking and fertility in women and men. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2006; 34: 945–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Chohan, KR, Griffin, JT, Lafromboise, M, De Jonge, CJ, Carrell, DT. Comparison of chromatin assays for DNA fragmentation evaluation in human sperm. J Androl 2006; 27: 53–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Paula, TS, Bertolla, RP, Spaine, DM, Cunha, MA, Schor, N, Cedenho, AP. Effect of cryopreservation on sperm apoptotic deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in patients with oligozoospermia. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 597600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aoki, VW, Emery, BR, Liu, L, Carrell, DT. Protamine levels vary between individual sperm cells of infertile human males and correlate with viability and DNA integrity. J Androl 2006; 27: 890–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spermon, JR, Ramos, L, Wetzels, AM, Sweep, CG, Braat, DD, Kiemeney, LA, Witjes, JA. Sperm integrity pre- and post-chemotherapy in men with testicular germ cell cancer. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 1781–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakamoto, Y, Ishikawa, T, Kondo, Y, Yamaguchi, K, Fujisawa, M. The assessment of oxidative stress in infertile patients with varicocele. BJU Int 2008; 101: 1547–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muratori, M, Forti, G, Baldi, E. Comparing flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy for analyzing human sperm DNA fragmentation by TUNEL labeling. Cytometry A 2008; 73(9): 785–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Sharma, R, Gupta, S, Henkel, R, Agarwal, A. Critical evaluation of two models of flow cytometers for the assessment of sperm DNA fragmentation: an appeal for performance verification. Asian J Androl 2019; 21(5): 438–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Cissen, M, Wely, MV, Scholten, I, Mansell, S, Bruin, JP, Mol, BW, Braat, D, Repping, S, Hamer, G. Measuring sperm DNA fragmentation and clinical outcomes of medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS One 2016; 11: 165125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, LA, De Iuliis, GN, Aitken, RJ. The TUNEL assay consistently underestimates DNA damage in human spermatozoa and is influenced by DNA compaction and cell vitality: development of an improved methodology. Int J Androl 2011; 34(1): 213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muratori, M, Tamburrino, L, Marchiani, S, Cambi, M, Olivito, B, Azzari, C, Forti, G, Baldi, E. Investigation on the origin of sperm DNA fragmentation: role of apoptosis, immaturity and oxidative stres. Mol Med 2015; 21(1): 109–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oleszczuk, K, Augustinsson, L, Bayat, N, et al. Prevalence of high DNA fragmentation index in male partners of unexplained infertile couples. Androl 2013; 1: 357–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saleh, RA, Agarwal, A, Nada, EA, et al. Negative effects of increased sperm DNA damage in relation to seminal oxidative stress in men with idiopathic and male factor infertility. Fertil Steril 2003; 79(Suppl. 3): 1597–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×