Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-02T20:43:49.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The contribution of criminal justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

By
Volker Nerlich
Edited by
François du Bois  and
Antje du Bois-Pedain
François du Bois
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Antje du Bois-Pedain
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In dealing with its apartheid past, South Africa took the position: We need not punish the perpetrators, but we must know the truth. The resultant combination of a victim-centred truth commission with the granting of individual amnesties on the basis of full disclosure has been praised as an innovative alternative to the prosecutorial approach to past injustices.

This chapter seeks to analyse the contribution of the criminal justice system to the amnesty process. It argues that this contribution has at least three dimensions. The first of these is a limiting one: the amnesty process mirrored certain aspects of the criminal justice system and thereby, in a sense, reaffirmed the apartheid legal order. This may explain some of the shortcomings of the process. The second dimension is complementary: ongoing investigations and prosecutions of apartheid crimes uncovered information and provided an accountability mechanism running parallel to that constituted by the amnesty process. The third dimension is interactive. During the lifetime of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), the criminal justice system played a crucial role in making perpetrators come forward and apply for amnesty. This dimension remains important after the conclusion of the TRC's work, for the prosecution of those who did not seek, or were found not to qualify for, amnesty is essential to the integrity and credibility of the amnesty scheme.

Type
Chapter
Information
Justice and Reconciliation in Post-Apartheid South Africa , pp. 90 - 115
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Werle, Gerhard, ‘ “Without Truth, No Reconciliation”. The South African Rechtsstaat and the Apartheid Past’ (1996) 29 Verfassung und Recht in Übersee. Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America58.Google Scholar
Boraine, Alex, A Country Unmasked. Inside South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Nerlich, Volker, Apartheidkriminalität vor Gericht. Der Beitrag der südafrikanischen Strafjustiz zur Aufarbeitung von Apartheidunrecht (Berlin: Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz, 2000).Google Scholar
Dugard, John, Human Rights and the South African Legal Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Slye, Ronald C., ‘Apartheid as a Crime Against Humanity: A Submission to the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission’ (1999) 20 Michigan Journal of International Law267Google Scholar
Werle, Gerhard, Principles of International Criminal Law (The Hague: TCM Asser Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Mamdani, Mahmood, ‘A Diminished Truth’ in James, Wilmot and Vijver, Linda (eds.), After the TRC: Reflections on Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa (Athens: Ohio University Press, 2001) 58Google Scholar
Teitel, Ruti G., Transitional Justice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Radbruch, Gustav, ‘Gesetzliches Unrecht und übergesetzliches Recht’ (1946) 1 Süddeutsche Juristenzeitung105Google Scholar
Pedain, Antje, ‘Was Amnesty a Lottery? An Empirical Study of the Decisions of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Committee on Amnesty’ (2004) 121 South African Law Journal785Google Scholar
Sarkin, Jeremy, Carrots and Sticks: The TRC and the South African Amnesty Process (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2004)Google Scholar
du Bois-Pedain, Antje, Transitional Amnesty in South Africa (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varney, Howard and Klaaren, Jonathan, ‘A Second Bite at the Amnesty Cherry? Constitutional and Policy Issues Around Legislation for a Second Amnesty’ in Villa-Vicencio, Charles and Doxtader, Erik (eds.), The Provocations of Amnesty: Memory, Justice and Impunity (Claremont: David Philip, 2003) 265Google Scholar
Bekker, Peet M.et al., 3rd edn, Criminal Procedure Handbook (Kenwyn: Juta, 1998) at 50Google Scholar
Richings, F.G., ‘The Prosecutor's Discretion: A Plea for Circumspection’ (1977) 1 South African Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology143Google Scholar
Goldstone, Richard, For Humanity (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Pauw, Jacques, Into the Heart of Darkness. Confessions of Apartheid's Assassins (Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball, 1997)Google Scholar
Kock, Eugene and Gordin, Jeremy, A Long Night's Damage: Working for the Apartheid State (Saxonwold: Contra Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Coleman, Max (ed.), A Crime Against Humanity: Analysing the Repression of the Apartheid State (Cape Town: David Philip, 1998)Google Scholar
Varney, Howard and Sarkin, Jeremy, ‘Failing to Pierce the Hit Squad Veil: An Analysis of the Malan Trial’ (1997) 10 South African Journal of Criminal Justice141Google Scholar
Burger, Marléne and Gould, Chandé, Secrets and Lies. Wouter Basson and South Africa's Chemical and Biological Warfare Programme (Cape Town: Zebra Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Kutz, Florian, Amnestie für politische Straftäter in Südafrika. Von der Sharpeville-Amnestie bis zu den Verfahren der Wahrheits- und Versöhnungskommission (Berlin: Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz, 2001)Google Scholar
Rousseau, Nicky, ‘Prosecutions’, in Doxtader, Erik (ed.), Provoking Questions: An Assessment of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Recommendations and their Implementation (Cape Town: Institute for Justice and Reconciliation, 2005)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×