Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T19:12:34.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 36 - IPM: ideals and realities in developing countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2010

Edward B. Radcliffe
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
William D. Hutchison
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

It is all too readily forgotten that agriculture still is the most important livelihood base for the majority of people living in developing countries (Abate et al., 2000; Lenné, 2000), and it follows that crop protection is an important dimension given the extent of crop losses to pests seen across the globe (Oerke, 2006). However, as crop protection is but a part of a bigger picture it can be difficult, if not impossible, to make a link between it and poverty alleviation (Lenné, 2000). IPM is the current ideology as to the form that crop protection should take, and is being promoted on a global scale within both developed and developing countries. But while its appeal is understandable, is IPM really the road we should encourage farmers in developing countries to follow? This chapter will address this question but I will put forward a set of arguments to spark a critical analysis in the mind of the reader rather than provide an “answer.” But it has to be said that this aim generates a number of conundrums.

First, the chances are that most readers of this chapter, like the author, will not be one of those farmers that form the basis of the discussion. Thus I am asking readers unconnected and remote in just about every sense of the term (spatially, culturally, economically, etc.) from the conditions of those farmers to ruminate on ways in which they can be “helped.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Integrated Pest Management
Concepts, Tactics, Strategies and Case Studies
, pp. 458 - 470
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abate, T., Huis, A. & Ampofo, J. K. O. (2000). Pest management strategies in traditional agriculture: an African perspective. Annual Review of Entomology, 45, 631–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altieri, M. A. (1987). Agroecology: The Scientific Basis of Alternative Agriculture. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
Altieri, M. A. (2002). Agroecology: the science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 93, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barfield, C. S. & Swisher, M. E. (1994). Integrated pest management: ready for export? Historical context and internationalization of IPM. Food Reviews International, 10, 215–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckmann, V. & Wesseler, J. (2003). How labour organization may affect technology adoption: an analytical framework analyzing the case of integrated pest management. Environmental and Development Economics, 8, 437–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brader, L. (1988). Needs and directions for plant protection in developing countries: the FAO view. FAO Plant Protection Bulletin, 36, 3–8.Google Scholar
Brower, V. (2002). Growing greener. The impact of integrated pest management. EMBO Reports, 3, 403–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunner, J. F. (1994). Integrated pest management in tree fruit crops. Food Reviews International, 10, 135–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaves, B. & Riley, J. (2001). Determination of factors influencing integrated pest management adoption in coffee berry borer in Colombian farms. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 87, 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chellemi, D. O. (2000). Adaptation of approaches to pest control in low-input agriculture. Crop Protection, 19, 855–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, R. J. (2000). Advances in plant health management in the twentieth century. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 38, 95–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cross, P. & Edwards-Jones, G. (2006). Variation in pesticide hazard from arable crop production in Great Britain from 1992 to 2002: pesticide risk indices and policy analysis. Crop Protection, 25, 1101–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, E. M., Zalom, F. G., Flint, M. L. & Zilbert, E. E. (2000). Quantifying trade-offs between pest sampling time and precision in commercial IPM sampling programs. Agricultural Systems, 66, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jager, A. (2005). Participatory technology, policy and institutional development to address soil fertility degradation in Africa. Land Use Policy, 22, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Earthtrends (2007). Agricultural Inputs: Pesticide Use Intensity. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Available at http://earthtrends.wri.org/searchable_db/ index.php?theme=8&variable_ID=204&action=select _countries.Google Scholar
Eddleston, M., Karalliedde, L., Buckley, N.et al. (2002). Pesticide poisoning in the developing world: a minimum pesticides list. Lancet, 360, 1163–1167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehler, L. E. (2006). Integrated pest management (IPM): definition, historical development and implementation, and the other IPM. Pest Management Science, 62, 787–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, L. & Bassein, S. (2003). Patterns of pesticide use in California and the implications for strategies for reduction of pesticides. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 41, 351–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escobar, A. (1992). Reflections on ‘development': grassroots approaches and alternative politics in the Third World. Futures, 24, 411–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, G., Murgai, R. & Quizon, J. B. (2004). The acquisition and diffusion of knowledge: the case of pest management training in Farmer Field Schools, Indonesia. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55, 221–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulginiti, L. E. & Perrin, R. K. (2004). Institutions and agricultural productivity in sub-Saharan Africa. Agricultural Economics, 31, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geier, P. W. (1966). Management of insect pests. Annual Review of Entomology, 11, 471–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geier, P. W. & Clark, L. R. (1961). An ecological approach to pest control. Proceedings of the Technical Meeting of the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Warsaw, 1960, pp. 10–18.Google Scholar
Haines, C. P. (2000). IPM for food storage in developing countries: twentieth century aspirations for the twenty-first century. Crop Protection, 19, 825–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M. K. (2001). IPM, what has it delivered? A Texas case history emphasizing cotton, sorghum and pecan. Plant Disease, 85, 112–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, G. (2001). Development critiques in the 1990s: culs de sac and promising paths. Progress in Human Geography, 25, 649–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillocks, R. J. (2005). Is there a role for Bt cotton in IPM for smallholders in Africa? International Journal of Pest Management, 51, 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishii-Eiteman, M. J. & Ardhianie, N. (2002). Community monitoring of integrated pest management verses conventional pesticide use in a World Bank project in Indonesia. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 8, 220–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeger, M. J. (2000). Bottlenecks in IPM. Crop Protection, 19, 787–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, K. (1996). IPM in developing countries: the Sri Lankan experience. Pesticides News, 31 (March 1996), 4–5.Google Scholar
Kahn, Z. R., Ampong-Nyarko, K., Hassanali, A. & Kimni, S. (1998). Intercropping increases parasitism of pests. Nature, 388, 631–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, M. (1998). Integrated pest management: historical perspectives and contemporary developments. Annual Review of Entomology, 43, 243–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kogan, M. & Bajwa, W. I. (1999). Integrated pest management: a global reality? Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil, 28, 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenné, J. (2000). Pests and poverty: the continuing need for crop protection research. Outlook on Agriculture, 29, 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacHardy, W. E. (2000). Current status of IPM in apple orchards. Crop Protection, 19, 801–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmoud, C. & Shively, G. (2004). Agricultural diversification and integrated pest management in Bangladesh. Agricultural Economics, 30, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, S. (2004). Post-development theory and the question of alternatives: a view from Africa. Third World Quarterly, 25, 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, G. (2006). Can we help Africa? Outlooks on Pest Management, April, 50–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, S. & Buhler, W. (1997). IPM in developing countries: the danger of an ideal. Integrated Pest Management Reviews, 2, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, J. D., Alston, J. M., Sumner, D. A., Kreith, M. T. & Kuminoff, N. V. (2005). The payoff to public investments in pest-management R&D: general issues and a case study emphasizing integrated pest management in California. Review of Agricultural Economics, 27, 558–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oerke, E.-C. (2006). Crop losses to pests. Journal of Agricultural Science, 144, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oerke, E.-C. & Dehne, H.-W. (2004). Safeguarding production: losses in major crops and the role of crop protection. Crop Protection, 23, 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, A. & Ritchie, J. M. (2004). Learning from failure: smallholder farming systems and IPM in Malawi. Agricultural Systems, 79, 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrin, R. M. (1997). Crop protection: taking stock for the new millennium. Crop Protection, 16, 449–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieterse, J. N. (1998). My paradigm or yours? Alternative development, post-development, reflexive development. Development and Change, 29, 343–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. (1993). Stepwise progress toward IPM and sustainable agriculture. IPM Practitioner, 15, 1–4.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. (2003). Two decades of bottom--up, ecologically based pest management in a small commercial orchard in Massachusetts. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 94, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prudent, P., Loko, S. & Vaissayre, M. (2006). Farmers Field Schools in Benin: a participatory approach to the transmission of information on integrated cotton pest management. Cahiers Agricultures, 15, 100– 101.Google Scholar
Quizon, J., Feder, G. & Murgai, R. (2001). Fiscal sustainability of agricultural extension: the case of the Farmer Field School approach. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 8, 13–24.Google Scholar
Rahnema, M. & Bawtree, V. (1997). The Post-Development Reader. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Roe, E. (1995). Critical theory, sustainable development and populism. Telos, 103, 1249–1262.Google Scholar
Shennan, C., Cecchettini, C. L., Goldman, G. B. & Zalom, F. G. (2001). Profiles of Californian farmers by degree of IPM use as indicated by self-descriptions in a phone survey. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 84, 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urech, P. (2000). Sustainable agriculture and chemical control: opponents or components of the same strategy? Crop Protection, 19, 831–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, M. J. & Emden, H. F. (2000). Integrated pest management in practice: pathways towards successful application. Crop Protection, 19, 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, W., Alldredge, J. R., Young, D. L. & Young, F. L. (2001). Downsizing an integrated crop management field study affects economic and biological results. Agronomy Journal, 93, 412–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, S., Ferrigno, S. & Vodouhe, S. D. (2005). Needs-based decision-making for cotton problems in Africa: a response to Hillocks. International Journal of Pest Management, 51, 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoks, J. C. (1993). Crop protection: why and how. In Crop Protection and Sustainable Agriculture, eds. Chadwick, D. J. & Marsh, J., pp. 48–55. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×