DC Code § 16-402 (2014). Available online at: www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/dccode/.Google Scholar

In re Roberto d.B., 923 A.2d 115, 118–142 (Md. 2007).Google Scholar

Creative Family Connections LLC. Gestational Surrogacy Law across the United States: State-By-State Interactive Map for Commercial Surrogacy, 2014. Available online at: http://surrogacymap.com; accessed May 29, 2015.Google Scholar

Hinson, D. S.. Parentage rights for same-sex couples: state-by-state gestational surrogacy laws, Family Advocate (Spring 2016): 42–43, 45.Google Scholar

Hinson, D. S.. State-by-state surrogacy law across America. Family Advocate (Winter 2015): 6.Google Scholar

Hinson, D. S., McBrien, M.. Surrogacy across America: both the law and the practice. Family Advocate (Fall 2011): 32–6.Google Scholar

Note that because legislation is pending in both DC and Maryland, by the time of publication, this chapter could already be out of date.Google Scholar

In re Baby M, 109 N.J. 396, 411 (1988).Google Scholar

Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. SART releases new annual report on in vitro fertilization procedures, 2014. Available online at: http://sart.org/SART_Technology_Releases_New_Annual_Report_on_In_Vitro_Fertilization_Procedures; accessed May 29, 2015.Google Scholar

ESHRE. The world’s number of IVF and ICSI babies has now reached a calculated total of 5 million, 2012. Available online at: www.eshre.eu/Press-Room/Press-releases/Press-releases-ESHRE-2012/5-million-babies.aspx; accessed May 29, 2015.Google Scholar

Creative Family Connections LLC. Gestational surrogacy in the District of Columbia, 2014. Available online at: http://creativefamilyconnections.com/surrogacy-law-by-state/DC; accessed May 29, 2015.Google Scholar

Hinson, D. S., ReVeal, L.. Surrogacy in the metropolitan Washington, DC, area, International Council on Infertility Information Dissemination, Spring 2013. Available online at: www.inciid.org/surrogacy-in-DC-and-Maryland; accessed May 29, 2015.Google Scholar

29 DCMR § 550.1 (2013) (prohibiting a district-certified emergency vehicle from crossing into Maryland).Google Scholar

Domestic Partnership Judicial Determination Parentage Act of 2009, amended in March 2013 and codified in DC Code, § 16-909, allows same-sex female couples who are married, registered domestic partners, or who sign a consent to parent and whose babies are born in DC (regardless of whether they are DC residents) to have their partner automatically recognized as the second parent and entered on a birth certificate when using artificial insemination as long as the second parent consented to the insemination with the intent to be a parent.Google Scholar

2013 DC Bill 20-0032 (20th Council Period) (January 8, 2013).Google Scholar

Chibbaro, L., Jr. Catania introduces surrogacy bill. Washington Blade, January 16, 2013. Available online at: www.washingtonblade.com/2013/01/16/catania-introduces-surrogacy-bill.Google Scholar

The committee hearing can be viewed in its entirety at http://dccarchive.oct.dc.gov/services/on_demand_video/channel13/June2013/06_20_13_JUDICI.asx. Even those in favor of legalizing surrogacy were not in agreement as to how to do so.Google Scholar

Chibbaro, L., Jr. DC marriage officiant, surrogacy bills advance. Washington Blade, Summer 2013. Available online at: www.washingtonblade.com/2013/06/24/dc-gay-marriage-officiant-surrogacy-bills-advance-gay-news.Google Scholar

Riley, J.. Tackling surrogacy laws a tricky business. Metro Weekly, February 12, 2015. Available online at: www.metroweekly.com/2015/02/tackling-surrogacy-laws-a-tricky-business.Google Scholar

Council of the District of Columbia, B 21-0016: Collaborative Reproduction Amendment Act of 2015 (21st Council Period), 2015. Available online at: http://lims.dccouncil.us/Legislation/B21-0016?FromSearchResults=true.Google Scholar

Council of the District of Columbia, B 21-0016. Available online at: http://lims.dccouncil.us/_layouts/15/uploader/AdminProxy.aspx?LegislationId=B21-0016.Google Scholar

Brandel, A.. Legislating surrogacy: a partial answer to feminist criticism. Md. L. Rev. 1995; 54:488, 511–12.Google ScholarPubMed

Nicolette, C. L., Reamer, L. C.. Comment: Regulatory options for surrogate arrangements in Maryland. U. Balt. L. Rev. 1988; 18:110, 136–7.Google Scholar

Md. Sen. 795 Reg. Sess. (1988).Google Scholar

H.B. 1479, 1988 Md. Leg. Sess.Google Scholar

Letter from W. Donald Schaefer, Governor of Md., to Thomas V. “Mike” Miller, Jr., President of the Maryland State Senate (May 26, 1992) (outlining his rationale for vetoing Senate Bill 251).Google Scholar

Rosen, Barry F., Lawson, Lynn S.. Surrogacy contracts in transition. Md. Bar J. July–Aug. 1993; at 32, 35 (citing S.B. 369, 1993 Md. Laws).Google Scholar

85 Op. Att’y Gen. 348, 367–8 (Md. 2000).Google Scholar

“Opinions of the Attorney General, while not binding, are entitled to great weight. [citations omitted]. In the absence of controlling authority, these opinions are persuasive ‘since the legislature is presumed to be cognizant of that construction of the statute’ [citation omitted].” (Napa Valley Educators’ Association v. Napa Valley Unified School District. (1987) 194 Cal. App.3rd 243, 251).Google Scholar

Md. Sen. 71, 2011 Reg. Sess. (January 19, 2011).Google Scholar

Md. Sen. B 792 (2013).Google Scholar

H.B. 1099 (2013).Google Scholar

Dresser, M.. Proposed law would govern surrogacy births. Baltimore Sun, March 28, 2013. Available online at: http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2013-03-28/news/bs-md-collaborative-reproduction-20130325_1_surrogacy-law-vitro-fertilization-maryland-law.Google Scholar

Archived: 2013 Testimony before Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee (February 28, 2013). Available online at: http://mgahouse.maryland.gov/house/play/5d62d957-be25-47d1-bec4-b950307ce02d/?catalog/03e481c7-8a42-4438-a7da-93ff74bdaa4c).Google Scholar

Boyle, M.. D.C. Catholic Conference opposes bill to legalize surrogacy in District. Catholic Standard, July 31, 2013. Available online at: www.cathstan.org/Content/News/News/Article/D-C-Catholic-Conference-opposes-bill-to-legalize-surrogacy-in-District/2/2/5762.Google Scholar

Southern Maryland Online. Annapolis Roundup, February 14, 2015. Available online at: http://somd.com/news/headlines/2015/19080.shtml.Google Scholar

H.B. 1477 (2016); H.B. 968 (2016), subsequent history available online at http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2016RS/votes_comm/hb1477_jud.pdf.Google Scholar

Creative Family Connections LLC. Gestational surrogacy in Maryland, 2014. Available online at: http://creativefamilyconnections.com/surrogacy-law-by-state/Maryland; accessed May 29, 2015.Google Scholar

Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 540 (1942) (right to have children is a “basic liberty”).Google Scholar