Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T19:33:58.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Technological change and the role of non-state actors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Knut H. Alfsen
Affiliation:
Centre for International Climate and Environmental Research
Gunnar S. Eskeland
Affiliation:
Norges Handelshøyskole
Kristin Linnerud
Affiliation:
Centre for International Climate and Environmental Research
Frank Biermann
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Philipp Pattberg
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Fariborz Zelli
Affiliation:
Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter addresses technological change as a key response to the challenge of climate change and focuses on the roles of private and government sectors in providing emissions reductions throughout this century. While standard economic theory recommends that governments set a price on emissions (Pigou 1920), we argue that market imperfections and dynamic inconsistencies may require that in addition, governments support far-reaching technological change by means of publicly funded research, development and demonstration. In fact, public funding of research and development and carbon pricing policies are, at least in theory, mutually supportive and should not be seen as unbridgeable alternatives.

The Kyoto Protocol may fail to meet even its modest goals. This underscores the need for more far-reaching technological change. The political target of avoiding a temperature increase greater than 2 °C – the European Union target – may already be beyond reach. The Stern Review (Stern 2007) estimates that stabilizing the greenhouse gas concentration level at 550 ppm carbon dioxide-equivalents by the middle of this century should avoid the most dangerous climate changes. Figure 13.1, adopted from the Stern Review, illustrates what stabilization targets of 550 ppm carbon dioxide-equivalents and below will imply in terms of emissions reductions by industrialized and developing countries. These targets aim at eliminating greenhouse gas emissions by industrialized nations by the end of the century.

Type
Chapter
Information
Global Climate Governance Beyond 2012
Architecture, Agency and Adaptation
, pp. 208 - 220
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfsen, K. H. and Eskeland, G. S. 2007. A Broader Palette: The Role of Technology in Climate Policy, Report to the Expert Group for Environmental Studies 2007:1. Stockholm: Ministry of Finance, Sweden.Google Scholar
Alfsen, K. H., Dovland, H. and Eskeland, G. S. 2008. Elements for an Agreement on Climate and Energy Technology Development (ACT), Policy Note 2008: 1. Oslo: Cicero.Google Scholar
Barrett, S. 2008. ‘Climate treaties and the imperative of enforcement’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24: 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, P. 1993. ‘Incomplete international cooperation to reduce CO2 emissions: alternative policies’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24: 258–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskeland, G. S. and Harrison, A. 2003. ‘Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution-haven hypothesis’, Journal of Development Economics 70: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskeland, G. S. and Mideksa, T. 2008. Transportation Fuel Use, Technology and Standards: The Role of Expectations and Credibility, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskeland, G. S., Mideksa, T. and Rive, N. 2008a. ‘European climate goals for 2020 and the role of the electricity sector’, mimeographed, .
Eskeland, G. S., Mideksa, T. and Rive, N. 2008b. ‘European emissions, carbon leakage, a case for border tax adjustments?’, mimeographed, .
Golombek, R. and Hoel, M. 2006. ‘Unilateral emission reductions and cross-country technology spillovers’, The B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis and Policy 4(2). Available at .Google Scholar
Golombek, R., Hagem, C. and Hoel, M. 1995. ‘Efficient incomplete international climate agreements’, Resource and Energy Economics 17: 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, D. 1998. ‘Climate change policy: why has so little been achieved?’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24: 211–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, C. and Stern, N. 2008. ‘A new global deal on climate change’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24: 259–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoel, M. 2001. ‘International trade and the environment: how to handle carbon leakage’, in Folmer, H., Gabel, H. L., Gerking, S. and Rose, A. (eds.), Frontiers of Environmental Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 176–191.Google Scholar
Kremer, M. 2000. Creating Markets for New Vaccines: Parts I and II, NBER Working Paper 7716 and 7717. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Lockwood, B. and Whalley, J. 2008. Carbon Motivated Border Tax Adjustments: Old Wine in New Bottles?’, NBER Working Paper 14025. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, D. 1994. ‘Can a small country gain from a domestic carbon tax? The case with R&D externalities’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 96: 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, W. D. and Smith, A. E. 2005. ‘Price, quantity, and technology strategies for climate change policy’, in Schlesinger, M., Kheshgi, H., Smith, J., de la Chesnaye, F., Reilly, J. M., Wilson, T. and Kolstad, C. (eds.), Human-Induced Climate Change: An Interdisciplinary Assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 328–342.Google Scholar
Pan, J., Phillips, J. and Chen, Y. 2008: ‘China’s balance of emissions embodied in trade: approaches to measurement and allocating international responsibility’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24: 354–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1920. Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Peters, G. and Hertwich, E. 2008. ‘Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: production versus consumption’, Climatic Change 86: 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prins, G. and Rayner, S. 2007. ‘Time to ditch Kyoto’, Nature 449: 973–975, doi:10.1038/449973a.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanden, B. and Azar, C. 2005. ‘Near term technology policies for long-term climate targets: economy wide versus technology specific approaches’, Energy Policy 33: 1557–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotchmer, S. 2004. Innovation and Incentives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Skodvin, T., Gullberg, A. and Aakre, S. 2008. ‘Target group influence as a determinant of political feasibility: the case of climate policy design in Europe’, mimeographed, .
Stern, N. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, M. S. 2004. ‘Unbundling the pollution haven hypothesis’, Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy 4: article 8.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×