Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T20:18:37.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

48 - Patient Outcomes Monitoring

from Section 2 - Psychological Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2019

Carrie D. Llewellyn
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
City, University of London
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
University College London
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
City, University of London
Keith J. Petrie
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Tracey A. Revenson
Affiliation:
City University of New York
John Weinman
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alonso, J, Bartlett, SJ, Rose, M, et al. (2013). The case for an international patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®) initiative. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 11:210.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., Ball, R. & Ranieri, W. (1996). Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67(3),588597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Carter, W. B., et al. (1981).The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care, 19(8), 787805.Google Scholar
Black, N., Burke, L., Forrest, C. B., et al.(2016). Patient-reported outcomes: pathways to better health, better services, and better societies. Quality of Life Research, 25(5),11031112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyce, M. B., Browne, J. P. & Greenhalgh, J. (2014). The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ Quality and Safety, 23(6), 508518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calvert, M., Brundage, M., Jacobsen, P. B., et al. (2013).The CONSORT Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) extension: implications for clinical trials and practice. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. M. (2011). Implementing NICE guidelines for the psychological treatment of depression and anxiety disorders: the IAPT experience. International Review of Psychiatry, 23(4),318327.Google Scholar
Demyttenaere, K., Bruffaerts, R., Posada-Villa, J., et al. (2004). Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA, 291(21), 25812590.Google Scholar
Emery, M. P., Perrier, L. L. & Acquadro, C. (2005). Patient-Reported Outcome and Quality of Life Instruments Database (PROQOLID): frequently asked questions. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3, 12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Espallargues, M., Valderas, J. M. & Alonso, J. (2000). Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: a systematic review of its impact. Medical Care, 38(2), 175186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, F., Gibbons, C., Coste, J., et al, (2018). Measurement invariance and general population reference values of the PROMIS Profile 29 in the UK, France, and Germany. Quality of Life Research, 27(6), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Duran Huet, M., Ferrer, M., Herdman, M. J., et al. (2010). BiblioPRO: online library of PRO instruments in Spanish. Quality of Life Research, 19, 6263.Google Scholar
Gilbody, S. M., House, A. O. & Sheldon, T. A. (2001). Routine administered questionnaires for depression and anxiety: systematic review. British Medical Journal. 322, 406409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, D. & Williams, P. (2006). A User’s Guide to the General Health Questionnaire. London: GL Assessment.Google Scholar
Gonçalves Bradley, D. C., Gibbons, C., Ricci-Cabello, I., et al. (2015). Routine provision of information on patient-reported outcome measures to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD011589. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011589.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. (2009) The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why? Quality of Life Research, 18(1), 115123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenhalgh, J. & Meadows, K. (1999). The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 5(4):401416.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J., Dalkin, S., Gooding, K., et al. (2017). Functionality and feedback: a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of patient-reported outcome measures data to improve patient care. Southampton (UK), NIHR Journals Library.Google Scholar
Kendrick, T., El-Gohary, M., Stuart, B., et al. (2016). Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7, CD011119. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011119.pub2.Google Scholar
Knaup, C., Koesters, M., Schoefer, D., et al. (2009). Effect of feedback of treatment outcome in specialist mental healthcare: meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 195, 1522.Google Scholar
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L. & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ‐9. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9): 606613.Google Scholar
Lawton, M. P. & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9(3), 179186.Google Scholar
Marshall, S., Haywood, K. & Fitzpatrick, R. (2006). Impact of patient reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12(5), 559568.Google Scholar
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737745.Google Scholar
National Health Interview Survey (2014). Survey description. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/quest_data_related_1997_forward.htm (accessed 20 November 2016).Google Scholar
O’Boyle, C. (1994). The schedule for the evaluation of individual quality of life (SEIQOL). International Journal of Mental Health, 23(3), 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, I., Gonçalves-Bradley, D., Ricci-Cabello, I., et al. (2016). Framework and guidance for implementing patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: evidence, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 5(5), 507519.Google Scholar
Rabin, R. & de Charro, F. (2001). EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Annals of Medicine, 33(5), 337343.Google Scholar
Ruta, D. A., Garratt, A. M., Leng, M., et al. (1994). A new approach to the measurement of quality of life: the patient-generated index. Medical Care, 32(11), 11091126.Google Scholar
Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., et al. (2012). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research, 21(8), 13051314.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R. L, Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B., Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of internal medicine, 166(10): 10921097.Google Scholar
Unsworth, G., Cowie, H. & Green, A.(2012). Therapists’ and clients’ perceptions of routine outcome measurement in the NHS: a qualitative study. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 12(1), 7180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Food and Drug Administration. (2006). Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf (accessed 20 November 2016).Google Scholar
Valderas, J. M., Ferrer, M., Mendívil, J., et al. (2008a). Development of EMPRO: a tool for the standardized assessment of patient-reported outcome measures. Value in Health, 11(4), 700708.Google Scholar
Valderas, J. M., Kotzeva, A., Espallargues, M., et al. (2008b). The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Quality of Life Research, 17(2), 179193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valderas, J. M., Espallargues, M., Kotzeva, A., et al. (2010). Assessing the impact of routinely measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: critical appraisal of 34 randomized clinical trials. Quality of Life Research, 17(1), 11Google Scholar
Van der Linden, W.J. & Glas, A.W.G. (eds) (2000). Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M. & Gandek, B. (2000) SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Inc.Google Scholar
Zung, W. W. K. (1965). A self rating depression rating scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 12, 6370.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×