To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure email@example.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Surgery on the head and neck requires excellent communication between surgeon and anaesthetist for a successful and safe outcome. The shared and often complex airway means that the anaesthetist and surgeon are integral in facilitating the work of each other and require a clear understanding of the needs of the other. Airway difficulties can mean that speed is of the essence and both parties need to work quickly together to obtain a safe airway.
The age range covered in routine otolaryngology and maxillofacial surgery spans from cradle to grave and covers a wide variety of pathology. Those patients who are generally fit and well with no significant cardiovascular or respiratory pathology require no more than standard pre-operative assessment appropriate for the age of the patient and nature of the surgery. Many cases are suitable for treatment as a day case. There are some notable exceptions where a more detailed pre-assessment is required.
Head and neck malignancy
A significant number of upper aerodigestive tract malignancies are associated with a prolonged history of smoking. The cardiovascular and pulmonary effects of this exposure need to be ascertained to establish any potential pre-operative optimisation or contraindications to surgery.
Do international standards regarding human rights require the existence of a liberal regime? This was the thrust of Rhoda Howard and Jack Donnelly's essay in the September 1986 issue of this Review. Neil Mitchell takes vigorous issue with this contention, arguing first and foremost that Howard and Donnelly have not defined liberalism satisfactorily. Howard and Donnelly present a spirited rejoinder.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.