The COVID-19 pandemic increased utilization of remote assessment to allow clinicians and researchers to continue valuable work while maintaining quarantine guidelines. With guidelines relaxing, researchers have returned to in-person assessment. Information is needed regarding the effect of remote assessments on test-retest reliability. COGNET, a longitudinal study of cognition in participants with essential tremor, transitioned from in-person to remote assessments during the pandemic, and has now returned to in-person assessment. The current study investigates the extent to which remote assessment affected test-retest reliability across a range of neuropsychological assessments administered in COGNET.

Participants included 27 older adults enrolled in COGNET (mean age=75.0 (9.1), education=16.2 (2.6), 67% female, and 100% white). Memory tests included: California Verbal Learning Test II, Logical Memory subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scales - Revised, and Verbal Paired? Associates. Executive function tests included: Digit Span Backwards and the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System subtests of Verbal Fluency, Sorting, and Color-Word. Attention tests included Oral Symbol Digit Modalities Test and Digit Span Forward. Language was assessed with the Boston Naming Test. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to examine test-retest reliability of InPerson to In-Person visits (P-P), and combination visits (e.g., In-Person to Remote (PR), and Remote to In-Person (R-P)). Following Koo & Li (2016), ICCs were interpreted as: >.90 excellent, .75-.90 good, .50-.74 moderate, and <.50 poor reliability. The Feldt approach was used to compare ICCs from P-P visits against ICCs calculated for combination visits (P-R or R-P), with the test statistic compared to an F distribution.

ICCs for person-to-person assessment ranged from .51 to .89. Memory test ICCs ranged from moderate to good (.51 to .80). Executive function test ICCs ranged from moderate to good (.55 to .89). The attention domain had moderate ICCs (.67 - .68). Language ICC was moderate (.70). ICCs for person-to-remote assessment ranged from .42 to .89. Memory tests ranged from moderate to good ICCs (.59 to .83). Executive function tests ranged from poor to good ICCs (.42 to .89). Attention ICCs were moderate to good (.55 to .79). The Language ICC was moderate (.72). ICCs for remote-to-person ranged from .48 to 86. Memory ICCs ranged from moderate to good (.59 to .86). Executive function ICCs ranged from poor to good (.48 to .83). Attention ICCs were moderate to good (.56 to .79). The Language ICC was good (.78). The only test for which an ICC from a combination visit was significantly lower than a person to person visit was Digit Span Backwards.

Test-retest reliability was moderate or better for all P-P assessments, consistent with the known psychometrics of these tests. Only one test of executive function showed lower reliability when remote assessment was introduced. From a broad standpoint, current results suggest that remote administration of neuropsychological tests can be used as a reliable substitute for in-person assessment for many measures, and suggest that caution be used when interpreting any change in Digit Span Backwards across person and remote assessments.

Patients with essential tremor exhibit heterogeneous cognitive functioning. Although the majority of patients fall under the broad classification of cognitively “normal,” essential tremor is associated with increased risk for mild cognitive impairment and dementia. It is possible that patterns of cognitive performance within the wide range of normal functioning have predictive utility for mild cognitive impairment or dementia. These cross-sectional analyses sought to determine whether cognitive patterns, or “clusters,” could be identified among individuals with essential tremor diagnosed as cognitively normal. We also determined whether such clusters, if identified, were associated with demographic or clinical characteristics of patients.

Elderly subjects with essential tremor (age >55 years) underwent comprehensive neuropsychological testing. Domain means (memory, executive function, attention, visuospatial abilities, and language) from 148 individuals diagnosed as cognitively normal were partitioned using k-means cluster analysis. Individuals in each cluster were compared according to cognitive functioning (domain means and test scores), demographic factors, and clinical variables.

There were three clusters. Cluster 1 (n = 64) was characterized by comparatively low memory scores (p < .001), Cluster 2 (n = 39) had relatively low attention and visuospatial scores (p < .001), and Cluster 3 (n = 45) exhibited consistently high performance across all domains. Cluster 1 had lower Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores and reported more prescription medication use and lower balance confidence.

Three patterns of cognitive functioning within the normal range were evident and tracked with certain clinical features. Future work will examine the extent to which such patterns predict conversion to mild cognitive impairment and/or dementia.

Essential tremor (ET) is associated with psychological difficulties, including anxiety and depression. Demoralization (feelings of helplessness, hopelessness, inability to cope), another manifestation of psychological distress, has yet to be investigated in ET. Our objectives are to (1) estimate the prevalence of demoralization in ET, (2) assess its clinical correlates, and (3) determine whether demoralization correlates with tremor severity.

We administered the Kissane Demoralization Scale (KDS-II) and several psychosocial evaluations (ie, scales assessing subjective incompetence, resilience, and depression [eg, Geriatric Depression Scale]) to 60 ET subjects. Tremor was assessed with a disability score and total tremor score. KDS-II >8 indicated demoralization.

Among 60 ET subjects (mean age = 70.2 ± 6.8 years), the prevalence of demoralization was 13.3%, 95% confidence interval = 6.9–24.2%. Although there was overlap between demoralization and depression (10% of the sample meeting criteria for both), 54% of depressed subjects were not demoralized, and 25% of demoralized subjects were not depressed. Demoralization correlated with psychological factors, but demoralized subjects did not have significantly higher total tremor scores, tremor disability scores, or years with tremor.

Demoralization has a prevalence of 13.3% in ET, similar to that in other chronic or terminal illnesses (eg, cancer 13–18%, Parkinson’s disease 18.1%, coronary heart disease 20%). Demoralization was not a function of increased tremor severity, suggesting that it is a separable construct, which could dictate how a patient copes with his/her disease. These data further our understanding of the psychological and psychosocial correlates of ET.

Individuals with essential tremor (ET) exhibit a range of cognitive deficits generally conceptualized as “dysexecutive” or “fronto-subcortical,” and thought to reflect disrupted cortico-cerebellar networks. In light of emerging evidence that ET increases risk for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), it is critical to more closely examine the nature of specific cognitive deficits in ET, with particular attention to amnestic deficits that may signal early AD.

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from 128 ET cases (age 80.4±9.5 years) enrolled in a longitudinal, clinical-pathological study. Cases underwent a comprehensive battery of motor-free neuropsychological tests and a functional assessment to inform clinical diagnoses of normal cognition (ET-NC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (ET-MCI), or dementia (ET-D). ET-MCI was subdivided into subtypes including: amnestic single-domain (a-MCI), amnestic multi-domain (a-MCI+), non-amnestic single-domain (na-MCI), or non-amnestic multi-domain (na-MCI+).

Ninety-one (71.1%) cases were ET-NC, 24 (18.8%) were ET-MCI, and 13 (10.2%) were ET-D. Within MCI, the a-MCI+ subtype was the most common (13/24; 54.2%) followed by a-MCI (4/24; 16.7%), na-MCI+ (4/24; 16.7%), and na-MCI (3/24; 12.5%). Cases with amnestic MCI demonstrated lower recognition memory Z-scores (−2.4±1.7) than non-amnestic groups (−0.9±1.2) (p=.042).

Amnestic MCI, defined by impaired memory recall but associated with lower memory storage scores, was the most frequent MCI subtype in our study. Such impairment has not been explicitly discussed in the context of ET and may be an early hallmark of AD. Results have implications for the prognosis of specific cognitive deficits in ET. (JINS, 2017, 23, 390–399)