Immune system markers may predict affective disorder treatment response, but whether an overall immune system marker predicts bipolar disorder treatment effect is unclear.

Bipolar CHOICE (N = 482) and LiTMUS (N = 283) were similar comparative effectiveness trials treating patients with bipolar disorder for 24 weeks with four different treatment arms (standard-dose lithium, quetiapine, moderate-dose lithium plus optimised personalised treatment (OPT) and OPT without lithium). We performed secondary mixed effects linear regression analyses adjusted for age, gender, smoking and body mass index to investigate relationships between pre-treatment white blood cell (WBC) levels and clinical global impression scale (CGI) response.

Compared to participants with WBC counts of 4.5–10 × 109/l, participants with WBC < 4.5 or WBC ≥ 10 showed similar improvement within each specific treatment arm and in gender-stratified analyses.

An overall immune system marker did not predict differential treatment response to four different treatment approaches for bipolar disorder all lasting 24 weeks.

A post-hoc, descriptive analysis was undertaken to assess the tolerability of and changes in psychiatric rating scales with lamotrigine (LTG) administered concomitantly with commonly prescribed bipolar medications.

During the 8- to 16-week, open-label, preliminary phase of two large clinical trials of patients (N=1,305) with bipolar I disorder, LTG was added to each patient's existing psychotropic regimen. Medications for acute symptoms could have been added and later discontinued to achieve LTG monotherapy. Data were compared for patients taking LTG with or without concomitant valproate, lithium, any atypical antipsychotic, or any selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

The percentages of patients with any reported adverse event and reported adverse events of mood symptoms or rash were comparable between those taking LTG with or without other concomitant bipolar medications. Adverse events in >10% of patients in at least one subgroup were headache, infection, nausea, rash, influenza, diarrhea, dizziness, and somnolence. Baseline scores on psychiatric rating scales improved similarly with LTG co-administered with other bipolar medications, and the pattern of results did not differ by baseline polarity of mood symptoms.

LTG co-administered with valproate, lithium, an atypical antipsychotic, or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in the treatment of bipolar disorder seemed to be well tolerated and was associated with clinical improvement.

To assess the efficacy of lamotrigine combined with either divalproex or lithium for the treatment of bipolar disorder.

Lithium and divalproex seem to be predominantly effective for manic and mixed symptoms of bipolar disorder, whereas lamotrigine may be more effective for bipolar depression than for mania. Combination therapy may provide more efficacious treatment for many patients with bipolar disorder.

Data from charts of adult outpatients with bipolar disorder treated with lamotrigine plus divalproex or lithium during a 3-year period were retrospectively analyzed. The Clinical Global Impressions for Bipolar Disorder scale was used to assess severity of illness at baseline (adjunct-therapy initiation) and improvement after 3 months of treatment. The safety and tolerability of the medication combinations were assessed.

After 3 months of treatment, 26 of 39 patients (67%) receiving lamotrigine plus divalproex had a depression rating of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) compared with seven of 16 (44%) taking lamotrigine plus lithium. The mania rating was 1 or 2 for 13 of 39 (39%) patients treated with lamotrigine plus divalproex and 7 of 16 (44%) patients receiving lamotrigine plus lithium. For overall illness severity, 26 of 39 (67%) patients given lamotrigine plus divalproex had scores of 1 or 2 compared with 10 of 16 (62%) patients taking lamotrigine plus lithium. Five of 39 patients (13%) taking lamotrigine plus divalproex and 5 of 16 (31%) receiving lamotrigine plus lithium discontinued at least one part of the combination in <3 months due to adverse events.

Combination therapy with lamotrigine plus divalproex or lithium may be a valuable option for managing symptoms of bipolar disorder. The combinations were generally well tolerated and apparently effective in improving depression as well as mania.The percentage of patients showing improvement in depression was somewhat larger. Tolerability was somewhat better for lamotrigine plus divalproex in combination than for lamotrigine plus lithium. Differences in tolerability are consistent with studies indicating poorer tolerability of lithium compared with divalproex.

There have been no previous factor analytic studies of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) in samples with bipolar I depression, and no investigations of the utility of any derived factors in determining treatment response in this condition. This study aimed to identify and compare factors of a 31-item version of the HDRS (HDRS-31) in large samples of patients with bipolar depression and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), then examine the responsiveness of such factors to lamotrigine compared with placebo in the bipolar depressed sample.

This multivariate analytical study was performed on 2 large depressed samples (one bipolar and the other MDD) that had been recruited for separate, contemporaneous, double-blind placebo-controlled trials of lamotrigine. The 2 studies had similar designs and assessment tools, the major measures being the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and HDRS-31. To identify the constructs underlying the scale, exploratory factor analyses were conducted using HDRS-31 baseline scores. Treatment responsiveness in the bipolar depressed sample—as indicated by improvement in the total MADRS and HDRS-31, as well as HDRS factors—were examined using both a mixed-effects analysis and individual time-point t-tests.

Seven factors of the HDRS-31 were identified: I—“depressive cognitions,” II—“psychomotor retardation,” III—“insomnia,” IV—“hypersomnia,” V—“appetite and weight change,” VI—“anxiety,” and VII—“anergia.” A significant therapeutic effect of lamotrigine in bipolar depression was found for the “depressive cognitions” factor (from week 3) and “psychomotor retardation” (from week 4).

This study has identified 7 factors of the HDRS in a large sample of patients with bipolar depression. The results suggest that that the clinical benefits of lamotrigine in acute bipolar depression are primarily upon depressive cognitions and psychomotor slowing.

Combinations of olanzapine and carbamazepine are often used in clinical practice in the management of mania.

To assess the efficacy and safety of olanzapine plus carbamazepine in mixed and manic bipolar episodes.

Randomised, double-blind, 6-week trial of olanzapine (10–30 mg/day) plus carbamazepine (400–1200 mg/day; n=58) v. placebo plus carbamazepine (n=60) followed by open-label, 20-week olanzapine (10–30 mg/day) plus carbamazepine (400–1200 mg/day, n=86), with change in manic symptoms as main outcome measure. Safety and pharmacokinetics were also evaluated.

There were no significant differences (baseline to endpoint) in efficacy measures between treatment groups, but at 6 weeks triglyceride levels were significantly higher (P=0.008) and potentially clinically significant weight gain (⩾7%) occurred more frequently (24.6% v. 3.4%, P=0.002) in the combined olanzapine and carbamazepine group. Carbamazepine reduced olanzapine concentrations but olanzapine had no effect on carbamazepine concentrations.

The combination of olanzapine and carbamazepine did not have superior efficacy to carbamazepine alone. The increases in weight and triglycerides observed during combination treatment are a matter of concern.

Sub-syndromal symptoms in bipolar disorder impair functioning and diminish quality of life.

To examine factors associated with time spent with sub-syndromal symptoms and to characterise how these symptoms influence outcomes.

In a double-blind randomised maintenance trial, patients received either olanzapine or lithium monotherapy for 1 year. Stepwise logistic regression models were used to identify factors that were significant predictors of percentage time spent with sub-syndromal symptoms. The presence of sub-syndromal symptoms during the first 8 weeks was examined as a predictor of subsequent relapse.

Presence of sub-syndromal depressive symptoms during the first 8 weeks significantly increased the likelihood of depressive relapse (relative risk 4.67, P<0.001). Patients with psychotic features and those with a greater number of previous depressive episodes were more likely to experience sub-syndromal depressive symptoms (RR=2.51, P<0.001 and RR=2.35, P=0.03 respectively).

These findings help to identify patients at increased risk of affective relapse and suggest that appropriate therapeutic interventions should be considered even when syndromal-level symptoms are absent.

Few controlled studies have examined the use of atypical antipsychotic drugs for prevention of relapse in patients with bipolar I disorder.

To evaluate whether olanzapine plus either lithium or valproate reduces the rate of relapse, compared with lithium or valproate alone.

Patients achieving syndromic remission after 6 weeks'treatment with olanzapine plus either lithium (0.6–1.2 mmol/l) or valproate (50–125 μg/ml) received lithium or valproate plus either olanzapine 5–20 mg/day (combination therapy) or placebo (monotherapy), and were followed in a double-masked trial for 18 months.

The treatment difference in time to relapse into either mania or depression was not significant for syndromic relapse (median time to relapse: combination therapy 94 days, monotherapy40.5 days; P=0.742), but was significant for symptomatic relapse (combination therapy 163 days, monotherapy42 days; P=0.023).

Patients taking olanzapine added to lithium or valproate experienced sustained symptomatic remission, but not syndromic remission, for longer than those receiving lithium or valproate monotherapy.