Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T04:10:03.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reading list

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2019

A. R. Braunmuller
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Macbeth , pp. 295 - 297
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, R. J.The real Macbeth: King of Scots, 1040–54’, History Today 7 (1957), 381–7Google Scholar
Adelman, Janet. Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, ‘Hamlet’ to ‘The Tempest’, 1992Google Scholar
Anglo, Sydney (ed.). The Damned Art: Essays in the Literature of Witchcraft, 1977Google Scholar
Bartholomeusz, Dennis. ‘Macbeth’ and the Players, 1969Google Scholar
Beale, Simon Russell. ‘Macbeth’ in Dobson, Michael (ed.), Performing Shakespeare’s Tragedies Today: The Actor’s Perspective, 2006, pp. 107–18Google Scholar
Booth, Stephen. ‘King Lear’, ‘Macbeth’, Indefinition, and Tragedy, 1983Google Scholar
Bradley, A. C. Shakespearean Tragedy, 1904Google Scholar
Brooks, Cleanth. The Well Wrought Urn, 1947Google Scholar
Brown, John Russell (ed.). Focus on ‘Macbeth’, 1982Google Scholar
Bushnell, Rebecca W. King Lear’ and ‘Macbeth’, 1674–1995: An Annotated Bibliography of Shakespeare Studies, Pegasus Shakespeare Bibliographies, 1996Google Scholar
Calderwood, James L. If It Were Done: ‘Macbeth’ and Tragic Action, 1986Google Scholar
Campbell, L. B. Shakespeare’s Tragic Heroes: Slaves of Passion, 1930Google Scholar
Campbell, O. J. ‘Shakespeare and the “New Critics” ’, in Adams Memorial Studies, ed. McManaway, James G. et al., 1948, pp. 8196Google Scholar
Carroll, William C. (ed.). ‘Macbeth’: Texts and Contexts, 1999Google Scholar
Charlton, H. B. Shakespearian Tragedy, 1948Google Scholar
Clark, Stuart. ‘Inversion, misrule and the meaning of witchcraft’, Past and Present 87 (May 1980), 98127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosse, Gordon. Shakespearean Playgoing 1890–1952, 1953Google Scholar
De Grazia, Margreta and Wells, Stanley (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Quincey, Thomas. ‘On the knocking at the gate in Macbeth’, in The Collected Writings of Thomas De Quincey, ed. Masson, David, 14 vols., 1889–90, x, 389–95Google Scholar
Dollimore, Jonathan. Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries (1984), 2nd edn, 1989Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. William Shakespeare, 1986Google Scholar
Edwards, Philip, et al. (eds.). Shakespeare’s Styles: Essays in Honour of Kenneth Muir, 1980Google Scholar
Empson, William. Seven Types of Ambiguity (1930), 3rd edn, 1953Google Scholar
Farnham, Willard. Shakespeare’s Tragic Frontier (1950), rpt. 1963Google Scholar
Fergusson, Francis. ‘“Macbeth” as the imitation of an action’, in English Institute Essays 1951, ed. Downer, Alan S., 1951, pp. 3143Google Scholar
Floyd-Wilson, Mary. ‘English Epicures and Scottish Witches’, SQ 57 (2006), 131–61Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. ‘Some character-types met with in psychoanalytic work’, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works, trans. Strachey, James et al., 24 vols., 1953–74, xiv (1957), pp. 311–30Google Scholar
Gardner, Helen. ‘Milton’s “Satan” and the theme of damnation in Elizabethan tragedy’, in Wilson, F. P. (ed.), English Studies 1948, 1948, pp. 4666Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. ‘Shakespeare bewitched’, in Kishi, Tetsuo et al. (eds.), Shakespeare and Cultural Traditions, 1994, pp. 1742Google Scholar
Honigmann, Ernst. Shakespeare: Seven Tragedies, 1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard-Hill, T. H. (ed.). ‘Macbeth’: A Concordance to the Text of the First Folio, 1971Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Paul A. Our Naked Frailties: Sensational Art and Meaning in ‘Macbeth’, 1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kliman, Bernice W. (ed.). Shakespeare in Performance: ‘Macbeth’, 2nd edn, 2004Google Scholar
Knight, George Wilson. The Imperial Theme, 1931Google Scholar
Knight, George Wilson. The Wheel of Fire, 1930Google Scholar
Knights, Lionel C.How many children had Lady Macbeth?’ (1933), rpt. in Knights, Explorations, 1946, pp. 139Google Scholar
Leggatt, Alexander (comp.). William Shakespeare’s ‘Macbeth’: A Sourcebook, 2006Google Scholar
Leiter, Samuel L., et al. (comp.). Shakespeare Around the Globe, 1986Google Scholar
Lemon, Rebecca. Treason by Words: Literature, Law, and Rebellion in Shakespeare’s England, 2006Google Scholar
Mahood, M. M. Shakespeare’s Wordplay, 1957Google Scholar
Maley, Willy and Murphy, Andrew (eds.). Shakespeare and Scotland, 2004Google Scholar
Masefield, John. A ‘Macbeth’ Production, 1946Google Scholar
McDonald, Russ. Look to the Lady: Sarah Siddons, Ellen Terry, and Judi Dench on the Shakespearean Stage, 2005Google Scholar
Miola, Robert S. (ed.). ‘Macbeth’: Authoritative Text, Sources and Contexts, Criticism, 2004Google Scholar
Morse, Ruth. ‘Monsieur Macbeth: from Jarry to Ionesco’, S.Sur. 57 (2004), 112–25Google Scholar
Moschovakis, Nicholas (ed.). ‘Macbeth’: New Critical Essays, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, Kenneth, and Edwards, Philip (eds.). Aspects of ‘Macbeth’, 1977Google Scholar
Norbrook, David. ‘Macbeth and the politics of historiography’, in Sharpe, Kevin and Zwicker, Steven N. (eds.), Politics of Discourse, 1987, pp. 78116Google Scholar
Nosworthy, J. M. Shakespeare’s Occasional Plays: Their Origin and Transmission, 1965Google Scholar
Paul, Henry N. The Royal Play of Macbeth, 1950Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Marvin. The Masks of ‘Macbeth’, 1978Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Macbeth, ed. Furness, Horace Howard, rev. edn Furness, Horace Howard, Jr, 1915Google Scholar
Sinfield, Alan (ed.). ‘Macbeth’: New Casebooks, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Theodore. Shakespeare and the Nature of Man, 1942Google Scholar
Spender, Stephen. ‘Time, violence, and Macbeth’, in Penguin New Writing, ed. Lehmann, John, 1941, pp. 115–26Google Scholar
Sprague, Arthur Colby. Shakespeare and the Actors: The Stage Business in his Plays 1660–1905, 1944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tredell, Nicolas. Shakespeare, ‘Macbeth’: A Reader’s Guide to Essential Criticism, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trewin, J. C. Shakespeare on the English Stage, 1900–1964, 1964Google Scholar
Wain, John (comp.). Shakespeare: ‘Macbeth’: A Casebook, 1968Google Scholar
Waith, Eugene M.Manhood and valor in two Shakespearean tragedies’, ELH 17 (1950), 262–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Roy. The Time is Free: A Study of ‘Macbeth’, 1949Google Scholar
Walter, Harriet. Macbeth, 2002Google Scholar
Watson, Robert N. Shakespeare and the Hazards of Ambition, 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, Stanley (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare Studies, 1986Google Scholar
Wells, Stanley, and Gary, Taylor with Jowett, John and Montgomery, William (eds.). William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion, 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Thomas. ‘Macbeth’: An Annotated Bibliography, 1990Google Scholar
Wilders, John. ‘Macbeth’: Shakespeare in Production, 2004Google Scholar
Williams, George Walton. ‘Macbeth: King James’s Play’, South Atlantic Review 47.2 (1982), 1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, William Proctor (ed.). Macbeth, The Sourcebooks Shakespeare, 2006Google Scholar
Willson, Robert F. Jr.Macbeth the player king: the banquet scene as frustrated play within the play’, Shakespeare Jahrbuch (Weimar), 114 (1978), 107–14Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×