Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T18:52:36.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reading List

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2019

William C. Carroll
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelman, Janet. ‘Male Bonding in Shakespeare’s Comedies’, in Shakespeare’s Rough Magic, ed. Erickson, Peter and Kahn, Coppélia, 1985, pp. 73103Google Scholar
Agnew, Gates K.Berowne and the Progress of Love’s Labour’s Lost’, S.St. 4 (1968), 4072Google Scholar
Asp, Carolyn. ‘Love’s Labour’s Lost: Language and the Deferral of Desire’, Literature and Psychology 35.3 (1989), 121Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. W. Shakspere’s ‘Love’s Labor’s Won, 1957Google Scholar
Barber, C. L. Shakespeare’s Festive Comedy, 1959Google Scholar
Barton, Anne Barton (published as Bobbyann Roesen). ‘Love’s Labour’s Lost’, SQ 4 (1953), 411–26Google Scholar
Bednarz, James P.Canonizing Shakespeare: The Passionate Pilgrim, England’s Helicon, and the Question of Authenticity’, S.Sur. 60 (2007), 253–68Google Scholar
Berry, Edward. Shakespeare and the Hunt: A Cultural and Social Study, 2001Google Scholar
Berry, Philippa. ‘“Salving the mail”: Perjury, Grace, and the Disorder of Things in Love’s Labour’s Lost’, in Spiritual Shakespeares, ed. Fernie, Ewan, 2005Google Scholar
Bevington, David. ‘“Jack Hath Not Jill”: Failed Courtship in Lyly and Shakespeare’, S. Sur. 42 (1990), 113Google Scholar
Breitenberg, Mark. Anxious Masculinity in Early Modern England, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, Mark Thornton. ‘Giving and Receiving: Love’s Labour’s Lost and the Politics of Exchange’, ELR 23 (1993), 287313Google Scholar
Calderwood, James L.Love’s Labour’s Lost: A Wantoning with Words’, SEL 5 (1965), 317–32; revised and reprinted in Shakespearean Metadrama, 1971Google Scholar
Carroll, William C. The Great Feast of Language in Love’s Labour’s Lost, 1976Google Scholar
Carroll, William C.(Re-)Staging Love’s Labour’s Lost,’ S.Bul. 25 (2007), 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaney, Joseph. ‘Promises, Promises: Love’s Labor’s Lost and the end of Shakespearean Comedy’, Criticism 35 (1993), 4165Google Scholar
Charlton, H. B.The Date of “Love’s Labour’s Lost”’, MLR 13 (1918), 257–66Google Scholar
Donawerth, Jane L. Shakespeare and the Sixteenth-Century Study of Language, 1984Google Scholar
Elam, Keir. Shakespeare’s Universe of Discourse: Language-Games in the Comedies, 1984Google Scholar
Ellis, Herbert A. Shakespeare’s Lusty Punning in Love’s Labour’s Lost, 1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, Peter. ‘The Failure of Relationship Between Men and Women in Love’s Labor’s Lost’, Women’s Studies 9 (1981), 6581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erne, Lukas. Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist, 2003Google Scholar
Evans, Malcolm. ‘Mercury Versus Apollo: A Reading of Love’s Labor’s Lost’, SQ 26 (1975), 113–27Google Scholar
Freedman, Barbara. Staging the Gaze: Postmodernism, Psychoanalysis, and Shakespearean Comedy, 1991Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop. ‘Shakespeare’s Experimental Comedy’, Stratford Papers on Shakespeare 1961, 1962Google Scholar
Gilbert, Miriam. Shakespeare in Performance: Love’s Labour’s Lost, 1993Google Scholar
Goldstien, Neal L.Love’s Labour’s Lost and the Renaissance Vision of Love’, SQ 25 (1974), 335–50Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas M.Love’s Labour’s Lost: The Grace of Society’, SQ 22 (1971), 315–28Google Scholar
Harvey, Nancy Lenz, and Kirwan Carey, Anna, eds., Love’s Labor’s Lost: An Annotated Bibliography, 1984Google Scholar
Hawkes, Terence. ‘Shakespeare’s Talking Animals’, S.Sur. 24 (1971), 4754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heninger, S. K.The Pattern of Love’s Labour’s Lost’, S.St. 7 (1974), 2553Google Scholar
Hodgdon, Barbara. ‘Rehearsal Process as Critical Practice: John Barton’s 1978 Love’s Labour’s Lost’, in Londré, pp. 387409Google Scholar
Holderness, Graham, Potter, Nick, and Turner, John. Shakespeare: Out of Court, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, John D.Grace, Art and the Neglect of Time in Love’s Labour’s Lost’, in Shakespearian Comedy, 1972, pp. 7596Google Scholar
Hunter, Robert G.The Function of the Songs at the End of Love’s Labour’s Lost’, S.St. 7 (1974), 5564Google Scholar
Hutson, Lorna. The Usurer’s Daughter: Male Friendship and Fictions of Women in Sixteenth-Century England, 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, Mary Ellen. ‘The Nature of Topicality in “Love’s Labour’s Lost”’, S.Sur. 38 (1985), 4959Google Scholar
Leggatt, Alexander. Shakespeare’s Comedy of Love, 1974Google Scholar
Londré, Felicia Hardison, ed. Love’s Labour’s Lost: Critical Essays, 2001Google Scholar
MacCary, W. Thomas. Friends and Lovers: The Phenomenology of Desire in Shakespearean Comedy, 1985Google Scholar
Magnusson, Lynne. ‘Scoff Power in Love’s Labour’s Lost and the Inns of Court: Language in Context’, S.Sur. 57 (2004), 196208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maus, Katharine Eisaman. ‘Transfer of Title in Love’s Labor’s Lost: Language, Individualism, Gender’, in Shakespeare Left and Right, ed. Kamps, Ivo, 1991Google Scholar
Mazzio, Carla. ‘The Melancholy of Print: Love’s Labour’s Lost’, in Historicism, Psychoanalysis, and Early Modern Culture, ed. Mazzio, Carla and Trevor, Douglas, 2001Google Scholar
McLay, Catherine M.The Dialogues of Spring and Winter: A Key to the Unity of Love’s Labour’s Lost’, SQ 18 (1967), 119–27Google Scholar
Montrose, Louis A.“Sport by sport o’erthrown”: Love’s Labour’s Lost and the Politics of Play’, Texas Studies in Literature and Language 18 (1977), 528–52Google Scholar
Nevo, Ruth. Comic Transformations in Shakespeare, 1980Google Scholar
Palmer, Daryl W. Writing Russia in the Age of Shakespeare, 2004Google Scholar
Parker, Patricia. ‘Preposterous Reversals: Love’s Labor’s Lost’, MLQ 54 (1993), 435–82Google Scholar
Potter, Ursula. ‘The Naming of Holofernes in Love’s Labour’s Lost’, ELN 38.2 (2000), 1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proudfoot, Richard. ‘“Love’s Labour’s Lost”: Sweet Understanding and the Five Worthies’, Essays and Studies 34 (1984), 1630Google Scholar
Richmond, Hugh. ‘Shakespeare’s Navarre’, HLQ 42 (1979), 193216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salingar, Leo. Shakespeare and the Traditions of Comedy, 1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalkwyk, David. ‘“She never told her love”: Embodiment, Textuality, and Silence in Shakespeare’s Sonnets and Plays’, SQ 45 (1994), 381407Google Scholar
Shannon, Laurie. Sovereign Amity: Figures of Friendship in Shakespearean Contexts, 2002Google Scholar
Tetzeli von Rosador, Kurt. ‘Plotting the Early Comedies: “The Comedy of Errors”, “Love’s Labour’s Lost”, “The Two Gentlemen of Verona”’, S.Sur. 37 (1984), 1322Google Scholar
Voss, Paul J. Elizabethan News Pamphlets, 2001Google Scholar
Weimann, Robert. Shakespeare and the Popular Tradition in the Theater, 1978Google Scholar
Westlund, Joseph. ‘Fancy and Achievement in Love’s Labour’s Lost’, SQ 18 (1967), 3746Google Scholar
Wiles, David. Shakespeare’s Clown: Actor and Text in the Elizabethan Playhouse, 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, Gillian. ‘Catholicism and Conversion in Love’s Labour’s Lost’, in How To Do Things with Shakespeare, ed. Maguire, Laurie, 2008, 101–30Google Scholar
Wray, Ramona. ‘Nostalgia for Navarre: The Melancholic Metacinema of Kenneth Branagh’s Love’s Labour’s Lost’, Literature/Film Quarterly 30.3 (2002), 1718Google Scholar
Yates, Frances A. A Study of ‘Love’s Labour’s Lost’, 1936Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×