Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T04:30:53.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2.16 - The Paleoindian and Archaic of Central and South America

from VI. - The Americas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

Hugo D. Yacobaccio
Affiliation:
Universidad de Buenos Aires
Colin Renfrew
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

The term “Paleoindian” refers to the short period of North American prehistory when people’s subsistence, at the end of the Pleistocene, was based on the hunting of megafauna like mammoths and mastodons. “Archaic” refers to generalised hunter-gatherers whose subsistence depended on modern fauna and a wide range of plants. This classification does not apply to Central and South American contexts. The full variability of Pleistocene and Holocene hunter-gatherer societies is not embraced by these concepts. It is better to refer to the process of population of Central and South America using the term “dispersal” in order to denote the spreading out of individuals or groups which filled up the available vacant habitat, and the term “colonisation” for the major extension of a population habitat or range that includes an established occupation of areas previously unoccupied or occupied.

There is no clear pattern for inferring a north–south route of dispersal and colonisation from Central America into South America. On the contrary, the first colonisers seem to have followed many routes, and for that reason the processes of dispersal and colonisation of the different regions were not necessarily connected. This can be seen in the uneven distribution of some characteristic markers of early human dispersal such as, for example, the distribution of Fish-tail projectile points throughout the continent. Although most of the dates are in the range of 12,000 to 9000 cal bce, a north–south cline is not observed. Moreover, the analysis of the few early human skeletal remains has shown two important issues: first, by 8000 cal bce different regional populations already existed; and second, more than one stock migrated into the continent. This does not mean that the process of colonisation of every region was isolated, but the study of this process, on a continental scale, remains to be done.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldenderfer, M. 1998. Montane Foragers: Asana and the South Central Andean Archaic. University of Iowa Press: Iowa City.
Aschero, C. A. 2000. El poblamiento del territorio, pp. 18–59 in (Tarragó, M. N., ed.) Nueva Historia Argentina: Los Pueblos Originarios y la Conquista. Editorial Sudamericana: Buenos Aires.
Babot, M. P. 2004. Tecnología y utilización de artefactos de molienda en el noroeste prehispánico. Tesis de Doctorado, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán.
Berón, M. A. 1999. Contacto, Intercambio, Relaciones Interétnicas e Implicancias Arqueológicas, pp. 287–302 in Soplando en el Viento ... Actas de las Terceras Jornadas de Arqueología de Patagonia. Universidad del Comahue: Neuquen.
Bird, J. 1988. Travels and Archaeology in South Chile. University of Iowa Press: Iowa City.
Borrero, L. A. 2008. Early occupations in the southern cone, pp. 59–77 in (Silverman, H. & Isbell, E. H., eds.) Handbook of South American Archaeology. Springer: New York.
Borrero, L. A. 2009. The elusive evidence: the archeological record of the South American extinct megafauna, pp. 145–68 in (Haynes, G., ed.) American Megafaunal Extinctions at the End of the Pleistocene. Springer: New York.
Bruno, M. C. 2006. A morphological approach to documenting the domestication of Chenopodium in the Andes, pp. 32–45 in (Zeder, M. A., Bradley, D. G., Emswhiller, E. & Smith, B. D., eds.) Documenting Domestication: New Genetic and Archaeological Paradigms. University of California Press: Berkeley.
Cartajena, I., Núñez, L. & Gorsjean, M. 2007. Camelid domestication on the western slope of the Puna de Atacama, Northern Chile. Anthropozoologica 42: 155–74.Google Scholar
Dillehay, T. D. 2000. The Settlement of the Americas. Basic Books: New York.
Dillehay, T. D., Calderón, G. A., Politis, G. & Beltrao, M. C. 1992. Earliest hunters and gatherers of South America. Journal of World Prehistory 6: 145–204.Google Scholar
Fiore, D. 2006. Poblamiento de imágenes: arte rupestre y colonización de la Patagonia. Variabilidad y ritmos de cambio en tiempo y espacio, pp. 43–62 in (Fiore, D. & Podestá, M., eds.) Tramas en la Piedra. Producción y usos del arte rupestreá. AINA-World Archaeological Congress-Sociedad Argentina de Antropología: Buenos Aires.
Fritz, S. C. 2005. Lacustrine perspectives on Holocene climate, pp. 227–41 in (Mackay, A., Battarbee, R., Birks, J. & Oldfield, F., eds.) Global Change in the Holocene. Hodder Arnold: London.
Gallardo, F. & Yacobaccio, H. D. 2005. Wild or domesticated? Camelids in early formative rock art of the Atacama Desert (Northern Chile). Latin American Antiquity 16 (2): 115–30.Google Scholar
Gamble, C. 1993. Timewalkers: The Prehistory of Global Colonization. Penguin: Hammondsworth.
Gnecco, C. 2003. Agrilocalities during the Pleistocene/Holocene transition in northern South America, pp. 7–11 in (Miotti, L., Salemme, M. & Flegenheimer, N., eds.) Where the South Winds Blow: Ancient Evidence of Paleo South Americans. Center for the Study of the First Americans, Texas A&M University Press: College Station.
Iriarte, J. 2006. Vegetation and climate change since 14,810 14C B.P. in southeastern Uruguay and implications for the rise of early Formative societies. Quaternary Research 65: 20–32.Google Scholar
Iriarte, J., Holst, I., Marozzi, O., Listopad, C., Alonso, E., Rinderknecht, A. & Montaña, J. 2004. Evidence for cultivar adoption and emerging complexity during the Mid-Holocene in the La Plata Basin. Nature 432: 614–7.Google Scholar
Lavallée, D. 2000. The First South Americans. University of Utah Press: Salt Lake City.
López, C. E. & Ranere, A. J. 2008. Diversidad Cultural durante el Pleistoceno Tardío y el Holoceno Temprano en la Baja Centroamérica y el Noroeste de Suramérica, pp. 45–54 in (López, C. E. & Ospina, G. A., eds.) Ecología Histórica: Interacciones Sociedad – Ambiente a Distintas Escalas Socio – Temporalesó. Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira-Sociedad Colombiana de Arqueología-Universidad del Cauca: Colombia.
Miotti, L. L. & Salemme, M. C. 2004. Poblamiento, movilidad y territorios entre las sociedades cazadoras-recolectoras de Patagonia. Complutum 15: 177–206.Google Scholar
Núñez, L., Grosjean, M. & Cartajena, I. 2005. Ocupaciones Humanas y Paleoambientes en la Puna de Atacama. Universidad Católica del Norte-Taraxacum: San Pedro de Atacama.
Orquera, L. A. & Gómez Otero, J. 2007. Los Cazadores-recolectores de las Costas de Pampa, Patagonia y Tierra del Fuego. Relaciones de la Sociedad Argentina de Antropologia 32: 75–99.Google Scholar
Orquera, L. A. & Piana, E. L. 1999. Arqueología de la región del canal Beagle (Tierra del Fuego, República Argentina). Publicaciones de las SAA: Buenos Aires.
Pintar, E. S. 2008. High altitude deserts: hunter-gatherers from the Salt Puna, North West, Argentina. International Journal of South American Archaeology 2: 47–55.Google Scholar
Piperno, D. R. 2006. Identifying manioc (Manihot esculenta Crantz) and other crops in Pre-Columbian tropical America through starch grain analysis, pp. 46–67 in (Zeder, M. A., Bradley, D. G., Emswhiller, E. & Smith, B. D., eds.) Documenting Domestication: New Genetic and Archaeological Paradigms. University of California Press: Berkeley.
Politis, G. G. & Madrid, P. E. 2001. Arqueología Pampeana: Estado Actual y Perspectivas, pp. 737–814 in (Berberián, E. E. & Nielsen, A. E., eds.) Historia Argentina Prehispánicaá, vol. 2. Editorial Brujas: Córdoba.
Ranere, A. J. & Cooke, R. G. 2002. Late glacial and Early Holocene occupation of Central American tropical forests, pp. 219–48 in (Mercader, J., ed.) Under the Canopy: The Archaeology of Tropical Rain Forests. Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick.
Salzano, F. M. 2006. The prehistoric colonization of the Americas, pp. 433–53 in (Crawford, M., ed.) Anthropological Genetics: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Steele, J. & Politis, G. 2009. AMS 14C dating of early human occupation of southern South America. Journal of Archaeological Science 36: 419–29.Google Scholar
Suárez, R. 2003. Paleo-Indian components of northern Uruguay: new data on early human occupations of the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene, pp. 29–36 in (Miotti, L., Salemme, M. & Flegenheimer, N., eds.) Where the South Winds Blow: Ancient Evidence of Paleo South Americans. Center for the Study of the First Americans, Texas A&M University Press: College Station.
Yacobaccio, H. D. 2004. Social dimensions of Camelid domestication in the southern Andes. Anthropozoologica 39 (1): 237–47.Google Scholar
Yacobaccio, H. D. 2009. History of the relationship between vicuñas and people, pp. 7–20 in (Gordon, I. J., ed.) The Vicuña: The Theory and Practice of Community Based Wildlife Management. Springer: New York.
Yacobaccio, H. D. & Morales, M. 2005. Middle Holocene environment and human occupation at Susques (Puna de Atacama, Argentina). Quaternary International 132: 5–14.Google Scholar
Zangrando, A. F. 2009. Historia evolutiva y subsistencia de cazadores-recolectores marítimos de Tierra del Fuego. Sociedad Argentina de Antropología: Buenos Aires.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×