Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T11:52:01.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Surrogacy and the artefact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2018

Marilyn Deegan
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter deals with the relationship between an artefact and different kinds of surrogate representation of that artefact in the digital world. It discusses the difficult problem of the authenticity and authentication of digital data, and some of the technical methods of authenticating data. The use of digital data as a preservation alternative is also dealt with.

With the advent of photographic techniques for copying documents, conservation of the originals became easier. Documents could be, and were, reproduced as facsimiles in books or on microfilm and these were offered to the readers as a substitute for the originals, thus preserving the originals from further damage. The documentary heritage has always been at risk of damage or destruction through natural or human forces: fire, flood, warfare or neglect. In the last 150 years, a new danger has threatened: the ‘“slow fires” of acidic paper’ (Kenney, 1997, 2), which has necessitated the large-scale microfilming of millions of pages of documents over many decades in order that the content is not lost. Many digital reformatting initiatives grew out of earlier microfilming projects, lighting the ‘“fast fires” of digital obsolescence’ (Kenney, 1997, 2).

Substitution of originals with other objects that simulate their content does, of course, pose its own problems: when is a facsimile a satisfactory surrogate for the object itself? This depends on both the needs of the reader and the quality of the reproduction, and is not an easy question to answer. The relationship between any original object and a reproduction of it is problematic, and is a question which has exercised theorists and practitioners of artefactual disciplines for many years. In his seminal essay ‘The Work of Art in an Age of Mechanical Reproduction’, Walter Benjamin states that: ‘Even the most perfect reproduction … is lacking in one element: its presence in time and space. … This unique existence of the work … determined the history to which it was subject throughout its time of existence.’ (Benjamin, 1973 (reprinted 1992), 214).

Type
Chapter

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×