Book contents
Summary
This book was written by a retired archivist who worked his entire career in one archival institution and who has had limited legal training. It does not constitute formal legal advice. Archivists and records managers should seek advice from a specialist intellectual property lawyer if they are in any doubt about their legal position or the legality of any action they might wish to take. Also, archivists and records managers themselves should always make abundantly clear to those who consult them that any advice they offer on copyright issues, including the subsistence and ownership of copyright in particular works, does not constitute legal advice or authority to use material protected by copyrights that they do not administer.
As this book is aimed at archivists and records managers, and at researchers in archives, and not at lawyers, it contains a lot of legal references. Although the primary authority for the law as set out here is statutes and statutory regulations, the UK legal system relies heavily for the interpretation of statutes on the decisions of judges in cases they have heard, including the judges of the Court of Justice of the European Union. As a result, the advice in this book on how the law is applied in particular circumstances derives largely from reports of those cases. The statutes and regulations alone are not enough.
The references to authorities (treaties, directives, statutes, statutory instruments, law reports) given in the footnotes to each paragraph are abbreviated; full citations appear in the table of authorities (see Chapter 11). Statutes are referred to simply by year (and, where necessary, a word), statutory instruments and regulations by their number and cases by title. There are also a few citations of legal opinions preserved in original documents; the full references are given at 10.1. It is now nearly a decade and a half since the first edition of this book and five years since the last edition. There has been a great deal of change to copyright since 2010, though not as much as I had hoped. When I first started studying copyright, I realized quickly that it contains some absurdities. Most preposterous of all is the duration of copyright until the end of the year 2039 in many unpublished materials, regardless of whether they were created in 1066 or 1966 (see 1.1.7).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Copyright for Archivists and Records Managers , pp. xi - xivPublisher: FacetPrint publication year: 2015