Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T04:53:14.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Who Is This Black Knight? Schiller's Maid of Orleans and (Mythological) History

from Part III - Schiller, History, and Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Erik B. Knoedler
Affiliation:
California State University Long Beach
Jeffrey L. High
Affiliation:
California State University Long Beach
Nicholas Martin
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Norbert Oellers
Affiliation:
University of Bonn
Get access

Summary

The Schiller Nationalausgabe lists Hume and Thoyras as being among Schiller's sources for both Maria Stuart (Mary Stuart, 1800) and Die Jungfrau von Orleans (The Maid of Orleans, 1801). Both texts contain detailed descriptions of the battles of Crécy and Poitiers: Shakespeare's Henry V had introduced Schiller to the extraordinary exploits of Edward the Black Prince of Wales, the scourge of France during the Hundred Years' War. Schiller required a nemesis for Joan of Arc, and remaining true to form, pulled the character from history. The appearance of Edward's ghost serves as a plot device: Schiller transforms a legendary, yet human, Black Prince, into an emissary of history compelling enough to return Joan to her historical responsibility. In response to his challenge, Joan transcends her role as a tool of the divine to become an Enlightenment liberation heroine.

IN DIE JUNGFRAU VON ORLEANS: EINE ROMANTISCHE TRAGÖDIE (The Maid of Orleans: A Romantic Tragedy, 1801), Schiller transforms the ostensible “history” of the martyred teenager's mythological mission into a work that embraces the philosophy of the Enlightenment. Specifically, Schiller's version replaces the divine mission of Joan of Arc with the philosophical ideas of human secularism and both individual and political autonomy. As late-eighteenth-century German literature and art moved from the Enlightenment's more rigid pursuit of verisimilitude toward the ambiguous symbolism of Romanticism, Die Jungfrau von Orleans, written before Early Romantic theory had resulted in any significant Early Romantic works, demonstrates characteristics of both movements.

Type
Chapter
Information
Who Is This Schiller Now?
Essays on his Reception and Significance
, pp. 236 - 246
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×