Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T12:46:38.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Ecceity, Ipseity and Existents

from Part II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Get access

Summary

I find myself hoping that one small step for non-humankind as well as humankind might be made by daring to think that Heidegger's categories of the world-constructing (weltbildend), the poor in world (weltarm) and the worldless (weltlos) can be transcended to what the Scholastics referred to as Transcendentals, namely Being, Unity, the True, the Good (and possibly the Beautiful). If these are most common notions that hold of being they would seem to hold of being when this is understood as existence in abstraction from properties and predicates. But the traditional doctrine maintains that the transcendentals are coextensive with one another. As regards being as sheer existence, its overlap with the Good is displayed in what I make bold to describe as the fact that a thing's existence is a good to that thing. But this ‘fact’ has something like the status of what Kant has in mind when he refers to the moral law as a Faktum of reason. His moral law, also what Plato refers to sometimes as the Good and sometimes as the Idea of the Good, and Levinas’ notion of the good as ethicality are, I argue, implicated and somehow complicit with existence or being in what Levinas refers to as an intrigue. This intrication won't answer the limitrophic questions we have to face from time to time, questions of where and when to draw the line. But it can teach us that otherness is the only ‘category’ that operates in the thought that the pure existence of something other than ourselves imposes on us a responsibility that is logically prior to predication.

Also logically prior to predication is address. Address and existence are partners in something like what Scotus dubs distinctio formalis. The distinctness of the terms in a formal distinction goes along with their real as distinct from solely logical inseparability. Paradigm cases of this for Scotus and his contemporaries are the relations between God and His attributes, the relation of the Persons of the Trinity and the relation between the will and the intellect in the human person.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×