Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T14:06:55.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Patrick Dumberry
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, José E., International Organizations as Law-Makers, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan Felix, Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organizations, edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Anzilotti, Dionisio, Cours de droit international, Paris: Recueil Sirey, 1929.
Arajärvi, N., The Changing Nature of Customary International Law: Methods of Interpreting the Concept of Custom in International Criminal Tribunals, London; New York: Routledge, 2014.
Arend, A.C., Legal Rules and International Society, New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Arsanjani, Mahnoush H.et al. (eds.), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W. Michael Reisman, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2011.
Bederman, David J., Custom as a Source of Law, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Bishop, R.D, Crawford, J. and Reisman, W.M., Foreign Investment Disputes: Cases, Materials and Commentary, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2005.
Bjorklund, Andrea K. and Reinisch, August (eds.), International Investment Law and Soft Law, Cheltenham: Elgar, 2012.
Borchard, Edwin, The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad, New York: Bank Law Publishing Co., 1915.
Boyle, A. and Chinkin, C., The Making of International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Brierly, J.L., The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the International Law of Peace, edn., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.
Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
Brownlie, Ian, The Rule of Law in International Affairs: International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1998.
Byers, M., Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Cahin, Gérard, La coutume internationale et les organisations internationales: l'incidence de la dimension institutionnelle sur le processus coutumier, Paris: Pedone, 2001.
Carreau, Dominique and Juillard, Patrick, Droit international économique, Paris: Dalloz, 2013.
Cassese, A. and Weiler, J.H.H. (eds.), Change and Stability in International Law-Making, Berlin: De Gruyter, 1988.
Cassese, Antonio, International Law, edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Clapham, Andrew, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Cobbett, Pitt, Leading Cases on International Law, London: Sweet & Maxwell, edn., vol. 1, 1931–1937.
Corten, O., Métholodologie du droit international public, Brussels: Ed. Université de Bruxelles, 2009.
Corten, O. and Klein, P., The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Crawford, James, Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law, edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Crepet Daigremont, Claire, ‘Les sources du droit international des investissements’, in Leben, C. (ed.) Droit international des investissements et l'arbitrage transnational, Paris: Pedone, 2015.
D'Amato, A., The Concept of Custom in International Law, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1971.
d'Aspremont, J., Formalism and the Sources of International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Danilenko, G.M., Law-Making in the International Community, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993.
de Brabandere, E., Investment Treaty Arbitration as Public International Law: Procedural Aspects and Implications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
de Visscher, Charles, Théories et réalités en droit international public, Paris: Pedone, 1953.
de Visscher, Charles, Theory and Reality in Public International Law, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968.
Diallo, O., Le consentement des parties à l'arbitrage international, Paris: PUF, 2010.
Diehl, Alexandra, The Core Standard of International Investment Protection: Fair and Equitable Treatment, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2012.
Doehring, K., Völkerrecht, edn., Heidelberg: Müller, 2004.
Dolzer, Rudolf and Stevens, Margrete, Bilateral Investment Treaties, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1995.
Dugan, Christopher, Rubins, Noah D., Wallace, Don and Sabahi, Borzu, Investor-State Arbitration, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Dumberry, Patrick, The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: A Guide to NAFTA Case Law on Article 1105, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2013.
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Droit international public, edn., Paris: Dalloz, 1998.
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie and Kerbrat, Yann, Droit international public, edn., Paris: Dalloz, 2014.
Dupuy, P-M., Francioni, F. and Petersmann, E.U. (eds.), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Eagleton, Clyde, The Responsibility of States in International Law, New York: New York University Press, 1928.
García Amador, F.V., Sohn, Louis B. and Baxter, R.R., Recent Codification of the Law of State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens, Dobbs Ferry: Oceana Publ., 1974.
Gazzini, T. and de Brabandere, E. (eds.), International Investment Law: The Sources of Rights and Obligations, Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012.
Goldsmith, Jack L. and Posner, Eric A., The Limits of International Law, New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Guggenheim, P., Traité de Droit international public, edn., Geneva: Georg, 1967.
Hackworth, Green H., Digest of International Law, vol. 3, Washington DC: Department of State, 1942.
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise (eds.), Customary International Humanitarian Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, vol. I.
Higgins, Rosalyn, The Development of International Law Through the Political Organs of the United Nations, London: Oxford University Press, 1963.
Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
Jennings, R. and Watts, A., Oppenheim's International Law, edn., London: Longman, 1996, vol. 1(1).
Johnston, D.M. and Macdonald, R. St. J. (eds.), The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy Doctrine and Theory, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983.
Kelsen, H., Principles of International Law, New York: Rinehart & Company, 1952.
Kelsen, H., Principles of International Law, edn., New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1966.
Kinnear, M., Biorklund, A. and Hannaford, J.F.G., Investment Disputes under NAFTA: An Annotated Guide to NAFTA Chapter 11, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2006.
Kinsella, N. Stephan and Rubins, Noah D., International Investment, Political Risk, and Dispute Resolution, Dobbs Ferry: Oceana, 2005.
Klabbers, Jan, An Introduction to International Institutional Law, edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Kläger, Roland, Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Kontou, Nancy, The Termination and Revision of Treaties in the Light of New Customary International Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
Lauterpacht, Elihu, The Development of International Law by the International Court, London: Stevens, 1958.
Laviec, Jean-Pierre, Protection et promotion des investissements, étude de droit international économique, Paris: PUF, 1985.
Lepard, B., Customary International Law: A New Theory with Practical Applications, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Lowenfeld, Andreas F., International Economic Law, edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Malanczuk, Peter, Akehurst's Modern Introduction to International Law, edn., London and New York: Routledge, 1997.
McLachlan, C., Shore, L. and Weiniger, M., International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Meriboute, Zidane, La codification de la succession d’États aux traités: décolonisation, sécession, unification, Paris: PUF, 1984.
Meron, T., Human Rights and Humanitarian Norms as Customary Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.
Montt, Santiago, State Liability in Investment Treaty Arbitration, Oxford: Hart Publ., 2009.
Muchlinski, Peter, Multinational Enterprises & the Law, edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Murphy, J.B. and Perreau-Saussine, A. (eds.), The Nature of Customary Law: Philosophical, Historical and Legal Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Newcombe, Andrew and Paradell, Luis, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer, 2009.
Nollkaemper, A., National Courts and the International Rule of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
O'Connell, D.P., International Law, London: Stevens & Sons, 1970.
Paparinskis, Martins, The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Parry, C., The Sources and Evidences of International Law, Manchester: University Press & Dobbs Ferry: Oceana, 1965.
Dinh, Nguyen Quoc, Dallier, Patrick, Forteau, Mathias and Pellet, Alain, Droit International Public, edn., Paris: LGDJ, 2007.
Reed, L., Paulsson, J. and Blackaby, N., A Guide to ICSID Arbitration, The Hague: Kluwer Law, 2004.
Rosenne, S., Practice and Methods of International Law, London: Oceana Publications, 1984.
Roth, Andreas Hans, The Minimum Standard of International Law Applied to Aliens, The Hague: A.W. Sijthoff, 1949.
Rovine, Arthur W. (ed.), 1973 Digest of the United States Practice in International Law, Washington DC, US Department of State, Office of the Legal Adviser, 1974.
Salacuse, Jeswald W., The Law of Investment Treaties, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010.
Salacuse, Jeswald W., The Three Laws of International Investment National, Contractual, and International Frameworks for Foreign Capital, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Scharf, Michael P., Customary International Law in Times of Fundamental Change: Recognizing Grotian Moments, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Schermers, H.G. and Blokker, N.M., International Institutional Law: Unity Within Diversity, edn., Boston; Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003.
Schill, S., The Multilateralization of International Investment Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Schokkaert, Jan and Heckscher, Yvon, International Investments Protection: Comparative Law Analysis of Bilateral and Multilateral Interstate Conventions, Doctrinal Texts and Arbitral Jurisprudence Concerning Foreign Investments, Brussels: Bruylant, 2009.
Schreuer, C. and Dolzer, R., Principles of International Investment Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Schreuer, Christoph H., Malintoppi, Loretta, Reinisch, August and Sinclair, Anthony, The ICSID Convention;A Commentary, edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Schwartzenberger, G., International Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals, London: Stevens & Sons, 1949.
Schwarzenberger, G., International Law, vol. 1, edn. London: Stevens & Sons, 1957.
Shahabuddeen, M., Precedent in the World Court, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Shaw, Malcolm N., International Law, edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Shaw, Malcolm N., International Law, edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Sornarajah, M., The International Law on Foreign Investment, edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Sornarajah, M., The International Law on Foreign Investment, edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Subedi, Surya P., International Investment Law: Reconciling Policy and Principle, Oxford: Hart Publ., 2008.
Thirlway, H.W.A., International Customary Law and Codification, Leiden: Sijthoff, 1972.
Tudor, Ioana, The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Foreign Investment Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
van Harten, Gus, Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
van Hoof, G.J.H., Rethinking the Sources of International Law, Deventer: Kluwer, 1983.
Vandevelde, K.J., Bilateral Investment Treaties: History, Policy and Interpretation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Vandevelde, K.J., U.S. International Investment Agreements, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Villanueva, Gabriel Cavazos, The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: The Mexican Experience, Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag, 2008.
Villiger, Mark E., Customary International law and Treaties: A Manual on the Theory and Practice of the Interrelation of Sources, edn., The Hague: Kluwer & Zürich: Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag, 1997.
Voss, Jan Ole, The Impact of Investment Treaties on Contracts between Host States and Foreign Investors, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2011.
Wälde, Thomas, Nouveaux horizons pour le droit international des investissements dans le contexte de la mondialisation de l’économie, Paris: Pedone, 2004.
Wang, Dong, China's Unequal Treaties: Narrating National History, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2005.
Weeramantry, J. Romesh, Treaty Interpretation in Investment Arbitration, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Weiler, Todd, The Interpretation of International Investment Law: Equality, Discrimination and Minimum Standards of Treatment in Historical Context, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2013.
Wilson, Robert R., The International Law Standard in Treaties of the United States, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1953.
Wolfke, Karol, Custom in Present International Law, edn., Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1993.
Abi-Saab, Georges, ‘The Newly Independent States and the Rules of International Law: An Outline’, Howard L. J 8 (1962), pp. 95–121.Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, Georges, ‘La coutume dans tous ses États ou le dilemme du développement du droit international général dans un monde éclaté’, in: Le droit international à l'heure de sa codification : études en l'honneur de Roberto Ago (Milan: Giuffrè, 1987), pp. 53–65.
Abi-Saab, Georges, ‘Custom and Treaties’ in Cassese, A. and Weiler, J.H.H. (eds.), Change and Stability in International Law-Making (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1988).
Abs, H. and Shawcross, H., ‘The Proposed Convention to Protect Private Foreign Investment: A Round Table: Comment on the Draft Convention by its Authors’, J.P.L. 9 (1960), pp. 119–124.Google Scholar
Acconci, P., ‘Determining the Internationally Relevant Link between a State and a Corporate Investor, Recent Trends Concerning the Application of the “Genuine Link” Test’, J. World Invest. & Trade 5 (2004), pp 139–175.Google Scholar
Acconci, P., ‘The Requirement of Continuous Corporate Nationality and Customary International Rules on Foreign Investment: the Loewen Case’, Italian YIL 14 (2004), pp. 195–223.Google Scholar
Adeyeye, Adefolake, ‘Corporate Responsibility in International Law: Which Way to go?’, Singapore YB Int'L 11 (2007), pp. 141–161.Google Scholar
Akehurst, M., ‘Custom as a Source of International Law’, British YIL 47 (1974–1975), pp. 1–53.Google Scholar
Akinsanya, A.,‘International Protection of Direct Foreign Investments in the Third World’, ICLQ 36 (1987), pp 58–75.Google Scholar
Al Faruque, Abdullah, ‘Creating Customary International Law through Bilateral Investment Treaties: a Critical Appraisal’, Indian JIL 44 (2004), pp. 292–318.Google Scholar
Alschner, Wolfgang, ‘The Return of the Home State and the Rise of ‘Embedded’ Investor-State Arbitration’, in Lalani, S. and Polanco, R. (eds.), The Role of the State in Investor-State Arbitration (Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff/Brill, 2014), pp. 192–218.
Alvarez-Jimenez, Alberto, ‘Methods for the Identification of Customary International Law in the International Court of Justice's Jurisprudence: 2000–2009’, ICLQ 60 (2011), pp. 681–712.Google Scholar
Alvarez, J.E., ‘The Contemporary International Investment Regime: An “Empire of Law” or the “Law of Empire”?’, Alabama L. Rev. 60 (2009), pp. 943–975.Google Scholar
Alvarez, J.E., ‘A BIT on Custom’, N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol. 42 (2009–2010), pp. 17–80.Google Scholar
Alvarez, J.E., ‘The Once and Future Investment Regime’ in Arsanjani, Mahnoushet al. (eds.), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W. Michael Reisman (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2011), pp. 607–648.
Alvarez, J.E., ‘Are Corporations “Subjects” of International Law?’, Santa Clara J. Int'l L. 9 (2011), pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Alvarez, J.E., ‘The Return of the State’, Minnesota JIL 20 (2011), pp. 223–264.Google Scholar
Arajärvi, N., ‘From State-Centricism to Where? The Formation of (Customary) International Law and Non-State Actors’, SSRN (2010).
Asamoah, Obed Y., ‘The Legal Significance of the Declarations of the General Assembly of the United Nations’, ICLQ 16(4) (1967), pp. xviii–274.Google Scholar
Audit, Mathias and Forteau, Mathias, ‘Investment Arbitration without BIT: Toward a Foreign Investment Customary Based Arbitration?’, J. Int'l Arb. 29 (2012), pp. 581–604.Google Scholar
Baker, R.B., ‘Customary International Law in the 21st Century: Old Challenges and New Debates’, EJIL 21(1) 2010, pp. 173–204.Google Scholar
Banifatemi, Y., ‘The Law Applicable in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, in Yannaca-Small, Katia (ed.), Arbitration Under International Investment Agreements: A Guide to the Key Issues (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 191–210.
Barberis, J.A., ‘Réflexions sur la coutume internationale’, AFDI 36 (1990), pp. 9–46.Google Scholar
Baxter, R., ‘Multilateral Treaties as Evidence of Customary International Law’, British YIL 41 (1965–1966), pp. 275–300.Google Scholar
Berezowski, C., ‘Les problèmes de la subjectivité internationale’, in Ibler, V. (ed.) Mélanges offerts à Juraj Andrassy (La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff Publ., 1968), pp. 31–53.
Bernasconi-Osterwalder, Nathalie and Mann, Howard, ‘A Response to the European Commission's December 2013 Document “Investment Provisions in the EU-Canada Free Trade Agreement (CETA)”, ’IISD (2014), pp. 1–26.
Bethlehem, D., ‘The Secret Life of International Law’, Cambridge J Intl Comp L 23 (2012), pp. 23–36.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, Andrea K., ‘Reconciling State Sovereignty and Investor Protection in Denial of Justice Claims’, Virginia JIL 45 (2005), pp. 809–895.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, Andrea K., ‘NAFTA's Contributions to Investor-State Dispute Settlement’ in Bungenberg, M., Griebel, J., Hobe, S. and Reinisch, A. (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Munich: C.H. Beck, Oxford: Hart, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2015), pp. 261–282.
Borchard, Edwin, ‘The “Minimum Standard” of the Treatment of Aliens’, ASIL Proc. 33 (1939), pp. 51–70.Google Scholar
Bos, M., ‘The Identification of Custom in International Law’, German YIL 25 (1982), pp. 9–53.Google Scholar
Bradley, Curtis A. & Gulati, Mitu, ‘Withdrawing from International Custom’, Yale LJ 120 (2010), pp. 202–275.Google Scholar
Bronfman, Marcela Klein, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: An Evolving Standard’, Max Planck Yrbk. UNL 10 (2006), pp. 609–680.Google Scholar
Brower, Charles H. II and Tepe, John B., ‘Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States-A Reflection or Rejection of International Law?’, Int'l Law 9 (1975), pp. 295–318.Google Scholar
Brower, Charles H. II, ‘Investor-State Disputes Under NAFTA: The Empire Strikes Back’, Colum J. Transnat'l L. 40 (2001–2002), pp. 43–84.Google Scholar
Brower, Charles H. II, ‘Structure, Legitimacy, and NAFTA's Investment Chapter’, Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 36 (2003), pp. 37–94.Google Scholar
Brower, Charles H. II, ‘Why the FTC Notes of Interpretation Constitute a Partial Amendment of NAFTA Article 1105’, Va. J. Int'l L. 46 (2006), pp. 347–363.Google Scholar
Brown, Chester, ‘Introduction. The Development and Importance of the Model Bilateral Investment Treaty’, in Brown, C. (ed.), Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 1–13.
Brown, Chester, ‘The Evolution of the Regime of International Investment Agreements: History, Economics and Politics’, in Bungenberg, M., Griebel, J., Hobe, S. and Reinisch, A. (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (München: C.H. Beck, Oxford: Hart, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2015), pp. 153–185.
Bubrowski, Helene, ‘Counterclaims’, in De Mestral, A. and Lévesque, C. (eds.), Improving International Investment Treaties: Negotiation, Substantive Obligations and Dispute Resolution (London: Routledge, 2013), pp. 212–229.
Caplan, Lee M. and Sharpe, Jeremy K., ‘United States’, in Brown, C. (ed.), Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 755–851.
Caron, David, ‘The Interpretation of National Foreign Investment Laws as Unilateral Acts under International Law’, in Arsanjani, Mahnoushet al. (eds.), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W. Michael Reisman (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2011), pp. 649–674.
Carreau, D., ‘Investissements’, in Répertoire de droit international (Paris: Dalloz, 1998).
Chalamish, E., ‘Future of Bilateral Investment Treaties: A De Facto Multilateral Agreement’, Brook. J. Int'l L. 34 (2008–2009), pp. 303–354.Google Scholar
Charney, J., ‘The Persistent Objector Rule and the Development of Customary International Law’, British YIL 56 (1985), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Charney, J., ‘International Agreements and the Development of Customary International Law’, Washington L. R. 61 (1986), pp. 971–996.Google Scholar
Charney, J., ‘Universal International Law’, AJIL 87 (1993), pp. 529–551.Google Scholar
Cheng, Bin, ‘United Nations Resolutions on Outer Space: “Instant” International Customary Law?’, Indian JIL 5 (1965), pp. 23–48.Google Scholar
Cheng, Bin, ‘Custom: The Future of General State Practice In a Divided World’, in Macdonald, R. St.J. and Johnston, D.M. (eds.), The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy Doctrine and Theory (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983), pp. 513–554.
Clodfelter, Mark A., ‘The Adaptation of States to the Changing World of Investment Protection through Model BITs’, ICSID Rev. 24 (2009), pp. 165–175.Google Scholar
Cohen-Jonathan, G., ‘La coutume locale’, AFDI 7 (1961), pp. 119–140.Google Scholar
Colson, David A., ‘How Persistent Must the Persistent Objector be’, Washington L. R. 61 (1986), pp. 957–970.Google Scholar
Congyan, Cai, ‘International Investment Treaties and the Formation, Application a Transformation of Customary International Law Rules’, Chinese JIL 7 (2008), pp. 659–679.Google Scholar
Corten, O., ‘La participation du Conseil de sécurité à l’élaboration, à la crystallisation ou à la consolidation de règles coutumières’, RBDI (2004), pp. 552–567.
Crawford, J., Pellet, A. and Redgwell, C., ‘Anglo-American and Continental Traditions in Advocacy before International Courts and Tribunals’, Cambridge J Intl Comp L 2 (2013), pp. 715–737.Google Scholar
d'Aspremont, J., ‘The Doctrinal Illusion of Heterogenity of International Lawmaking Processes’, in Ruiz-Fabri, H., Wolfrum, R., and Gogolin, J. (eds.), Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law (Oxford: Hart, vol. 2, 2010), pp. 297–312.
d'Aspremont, J., ‘International Customary Investment Law: Story of a Paradox’, in Gazzini, T. and Brabandere, E. de (eds.), International Investment Law: The Sources of Rights and Obligations (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012), pp. 5–47.
d'Aspremont, J., ‘An Autonomous Regime of Identification of Customary International Humanitarian Law: Do Not Say What You Do Or Do Not Do What You Say?’, in van Steenberghe, R. (ed.), Droit international humanitaire: un régime spécial de droit international? (Brussels: Bruylant, 2013), pp. 1–26.
d'Aspremont, J., ‘Inclusive Law-Making and Law-Enforcement Processes for an Exclusive International Legal System’, in d'Aspremont, J. (ed.), Participants in the International Legal System: Multiple Perspectives on Non-State Actors in International Law (London: Routledge, 2013), pp. 425–439.
d'Aspremont, J., ‘Customary International Law as a Dance Floor: Part I’, EJIL Talks!, 15 April 2014.
d'Aspremont, J., ‘Customary International Law as a Dance Floor: Part II’, EJIL Talks!, 15 April 2014.
D'Amato, Anthony, ‘The Concept of Special Custom in International Law’, AJIL 63 (1969), pp. 211–223.Google Scholar
D'Amato, Anthony, ‘What “Counts” as Law?’, in Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood (ed.) Law-Making in the Global Community (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 1982), pp. 83–107.
D'Amato, Anthony, ‘Trashing Customary International Law’, AJIL 81 (1987), pp. 101–105.Google Scholar
D'Amato, Anthony, ‘Custom and Treaty: A Response to Professor Weisburd’, Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 21 (1988), pp. 459–472.Google Scholar
D'Amato, Anthony, ‘Customary International Law: A Reformulation’, International Legal Theory (1998), pp. 1–6.
Dahlman, C., ‘The Function of opinio juris in Customary International Law’, Nordic JIL (2012), pp. 327–339.
de Brabandere, E., ‘Judicial and Arbitral Decisions as a Source of Rights and Obligations’, in: Gazzini, T. and Brabandere, E. de (eds), Sources of Transnational Investment Law (Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012), pp. 245–288.
Delaume, George R., ‘The Proper Law of State Contracts Revisited’, ICSID Rev. 12 (1997), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Denza, E. and Brooks, S., ‘Investment Protection Treaties: United Kingdom Experience’, ICLQ 36 (1987), pp. 908–923.Google Scholar
Dickerson, Hollin, ‘Minimum Standards’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, vol. 9, 2013).
Doehring, K., ‘Gewohnheitsrecht aus Verträgen’, ZaöRV 36 (1976), pp. 77–95.Google Scholar
Dolzer, R., ‘New Foundations of the Law of Expropriation of Alien Property’, AJIL (1981), pp. 553–589.
Dolzer, R., ‘Indirect Expropriation of Alien Property’, ICSID Rev. (1987), pp. 41–65.
Dolzer, R., ‘Fair And Equitable Treatment in International Law, Remarks’, ASIL Proc. 100 (2006), p. 69.Google Scholar
Dolzer, R. and von Walter, A., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment – Lines of Jurisprudence on Customary Law’, in Ortino, F. (ed.), Investment Treaty Law, Current Issues II (London: BIICL, 2007), pp. 99–115.
Dominicé, C., ‘La personnalité juridique internationale du CICR’, in Swinarski, C. (ed.), Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet (The Hague: Nijhoff/Geneva: ICRC, 1984), pp. 663–673.
Dominicé, C., ‘L’émergence de l'individu en droit international public’, Annales d’études internationales 16 (1987–1988), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Douglas, Z., ‘The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration’, British YIL 74(1) (2003), pp. 151–289.Google Scholar
Duchesne, M.S., ‘The Continuous Nationality of Claims Principle: Its Historical Development and Current Relevance to Investor-State Investment Disputes’, Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 36 (2004), pp. 783–815.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘L'entreprise, sujet de droit international? Retour sur la question à la lumière des développements récents du droit international des investissements’, RGDIP 108(1) (2004), pp. 103–122.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘Are BITs Representing the “New” Customary International Law in International Investment Law?’, Penn State ILR 28(4) (2010), pp. 675–702.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘Incoherent and Ineffective: The Concept of Persistent Objector Revisited’, ICLQ 59 (2010), pp. 779–802.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘The Last Citadel! Can a State Claim the Status of Persistent Objector to Prevent the Application of a Rule of Customary International Law in Investor-State Arbitration?’, Leiden JIL 23(2) (2010), pp. 379–400.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘The Legal Standing of Shareholders before Arbitral Tribunals: Has Any Rule of Customary International Law Crystallised?’, Michigan State JIL 18 (2010), pp. 353–374.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P. and Labelle Eastaugh, E., ‘Non-State Actors in International Investment Law: The Legal Personality of Corporations and NGOs in the Context of Investor-State Arbitration’, in d'Aspremont, Jean (ed.), Participants in the International Legal System: Multiples Perspectives on Non-State Actors in International Law (London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2011), pp. 360–371.
Dumberry, P. and Dumas-Aubin, G., ‘How to Impose Human Rights Obligations on Corporations under Investment Treaties?’, Yb Int'l Invest. L. & Pol. 4 (2011–2012), pp. 569–600.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P. and Dumas-Aubin, G., ‘When and How Allegations of Human Rights Violations can be Raised in Investor-State Arbitration’, J. World Invest. & Trade 13(3) (2012), pp. 349–372.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘Corporate Investors’ International Legal Personality and their Accountability for Human Rights Violations under Investment Treaties’, in De Mestral, A. and Lévesque, C. (eds.), Improving International Investment Agreements Negotiation, Substantive Obligations and Dispute Resolution (London: Routledge, 2013), pp. 179–194.
Dumberry, P. ‘International Investment Contracts’, in Gazzini, T. and Brabandere, E. de (eds.), International Investment Law: The Sources of Rights and Obligations (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff & Brill, 2012), pp. 215–243.
Dumberry, P. and Stone, J., ‘International Law, Whether You Like It or Not: An Analysis of Arbitral Tribunal Practice Regarding the Applicable Law in Deciding State Contracts Disputes under the ICSID Convention in the Twenty First Century’, Yb Int'l Invest. L. & Pol. 5 (2012–2013), pp. 477–516.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P. and Dumas-Aubin, G., ‘The Doctrine of “Clean Hands” and the Inadmissibility of Claims by Investors Breaching International Human Rights Law’, in Kriebaum, Ursula (ed.), Aligning Human Rights and Investment Protection, TDM Special Issue, 10 (1) (2013).Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘Denial of Justice under NAFTA Article 1105: A Review of 20 Years of Case Law’, ASA Bull. 32(2) (2014), pp. 145–163.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘The Protection of Investors’ Legitimate Expectations and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard under NAFTA Article 1105’, J. Int'l Arb. 31(1) (2014), pp. 47–74.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘Moving the Goal Post! How Some NAFTA Tribunals have Challenged the FTC Note of Interpretation on the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard under NAFTA Article 1105’, W. Arb & Med Rev 8 (2014), pp. 251–293.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘The Prohibition Against Arbitrary Conduct and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard under NAFTA Article 1105’, J. World Invest. & Trade 15 (2014), pp. 117–151.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘The Practice of States as Evidence of Custom: An Analysis of Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Clauses in States’ Foreign Investment Laws’, McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution (forthcoming, 2016).
Dumberry, P., ‘Has the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard become a Rule of Customary international Law? An Empirical Study of the Practice of States (forthcoming, 2016).
Dumberry, P., ‘The Importation of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Through MFN Clauses: An Empirical Study of BITs’, ICSID Rev. (forthcoming, 2016).
Dumberry, P., ‘Shopping for a Better Deal: The Use of MFN Clauses to Get ‘Better’ Fair and Equitable Treatment Protection under other treaties’ (forthcoming 2016).
Dunbar, N.C.H., ‘The Myth of Customary International Law’, Australian YIL 8 (1983), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Dupuy, P.-M., ‘A propos de l'opposabilité de la coutume générale: enquête brève sur l'objecteur persistant’, in Mélanges Michel Virally (Paris: Pedone, 1991), pp. 257–272.
Dupuy, R.J., ‘Coutume sage et coutume sauvage’, in Mélanges Rousseau (Paris: Pedone, 1974), pp. 75–87.
El-Kosheri, Ahmed S. and Riad, Tarek F., ‘The Law Governing a New Generation of Petroleum Agreements: Changes in the Arbitration Process’, ICSID Rev. 1 (1986), pp. 257–288.Google Scholar
Elias, Olufemi, ‘The Nature of the Subjective Element in Customary International Law’, ICLQ 44 (1995), pp. 501–520.Google Scholar
Ewing-Chow, M. and Losari, J.J., ‘Which is to be the Master?: Extra-Arbitral Interpretative Procedures for IIAs’, in Joubin-Bret, A. and Kalicki, Jean E. (eds.), Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: In Search of A Roadmap (TDM Special issue, 2014).
Falsafi, Alireza, ‘The International Minimum Standard of Treatment of Foreign Investors’ Property: A Contingent Standard’, Suffolk Transnat'l L. Rev. 30 (2006–2007), pp. 317–363.Google Scholar
Fauchald, Ole Kristian, ‘The Legal Reasoning of ICSID Tribunals – An Empirical Analysis’, EJIL 19 (2008), pp. 301–364.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G., ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice, 1951–54: General Principles and Sources of Law’, British YIL 30 (1953), pp. 1–70.Google Scholar
Francioni, F., ‘Access to Justice, Denial of Justice and International Investment Law’, EJIL 20(3) (2009), pp. 729–748.Google Scholar
Fumagalli, Luigi, ‘Evidence before the International Court of Justice: Issues of Fact and Questions of Law in the Determination of International Custom’, in Boschiero, Nerinaet al. (eds.), International Courts and the Development of International Law: Essays in Honour of Tullio Treves (The Hague: Asser Press, 2013), pp. 137–148.
Gagné, Gilbert and Morin, Jean-Frédéric, ‘The Evolving American Policy on Investment Protection: Evidence from Recent FTAs and the 2004 Model BIT’, J. Int'l Econ. L. 9 (2006), pp. 357–382.Google Scholar
Gaillard, Emmanuel and Banifatemi, Yas, ‘The Meaning of ‘and’ in Article 42 (1),Second Sentence of the Washington Convention: The Role of International Law in the ICSID Choice of Law Process’, ICSID Rev. 18 (2003), pp. 375–411.Google Scholar
Gamble, John King and Ku, Charlotte, ‘International Law—New Actors and New Technologies: Center Stage for NGOs?’, Law & Pol'y Int'l. Bus. 31 (2000), pp. 221–262.Google Scholar
Gattini, A., ‘Le rôle du juge international et du juge national et la coutume internationale’, in Alland, D.et al. (eds.), Unité et diversité du droit international: écrits en l'honneur du professeur Pierre-Marie Dupuy (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2014), pp. 253–273.
Gazzini, Tarcisio, ‘The Role of Customary International Law in the Field of Foreign Investment’, J. World Invest. & Trade 8 (2007), pp. 691–715.Google Scholar
Geiger, R.H., ‘Customary International Law in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice: A Critical Appraisal’, in Fastenrath, U.et al. (eds.), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Judge Bruno Simma (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 673–694.
Glennon, Michael J., ‘How International Rules Die’, GEO. L. J. 93 (2005), pp. 939–991.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L. and Posner, Eric A., ‘A Theory of Customary International Law’, Chicago L. Rev. 66 (1999), pp. 1113–1177.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L. and Posner, Eric A., ‘Understanding the Resemblance Between Modern and Traditional Customary International Law’, Virginia JIL 40 (2000), pp. 639–672.Google Scholar
Grisel, Florian, ‘The Sources of Foreign Investment Law’, in: Douglas, Z., Pauwelyn, J. and Viñuales, J.E. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 213–233.
Guggenheim, P., ‘Les deux éléments de la coutume en droit international’, in La technique et les principes du droit public. Etudes en l'honneur de Georges Scelle (Paris: LGDJ, 1950), pp. 275 ff.
Guha-Roy, S-N., ‘Is the Law of Responsibility of States for Injuries to Aliens A Part of Universal International Law?’, AJIL 55 (1961), pp. 863–891.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Gilbert, ‘Can Arbitral Awards Constitute a Source of International Law under Article 38 of the ICJ Statute?’, in Banifatemi, Y. (ed.), Precedent in International Arbitration (Huntington: Juris Publishing, 2008), pp. 105–112.
Guldahl, Camilla G., ‘The Role of Persistent Objection in International Humanitarian Law’, Nordic JIL 77 (2008), pp. 51–86.Google Scholar
Gunning, Isabelle R., ‘Modernizing Customary International Law: The Challenge of Human Rights’, Virginia JIL 31 (1991), pp. 211–247.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T., ‘Why LDCs Sign Treaties That Hurt Them: Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral Investment Treaties’, Va.J.Int'l L. 38(4) (1998), pp. 639–688.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T., ‘A Compliance-Based Theory of International Law’, Cal. L. Rev. 90 (2002), pp. 1827–1887.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T., ‘Saving Customary International Law’, Michigan JIL 27 (2006), pp. 115–176.Google Scholar
Haeri, Hussein, ‘A Tale of Two Standards: ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ and the Minimum Standard in International Law’, Arb. Int'l 27 (2011), pp. 27–46.Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, P., ‘La doctrine des deux éléments du droit coutumier dans la pratique de la Cour internationale’, RGDIP 90 (1986), pp. 5–126.Google Scholar
Harrison, J., ‘The International Law Commission and the Development of International Investment Law’, Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev, 45 (2013), pp. 413–442.Google Scholar
Heiskanen, Veijo, ‘Arbitrary and Unreasonable Measures’, in Reinisch, A. (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 87–110.
Henckaerts, J.M., ‘International Humanitarian Law as Customary International Law’, Refugee Survey Quarterly 21 (3) (2002), pp. 186–193.Google Scholar
Higgins, R., ‘The ICJ, the ECJ, and the Integrity of International Law’, ICLQ 52 (2003), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Hindelang, Steffen, ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties, Custom and a Healthy Investment Climate – The Question of whether BITs Influence Customary International Law Revisited’, J. World Invest. & Trade 5 (2004), pp. 789–809.Google Scholar
Igbokwe, Virtus Chitoo, ‘Developing Countries and the Law Applicable to International Arbitration of Oil Investment Disputes Has the Last Word been Said?’, J. Int'l Arb. 14(1) (1997), pp. 99–124.Google Scholar
Jacquet, Jean-Michel, ‘Contrat d’État’, Jurisclasseur Droit international, fasc. 565, 11/98 (Paris: Dalloz, 1998).
Jenks, W.C., ‘Multinational Entities in the Law of Nations’, in Transnational Law in a Changing Society: Essays in Honor of Philip C. Jessup (New York: Columbia University Press, 1972), pp. 70–83.
Jennings, R., ‘What is International Law and How Do We Tell It When We See It’, ASDI 37 (1981) (also in: The Cambridge Tilburg Lectures, Deventer: Kluwer, 1983, pp. 59–91).
Jia, Bing Bing, ‘The Relations between Treaties and Custom’, Chinese JIL 9(1) (2010), pp. 81–109.Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J., ‘Uncertainty in the Formal Sources of International Law: Customary International Law and Some of Its Problems’, EJIL 15(3) (2004), pp. 523–553.Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J., ‘Law-Making by Scholarship? The Dark Side of 21st Century International Legal “Methodology”’, in Crawford, J.et al. (eds), Selected Proceedings of the European Society of International Law (Oxford: Hart, vol. 3, 2011), pp. 115–126.
Kammerhofer, J., ‘Orthodox Generalists and Political Activists in International Legal Scholarship’, in Happold, M. (ed.), International Law in a Multipolar World (London: Routledge, 2012), pp. 138–157.
Kammerhofer, J., ‘Law-making by Scholars’ in Brölmann, Catherine and Radi, Yannick (eds.), Research Handbook on the Theory and Practice of International Law‐Making (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2013).
Kantor, Mark, ‘Little Has Changed in the New US Model Bilateral Investment Treaty’, ICSID Rev. 27(2) (2012), pp. 335–378.Google Scholar
Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle, ‘Arbitral Precedent: Dream, Necessity or Excuse?’, Arb. Int'l 23 (2007), pp. 357–378.Google Scholar
Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle, ‘Interpretive Powers of the NAFTA Free Trade Commission – Necessary Safety Valve or Infringement of the Rule of Law?’, in Bachand, Frédéric (ed.), Fifteen Years of NAFTA Chapter 11 Arbitration (New York: JurisNet, 2011), pp. 175–194.
Kaushal, Asha, ‘Revisiting History: How the Past Matters for the Present Backlash Against the Foreign Investment Regime’, Harvard ILJ 50(2) (2009), pp. 491–534.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. Patrick, ‘The Twilight of Customary International Law’, Virginia JIL 40 (2000), pp. 449–543.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H., ‘Théorie du droit coutumier’, Revue internationale de la théorie du droit (1939), pp. 253–274.
Khalil, Mohamed, ‘Treatment of Foreign Investment in BITs’, ICSID Rev. 7(2) (1992), p. 339–383.Google Scholar
Kill, T., ‘Don't Cross the Streams: Past and Present Overstatement of Customary International Law in Connection with Conventional Fair and Equitable Treatment Obligations’, Michigan LR 106 (2008), pp. 853–880.Google Scholar
Kinley, David and Tadaki, Junko, ‘From Talk to Walk: The Emergence of Human Rights Responsibilities for Corporations at International Law’, Virginia J. I.L. 44(4) (2004), pp. 931–1023.Google Scholar
Kirakosyan, Yeghishe, ‘Finding Custom: the ICJ and the International Criminal Courts and Tribunals compared’, in van den Herik, Larissa and Stahn, Carsten (eds.) The Diversification and Fragmentation of International Criminal Law (Leiden: Brill & Nijhoff, 2012), pp. 149–161.
Kirkman, Courtney C., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: Methanex v. United States and the Narrowing Scope of NAFTA Article 1105’, Law & Pol'y Int'l Bus. 34 (2002–2003), pp. 343–392.Google Scholar
Kirgis, F.L., ‘Custom on a Sliding Scale’, AJIL 81 (1987), pp. 146–151.Google Scholar
Kishoiyian, Bernard, ‘The Utility of Bilateral Investment Treaties in the Formulation of Customary International Law’, Northwestern J. Int'l L & Bus 14(2) (1993), pp. 327–375.Google Scholar
Knoll-Tudor, Ioana, ‘The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard and Human Rights Norms’, in Dupuy, P.M., Francioni, F. and Petersmann, E.U. (eds.), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 310–343.
Kolb, R., ‘Selected Problems in the Theory of Customary International Law’, Netherlands ILR 50 (2003), pp. 119–150.Google Scholar
Kopelmanas, L., ‘Custom as Means of the Creation of the International Law’, British YIL 18 (1937), pp. 127–151.Google Scholar
Laborde, Gustavo, ‘The Case for Host State Claims in Investment Arbitration’, J. Int Disp Settl 1(1) (2010), pp. 97–122.Google Scholar
Laird, I., ‘Betrayal, Shock and Outrage – Recent Developments in NAFTA Article 1105’, in Weiler, T. (ed.) NAFTA Investment Law and Arbitration: Past Issues, Current Practice, Future Prospects (Ardsley: Transnational Publ. 2004), pp. 49–75.
Laird, I., ‘A Community of Destiny – The Barcelona Traction Case and the Development of Shareholder Rights to Bring Investment Claims’, in Weiler, Todd (ed.), International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law (London: Cameron May, 2005), pp. 77–96.
Lauterpacht, H., ‘The World Bank Convention on the Settlement of International Investment Disputes’, Recueil d'Etudes de Droit International en Hommage à Paul Guggenheim (Geneva: Tribune, 1968), pp. 642–664.
Leben, Charles, ‘L’Évolution du droit international des investissements’, Journal CEPMLP, 7(12) (2000).Google Scholar
Lee, Lawrence Jahoon, ‘Barcelona Traction in the 21st Century: Revisiting its Customary and Policy Underpinnings 35 Years Later’, Stanford JIL 42 (2006), pp. 237–289.Google Scholar
Legum, Barton, ‘Representing States – A US Perspective’, Arbitration & ADR 6 (2001), p. 46.Google Scholar
Legum, Barton, ‘Dallas Workshop 2001: Commentary Scene III: ICSID Proceedings in the Absence of a Bilateral Investment Treaty’, Arb. Int'l 18(3) (2002).Google Scholar
Legum, Barton, ‘The Difficulties of Conciliation in Investment Treaty Cases: A Comment on Professor Jack C. Coe, “Toward a Complementary Use of Conciliation in Investor-State Disputes: A Preliminary Sketch”’, Mealey's Int'l Arb. Rep. (2006).
Lévesque, C. and Newcombe, A., ‘Commentary on the Canadian Model Foreign Promotion and Protection Agreement’, in Brown, C. (ed.), Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 53–130.
Lévesque, C.Influences on the Canadian Model FIPA and US Model BIT: NAFTA Chapter 11 and Beyond’, Can. YIL 44 (2006), pp. 249–298.Google Scholar
Liberti, Lahra, ‘Investissements et droits de l'homme’, in Kahn, P. and Wälde, T. (eds.), New Aspects of International Investment Law (Hague Academy of International Law, Leiden: Nijhoff, 2007), pp. 791–852.
Lillich, R.B., ‘The Growing Importance of Customary International Human Rights Law’, Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 25 (1995/6), pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Lorz, Ralph Alexander, ‘Protection and Security (Including the NAFTA Approach)’, in Bungenberg, M., Griebel, J., Hobe, S. and Reinisch, A. (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (München: C.H. Beck, Oxford: Hart, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2015), pp. 764–789.
Lowenfeld, Andeas F., ‘Investment Agreements and International Law’, Columbia JTL 42 (2003), pp. 123–130.Google Scholar
MacGibbon, I., ‘General Assembly Resolutions: Custom, Practice and Mistaken Identity’, in Cheng, B. (ed.), International Law: Teaching and Practice (London: Stevens & Sons, 1982), pp. 10–26.
Maniruzzaman, A.F.M., ‘State Contracts in Contemporary International Law: Monist versus Dualist Controversies’, EJIL 12 (2001), pp. 309–328.Google Scholar
Mann, F.A., ‘British Treaties for the Promotion and Protection of Investment’, British YIL 52 (1981), pp. 241–254.Google Scholar
Mann, Howard, ‘International Investment Agreements, Business and Human Rights: Key Issues and Opportunities’, IISD (2008), pp. 1–42.
Mayeda, Graham, ‘Playing Fair: The Meaning of Fair and Equitable Treatment in Bilateral Investment Treaties’, J. World Trade 41(2) (2007), pp. 273–291.Google Scholar
McClane, Brock J., ‘How Late in the Emergence of a Norm of Customary International Law May a Persistent Objector Object?’, I.L.S.A. J.I.L. 13 (1989), pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
McCorquodale, Robert, ‘An Inclusive International Legal System’, Leiden JIL 17 (2004), pp. 477–504.Google Scholar
McLachlan, Campbell, ‘Investment Treaties and General International Law’, ICLQ 57 (2008), pp. 361–401.Google Scholar
Mendelson, Maurice, ‘Disentangling Treaty and Customary International Law’, ASIL Proc. 81 (1987), pp. 157–164.Google Scholar
Mendelson, Maurice, ‘The Subjective Element in Customary International Law’, British YIL 66 (1996), pp. 177–208.Google Scholar
Mendelson, Maurice, ‘The Runaway Train: the Continuous Nationality Rule from the Panevezys-Saldutiskis Railway Case to Loewen’, in Weiler, T. (ed.) International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law (London: Cameron May, 2005), pp. 97–149.
Menon, K.P., ‘The Legal Personality of Individuals’, Sri Lanka J. Int'l L. 6 (1994), pp. 127–156.Google Scholar
Meron, T., ‘The Continuing Role of Custom in the Formation of International Humanitarian Law’, AJIL 90 (1996), pp. 238–249.Google Scholar
Meron, T., ‘Revival of Customary Humanitarian Law’, AJIL 99 (2005), pp. 817–834.Google Scholar
Mertus, J., ‘Considering Nonstate Actors in the New Millennium: Toward Expanded Participation in Norm Generation and Norm Application’, International Law and Politics 32 (2000), pp. 537–566.Google Scholar
Meyer, T.L., ‘Codifying Custom’, Univ. Pennsylvania LR 160 (2012), pp. 995–1069.Google Scholar
Moremen, Philip, ‘National Court Decisions as State Practice: A Transnational Judicial Dialogue?’, North Carolina JIL & Comm Reg 32 (2006), pp. 259–309.Google Scholar
Muchlinski, Peter T., ‘Policy Issues’, in Muchlinski, Peter, Ortino, Federico and Schreuer, Christoph (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 3–48.
Muller, Till, ‘Customary Transnational Law: Attacking the Last Resort of State Sovereignty Conference on Democracy and the Transnational Private Sector’, Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 15 (2008), pp. 19–47.Google Scholar
Müllerson, R., ‘On the Nature and Scope of Customary International Law’, Austrian RIEL 2 (1997), pp. 341–360.Google Scholar
Müllerson, R., ‘The Interplay of Objective and Subjective Elements in Customary Law’, in Wellens, K. (ed.), International law: Theory and Practice: Essays in Honour of Eric Suy (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1998), pp. 161–178.
Nollkaemper, A., ‘The Role of Domestic Courts in the Case Law of the International Court of Justice’, Chinese JIL 5 (2006), pp. 269–300.Google Scholar
Norman, George and Trachtman, Joel, ‘The Customary International Law Game’, AJIL 99 (2005), pp. 541–580.Google Scholar
Nowrot, Karsten, ‘Legal Consequences of Globalization: The Status of NGO's Under International Law’, Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 6 (1999), pp. 579–645.Google Scholar
Öberg, M.D., ‘The Legal Effects ofResolutions of the UN Security Council and General Assembly in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ’, EJIL 16 (2006), pp. 879–906.Google Scholar
Ochoa, Christiana, ‘The Individual and Customary International Law Formation’, Virginia JIL 48 (2007), pp. 119–186.Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, ‘The Position of the Individual in International Law’, Cal. W. Int'l.J. 31 (2001), pp. 241–276.Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, ‘The Normative Basis of “Fair and Equitable Treatment”: General International Law on Foreign Investment?’, Archiv des Völkerrechts 1 (2008), pp. 74–105.Google Scholar
Orellana, M.A., ‘International Law on Investment: The Minimum Standard of Treatment (MST)’, TDM 3 (2004).Google Scholar
Paparinskis, Martins, ‘Investment Treaty Interpretation and Customary Investment Law: Preliminary Remarks’, in Brown, Chester and Miles, Kate (eds.), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2011), pp. 65–96.
Paparinskis, Martins, ‘Sources of Law and Arbitral Interpretations of Pari Materia Investment Protection Rules’, in: Fauchald, O. K. and Nollkaemper, A. (eds.), The Practice of International and National Courts and the (De-)Fragmentation of International Law (Oxford; Portland: Hart Publ., 2012), pp. 87–115.
Parra, Antonio R., ‘Principles Governing Foreign Investment, as Reflected in National Investment Codes’, ICSID Rev. 7 (1992), pp. 428–452.Google Scholar
Parra, Antonio R., ‘Applicable Law in Investor-State Arbitration’, in: Rovine, Arthur (ed.), Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation (Leiden: Brill & Nijhoff, 2008), pp. 3–12.
Paulsson, J., ‘Third-World Participation in International Investment Arbitration’, ICSID Rev. 2 (1987), pp. 19–65.Google Scholar
Paulsson, J.Arbitration Without Privity’, ICSID Rev. 10 (1995), pp. 232–257.Google Scholar
Paulsson, J. and Petrochilos, G., ‘Neer-ly Misled?’, ICSID Rev. 22(2) (2007), pp. 242–257.Google Scholar
Paust, Jordan J., ‘The Complex Nature, Sources and Evidences of Customary Human Rights’, Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 25 (1996), pp. 147–164.Google Scholar
Paust, Jordan J., ‘Non-State Actor Participation in International Law and the Pretense of Exclusion’, Virginia JIL 51(4) (2011), pp. 977–1004.Google Scholar
Pellet, Alain, ‘Shaping the Future of International Law: The Role of the World Court in Law-Making’, in Arsanjani, M.H.et al. (eds.), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W. Michael Reisman (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2011), pp. 1065–1083.
Pellet, Alain, ‘Article 38’, in Zimmermann, A.et al. (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 731–870.
Peterson, Niels, ‘Customary Law without Custom? Rules, Principles, and the Role of State Practice in International Norm Creation’, American University ILR 23 (2008), pp. 275–310.Google Scholar
Peterson, Luke Eric, ‘Human Rights and Bilateral investment Treaties. Mapping the Role of Human Rights Law within Investor-State Arbitration’, Rights & Democracy, International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development (2009), pp. 1–45.
Picherack, J. Roman, ‘The Expanding Scope of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Have Recent Tribunals Gone Too Far?’, J. World Invest. & Trade 9(4) (2008), pp. 255–291.Google Scholar
Pilch, Gennady, ‘The Development and Expansion of Bilateral Investment Treaties’, ASIL Proc. 96 (1992).Google Scholar
Porterfield, M.C., ‘An International Common Law of Investor Rights?’, U. Pa. J. Int'l Econ. L. 27 (2006), pp. 79–114.Google Scholar
Porterfield, M.C., ‘State Practice and the (Purported) Obligation under Customary International Law to Provide Compensation for Regulatory Expropriations’, North Carolina JIL & Comm Reg 37 (2011), pp. 159–197.Google Scholar
Reiner, Clara and Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Human Rights and International Investment Arbitration’, in Dupuy, P.M., Francioni, F. and Petersmann, E.U. (eds.), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 82–96.
Reinisch, August, ‘Legality of Expropriations’, in Reinisch, A. (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 171–204.
Reisman, W. Michael and Sloane, Robert D., ‘Indirect Expropriation and its Valuation in the BIT Generation’, British YIL 74 (2003), pp. 115–150.Google Scholar
Reuter, P., ‘La personnalité juridique internationale du Comité international de la Croix-Rouge’, Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet (The Hague: Nijhoff/Geneva : ICRC, 1984), pp. 783–791.
Roach, J.A., ‘Today's Customary International Law of the Sea’, Ocean Development and International Law, 45 (2014), pp. 239–259.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea, ‘Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation’, AJIL 95 (2001), pp. 757–791.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea, ‘Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States’, AJIL 104 (2010), pp. 179–225.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea, ‘Who Killed Article 38(1)(b)? A Reply to Bradley and Gulati’, Duke J Comp & IL 21 (2010), pp. 173–190.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea and Sivakumaran, Sandesh, ‘Lawmaking by Nonstate Actors: Engaging Armed Groups in the Creation of International Humanitarian Law’, Yale JIL 37 (2012), pp. 107–152.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea, ‘Comparative International Law? The Role of National Courts in Creating and Enforcing International Law’, ICLQ 60 (2011), pp. 57–92.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea, ‘Custom, Public Law and the Human Rights Analogy’, EJIL Talks, 14 August 2013.
Robinson, R., ‘Expropriation in the Restatement (Revised)’, AJIL 78 (1984), pp. 176–178.Google Scholar
Root, Elihu, ‘The Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad’, AJIL 4 (1910), pp. 517–528.Google Scholar
Rubins, N., ‘Loewen v. United States: the Burial of an Investor-State Arbitration Claim’, Arb. Int. 21 (2005), pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Ruzza, Alice, ‘Expropriation and Nationalization’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, vol. 9, 2013).
Ryan, Margaret Clare, ‘Glamis Gold, Ltd. v. The United States and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’, McGill LJ 56(4) (2011), pp. 919–958.Google Scholar
Salacuse, Jeswald W., ‘BIT by BIT: The Growth of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Impact on Foreign Investment in Developing Countries’, Int'l L. 24 (1990), pp. 655–675.Google Scholar
Salacuse, Jeswald W., ‘Towards a Global Treaty on Foreign Investment: the Search for a Grand Bargain’, in Horn, N. and Kröll, S. (eds.), Arbitrating Foreign Investment Disputes. Procedural and Substantive Legal Aspects (The Hague: Kluwer International Law, 2004), pp. 51–88.
Salacuse, Jeswald W., ‘The Treatification of International Investment Law: a Victory of Form Over Life? A Crossroads Crossed?’, TDM 3(3) (2006).Google Scholar
Sanan, Manu, ‘International Investment Law; Questions Riddling an Answer’, Trade, law and Development 2(1) (2010), pp. 9–18.Google Scholar
Sands, P., ‘Treaty, Custom and the Cross-fertilization of International Law’, Yale Human Rights & Dev. law journal 88 (1998), pp. 39–60.Google Scholar
Schabas, W., ‘Customary Law or ‘Judge-Made’ Law: Judicial Creativity at the UN Criminal Tribunals’, in Doria, J.et al. (eds.), The Legal Regime of the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Professor Igor Blishchenko (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009), pp. 77–101.
Schachter, O., ‘Compensation for Expropriation’, AJIL 78 (1986), pp. 119–130.Google Scholar
Schachter, O., ‘Entangled Treaty and Custom’, in Dinstein, Yoram (ed.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity: Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne (Drodrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1989), pp. 717–738.
Schachter, O., ‘New Custom: Power, Opinio Juris and Contrary Practice’, in Makarczyk, J (ed.), Theory of International Law at the Threshold of the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Krzysztof Skubieszewski (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996), pp. 531–540.
Schill, Stephan W, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law’, in Hofmann, R. and Tams, C. (eds.), The International Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID): Taking Stock after 40 Years (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2007), pp. 31–72.
Schill, S.W., book review of Tudor's book, EJIL 20 (2009).Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W., ‘From Sources to Discourse: Investment Treaty Jurisprudence as the New Custom?’, in Is There an Evolving Customary International Law on Investment? (London: BIICL, 2011).
Schill, Stephan W., ‘Multilateralization: An Ordering Paradigm for International Investment Law’, in Bungenberg, M., Griebel, J., Hobe, S. and Reinisch, A. (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Munich: C.H. Beck; Oxford: Hart; Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2015), pp. 1817–1838.
Schmid, M., ‘Switzerland’, in Brown, C. (ed.), Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 651–696.
Schreuer, C., ‘Diversity and Harmonization of Treaty Interpretation in Investment Arbitration’, in Fitzmaurice, M., Elias, O. & Merkouris, P. (eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2010), pp. 129–151.
Schwebel, Stephen M., ‘The Story of the U. N.'s Declaration on Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources’, ABAJ 49 (1963), pp. 463–496.Google Scholar
Schwebel, Stephen M., ‘The Effect of Resolutions of the U.N. General Assembly on Customary International Law’, ASIL Proc. 73 (1979), pp. 301–309.Google Scholar
Schwebel, Stephen M., ‘Investor-State Disputes and the Development of International Law: The Influence of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Customary International Law’, ASIL Proc. 98 (2004), pp. 27–30.Google Scholar
Schwebel, Stephen M., ‘The United States 2004 Model Bilateral Investment Treaty: An Exercise in the Regressive Development of International Law’, in Global Reflections on International Law, Commerce and Dispute Resolution, Liber Amicorum in honour of Robert Briner (Paris: ICC Pub. No. 693, 2005), pp. 815–823.
Schwebel, Stephen M., ‘Is Neer far from Fair and Equitable?’, Arb. Int'l 27(4) (2011), pp. 555–561.Google Scholar
Scott, G.L. and Carr, C.L., ‘The International Court of Justice and the Treaty/Custom Dichotomy’, Texas ILJ 16 (1981), pp. 347–359.Google Scholar
Séfériadès, S., ‘Aperçu sur la coutume juridique internationale et notamment sur son fondement’, RGDIP 43 (1936).Google Scholar
Shan, W. and Gallaguer, N., ‘China’, in Brown, C. (ed.), Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).
Sharpe, Jeremy K., ‘Representing a Respondent State in Investment Arbitration’, in Giorgetti, Chiara (ed.), Litigating International Investment Disputes: A Practitioner's Guide (Leiden; Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2014), pp. 41–79.
Simma, B. and Alston, P., ‘The Sources of Human Rights Law: Custom, Jus Cogens, and General Principles’, Australian YIL 12 (1988–1989), pp. 82–108.Google Scholar
Simma, B. and Pulkowski, D., ‘Two Worlds, but Not Apart: International Investment Law and General International Law’, in Bungenberg, M., Griebel, J., Hobe, S. and Reinisch, A. (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Munich: C.H. Beck, Oxford: Hart, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2015), pp. 361–371.
Sinclair, Anthony C., ‘The Substance of Nationality Requirements in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, ICSID Rev. 20(2) (2005), pp. 357–388.Google Scholar
Siwy, A., ‘Investment Arbitration – Indirect Expropriation and the Legitimate Expectations of the Investor’, in Klausegger, Christian, Klein, Peter, et al. (eds.), Austrian Arbitration Yearbook (Vienna: C.H. Beck, Stämpfli & Manz 2007), pp. 355–377.
Skubiszewski, K., ‘Elements of Custom and the Hague Court’, ZaöRV 31 (1971), pp. 810–854.Google Scholar
Skubiszewski, K., ‘Resolutions of the UN General Assembly and Evidence of Custom’ in Essays in Honour of Roberto Ago (vol. 1, Milan: Giuffré, 1987), pp. 503–513.
Sohn, L., ‘The International Law of Human Rights: A Reply to Recent Criticisms’, Hofstra L Rev 9 (1981), pp. 347–356.Google Scholar
Sohn, L., ‘The Law of the Sea: Customary International Law Developments’, American University LR 34 (1985), pp. 271–280.Google Scholar
Sohn, L., ‘“Generally Accepted” International Rules’, Washington L Rev 61 (1986), pp. 1073–1080.Google Scholar
Sornarajah, M., ‘Power and Justice in Foreign Investment Arbitration’, J. Int'l Arb. 14(3) (1997), pp. 103–140.Google Scholar
Sornarajah, M., ‘The Fair and Equitable Standard of Treatment: Whose Fairness? Whose Equity?’, in Ortino, Federicoet al. (eds.), Investment Treaty Law: Current Issues II (London: BIICL, 2007), pp. 167–181.
Sourgens, Frédéric G., ‘Law's Laboratory: Developing International Law on Investment Protection as Common Law’, Northwestern J. Int'l L & Bus 34 (2014), pp. 181–247.Google Scholar
Spiermann, O., ‘Applicable Law’ in: Muchlinski, P., Ortino, F. and Schreuer, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 1373–1390.
Steer, C., ‘Non-State Actors in International Criminal Law’, in d'Aspremont, J. (ed.), Participants in the International Legal System: Multiple Perspectives on Non-State Actors in International Law (London: Routledge, 2011), pp. 295–310.
Stern, Brigitte, ‘Custom at the Heart of International Law’, Duke J Comp & IL 11 (2001), pp. 89–108.Google Scholar
Swaine, Edward T., ‘Rational Custom’, Duke L. J. 52 (2002), pp. 559–627.Google Scholar
Swart, M., ‘Judicial Lawmaking at the ad hoc Tribunals: The Creative Use of the Sources of International Law and “Adventurous Interpretation”’, ZaöRV 70 (2010), pp. 459–486.Google Scholar
Tams, C. and Tzanakopoulos, A., ‘Barcelona Traction: the ICJ as an Agent of Legal Development’, Leiden JIL 23 (2010), pp. 781–800.Google Scholar
Tams, C., ‘The Sources of International Investment Law’, in Gazzini, T. and Brabandere, E. de (eds.), International Investment Law: The Sources of Rights and Obligations (Leiden: Nijhoff & Brill, 2012), pp. 320–331.
Tasioulas, J., ‘In Defence of Relative Normativity: Communitarian Values and the Nicaragua Case’, OJLS 16 (1996), pp. 85–128.Google Scholar
Tasioulas, J., ‘Customary International Law and the Quest for Global Justice’, in Perreau-Saussine, A. and Murphy, J.B. (eds.), The Nature of Customary Law: Philosophical, Historical and Legal Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 307–335.
Thomas, J.C., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment under NAFTA's Investment Chapter; Remarks’, ASIL Proc. 96 (2002).Google Scholar
Thomas, J.C., ‘Reflections on Article 1105 of NAFTA: History, State Practice and the Influence of Commentators’, ICSID Rev. 17(1) (2002), pp. 21–101.Google Scholar
Tomka, Peter, ‘Custom and the International Court of Justice’, Law & Prac Int'l Cts & Tribunals 12(2) (2013), pp. 195–216.Google Scholar
Toral, Mehmet and Schultz, Thomas, ‘The State, a Perpetual Respondent in Investment Arbitration? Some Unorthodox Considerations’, in Waibel, Michael, Kaushal, Asha, Chung, Kyo-Hwa Liz, and Balchin, Claire (eds.), The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions And Reality (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2010), pp. 577–602.
Treves, T., ‘Customary International Law’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, vol. 9, 2012).
Trimble, Phillip R., ‘A Revisionist View of Customary International Law’, UCLA L. Rev. 33 (1986), p. 665.Google Scholar
Tuck, Andrew P., ‘The “Fair And Equitable Treatment” Standard Pursuant to the Investment Provisions of the U.S. Free Trade Agreements with Peru, Colombia and Panama’, L. & Bus. Rev. Am. 16 (2010), pp. 385–408.Google Scholar
Tucker, Edwin W., ‘Has the Individual Become the Subject of International Law?’, U. Cin. L. Rev. 34 (1965), p. 341.Google Scholar
Tunkin, G.I., ‘Remarks on the Juridical Nature of Customary Norms of International Law’, California Law Review 49 (1961), pp. 419–430.Google Scholar
Vandevelde, K.J., ‘The BIT Program: A Fifteen-Year Appraisal’, ASIL Proc. 86 (1992), pp. 532–540.Google Scholar
Vandevelde, K.J., ‘U.S. Bilateral Investment Treaties: The Second Wave’, Michigan JIL 14 (1993), pp. 621–704.Google Scholar
Vandevelde, K.J., ‘A Comparison of the 2004 and 1994 US Model BITs’, Yb Int'l Invest. L. & Pol. 1 (2008–2009), p. 283.Google Scholar
Vandevelde, K.J., ‘Model Bilateral Investment Treaties: the Way Forward’, Sw. J. Int'l L. 18 (2011), pp. 307–314.Google Scholar
Vasciannie, Stephen, ‘The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law and Practice’, British YIL 70 (1999), pp. 99–164.Google Scholar
Vazquez, Carlos M., ‘Direct vs. Indirect Obligations of Corporations Under International Law’, Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 43 (2005), pp. 927–959.Google Scholar
Verdier, Pierre-Hugues, ‘Cooperative States: International Relations, State Responsibility and the Problem of Custom’, Virginia JIL 42 (2002), pp. 839–867.Google Scholar
Verdier, P. -H. and Voeten, E., ‘Precedent, Compliance, and Change in Customary International Law: An Explanatory Theory’, AJIL 108 (2014), pp. 389–434.Google Scholar
Vicuña, F. Orrego, ‘Changing Approaches to the Nationality of Claims in the Context of Diplomatic Protection and International Dispute Settlement’, in Schlemmer-Schulte, S. and Tung, K.-Y. (eds.) Liber amicorum Ibrahim F.I. Shihata: International Finance and Development Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001), pp. 503–525.
Vicuña, F. Orrego, ‘Customary International Law in a Global Community: Tailor Made?’, Estudios Internacionales 148 (2005), pp. 21–38.Google Scholar
Virally, M., ‘The Sources of International Law’, in Sørensen, M. (ed.), Manual of Public International Law (London, Melbourne, Toronto, New York: Macmillan, 1968), pp. 116–174.
Walden, Raphael M., ‘The Subjective Element in the Formation of Customary International Law’, Israel L. Rev. 12 (1977), pp. 344–364.Google Scholar
Weil, Prosper, ‘Toward Relative Normativity in International Law’, AJIL 77 (1983), pp. 413–432.Google Scholar
Weiler, T., ‘NAFTA Investment Arbitration and the Growth of International Economic Law’, Bus. L. Int'l 2 (2002), pp. 405–435.Google Scholar
Weiler, Todd, ‘Methanex Corp. v. U. S. A:Turning the Page on NAFTA Chapter Eleven?’, J. World Invest. & Trade 6(6) (2005), p. 903.Google Scholar
Weiler, T. & Laird, I., ‘Standards of Treatment’, in Muchlinski, Peter, Ortino, Federico and Schreuer, Christoph (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 259–304.
Weiler, Todd, ‘An Historical Analysis of the Function of the Minimum Standard of Treatment in International Investment Law’, in Weiler, Todd and Baetens, Freya (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: In Memoriam Thomas Wälde (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2011).
Weisburd, Arthur Mark, ‘Customary International Law: The Problem of Treaties’, Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 21 (1988), p. 1.Google Scholar
Westberg, Arthur Mark, ‘Compensation in Cases of Expropriation and Nationalization: Awards of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal’, ICSID Rev. 5 (1990), pp. 256–291.Google Scholar
Wisner, R. and Gallus, N., ‘Nationality Requirements in Investor-State Arbitration’, J. World Invest. & Trade 5 (2004), pp. 927–945.Google Scholar
Wolfke, K., ‘Some Persistent Controversies Regarding Customary International Law’, NYBIL 24 (1993), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Wood, Michael, ‘Teachings of the Most Highly Qualified Publicists (Art. 38 (1)ICJ Statute)’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, vol. 9, 2012).
Wood, Michael and Sender, Omri, ‘State Practice’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).
Wouters, J. and Ryngaert, C., ‘Impact on the Process of the Formation of Customary International Law’, in Kamminga, M. & Scheinin, M. (eds.), The Impact of Human Rights Law on General International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 111–131.
Wuerth, Ingrid, ‘International Law in Domestic Courts and the Jurisdictional Immunities of the State Case’, Melbourne JIL 13 (2012), pp. 819–837.Google Scholar
Yannaca-Small, Katia, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Recent Developments’, in Reinisch, A. (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 111–130.
Yasuaki, O., ‘Is the International Court of Justice an Emperor Without Clothes?’, International Legal Theory 81 (2002), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Zamora, Stephen, ‘Is there Customary International Economic Law?’, German YIL 32 (1989), pp. 9–42.Google Scholar
Zedalis, R.J., ‘Claims by Individuals in International Economic Law: NAFTA Developments’, American Rev. Int'l Arb. 7(2) (1996), pp. 115–147.Google Scholar
Zemanek, K., ‘What is ‘State Practice’ and who Makes It?’ in Beyerlin, U.et al. (eds.), Festschrift für Rudolf Bernhardt (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1995), pp. 289–306.
Abi-Saab, Georges, ‘Cours général de droit international public’, Rec. des cours, 207 (1987-VII), pp. 9–463.Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E., ‘The Public International Law Regime Governing International Investment’, Rec. des cours, 344 (2009), pp. 193–452.Google Scholar
Barberis, J.A., ‘Nouvelles questions concernant la personnalité juridique internationale’, Rec. des cours, 179 (1983-I), pp. 145–304.Google Scholar
Baxter, R., ‘Treaties and Custom’, Rec. des cours, 129 (1970), pp. 25–106.Google Scholar
Bedjaoui, Mohammed, ‘Problèmes récents de succession d’États dans les États nouveaux’, Rec. des cours, 130 (1970–II), pp. 455–586.Google Scholar
Cahier, Philippe, ‘Changement et continuité du droit international: Cours général de droit international public’, Rec. des cours, 195 (1985-VI), pp. 9–374.Google Scholar
Conforti, Benedetto, ‘Cours général de droit international public’, Rec. des cours, 212 (1988-V), pp. 9–210.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y., ‘The Interaction between Customary International Law and Treaties’, Rec. des cours, 322 (2006), pp. 243–428.Google Scholar
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘L'unité de l'ordre juridique international’, Rec. des cours, 297 (2002), pp. 9–496.Google Scholar
Ferrari-Bravo, L., ‘Méthodes de recherche de la coutume internationale dans la pratique des États’, Rec. des cours, 192 (1985), pp. 233–330.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G., ‘The General Principles of International Law’, Rec. des cours, 92 (1957), pp. 1–228.Google Scholar
Franck, T.M., ‘Fairness in the International Legal and Institutional System: General Course on Public International Law’, Rec. des cours 240 (1993), pp. 9–498.Google Scholar
Henkin, L., ‘International Law: Politics, Values and Function: General Course on Public International Law’, Rec. des cours, 216 (1989), pp. 9–416.Google Scholar
Jennings, R., ‘General Course on Principles of International Law’, Rec. des cours, 121 (1967-II), pp. 323–606.Google Scholar
Jiménez de Aréchaga, E., ‘General Course in Public International Law’, Rec. des cours, 159 (1978), pp. 1–343.Google Scholar
Juillard, Patrick, ‘L’évolution des sources du droit des investissements’, Rec. des cours, 250 (1994), pp. 9–216.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H., ‘Théorie du droit international public’, Rec. des cours, 84 (1953-III), pp. 1–204.Google Scholar
Leben, Ch., ‘La théorie du contrat d’État et l’évolution du droit international des investissements’, Rec. des cours, 302 (2003), pp. 197–386.Google Scholar
Makonnen, Yilma, ‘State Succession in Africa: Selected Problems’, Rec. des cours, 200 (1986–V), pp. 93–234.Google Scholar
Mendelson, Maurice H., ‘The Formation of Customary International Law’, Rec. des cours, 192 (1985), pp. 155–410.Google Scholar
Schachter, O., ‘International Law in Theory and Practice: General Course in Public International Law’, Rec. des cours, 178 (1982), pp. 9–395.Google Scholar
Sørensen, M., ‘Principes de droit international public’, Rec. des cours, 101 (1960-III), pp. 1–254.Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C., ‘Obligations Arising for States Without or Against Their Will’, Rec. des cours, 241 (1993), pp. 195–374.Google Scholar
Treves, T., ‘Codification du droit international et pratique des Etats dans le droit de la mer’, Rec. des cours 223 (1990), pp. 9–302.Google Scholar
Waldock, H., ‘General Course on Public International Law’, Rec. des cours 106 (1962), pp. 1–252.Google Scholar
Weil, Prosper, ‘Le droit international en quête de son identité, Cours général de droit international public’, Rec. des cours, 237 (1992-VI), pp. 9–370.Google Scholar
Arajärvi, N., ‘Changing Customary International Law and the Fluid Nature of Opinio Juris’, paper presented at the conference ‘The Role of Opinio Juris in Customary International Law’, Duke-Geneva Institute in Transnational Law, Geneva, 2013.
Bradley, Curtis A., ‘The Chronological Paradox, State Preferences, and Opinio Juris’, paper presented at the conference ‘The Role of Opinio Juris in Customary International Law’, Duke-Geneva Institute in Transnational Law, Geneva, 2013.
Canadian Center for Policy Alternatives, ‘NAFTA Chapter 11 Investor-States Disputes’ (2010).
Crawford, James, ‘The Identification and Development of Customary International Law’, ILA British Branch Conference, 2014.
Dumberry, Patrick, Rules of Customary International Law in the Field of International Investment Law, SSHRC Research Project, 2012–2014.
Gulati, Mitu, ‘How the Courts Find International Custom?’, paper presented at the conference ‘The Role of Opinio Juris in Customary International Law’, Duke-Geneva Institute in Transnational Law, Geneva, 2013.
Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘Customary International Law Needs both Opinio and Usus’, paper presented at the conference ‘The Role of Opinio Juris in Customary International Law’, Duke-Geneva Institute in Transnational Law, Geneva, 2013.
Kelly, J. Patrick, ‘Opinio Juris in Historical Context’, paper presented at the conference ‘The Role of Opinio Juris in Customary International Law’, Duke-Geneva Institute in Transnational Law, Geneva, 2013.
Kuprieieva, Anna, ‘Regulatory Freedom and Indirect Expropriation: Seeking Compatibility with Sustainable Development In New Generation of Bilateral Investment Treaties’, Master of Laws Thesis, University of Ottawa, 2015.
Lepard, Brian D., ‘The Necessity of opinio juris in the Formation of Customary International Law’, paper presented at the conference ‘The Role of Opinio Juris in Customary International Law’, Duke-Geneva Institute in Transnational Law, Geneva, 2013.
Mendelson, Maurice, ‘Does Customary International Law Require Opinio Juris?, paper presented at the conference ‘The Role of Opinio Juris in Customary International Law’, Duke-Geneva Institute in Transnational Law, Geneva, 2013.
Merkouris, Panagiotis, Article 31(3)(c) of the VCLT and the Principle of Systemic Integration, PhD. thesis, Queen Mary University of London (2010).
Neff, Stephen C., ‘Opinio Juris: Three Concepts Chasing a Label’, paper presented at the conference ‘The Role of Opinio Juris in Customary International Law’, Duke-Geneva Institute in Transnational Law, Geneva, 2013.
Pauwelyn, J., ‘Treaty Regimes and opinio juris’, paper presented at the conference ‘The Role of Opinio Juris in Customary International Law’, Duke-Geneva Institute in Transnational Law, Geneva, 2013.
Peterson, Luke E. and Gray, Kevin, ‘International Human Rights in Bilateral Investment Treaties and Investment Treaty Arbitration’, Working Paper for the Swiss Ministry for Foreign Affairs (2003).
Tasioulas, John, ‘Custom and Consent’, paper presented at the conference ‘The Role of Opinio Juris in Customary International Law’, Duke-Geneva Institute in Transnational Law, Geneva, 2013.
Trachtman, Joel P., ‘The Obsolescence of Customary International Law’, SSRN Working Paper (2014).
Weisburd, Arthur Mark, ‘The International Court of Justice and the Concept of State Practice’, UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1282684.
Wuerth, Ingrid, ‘National Court Decisions and Opinio Juris’, paper presented at the conference ‘The Role of Opinio Juris in Customary International Law’, Duke-Geneva Institute in Transnational Law, Geneva, 2013.
The Formation and Identification of Rules of Customary International Law in International Investment LawDumberry, Patrick
Static and Evolutive Treaty Interpretation: A Functional ReconstructionDjeffal, Christian
Civil Liability in Europe for Terrorism-Related RiskBergkamp, Lucas, Faure, Michael, Hinteregger, Monika and Philipsen, Niels
Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory AutonomyHenckels, Caroline
International Law and Governance of Natural Resources in Conflict and Post-Conflict SituationsJong, Daniëlla Dam-de
Proof of Causation in Tort LawSteel, Sandy
Taking Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Seriously in International Criminal LawSchmid, Evelyne
Climate Change Litigation: Regulatory Pathways to Cleaner Energy?Peel, Jacqueline and Osofsky, Hari
Mestizo International Law: A global intellectual history 1842–1933Lorca, Arnulf Becker
Sugar and the Making of International Trade LawFakhri, Michael
Strategically-created Treaty Conflicts and the Politics of International LawRanganathan, Surabhi
Investment Treaty Arbitration as Public International Law: Procedural Aspects and ImplicationsBrabandere, Eric De
The New Entrants Problem in International Fisheries LawSerdy, Andrew
Substantive Protection under Investment Treaties: A Legal and Economic AnalysisBonnitcha, Jonathan
Popular Governance of Post-Conflict Reconstruction: The Role of International LawSaul, Matthew
Evolution of International Environmental Regimes: The Case of Climate ChangeSchiele, Simone
Judges, Law and War: The Judicial Development of International Humanitarian LawDarcy, Shane
Religious Offence and Human Rights: The Implications of Defamation of ReligionsLanger, Lorenz
Forum Shopping in International Adjudication: The Role of Preliminary ObjectionsRibeiro Salles, Luiz Eduardo
International Law and the ArcticByers, Michael
Cooperation in the Law of Transboundary Water ResourcesLeb, Christina
Underwater Cultural Heritage and International LawDromgoole, Sarah
State Responsibility: The General PartCrawford, James
The Origins of International Investment LawMiles, Kate
The Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal CourtMcDougall, Carrie
Crimes against Peace and International LawSellars, Kirsten
The Non-Legal in International LawJohns, Fleur
Armed Conflict and Displacement: The Protection of Refugees and Displaced Persons under International Humanitarian LawJacques, Mélanie
Foreign Investment and the Environment in International LawViñuales, Jorge
The Human Rights Treaty Obligations of PeacekeepersLarsen, Kjetil
Cyberwarfare and the Laws of WarDinniss, Heather Harrison
The Right to Reparation in International Law for Victims of Armed ConflictEvans, Christine
Global Public Interest in International Investment LawKulick, Andreas
State Immunity in International LawYang, Xiaodong
Reparations and Victim Support in the International Criminal CourtMcCarthy, Conor
Reducing Genocide to Law: Definition, Meaning, and the Ultimate CrimeAkhavan, Payam
Decolonizing International Law: Development, Economic Growth and the Politics of UniversalityPahuja, Sundhya
Complicity and the Law of State ResponsibilityAust, Helmut Philipp
State Control over Private Military and Security Companies in Armed ConflictTonkin, Hannah
‘Fair and Equitable Treatment'in International Investment LawKläger, Roland
The UN and Human Rights: Who Guards the Guardians?Verdirame, Guglielmo
Sovereign Defaults before International Courts and TribunalsWaibel, Michael
Making the Law of the Sea: A Study in the Development of International LawHarrison, James
Science and the Precautionary Principle in International Courts and Tribunals: Expert Evidence, Burden of Proof and FinalityFoster, Caroline E.
Transition from Illegal Regimes in International LawRonen, Yaël
Access to Asylum: International Refugee Law and the Globalisation of Migration ControlGammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas
Trading Fish, Saving Fish: The Interaction between Regimes in International LawYoung, Margaret
The Individual in the International Legal System: Continuity and Change in International LawParlett, Kate
The Participation of States in International Organisations: The Role of Human Rights and DemocracyDuxbury, Alison
‘Armed Attack’ and Article 51 of the UN Charter: Evolutions in Customary Law and PracticeRuys, Tom
Science and Risk Regulation in International LawPeel, Jacqueline
Theatre of the Rule of Law: Transnational Legal Intervention in Theory and PracticeHumphreys, Stephen
The Public International Law Theory of Hans Kelsen: Believing in Universal LawBernstorff, Jochen von
Vicarious Liability in Tort: A Comparative PerspectiveGiliker, Paula
Legal Personality in International LawPortmann, Roland
Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional AccountBrunnée, Jutta and Toope, Stephen J.
The Concept of Non-International Armed Conflict in International Humanitarian LawCullen, Anthony
The Challenge of Child Labour in International LawHumbert, Franziska
Shipping Interdiction and the Law of the SeaGuilfoyle, Douglas
International Courts and Environmental ProtectionStephens, Tim
Legal Principles in WTO DisputesMitchell, Andrew D.
War Crimes in Internal Armed ConflictsHaye, Eve La
Humanitarian OccupationFox, Gregory H.
The International Law of Environmental Impact Assessment: Process, Substance and IntegrationCraik, Neil
The Law and Practice of International Territorial Administration: Versailles to Iraq and BeyondStahn, Carsten
Cultural Products and the World Trade OrganizationVoon, Tania
United Nations Sanctions and the Rule of LawFarrall, Jeremy
National Law in WTO Law: Effectiveness and Good Governance in the World Trading SystemBhuiyan, Sharif
The Threat of Force in International LawStürchler, Nikolas
Indigenous Rights and United Nations StandardsXanthaki, Alexandra
International Refugee Law and Socio-Economic RightsFoster, Michelle
The Protection of Cultural Property in Armed ConflictO'Keefe, Roger
Interpretation and Revision of International Boundary DecisionsKaikobad, Kaiyan Homi
Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility: Limitations and Opportunities in International LawZerk, Jennifer A.
Judiciaries within Europe: A Comparative ReviewBell, John
Law in Times of Crisis: Emergency Powers in Theory and PracticeGross, Oren and Aoláin, Fionnuala Ní
Vessel-Source Marine Pollution:The Law and Politics of International RegulationTan, Alan
Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International LawTams, Christian J.
Non-Governmental Organisations in International LawLindblom, Anna-Karin
Democracy, Minorities and International LawWheatley, Steven
Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity and the International Law RegimeCryer, Robert
Compensation for Personal Injury in English, German and Italian Law: A Comparative OutlineMarkesinis, Basil, Coester, Michael, Alpa, Guido, Ullstein, Augustus
Dispute Settlement in the UN Convention on the Law of the SeaKlein, Natalie
The International Protection of Internally Displaced PersonsPhuong, Catherine
Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International LawAnghie, Antony
Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by StatesGardam, Judith
International Legal Argument in the Permanent Court of International Justice: The Rise of the International JudiciarySpiermann, Ole
Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal OrderSimpson, Gerry
Local Remedies in International LawAmerasinghe, C. F.
Reading Humanitarian Intervention:Human Rights and the Use of Force in International LawOrford, Anne
Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International LawPauwelyn, Joost
Transboundary Damage in International LawXue, Hanqin
European Criminal Procedures Edited by Delmas-Marty, Mireille and Spencer, John
The Accountability of Armed Opposition Groups in International LawZegveld, Liesbeth
Sharing Transboundary Resources: International Law and Optimal Resource UseBenvenisti, Eyal
International Human Rights and Humanitarian LawProvost, René
Remedies Against International OrganisationsWellens, Karel
Diversity and Self-Determination in International LawKnop, Karen
The Law of Internal Armed ConflictMoir, Lindsay
International Commercial Arbitration and African States: Practice, Participation and Institutional DevelopmentAsouzu, Amazu A.
The Enforceability of Promises in European Contract LawGordley, James
International Law in AntiquityBederman, David J.
Money Laundering: A New International Law Enforcement ModelStessens, Guy
Good Faith in European Contract LawZimmermann, Reinhard and Whittaker, Simon
On Civil ProcedureJolowicz, J. A.
Trusts: A Comparative StudyLupoi, Maurizio
The Right to Property in Commonwealth ConstitutionsAllen, Tom
International Organizations Before National CourtsReinisch, August
The Changing International Law of High Seas FisheriesVicuña, Francisco Orrego
Trade and the Environment: A Comparative Study of EC and US LawGeradin, Damien
Unjust Enrichment: A Study of Private Law and Public ValuesDagan, Hanoch
Religious Liberty and International Law in EuropeEvans, Malcolm D.
Ethics and Authority in International LawRubin, Alfred P.
Sovereignty Over Natural Resources: Balancing Rights and DutiesSchrijver, Nico
The Polar Regions and the Development of International LawRothwell, Donald R.
Fragmentation and the International Relations of Micro-States: Self-determination and StatehoodDuursma, Jorri
Principles of the Institutional Law of International OrganizationsAmerasinghe, C. F.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Patrick Dumberry, University of Ottawa
  • Book: The Formation and Identification of Rules of Customary International Law in International Investment Law
  • Online publication: 05 May 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316481479.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Patrick Dumberry, University of Ottawa
  • Book: The Formation and Identification of Rules of Customary International Law in International Investment Law
  • Online publication: 05 May 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316481479.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Patrick Dumberry, University of Ottawa
  • Book: The Formation and Identification of Rules of Customary International Law in International Investment Law
  • Online publication: 05 May 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316481479.010
Available formats
×