Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T23:55:29.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Controlling interference: licensing and receivers

from Part III - Sharing and other emerging approaches to spectrum management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Martin Cave
Affiliation:
Imperial College London and the Competition Commission
William Webb
Affiliation:
Weightless SIG
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In previous chapters we have seen how one of the key functions of spectrum management is the control of interference. In Chapter 2 we looked at how interference occurred and towards the end of the chapter noted the difficulties in optimally regulating interference levels.

In this chapter we build upon an understanding of interference to look at how licenses might be structured so that they better define and control interference levels – enabling market mechanisms such as change of use without compromising nearby users of spectrum. This naturally leads on to looking at whether the performance of receivers in an interference environment requires greater specification.

Spectrum usage rights

Introduction

In a world where the use of a band of spectrum is unchanging, the regulator can determine various band parameters such as transmission levels and guard bands based on these specific uses and technologies. This is the approach that has been adopted for over a century. However, with increasing change of use of spectrum, e.g. from broadcasting to mobile broadband, this assumption is no longer valid. When the use of the band changes, the interference levels and patterns can change massively, potentially causing issues to existing users. If these existing users do not have some level of certainty about the interference they may suffer in the future (in some cases 10–20 years hence) then they may not invest in expensive infrastructure. Therefore, some solution to this problem that allows for change of use of spectrum but also provides certainty of interference levels is needed.

The actual interference suffered by a license holder will depend on the power emitted by the neighboring base station and the distance from that base station. A network of a relatively small number of high-power sites, such as that used by broadcast systems, would result in relatively few areas where interference might be experienced, but these areas would be relatively large. Conversely, a network of many medium- or low-powered sites, such as used by a cellular system, would result in many more areas where interference might occur, but these areas would be smaller.

Type
Chapter
Information
Spectrum Management
Using the Airwaves for Maximum Social and Economic Benefit
, pp. 192 - 204
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] See http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/sur.
[2] Vries, J. and Weisner, P. J., “Unlocking Spectrum Value through Improved Allocation, Assignment, and Adjudication of Spectrum Rights,” the Hamilton Project, discussion paper, 2014-1.
[3] See http://transition.fcc.gov/bureaus/oet/receiver-workshop1/Session4/SESSION-4-6-Schaubach-WCS.pdf.
[4] See Comsearch, “Estimating the Required Separation Distances to Avoid Interference from Part 90 3650–3700 MHz Band Transmitters into C-Band Earth Stations,” at www.comsearch.com/files/TP-102516-EN_LR_3650-3700_MHz_Interference_into_CBand_ES.pdf.
[5] T-Mobile, “AWS-3 to AWS-1 Interference,” at http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=6520035723.
[6] See http://transition.fcc.gov/bureaus/oet/receiver-workshop1/Session4/Session-4-4-NAB-Victor-Tawil.pdf.
[7] Ofcom, “Notice of Coordination Procedure Required under Spectrum Access Licences for the 2.6 GHz Band: Coordination with Aeronautical Radionavigation Radar in the 2.7 GHz Band” (March 2013).
[8] See http://transition.fcc.gov/pshs/public-safety-spectrum/800-MHz.
[9] See www.fcc.gov/document/spokesperson-statement-ntia-letter-lightsquared-and-gps.
[10] Ofcom, “Study of Current and Future Receiver Performance,” at http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/technology-research/research/spectrum-liberalisation/receiver.
[11] See http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/spectrum/UHF700MHz/DTT_RX_study_stakeholder_presentation_20131125_released_20131122.pdf.
[12] See RSPG13–511 Rev 1.
[13] See RSPG13–527 Rev 1 final.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×