Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T07:23:27.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

34 - The Colombian peace process (Law 975 of 2005) and the ICC’s principle of complementarity

from PART VI - Complementarity in practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2014

Carsten Stahn
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Mohamed M. El Zeidy
Affiliation:
International Criminal Court
Get access

Summary

This chapter assesses the Colombian peace process, as regulated by Law 975 of 2005 (Ley de Justicia y Paz), against Colombia's obligations under Article 17 of the Rome Statute. After some preliminary remarks (Section 1), it gives an overview of the process under Law 975, taking into account not only the relevant norms, but, especially, the practice (Section 2). In the third section, the complementarity test of Article 17 of the Rome Statute is systematically analysed and applied to the Colombian situation (Section 3). First, the object of reference of this test, in particular the distinction between situation and case, will be examined. Then, the actual complementarity test will be analysed – distinguishing between complementarity stricto sensu on the one hand and an additional gravity threshold on the other.

Preliminary remarks

The so-called ‘Justice and Peace Law’ (Ley de Justicia y Paz) of 25 July 2005 (‘Law 975’) continues a Colombian policy of restorative justice which goes back to the 1980s and pursues the objective of disarming, demobilizing and reintegrating irregular armed groups (‘Grupos Armados Organizados al Margen de la Ley’, i.e. ‘groups operating outside the law’, ‘GAOML’). While the earlier peace processes only referred to ‘left-wing’ insurgents, Law 975 also, or even predominantly, covers ‘right-wing’ paramilitary groups. The Law provides, as the central concession to the irregular groups, for a conversion of the ‘normal’ punishment into a so-called ‘alternative sentence’ (‘pena alternativa’) of a minimum of five and a maximum of eight years for the crimes committed during membership of the irregular group (Articles 3, 29). Thus, while Law 975 does not offer a full exemption from punishment, its mitigation is considerable compared with the normal punishment for these kind of crimes under the ordinary Colombian criminal law. Clearly, this considerable mitigation requires something in return from the potential beneficiary and that is his contribution to ‘truth, justice and reparation’ (Article 1), in particular by providing full information about the crimes committed by him and/or his group (Article 3). The Constitutional Court has reinforced this obligation. Against this background Law 975 can be qualified as a law of a conditionally reduced penalty.

Type
Chapter
Information
The International Criminal Court and Complementarity
From Theory to Practice
, pp. 1071 - 1096
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The Colombian Peace Process and the Principle of Complementarity of the International Criminal Court – An Inductive Approach (2010)
It started in March 1981 with a conditional amnesty for political and related crimes for guerrilla groups (Ley 37 de 1981); for a good summary in English see Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (‘IACHR’), Report on the Demobilization Process in Colombia, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.120, Doc. 60, 13 December 2004, 53 ff.
Uprimny, R. (ed.), Justicia Transicional sin Transición (2006), 201, 211
Bergsmo, M. and Kalmanovitz, P. (eds.), Law and Peace Negotiations (2009), 7, 15
Ambos, K., Large, J. and Wierda, M. (eds.), Building a Future on Peace and Justice (2009), 19–103, 28 ff.
Stigen, J., The Relationship between the International Criminal Court and National Jurisdictions (2008), 245
Ambos, K., Internationales Strafrecht (2008), §8 mn. 20a ff.
Bohlander, M. (ed.), International Criminal Justice: A Critical Analysis of Institutions and Procedures (2007)
Rodman, K., ‘Is Peace in the Interest of Justice? The Case for Broad Prosecutorial Discretion at the International Criminal Court’, (2009)
Almqvist, J. and Espósito, C. (eds.), Justicia Transicional en Iberoamérica (2009), 286 ff.
Ibid. See also J. K. Kleffner, Complementarity in the Rome Statute and National Criminal Jurisdictions (2008), 199
War Crimes Research Office (‘WCRO’), The Relevance of ‘a Situation’ to the Admissibility and Selection of Cases before the International Criminal Court (2009), 21–2
Stegmiller, I., The Pre-Investigation Stage of the ICC: Criteria for Situation Selection (2011)
McAuliffe deGuzman, M., ‘Gravity and the Legitimacy of the ICC’ (2009) 32 Fordham Int'l L.J. 1400, 1451Google Scholar
Stahn, C. and Sluiter, G. (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (2009), 209, 214
Stahn, C. and van den Herik, L. (eds.), Future Perspectives in International Criminal Justice (2010), 227, 229 ff.
Schabas, W., An Introduction to the International Criminal Court (2007), 190
Bergsmo, M. (ed.), Criteria for Prioritizing and Selecting Core International Crimes Cases (2009)
Seils, was the former Head of OTP's Situation Analysis Section (August 2004–October 2008) and mainly responsible, inter alia, for the OTP selection paper which does not contain this criterion (ICC-OTP, supra note 62, para. 12)
Schabas, W., ‘Prosecutorial Discretion v. Judicial Activism at the International Criminal Court’, (2008) 6 JICJ731Google Scholar
The Gravity Threshold of the ICC (2008)
Otero, D., Las Cifras del Conflicto Colombiano (2007)
Amnesty International, ‘Leave us in Peace’: Targeting Civilians in Colombia´s Internal Armed Conflict (2008), 38
Meißner, J., Die Zusammenarbeit mit dem Internationalen Strafgerichtshof nach dem Römischen Statut (2003), 70–1;
Cárdenas, C., Die Zulässigkeitsprüfung vor dem Internationalen Strafgerichtshof (2005)
Stegmiller, I., ‘Complementarity Thoughts’, (2010) 21(1) CLF.
El Zeidy, M., The Principle of Complementarity in International Criminal Law: Origin, Development and Practice (2008)
Olásolo, H., The Triggering Procedure of the International Criminal Court (2005), 149–50, 166
Stahn, C., ‘The Geometry of Transitional Justice: Choices of Institutional Design’, (2005) 3 JICJ 695, 712Google Scholar
Robinson, D., ‘Serving the Interests of Justice: Amnesties, Truth Commissions and the International Criminal Court’, (2003) 14 EJIL 500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morel, S., La Mise en œuvre du Principe de Complémentarité par la Cour Pénale Internationale le Case Particulier des Amnisties (2005), 116
Razesberger, F., The ICC: The Principle of Complementarity (2006)
Cassese, A. et al. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the ICC: a Commentary (2002), Vol. I, 667, at 677
Sadat, L. and Scharf, M. (eds.), The Theory and Practice of International Criminal Law. Essays in Honour of M. Cherif Bassiouni (2008)
Lee, R. S. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute. Issues, Negotiations, Results (1999), 41, 48
Burke-White, W., ‘Complementarity in Practice: The International Criminal Court as Part of a System of Multi-level Global Governance in the Democratic Republic of Congo’, (2005) 18 LJIL 559, 579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, M. Villegas (ed.), Jueces sin Estado, La Justicia Colombiana en Zonas de Conflicto Armado (2008), 168

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×