Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-08T18:23:07.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The methodology of judicial boundary delimitation

from PART III - Delimitation based on equity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Thomas Cottier
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Competing schools of jurisprudence

A. Introduction

The essence and virtue of any legal concept and process, consisting of a principled and reasoned approach to problems of life, is no different in maritime boundary delimitation and the allocation of marine space from any other field of the law. In Chapter 10, a principled approach was considered to be an essential requirement for satisfying legitimate expectations, political predictability and acceptance of results. Abstract approaches by the courts to this effect have evolved over the last fifty years through a pendulum development and a process of trial and error – away from an emphasis on rule-orientation and towards result-orientation, then backagain to delimitation primarily based on equitable principles, and finally towards a combination of a result-oriented and a rule-oriented approach emphasizing the method of equidistance and taking into account special circumstances and proportionality on the basis of a three-step approach with equitable principles largely operating in the background. Whatever the practical differences of these various approaches and the submitted return to an approach based upon equitable principles in this book, there is no disagreement that delimitation based upon equity pursues the ambition of being a legal and rule-based concept, relying upon principles and relevant circumstances, the specification of which should result in an overall equitable apportionment.Whether delimitation based on the rule of equity is in fact a legal operation, or one of ex aequo et bono settlement in disguise, much depends on the methodology and the consistency with which it is applied in a particular case. By and large, the results of cases so far have implicitly complied with the requirements of equitable solutions under the standards of political predictability and legitimate expectations, and the compromises achieved have been equitable in that sense. They were all politically accepted. But, all too often, they have not been achieved in a sufficiently principled manner.

Type
Chapter
Information
Equitable Principles of Maritime Boundary Delimitation
The Quest for Distributive Justice in International Law
, pp. 602 - 644
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×