Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:42:02.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Lung volume reduction surgery for the treatment of advanced emphysema

from Section III - Benign conditions of the lung

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Nathaniel Marchetti
Affiliation:
Temple University School of Medicine
Gerard J. Criner
Affiliation:
Temple University School of Medicine
Marco Scarci
Affiliation:
University College London Hospital
Aman Coonar
Affiliation:
Papworth Hospital
Tom Routledge
Affiliation:
Guy’s Hospital
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common worldwide problem associated with morbidity and mortality that, unlike other diseases, is increasing. Recently, COPD has become the third leading cause of death in the United States, an event that was not predicted to occur until the year 2020. Therapy for COPD focuses on smoking cessation, bronchodilators, oxygen therapy, pulmonary rehabilitation, lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), transplantation and treatment of comorbidities. While many of these interventions may improve dyspnea and quality of life, only oxygen supplementation in those with hypoxemia at rest, smoking cessation and LVRS have been associated with improved mortality in COPD. This chapter will review the role of LVRS in the treatment of patients with advanced COPD, and also examine the current status of minimally invasive bronchoscopic techniques for lung reduction that are approved overseas but are currently under study in the United States.

Rationale for lung reduction in COPD

COPD is an inflammatory disease that leads to airflow obstruction secondary to a combination of airway disease and emphysema, primarily in the distal small airways of the lung. The small airways become narrowed due to airway inflammation, smooth muscle hypertrophy, peribronchial fibrosis and mucus plugging. In emphysema, the destruction of alveolar walls leads to a loss of tethering of distal small airways, predisposing the airway to expiratory collapse. Most individuals with COPD will have a mixture of small airways obstruction and emphysema, but some will have a predominance of one abnormality or the other. Lung emptying is determined by the expiratory time constant, which is the product of airway resistance and lung compliance. Because subjects with emphysema have both increased lung compliance and airways resistance, they have impaired lung emptying and are prone to hyperinflation. As emphysema progresses, total lung capacity (TLC) and residual volume (RV) both increase as a result of decreased lung compliance and unopposed chest wall recoil causing hyperinflation and gas trapping, respectively. During exertion, the respiratory rate increases, reducing the time available for lung emptying, and the end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) rises even further, leading to dynamic hyperinflation. Figure 8.1 demonstrates the rise in lung volumes that occurs during exercise in severe COPD. EELV rises during exercise, thereby limiting the normal increase in tidal volume that occurs during exercise.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kochanek, KD, Xu, J, Murphy, SL, et al. Deaths: Preliminary data for 2009. National Vital Statistics Reports 2011; 59(4): 1–51.Google Scholar
2 Vestbo, J, Hurd, SS, Agusti, AG, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012.
3 Continuous or nocturnal oxygen therapy in hypoxemic chronic obstructive lung disease: a clinical trial. nocturnal oxygen therapy trial group. Ann Intern Med 1980; 93(3):391–8.
4 Long term domiciliary oxygen therapy in chronic hypoxic cor pulmonale complicating chronic bronchitis and emphysema. Report of the Medical Research Council Working Party. Lancet 1981; 1(8222):681–6.
5 Anthonisen, NR, Skeans, MA, Wise, RA, et al. The effects of a smoking cessation intervention on 14.5-year mortality: A randomized clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142(4):233–9.Google Scholar
6 Naunheim, KS, Wood, DE, Mohsenifar, Z, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients receiving lung-volume-reduction surgery versus medical therapy for severe emphysema by the national emphysema treatment trial research group. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82(2):431–43.Google Scholar
7 Fishman, A, Martinez, F, Naunheim, K, et al. A randomized trial comparing lung-volume-reduction surgery with medical therapy for severe emphysema. N Engl J Med 2003; 348(21):2059–73.Google Scholar
8 O'Donnell, DE, Revill, SM, Webb, KA. Dynamic hyperinflation and exercise intolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 164(5):770–7.Google Scholar
9 Casanova, C, Cote, C, Torres, JP de, et al. Inspiratory-to-total lung capacity ratio predicts mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171(6):591–7.Google Scholar
10 Washko, GR, Martinez, FJ, Hoffman, EA, et al. Physiological and computed tomographic predictors of outcome from lung volume reduction surgery. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;181(5):494–500.Google Scholar
11 Fessler, HE, Scharf, SM, Ingenito, EP, et al. Physiologic basis for improved pulmonary function after lung volume reduction. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008; 5(4):416–20.Google Scholar
12 Fessler, HE, Permutt, S. Lung volume reduction surgery and airflow limitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157(3 Pt 1):715–722.Google Scholar
13 Brantigan, OC, Mueller, E, Kress, MB. A surgical approach to pulmonary emphysema. Am Rev Respir Dis 1959; 80(1, Part 2):194–206.Google Scholar
14 Cooper, JD, Trulock, EP, Triantafillou, AN, et al. Bilateral pneumectomy (volume reduction) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 109(1):106–16; discussion 116–9.Google Scholar
15 Cooper, JD, Patterson, GA, Sundaresan, RS, et al. Results of 150 consecutive bilateral lung volume reduction procedures in patients with severe emphysema. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112(5):1319–29; discussion 1329–30.Google Scholar
16 Criner, GJ, Cordova, FC, Furukawa, S, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing bilateral lung volume reduction surgery to pulmonary rehabilitation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 160(6):2018–27.Google Scholar
17 Geddes, D, Davies, M, Koyama, H, et al. Effect of lung-volume-reduction surgery in patients with severe emphysema. N Engl J Med 2000; 343(4):239–45.Google Scholar
18 Weinmann, GG, Chiang, YP, Sheingold, S. The National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT): a study in agency collaboration. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008; 5(4):381–4.Google Scholar
19 Rationale and design of the national emphysema treatment trial: A prospective randomized trial of lung volume reduction surgery. the national emphysema treatment trial research group. Chest 1999; 116(6):1750–61.
20 Fishman, A, Martinez, F, Naunheim, K, et al. A randomized trial comparing lung-volume-reduction surgery with medical therapy for severe emphysema. N Engl J Med 2003; 348(21):2059–73.Google Scholar
21 National Emphysema Treatment Trial Research Group. Patients at high risk of death after lung-volume-reduction surgery. N Engl J Med 2001; 345(15):1075–83.
22 Naunheim, KS, Wood, DE, Krasna, MJ, et al. Predictors of operative mortality and cardiopulmonary morbidity in the national emphysema treatment trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 131(1):43–53.Google Scholar
23 DeCamp, MM, Blackstone, EH, Naunheim, KS, et al. Patient and surgical factors influencing air leak after lung volume reduction surgery: lessons learned from the national emphysema treatment trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82(1):197–206; discussion 206–7.Google Scholar
24 McKenna, RJ Jr, Benditt, JO, DeCamp, M, et al. Safety and efficacy of median sternotomy versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung volume reduction surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127(5):1350–60.Google Scholar
25 Stoller, JK, Gildea, TR, Ries, AL, et al. National Emphysema Treatment Trial Research Group. Lung volume reduction surgery in patients with emphysema and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83(1):241–51.Google Scholar
26 Chandra, D, Lipson, DA, Hoffman, EA, et al. Perfusion scintigraphy and patient selection for lung volume reduction surgery. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;182(7):937–46.Google Scholar
27 Washko, GR, Fan, VS, Ramsey, SD, et al. The effect of lung volume reduction surgery on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 177(2):164–9.Google Scholar
28 Snyder, ML, Goss, CH, Neradilek, B, et al. Changes in arterial oxygenation and self-reported oxygen use after lung volume reduction surgery. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 178(4):339–45.Google Scholar
29 Criner, GJ, Scharf, SM, Falk, JA, et al. Effect of lung volume reduction surgery on resting pulmonary hemodynamics in severe emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; 176(3):253–60.Google Scholar
30 Criner, GJ, Belt, P, Sternberg, AL, et al. Effects of lung volume reduction surgery on gas exchange and breathing pattern during maximum exercise. Chest 2009; 135(5):1268–79.Google Scholar
31 Vestbo, J, Prescott, E, Almdal, T, et al. Body mass, fat-free body mass, and prognosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from a random population sample: findings from the Copenhagen City Heart study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173(1):79–83.Google Scholar
32 Kim, V, Kretschman, DM, Sternberg, AL, et al. National Emphysema Treatment Trial Research Group. Weight gain after lung reduction surgery is related to improved lung function and ventilatory efficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 186(11):1109–16.Google Scholar
33 Mineo, TC, Pompeo, E, Mineo, D, et al. Resting energy expenditure and metabolic changes after lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82(4):1205–11.Google Scholar
34 Ramsey, SD, Berry, K, Etzioni, R, et al. Cost effectiveness of lung-volume-reduction surgery for patients with severe emphysema. N Engl J Med 2003; 348(21):2092–102.Google Scholar
35 Ramsey, SD, Shroyer, AL, Sullivan, SD, Wood, DE. Updated evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of lung volume reduction surgery. Chest 2007; 131(3):823–32.Google Scholar
36 Anonymous, Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. Part B National summary data file (previously known as BESS): Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. Part B National summary data file (previously known as BESS): Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services website: www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Files-for-Order/NonIdentifiableDataFiles/PartBNationalSummaryDataFile.html. Updated 2012. Accessed 20 September 2013.
37 Akuthota, P, Litmanovich, D, Zutler, M, et al. An evidence-based estimate on the size of the potential patient pool for lung volume reduction surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 94(1):205–11.Google Scholar
38 Criner, GJ, Sternberg, AL. National Emphysema Treatment Trial Research Group. A clinician's guide to the use of lung volume reduction surgery. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008; 5(4):461–7.Google Scholar
39 Kim, V, Criner, GJ, Abdallah, HY, et al. Small airway morphometry and improvement in pulmonary function after lung volume reduction surgery. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171(1):40–7.Google Scholar
40 Hogg, JC, Chu, FS, Tan, WC, et al. Survival after lung volume reduction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Insights from small airway pathology. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;176(5):454–9.Google Scholar
41 Sciurba, FC, Ernst, A, Herth, FJ, et al. A randomized study of endobronchial valves for advanced emphysema. N Engl J Med 2010; 363(13):1233–44.Google Scholar
42 Herth, FJ, Noppen, M, Valipour, A, et al. Efficacy predictors of lung volume reduction with zephyr valves in a European cohort. Eur Respir J 2012; 39(6):1334–42.Google Scholar
43 Shah, PL, Herth, FJ. Current status of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves. Thorax 2013.
44 Sterman, DH, Mehta, AC, Wood, DE, et al. A multicenter pilot study of a bronchial valve for the treatment of severe emphysema. Respiration 2010; 79(3):222–33.Google Scholar
45 Herth, FJ, Eberhard, R, Gompelmann, D, et al. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with a dedicated coil: a clinical pilot study. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2010; 4(4):225–31.Google Scholar
46 Slebos, DJ, Klooster, K, Ernst, A, et al. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction coil treatment of patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema. Chest 2012; 142(3):574–82.Google Scholar
47 Shah, PL, Zoumot, Z, Singh, S, et al. Endobronchial coils for the treatment of severe emphysema with hyperinflation (RESET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respiratory Medicine 2013; 1(3):233–40.Google Scholar
48 Criner, GJ, Pinto-Plata, V, Strange, C, et al. Biologic lung volume reduction in advanced upper lobe emphysema: Phase 2 results. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009; 179(9):791–8.Google Scholar
49 Refaely, Y, Dransfield, M, Kramer, MR, et al. Biologic lung volume reduction therapy for advanced homogeneous emphysema. Eur Respir J 2010; 36(1):20–7.Google Scholar
50 Herth, FJ, Gompelmann, D, Stanzel, F, et al. Treatment of advanced emphysema with emphysematous lung sealant (AeriSeal(R)). Respiration 2011; 82(1):36–45.Google Scholar
51 Kramer, MR, Refaely, Y, Maimon, N, et al. Bilateral endoscopic sealant lung volume reduction therapy for advanced emphysema. Chest 2012; 142(5):1111–17.Google Scholar
52 Shah, PL, Slebos, DJ, Cardoso, PF, et al. Bronchoscopic lung-volume reduction with exhale airway stents for emphysema (EASE trial): randomised, sham-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011; 378(9795):997–1005.Google Scholar
53 Snell, G, Herth, FJ, Hopkins, P, et al. Bronchoscopic thermal vapour ablation therapy in the management of heterogeneous emphysema. Eur Respir J 2012;39(6):1326–33.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×